NRL willing to sacrifice money for schedule
By Ed Jackson, 20 Nov 2009 Ed Jackson is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- David Gallop, NRL, Rugby League
165 Have your say
The NRL says it’s willing to take a pay hit on its new television rights agreement if it means they can have a fixed calendar of matches.
The NRL’s current deal, valued at $500 million over six years, ends following the 2012 campaign.
But under the terms of that deal, the NRL has a rolling schedule which allows broadcasters – the Nine Network and Fox Sports – to pick and choose which matches they want to televise depending on a team’s form and appeal.
So if it guaranteed the year’s fixtures were locked in before the season started, NRL chief executive David Gallop says the game would accept less money for its next deal.
Gallop says the system should be changed to allow fans and clubs to know exactly where and when they are playing – even though he said it could cost the code up to $50 million on the negotiating table.
“A fixed schedule for us, the advantages for our fans and clubs will hopefully outweigh that equation,” he said.
“The whole issue of how we allocate games on that rolling schedule … is a very complicated exercise.
“We will definitely be going to them and say that’s what we want and if they were to come back hypothetically and say `okay, that’s $50 million less’ then we’ve got a commercial decision to make.
“I doubt they’ll do that. I do think they’ll come back and offer us less but I don’t think it’ll be enough to make us change our mind.
“I think that certainty has become a real imperative for the game.”
Gallop, speaking at the NRL’s second annual club members forum, also expressed his frustration with the sport’s broadcasters, saying they had been guilty of breaking their contractual obligations at times, particularly with televising matches in Melbourne.
“We do agitate about it, on a week-to-week basis because, to be frank, from time-to-time they don’t even comply with their contractual obligations,” he said.
“You can’t fine them, but I’d like to. I think we all share that frustration.”
NRL marketing and commercial director Paul Kind said the new TV deal could also include a Sunday afternoon “twilight” fixture as that concept gained popularity with fans and broadcasters.
“When this deal was negotiated Friday night was the big night … two Friday night matches looked like it was going to be a great outcome for us from an attendance point of view,” Kind said.
“And now that Sunday afternoon idea seems to have warmed right up in the past 12 months.”
© AAP 2012Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- David Gallop, NRL, Rugby League

Billo said | November 20th 2009 @ 2:28am | Report comment
Gallop is a lousy chief executive.
By saying he’ll take a hit on the money under the next deal, you can be sure the NRL will take a hit.
If Gallop had any business sense at all, he would be pointing out that what he is seeking would ensure higher attendances, which would in turn lead to a more dynamic TV product. So he shouldn’t be valuing it any less than the existing deal, which is badly skewed against the NRL.
LT80 said | November 20th 2009 @ 9:51am | Report comment
He’s not suggesting the next deal would be valued less than the current deal because of fixed scheduling. He’s saying that by insisting on fixed scheduling, it will reduce the value of the deal from what it could be with a rolling schedule. That’s my take, but I think the article is a bit ambiguous.
MyGeneration said | November 20th 2009 @ 10:22am | Report comment
That’s my read too. He’s not saying $50 million off $500 million, but $50 million off whatever. He’s just saying that this is the commercial cost of going back to a fixed schedule.
Mick from Giralang said | November 20th 2009 @ 4:15pm | Report comment
MG: And what’s your opinion of his comments?
Crosscoder said | November 20th 2009 @ 5:19am | Report comment
Agree to say the game would be prepared to take a financial hit ,is undervaluing what is one of the best TV ‘products” in this country.Any marketeer in his rtight mind,never undervalues his product.
I think however what Gallop is finally admitting, the fans have previously been dudded,not having a set seasonal fixture in place.After all the game is about the fans,without them good luck.
The trouble is the game is tied down contractually to a useless ch9,which does zilch in spreading the word into other non rl states.
What he has trumpeted to the Tv stations”fellas no worries ,we will have a set fixture list,as this may not meet your programme needs , just pay us less.Now that is fair”.
There are lawyers,accountants and marketeers,and neither the twain shall meet.
Firestarter Bob said | November 20th 2009 @ 5:53am | Report comment
Stand out contender for the most ill thought out comment from a football code CEO so far in the 21st century.
