Technique and mobility up front are all the rage
By Tony Tannous, 6 Nov 2009 Tony Tannous is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- A-League, football, Sydney FC, Vitezslav Lavicka

Sydney FC'S Mark Rudan (centre) competes for the ball with Saso Ognenovski (left) and Reinaldo da Costa of the Queensland Roar during their A-League clash at Aussie Stadium, Sydney, Sunday, Oct. 8, 2006. The match ended in a 1-1 draw. AAP Image/Jenny Evans
Casting an eye over the A-League over the past month or two, what is becoming abundantly clear is that the teams that are using technique and mobility in the front third are the ones playing the most fluid and effective football.
You only have to look at the top of the table to see how effective this combination has been for the top two, Sydney and Melbourne.
The Vitezslav Lavicka-led Sydney have won five of their past seven, largely on the back of the maturing combination between Alex Brosque and Mark Bridge, who have bagged seven of Sydney’s 11 goals during this run.
Lavicka is finally getting the best out of both of these hitherto enigmatic strikers, and his template, built on rapid transition from defence to attack, and visa versa, is undoubtedly suiting both of these fit and dynamic runners.
Contrast it with Sydney’s static front-third earlier in the season, when John Aloisi led the line.
Aloisi, these days, is a through-the-middle-striker, meaning he essentially plays up and down the central third of the pitch, rarely venturing out wide.
When the ball was being targeted at him, Sydney’s forward play essentially came to halt as Aloisi attempted to hold the ball and hold off his marker. Every time he touched the ball it was a scrappy, slow contest, and Sydney’s play was pedestrian as a result.
Brosque and Bridge, since, have been moving all over the place and using their pace and first touch to turn, face the goal and link with their on-rushing midfielders. It has made for some very fluid front-third play.
Meanwhile, south of the Yarra, Melbourne first attempted to replace Danny Allsopp with the equally large Ney Fabiano, but the Brazilian is an altogether different player. He has the size, but not the mobility, and Melbourne were very static in round 11 when Sydney came to town and thumped them.
It wasn’t until Ernie Merrick replaced Fabiano with Mate Dugandzic at half time in the following game, away to Newcastle, that Melbourne finally started flowing.
In the past couple of weeks, the mobile and neat Sutee Suksomkit has joined both Dugandzic and Archie Thompson, and, with Carlos Hernandez drifting in from deep, the Victory look to have found a mobile solution to the loss of Allsopp.
Even Nathan Elasi did well off the bench last week in Perth, and Thompson appears to be relishing playing alongside some willing runners who can use the ball.
Further down the table and the bottom placed Newcastle Jets have been looking very effective with the pairing of Labinot Haliti and Michael Bridges, both blessed with pace, excellent movement and some very impressive work on the ball.
Even on Wednesday night, in a poor Jets display in Wellington, Haliti and Bridges created some chances, only to be thwarted by some desperate defending by the in-form Phoenix skipper Andrew Durante.
The Phoenix, meanwhile, have also been producing some very neat front-third play, with Paul Ifill continuing to catch the eye with his movement, pace, crossing and shooting ability, while he has been supported by a number of technically gifted attackers in Daniel and Leo Bertos.
Even Costa Barbarouses, who came into the 11 for Bertos on Wednesday, had a blinder, combining excellent pace and movement with a couple of lovely touches, including one delightful reverse-flick into the path of Chris Greenacre.
Of the in form teams, perhaps only the North Queensland Fury haven’t relied on the combination of mobility and technique to send them up the ladder.
Undefeated in five games, with only one loss in their past 10, the men leading the charge up front have been the technical Robbie Fowler, who has been a model of consistent finishing and football-smarts, and the industrious Daniel McBreen, who has been one of the few big-men making an impression so far this season.
Two teams, by contrast, who have relied on big men and are struggling in the front third are Adelaide and the Central Coast Mariners.
Indeed, their forward lines, at times, are probably best described as battering-ram attacks.
Up until recently Aurelio Vidmar was relying heavily on Lloyd Owusu to lead his line, but the United strategy with Owusu in the team was often very one-dimensional.
In the past three weeks Cristiano has been leading the line with support from Matthew Leckie and Travis Dodd, suggesting Vidmar is attempting to add more subtlety to the attack.
The problem is that while Cristiano has the technique, he doesn’t have the pace and mobility and is struggling to brake the shackles.
Meanwhile, the Mariners have been really ineffective in the front line, evidenced by only one win in their past six games, with only two goals in that run other than the three they bagged against the hapless Brisbane Roar in round 11.
Only five of the Mariners’ 13 goals this season have come from strikers, four of them from Matt Simon.
Simon puts himself about, Adam Kwasnik has a bit of pace, but neither of them, nor Dylan Macallister, has provided the requisite technique and mobility.
Even the Roar, which have relied on the goals of Sergio van Dijk for the past 12 months, have been looking less fluid of late, despite the efforts of Tommy Oar.
Van Dijk undoubtedly has the muscle and technique, and has been holding the ball up well, but the Roar is another side seemingly being left behind by this shift to having more mobility and movement in the front third.
No doubt the injury to Henrique played a big part in this, but right now a first choice combination of Van Dijk and Reinaldo looks more direct then dynamic.
The recent trend towards a more mobile and skilful front third has been a fascinating one, and is certainly worth watching.
