The Melbourne Heart name saga rolls on
By Adrian Musolino, 18 Nov 2009 Adrian Musolino is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- A-League, football, melbourne heart, Peter Sidwell, Scott Munn
Related coverage

The new coach of A-league team John van't Schip (right) takes questions from the media in Melbourne, Monday, Oct. 12, 2009. Dutchman van't Schip has been appointed coach of Melbourne Heart team whose syndicate hopes to gain entry to the Soccer A-League. AAP Image/Julian Smith
Enough is enough. It’s time for the FFA and Melbourne Heart chief executive Scott Munn and chairman Peter Sidwell to bite the bullet, ignore the competition to name the club being run in the Herald Sun, and keep the working title of Melbourne’s second A-League franchise.
In case you haven’t been following the saga of deciding the name of the club, the Heart – the name of the franchise holders, Melbourne Heart Syndicate – are floating four nominations for its name in a poll run through the Herald Sun newspaper, over a year since the franchise was given exclusive negotiating rights for the 11th slot in the A-League and five months after they were officially awarded the license.
It is this delay that makes this competition futile, but more of that later.
The four options short-listed by the franchise include the working title of Heart and three other choices. They are as follows:
- Melbourne Heart FC
- Sporting Melbourne FC
- Melburnians
- Melbourne Revolution
Revolution is the most interesting candidate, in my opinion.
While many would rule the name out as yet another Americanised intangible name, some have pondered if Revolution does have some context considering its intimation to the Eureka Stockade, the closest Australia has come to revolution.
The Eureka rebellion has strong cultural and historical ties to Melbourne, and although the Southern Cross flag is often used as a symbol of protest, the meaning of Eureka has strong political and cultural connotations.
Whether such an idea would get past the FFA – who, let’s not forget, banned Melbourne Victory fans from bringing Eureka flags to matches before backflipping on that decision – seems doubtful.
If Revolution is selected and there is not some sort of link to Eureka, then it seems like a wasted opportunity to immediately inject some culture and meaning to the club, not to mention try and nab some supporters from the Victory, perhaps.
Melburnians has an interesting ring to it but seems a tad vague, while Sporting appears to be growing in favour as a tribute to Melbourne’s rich and varied sporting tastes.
But it seems to me this is a void debate, sadly.
The fact remains that according to the public the second Melbourne A-League franchise IS called Heart.
It’s too late now to move away from that.
When Mark Viduka has been linked with a possible return home it has been with the Heart. When they signed John van’t Schip it was as head coach of the Melbourne Heart team.
All the public awareness of the franchise is with Heart, and a new franchise can’t afford to lose that recognition and brand awareness when it is still in such an embryonic stage.
If Sporting wins out, for example, will people refer to the club as: “Sporting Melbourne FC, the club formerly known as Melbourne Heart?” I fear so.
This will be a branding disaster; not good for a franchise that is moving into a town alongside the most successful A-League franchise, without having any geographical or cultural – as yet – differentiation.
It’s a shame the FFA and the franchise waited and squabbled for so long on a name. Taking such a vote to the public is a great way to engage and build a fanbase, but more damage would be done in awareness for the club if they moved away from the Heart name.
Let’s hope commonsense wins out and they stick with Heart.
Adrian Musolino is editor of V8X Magazine, and has written as an expert on The Roar since 2008, cementing himself as a key writer who can see the big picture in sport. He freelances on other forms of motorsport, football, cycling and more.
- Explore:
- A-League, football, melbourne heart, Peter Sidwell, Scott Munn

November 18th 2009 @ 6:21am
megatron said | November 18th 2009 @ 6:21am | Report comment
Pretty little fanfare around this comp too
November 18th 2009 @ 7:33am
Brett McKay said | November 18th 2009 @ 7:33am | Report comment
must agree Adrian, not calling the Heart, Heart, would be as successful as all the people in Melbourne who still refer to Footscray, and the people in Sydney still stuck with ‘Easts’. Once people learn to live with a name, it sticks.
Melbourne Heart FC.
November 18th 2009 @ 7:40am
Tom said | November 18th 2009 @ 7:40am | Report comment
Good point. Well made.
I suspect Heart will win the vote, anyway.
November 18th 2009 @ 7:51am
danny said | November 18th 2009 @ 7:51am | Report comment
i suspect heart was ALWAYS going to win the vote. a very deliberate delay in the competition, not to mention the fact that the board has 50% of the vote. if they’ve already decided to vote heart, the whole thing’s a charade anyway.
i don’t mind either way, i’m just looking forward to the derby at the new ground!
November 18th 2009 @ 7:57am
Redb said | November 18th 2009 @ 7:57am | Report comment
Melbourne Revolution for me. I think it creates a point of difference for fans not happy with Victory, join the revolution,etc…
November 18th 2009 @ 8:10am
M1tch said | November 18th 2009 @ 8:10am | Report comment
Yeh thats the best name out of the options
November 18th 2009 @ 8:20am
David said | November 18th 2009 @ 8:20am | Report comment
If is heart i wont support them Sporting melbourne is a good idea
November 18th 2009 @ 8:29am
Bay35Pablo said | November 18th 2009 @ 8:29am | Report comment
They all suck.
