Introduce a Melbourne Barbarians side for 2011
By Tim Reardon, 5 Nov 2009 Tim Reardon is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- melbourne rugby, Rugby Union, SANZAR, Super 15, Super Rugby 2011
A Melbourne based Barbarians style Super 15 team could be the compromise solution to expanding Australian and Southern Hemisphere rugby union.
SANZAR have made the decision that there will be a 15th Super Rugby team and that the new team will compete in an Australian domestic competition alongside the existing four Australian teams.
SANZAR has, however, come to a stalemate on whether this team should comprise Australian or South African players.
The South African Rugby Union are promoting the virtues of the Southern Kings with the aim of expanding rugby within the ethnic majority of South Africa. Based around Port Elizabeth in the Eastern Cape, this less developed region of South Africa promotes itself as the birth place of Nelson Mandella.
The Southern Kings would, however, be based in Australia for almost half of the Super 15 competition and the tyranny of travel may impact on the teams performance.
An African team based in an Australian domestic rugby competition would also limit the marketing potential needed to grow grass roots rugby in Victoria.
The Australian Rugby Union is very conscious that it has been losing the battle with other sporting codes, which is evident in the declining spectators and potentially declining revenues from broadcasting rights.
There are concerns, however, that Australia does not have the player pool necessary to sustain a fifth quality team.
Since the arrival of the Western Force in 2006 only one Australian team has finished in the top four (Warraths, 2006) of the Super 14 and the Wallabies have backed up a terrible world cup with two of their worst years on record.
As SANZAR enters mediation to resolve the origins of the 15th Super Rugby franchise, it should be conscious that there are other options.
A compromise solution could be to have a Melbourne based team, but allow this club to draw players from around the world, not just Australia or South Africa.
For example the team could be required to have a player roster comprising of 30% Australian, 30% South African, 30% South Pacific players, and the remainder sourced from the rest of the world.
A combination of players from Japan and Argentina should also be considered.
There is the potential that this team could outclass the rest of the competition. To balance this, SANZAR could impose restrictions on the Melbourne team, such as requiring them to turn over 30% of their player roster each year, impose an average age limit or salary cap, or have them coached by John Connolly.
This compromise solution would satisfy the ARU’s desire to grow rugby in Melbourne, provide an avenue to develop players from neighboring rugby nations and South Africa without impeding the existing Australian Super 14 teams.
It may also draw quality European players seeking a southern sabbatical resulting in Super Rugby becoming even more spectacular.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (201)
- Will South African rugby force a Super 21 by 2018? (173)
- The real story of how John O’Neill turned Manchester City down (70)
- Dan Parks and the unsolved questions of expat rugby (65)
- Australian teams at Super disadvantage (58)
- Pocock set to be named new Force skipper (56)
- Can the ‘Tahs win the battle after losing the Waugh? (51)
- France turns to Parra and Trinh-Duc
- Rebels look to lift for formidable Blues in rugby trial
- Mr Fix-It Lucas wants to nail down No.10
- Force roost loses ‘Mother Hen’ Sharpe
- Waratahs romp to 83-5 trial win over Samoa A (2)
- Quade Cooper’s return to the Reds goes up a gear
- Chiefs continue to wait for SBW (7)
- Wales show Southern Hemisphere how to play running rugby (29)
- What opening matches of Six Nations taught us (19)
- Will Super Rugby crowds continue their slide? (202)
- Clinical Chiefs cost rusty Rebels in Corio (9)
- Six Nations shows rugby is a parochial game at heart (5)
- Goose’s Super Rugby up-and-comer XV for 2012 (29)
- What does the future hold for the Six Nations (50)
- Explore:
- melbourne rugby, Rugby Union, SANZAR, Super 15, Super Rugby 2011

Conor said | November 5th 2009 @ 2:23pm | Report comment
I think im alone, but i reckon australia can actuallly put another 15 decent rugby players on the field, without having to rely (at least on a big scale) on recruiting islanders or south africans.
Not saying they’re gonna be spectacular from the get-go but if the oppurtunity is there and a good training regime is in place, Aus has well enough player resources to challenge other teams.
Thats me but.
Cattledog said | November 5th 2009 @ 2:42pm | Report comment
I thought this was a serious submission, up until you mentioned John Connolly as coach, so as the team doesn’t achieve too much!! LOL You should write comedy!
sheek said | November 5th 2009 @ 4:16pm | Report comment
Actually, with all due respect, it’s an incredibly dumb suggestion. Let this post sink without trace……….
MyGeneration said | November 5th 2009 @ 4:24pm | Report comment
After reading the drivel on some other threads today, this article almost looks sensible. I think it’s time to give the Roar a little rest.
Pippinu said | November 5th 2009 @ 4:28pm | Report comment
Let us assume that Melbourne get the nod (I mean, as the Rebels, home base at the Bubble Dome, etc) – what is stopping them from recruiting whoever they want from anywhere in the world?
What is this article suggesting that the new franchise couldn’t do themselves right now?
AndyRoo said | November 5th 2009 @ 4:37pm | Report comment
I thought they were only allowed one player who can’t represent Australia under ARU rules?
Pippinu said | November 5th 2009 @ 4:39pm | Report comment
If that’s the case – they better change the rules!!
sheek said | November 5th 2009 @ 5:35pm | Report comment
Pip,
Why have a team in Melbourne if it’s going to be filled with players from all over the world?
Filling it with interstate Aussies is one thing (at least it retains the Aussie theme), but Kiwis, Saffies, Argies, Islanders, Europeans, Asians, Yanks??
Might as well just call them the Harlem Globetrotters….. or give the gig to the Southern Kings???
Seriously, I’m open to a proportion of the Melbourne team being non-Australian, say max 10 out of 35, but obviously there must be an overwhelming Aussie dominance.
Bay35Pablo said | November 6th 2009 @ 11:34am | Report comment
Screw compromise!! I vote we show as much compromise as the Saafies usually do – none!!!
Melbourne Rebels or bust!!!!
Brett McKay said | November 6th 2009 @ 11:44am | Report comment
Pablo, Melbourne Rebels or armbands at dawn?!?!
Michael C said | November 12th 2009 @ 5:41am | Report comment
and so Melbourne becomes number 15.