Keep Guus away from the Socceroos
By Jesse Fink, 20 Nov 2009 Jesse Fink is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Craig Foster, football, Guus Hiddink, Socceroos

Chelsea's Guus Hiddink, centre gestures as he watches his team play Juventus during their Champions League round of 16 first leg soccer match at Chelsea's Stamford Bridge stadium in London, Wednesday, Feb. 25, 2009. Chelsea won the match 1-0. AP Photo/Carlo Baroncini
Now I’ve got all the time in the world for Craig Foster, a professional and personal mate. We’ve even talked about working together on a project. But he’s being unusually provocative in calling for Guus Hiddink to replace Pim Verbeek as coach of Australia at the World Cup.
While I have the utmost respect for what Hiddink has achieved as a coach and what he did for Australia in 2005 and 2006, it isVerbeek who has earned the right to lead Australia at the World Cup and it would be an outrage if he were demoted.
I say that not as someone who especially likes the way Verbeek’s teams play, because I do not, nor the players he picks, because again I do not, but he is entitled to prove to us all that his vision is the right one. He can only do that by leading us to success at South Africa 2010 without having to worry about looking over his shoulder for Hiddink or anyone.
Hiddink has failed with Russia and failed badly. His famous luck ran out this week against Slovenia but in truth it should have happened long ago. The Dutchman is a maverick, a bluffer, someone who has the uncanny knack of taking the right opportunity at the right time and demanding heavy remuneration for it. He is unquestionably good at his job and a brilliant motivator but so are many others in his game. They just don’t have his aura or his agent.
Conspiracy theorists might point out that the men who appointed Hiddink to the Socceroos in 2005, Frank Lowy and Phil Wolanski, are still running the show at Football Federation Australia and could well be tempted with a trip down memory lane. That might be the case. But Verbeek and his wife are close personal friends of Wolanski, so there is as much chance of Wolanski stabbing Verbeek in the back as there is me having dinner with Graham Arnold. It ain’t going to happen.
South Africa 2010 is Verbeek’s arrival as a coach. The moment he’s been waiting for his entire life. He’s made other people, Hiddink and Dick Advocaat among them, look good and now it’s his turn for some time in the sun.
To bring in Hiddink now over the top of Verbeek would be the biggest slight that could ever be perpetrated on the man. Foster contends, “I’d be surprised if Verbeek had a massive problem with it.” But the truth is he’d be livid.
Where I think Fozz does have it right, though, is his assessment of Hiddink’s discipline of players and man-management style as diametrically opposed to Verbeek’s, or the “polar opposite”. That is: not getting close to any of the players, making certain players know they don’t have a mortgage on their positions, not brooking any crap from anyone.
In my opinion, Australia could do with a little more of the Hiddink approach and less of Verbeek’s comparative softness. He’s given his players way too much licence.
But for me, Verbeek should stay. No questions.
If any country is to make a beeline for Hiddink’s services it should be South Africa, which must be ruing its decision to reappoint Carlos Alberto Parreira. Hiddink would have been perfect for Bafana Bafana.
Still, there’s a long time between now and June. Anything can happen. As we saw this week in Slovenia. When Hiddink says, as he did following the game in Maribor, that “the question of whether I will continue to UEFA Euro 2012 will require some time for thought” and “we’ll talk about the future at a later stage”, you just know he’s got another trick up his sleeve.
But who’s he fooling now?
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- Craig Foster, football, Guus Hiddink, Socceroos

Tifosi said | November 20th 2009 @ 5:06am | Report comment
Foster contends, “I’d be surprised if Verbeek had a massive problem with it.” But the truth is he’d be livid.
Foster actually said that? What an idiot. Of course he would be livid.
SBS should replace Fos just before the World cup as the “chief football commentator” and see how he would like it.
Ive always felt Hiddink was a lucky coach and like you said Jess his luck finally ran out.
At any rate who says he wants to come back to Australia anyway?