Reboot.
Melbourne United FC?
November 18th 2009 @ 8:39am
James said | November 18th 2009 @ 8:39am | Report comment
Nah, The Hun report said there are too many United’s (Adelaide and Gold Coast), and “City” may restrict it to just the metropolitan area of Melbourne.
Sporting or Heart for me
November 18th 2009 @ 8:36am
Andrew Sutherland said | November 18th 2009 @ 8:36am | Report comment
What about The Melbourne Heart Foundation (or Palpitations)?
November 18th 2009 @ 8:43am
Brett McKay said | November 18th 2009 @ 8:43am | Report comment
I should’ve added above, I think ‘Heart’ with no plural sounds ridiculous. But it’s so ingrained now, it has to be the name. Again, Ian Rowden jumped on these forums within days of “Sydney Rovers FC” and explained what the name, colours, and logo meant, and it was all well accepted. It made sense. ‘Heart’ makes no sense at all, but we’re way beyond the window for change now.
Potential supporters need to brace themsleves for generations of headlines like HEART ATTACK, HEART FAILURE, HEARTLESS, HEART LIKE PHAR LAP, and so on. It’s a Bad Pun Department lottery win…
November 18th 2009 @ 9:32am
Andrew Sutherland said | November 18th 2009 @ 9:32am | Report comment
Gee Brett you would have to bring up bad puns after my comment.
The name of Heart is just a bit too…ORGANIC. It makes me squeamish. Lets hope there’s not too much red in the kit. The nickname for the maroon coloured Hearts in Edinburgh is The Jam Tarts (uurgh!).
November 18th 2009 @ 9:53am
Simmo said | November 18th 2009 @ 9:53am | Report comment
Which is why they’re currently known as the Jam Tards by Sydney FC fans inter alia.
November 18th 2009 @ 9:48am
Brett McKay said | November 18th 2009 @ 9:48am | Report comment
funnily enough Andrew, it was only last week reported that Heart, Reebok, and the FFA were looking at strip designs incorporating red and white!!
November 18th 2009 @ 9:55am
AndyRoo said | November 18th 2009 @ 9:55am | Report comment
Too late Rovers allready have red and white….. but I think on the Vic Rugby thread someone mentioned silver with dark blue sleeves. I wouldn’t mind that for an A league team. I love the Jets jersey and i think a silver one would look good with a pair of jeans.
November 18th 2009 @ 10:11am
Redb said | November 18th 2009 @ 10:11am | Report comment
AndyRoo,
Chris Munn was interviewed on radio SEN yesterday and he said red and white were the likely colours. I think they’re looking at a complete contrast to Melb Victory. Red will defintely feature as it is perceived as a powerful and successful colour and it also gives you the classic futsal game v Victory…. red v blue.
Redb
November 18th 2009 @ 10:23am
AndyRoo said | November 18th 2009 @ 10:23am | Report comment
I was being a bit cheeky, I guess it is ok for them to still grab red and white. Will mean Rovers have to use more black, not a bad think I suppose.
November 18th 2009 @ 3:16pm
Griffo said | November 18th 2009 @ 3:16pm | Report comment
Nothing wrong with metallic silver/white and metallic red/maroon – now that would stand out in a derby. Not sure about the denim fashion though…
November 18th 2009 @ 10:11am
Andrew Sutherland said | November 18th 2009 @ 10:11am | Report comment
At least red and white stripes would be better than all white with a big red heart on the chest!
November 18th 2009 @ 10:20am
Brett McKay said | November 18th 2009 @ 10:20am | Report comment
Andy, check out http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,26333380-5000940,00.html
Rovers colours are red, white and black.
December 7th 2009 @ 8:23pm
Westy said | December 7th 2009 @ 8:23pm | Report comment
braveheart? heart of a lion?? the list goes on…
November 18th 2009 @ 9:08am
Brendan said | November 18th 2009 @ 9:08am | Report comment
Rubbish
To say that a crap name that has been bandied about as working title for just over 4-6 months has become so ingrained in the public mind that it would be impossible to move away is rubbish. Within another 6 months of branding and promotion everyone would even struggle to remember that name. Rather than stick with a name that means very little please please choose one the will strike a cord with the public and potential supporters.
Personally I prefer Sporting as a name as I believe out of the four it has the most potentially from a image and branding perspective They could market the club that represents the image of how Melbourne sees themselves (as sports lovers).
Revolution is a awful name, we have never had a revolution here in Australia and if they wanted to associate themselves to the Eureka Stockade then it should have been Melbourne Rebels (oh wait!).
Melburnians is OK but they couldn’t even spell is correctly when they first released the names for the comp so it doesn’t say a lot for the understanding and commitment the club have to these names.
In the end though the board will choose the name they want not want the public want. Pretty certain it will be between Heart and Sporting.