Recommend this story.
Follow Tony on Twitter @TonyTannousTRBA
- Explore:
- A-League, football, Sydney FC, Vitezslav Lavicka

November 6th 2009 @ 9:09am
AndyRoo said | November 6th 2009 @ 9:09am | Report comment
There were later moments against the Jets last friday where Van Dijk was playing with his front to goal and going wide, looked very menacing. He certainly has the mobility if in the right set up but more often than not he is asked to work with his back to goal.
November 6th 2009 @ 12:56pm
Rob said | November 6th 2009 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
AndyRoo,
That’s exactly right about Van Dijk. He does have mobility, but when asked to play with back to goal, he’s not anywhere near as effective. As Tony said, I think the big problem is that the Roar are missing Zullo, Henrique, and Murdocca, who give a massive amount of mobility to the side. Van Dijk then can play facing goal more, and attack the excellent service those players provide.
Oar has provided some of the go-forward Tony talks about, but the problem is that he is often crossing the ball from bad positions – diagonal balls into the balls, which are easy to cut out as defenders move forward to them, rather than getting in behind and whipping the ball in, with defenders facing their own goal. This is something he needs to learn – maybe when Henrique gets back to training he can show him that? Cernak is in that boat too – and he often floats the ball in – easy pickings for keepers (unless your name is Ben Kennedy – boy is he a Vampire!)
November 6th 2009 @ 1:00pm
AndyRoo said | November 6th 2009 @ 1:00pm | Report comment
Ben Kennedy is a shocker….. the first goal against Wellington on Wednesday ouch and meant Jets had to chase a result.
Velaphi is also a bit of a shocker but I have at least seen him have some good games.
November 6th 2009 @ 1:09pm
Rob said | November 6th 2009 @ 1:09pm | Report comment
I agree. That first goal was fired straight at his breadbasket. Now everyone knows why Culina bagged him out. It was a basic skill error, unforgivable. Same with the game against the Roar – that penalty was in a large part his fault. The corner should have been his, but he misread it hugely, and it led to a defender making a mistake.
I don’t entirely agree about Velaphi. I think he is a bit inconsistent – sure, there was that howler against CCM, but generally he’s been ok – not great, but ok.
On keepers, the trouble is, when defenders can’t look at their goalkeeper and say, oh, he’s got that, no worries, they begin to try to do the keeper’s job as well, winning headers when the keeper is coming for the cross and calling for it, just to be on the safe side. It means they are constantly nervous and likely to make mistakes trying to cover for the likelihood that the keeper will screw up again. Remember when McMaster came in last season at the Roar? Craig Moore had zero faith in him, and it was obvious. Senior players basically told Frank they wanted Reddy back in the side as soon as he was fit.
I’ll bet that’s what is behind some of the fragile defending you are currently seeing from Newcastle. No faith in Kennedy.
November 6th 2009 @ 11:37am
mintox said | November 6th 2009 @ 11:37am | Report comment
That’s a great article Tony, nice to see a bit of a tactical analysis of the league.
You only need to look at Glory vs Melbourne in their two games in Perth this year for a great example of what you’re describing. The first game saw Glory easily cope with Ney Fabiano and Thompson up front whilst the Victory background struggled with the likes of Sikora, Sterjovski and Sikora. In the game on Sunday just past, the Glory played with the largely immobile (and useless) Dadi up front and ran out of ideas compared to the much more mobile Victory offense.
This seems to be part of the evolution of the game in Australia (a sign that the A-League is working?), you can no longer use the battering ram approach to try and break down defences as teams become a lot more organised defensively. Instead it requires pace, mobility and ball control to create the spaces to exploit.
November 6th 2009 @ 12:15pm
Tony Tannous said | November 6th 2009 @ 12:15pm | Report comment
That’s a great example and a great post Mintox.
I thought Dadi was fantastic last season, but this year he appears to be really struggling, and I’m not sure he suits the way Perth want to play, or perhaps it’s his 36 years catching up…
“A sign the A-League is working?”
On the field I think the evolution has been great. The mentality from the beginning (to go for physical types who could run all day) was wrong on so many levels. I think this is finally being appreciated, and addressed.
It’s not the EPL, it’s not La Liga, but it’s improving incrementally and that’s a sign of success in my mind. This season that improvement has been the best yet.
November 6th 2009 @ 1:09pm
Art Sapphire said | November 6th 2009 @ 1:09pm | Report comment
The best thing that happened to Victory was losing to Sydney and playing like crap in the first half against Newcastle.
Merrick has taken this new refreshing approach out of necessity not because he is a master stategist and it looks to be working. I doubt Ney Fabiano will start another game for Victory. Lets hope the mosquito fleet of Mate, Sutee, Archie and Elasi with Hernandez conducting from midfield can run rings around the CCM tomorrow. C’mon boys fire up!!
November 7th 2009 @ 12:00am
Midfielder said | November 7th 2009 @ 12:00am | Report comment
Tony
Spot on about the Mariners … boy do we need someone to help Matty Simons out … I think the problem is more we only have Matty in form the others are playing .. being kind not well…
November 8th 2009 @ 8:55pm
the all rounder said | November 8th 2009 @ 8:55pm | Report comment
great article tony tannous, thanks.