GazGoldCoast said | November 20th 2009 @ 6:05am | Report comment
I’d be surprised if Fozzie had a massive problem with being replaced at SBS by Jesse Fink. LOL
I’m sure Alex Ferguson wouldn’t mind handing over the reins to Guus either. And that French coach would be delighted to give someone else a turn.
Freud of Football said | November 20th 2009 @ 5:55am | Report comment
Hiddink would be an excellent assistant to Verbeek. Contrasting styles and while Hiddink may be a better man manager, as Fink said, his luck was bound to run out at some point and with Russia, it’s hardly a country where you’d want your luck to run out.
So the odds of him becoming Verbeek’s number 2 are as good as none as a man with Hiddink’s CV can more-or-less pick and choose what he wants but if the WC comes around and he isn’t involved with one team or another, don’t be surprised if he jumps on board with some country for a short spell (not necessarily as manager) to ride their coattails and line his pockets at the same time before he selects his next project.
albe said | November 20th 2009 @ 6:53am | Report comment
i love the idea of Guus being involved… but more a case of “in some capacity” rather than coach. So as assistant, advisor, consultant or whatever. He’s certainly a guy you’d love to have on your bench as part of the set-up if you’re in Verbeek’s shoes.
You’d think it would appeal to Hiddink to go to South Africa with a national team, unless he has some club gig lined up in the meantime and can’t commit to both.
agga78 said | November 20th 2009 @ 7:14am | Report comment
Foster is a nuff nuff, always has, always will be, As for Guus he should not hired again, not for this campaign anyway. Pim has qaulified the team, so he can’t be replaced even though imo any manager in the professional game could of got us their even Graham Arnold. Under Pim though Australia won’t score a goal at the World Cup Finals we have struggled to score against Asian teams, wait to we get a European, South American or African nation, it will be park the soccceroo bus in front of the goals, Pim has the team set up playing his 4-5-1 with a very lone striker usually 30 metres away from anyone else and there is no way we can progress anywhere through the tournment playing that way.
sledgeross said | November 20th 2009 @ 7:34am | Report comment
I pissed myself laughing at Fozz last night on SBS news, the way he deflected over his “clarsh” player Henrys cheating. I’ll paraphrase.
News presenters “but fozz, surely we have to mention the French handball”
Fozz “oh, yeah, he’ll regret it, it was cheating. But how ’bout those Mets?”
dasilva said | November 20th 2009 @ 8:53am | Report comment
Watch Foster and LEs talking on SBS Shootout on the SBS The wOrld Game website. He was pretty harsh on the French Team, Domenech and Henry
NEws bullitin is not the right time for a rant
David said | November 20th 2009 @ 9:46am | Report comment
the hand ball was a disgrace Frances squad is a 5 star line up and they had to cheat in front of there home fans to win.
Remember when Grosso dived it was the worst way to lose for Australia in the WC that how ireland feel cuz this was an eve more clear infringment on the rules!
Lazza said | November 20th 2009 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
Lucas went to ground in the penalty box, didn’t get the ball, interfered ever so slightly with Grosso and the Italian took full advantage of it. That’s professional sport – if it happened the other way round the Italians wouldn’t accuse us of cheating, they would just blame the defender.
When I was young, my junior coaches used to tell me that I should always stay on my feet when defending in the penalty area. If you go to ground and don’t get the ball then bad things can happen.
vladimir said | November 20th 2009 @ 1:12pm | Report comment
bad things like diving?
youre kidding if you think he touched him at all…
grosso is a cheat but aust were appalling in the attacking third and hiddink did nothing about it…
Fisher Price said | November 20th 2009 @ 1:18pm | Report comment
On the other hand, if the ref had awarded a blatant penalty against Cahill v Japan then Australia would probably not have gone through to beat Croatia (via Kewell’s offside goal), let alone to play Italy.
vladimir said | November 20th 2009 @ 2:13pm | Report comment
yes it was a penalty against cahill for sure but thats not the point i was making… i was talking about grosso cheating… like henry did this morning…
Robbos said | November 20th 2009 @ 2:40pm | Report comment
Cahill penalty fair enough.