Rusty said | November 20th 2009 @ 6:49am | Report comment
Gallop – A News Limited man to the end. Is he getting a bonus for saving Fox money on the next pay tv rights deal? Sorry, I just noticed the Daily Telegraph back page saying he’s doing it for the fans – what a man, he should chair the independent commission.
Col the Bear said | November 20th 2009 @ 7:31am | Report comment
… CENTRAL COAST BEARS JERSEY UNVAILED IN THE HERLAD TODAY.. thats the real news…
Redb said | November 20th 2009 @ 7:50am | Report comment
Col,
Got a link?
Redb
Col the Bear said | November 20th 2009 @ 7:59am | Report comment
it’s the push by the Bears that has bought this on probably, our bid will be top notch,CC crusaders also being announced this week with the newcastle deal.. rather hastily mind you, and now look like having to change their name .. thanks to the CC basketball..
The push is well and truly underway for the next licence the CC Bears…and now it gets serious..!!!
it’s in the sports section of the Herald.. can someone pop it up please on this site Steve???
Redb said | November 20th 2009 @ 8:02am | Report comment
no pic just this…
“BEAR CHEST
Here is the first look at the Central Coast Bears’ jersey. The new strip will be unveiled at the official launch of the Bears’ new headquarters at the Fortuity Building in Erina tonight. More than 150 guests are expected at the function, emceed by television personality Mike Munro. Attendees will include Gosford Mayor Chris Holstein, controversial Labor MP Belinda Neal and a host of former North Sydney greats. The Bears, who are pushing for readmission into the NRL for 2013, will also launch their membership drive and interactive website at the event. ”We see these as being important steps in our return,” Bears chief Greg Florimo said.”
prowling panther said | November 20th 2009 @ 9:13am | Report comment
is that in the paper or online. cant find it on google
Redb said | November 20th 2009 @ 9:16am | Report comment
I think I spotted it in the ‘Inside Word’ on SMH online.
prowling panther said | November 20th 2009 @ 9:25am | Report comment
cheers
Col the Bear said | November 20th 2009 @ 8:13am | Report comment
the jersey is in there twice today.. lets hope phil gould now takes this by the throat and runs with it on Sunday..
M1tch said | November 20th 2009 @ 8:15am | Report comment
Well, I am gobsmacked..
once again gallop has bent over to the networks and they done what they’ve done to RL for 15 years.
Seriously, expansion to the Central Coast or Qld again isnt a risk, unlike afl in WS and a-league
This just simply shows the pathetic organisation at NRL HQ..they’ll give Melbourne the blockbusters of 2 tests, but then say, we will have less money so we can apease the fans..
oikee said | November 20th 2009 @ 2:29pm | Report comment
Hey Mitch, just let Sydney worry about filling Origin, after all, it is our show Piece. One thing you have to learn my good fellow, if you create demand, you can sell ice to Eskimo’s. Now please take note,= why do you think Origin in QLD sells out in under a hour, ? demand to get a seat. Now if that was a 80 thousand stadium, demand would not be a risk, as a matter of fact, you would probably be where Sydney is at the moment, heaps of games so you can pick and choose.
And the final peice to the Puzzle, if Qld wants to pay the NRL 3 million just to hold a final, why would you sell it to Sydney for half a million? We all keep complaining about money, when someone comes up with ideas, we all Whinge. Things are looking up, lets not blow it with-out looking at what they are trying to acheive,
P.S, read my post below, i will explain what the NRL are doing in full.
M1tch said | November 20th 2009 @ 3:15pm | Report comment
I got no problem with Brisbane hosting the grand final.
prowling panther said | November 20th 2009 @ 8:23am | Report comment
i dont mind a rolling schedule although the broncos get way too many friday nights. not sure why he’d by willing to sacrifice any sort of money given the afls massive warchest.
nine is a disgrace. i wasnt aware they had conractual obligations to broadcast into melbourne. id sue them all the way but i guess it aint great for media relations
Ziggy the God said | November 20th 2009 @ 8:29am | Report comment
If the guys running the NRL do not try and get the best deal for the game at the next contract, they will be standing in front of an old guy with a wig this time.
Nothing will be surer.
Gallop, either talk up the game or phark off you clown.