But lets not go to the Croatia match, English ref, should have sent Suminic of after 2 yellow cards not 3.
The Aussie born Suminic actually rugby tackled Viduka in a worst penalty offence then Cahill in the Croatia match, not given. Plus I still to this day do not know why the goal we scored in the last minute did not count.
Very poor refereeing that day.
Yes very emotional after Grosso dive, still hate him immensely, but I know most professionals would have taken the same route.
Lazza said | November 20th 2009 @ 1:55pm | Report comment
If Lucas had stayed on his feet then there would of been no penalty. We were all very emotiomal that night but on reflection a lot of us have come to a different conclusion.
Even Lucas backed off on his “cheat’ remarks after the game. Let’s just get over it. The Olympics and other sports are full of drug cheats, Rugby had it’s premeditated “Bloodgate’ cheating scandal. There are a lot worse cheats in World sport than a bit of play acting to get a free kick or pen.
vladimir said | November 20th 2009 @ 2:14pm | Report comment
people like you are the reason it continues…
Joe FC said | November 20th 2009 @ 8:21am | Report comment
You’ve said it all Jesse.
whiskeymac said | November 20th 2009 @ 8:22am | Report comment
good call Jesse. Although frustrating at times it would be an aboslute act of bastardy to replace Verbbek after what he has done, and i hope it is not countenanced by the FFA. For better or worse “Pim” was the man employed to do the job and although it hasnt always been pretty he’s done the hard yards. Who is to say Guus, or someone else, cld do any better? He got us to the 2nd round to a comp we qualified via penalties.
I assume it would also be costly with breach of contract/ unfair dismissal, a messy media, tarnishing of reputation (altho this is normally forgotten with a bag of money and a few good results) etc.
I am interested to see what happens after the WC/ Asian Cup in relation to who will be running the roos, and what will happen to Pimbo.
Ben of Phnom Penh said | November 20th 2009 @ 10:43am | Report comment
An interesting point, Whiskeymac as there isn’t much time between the World Cup and Asia Cup as it will be held in January 2011 due to the heat in Qatar. If Pim doesn’t want to continue for another 6 months then we may have to opt for the “care taker” coach and we don’t want a repeat of 2007 now do we.
whiskeymac said | November 20th 2009 @ 2:09pm | Report comment
am sure they wont fall for GA again… the hope is that maybe the FFA have lined someone up quickly. i imagine after 2010 there will be a few elligible candidates floating about. if they havent then there would be serious questions about what lessons the admin have learnt from the past.
cbowden9000 said | November 20th 2009 @ 8:33am | Report comment
Totally agree Jesse – Verbeek deserves his chance to prove to everyone what he can do. He has earnt it.
vladimir said | November 20th 2009 @ 8:40am | Report comment
that russian team should have qualified easily… it is a very poor performance by hiddink not to get them to south africa… as for all those above moralising about how verbeek deserves to go to the world cup (including that prankster fink) it really is laughable… think about those players who have played in so many qualifiers who will undoubtedly miss out for the good of the team… it would be for the good of the team if verbeek was replaced straight away with trousier (who should of got the job in the first place)… never mind that diletante foster…
Fisher Price said | November 20th 2009 @ 9:46am | Report comment
Verbeek is too cautious to take this team anywhere. Possibly the powers that be should have realised this many months ago and replaced him. But they didn’t. Seemingly they’re content with him at the helm.
Hiddink’s non-qualification with Russia is a suitable antidote to those who think the sun shines from his Spider-selecting posterior.
vladimir said | November 20th 2009 @ 9:53am | Report comment
i had a dream (nightmare) the other night that schwarzer got injured before the world cup and spider took his spot…
Midfielder said | November 20th 2009 @ 8:42am | Report comment
Agree Jes …. + 1, 000.