Attention mothers of Sydney: AFL

Roar Rookie

By Michael C Jordan, 23 Nov 2009 Michael C Jordan is a Roar Rookie

Tagged:: AFL, Greater Western Sydney AFL, Kevin Sheedy, NRL, western Sydney

Related coverage

The date November 9th was a pivotal day in the life of the fledgling Greater Western Sydney AFL team for two important reasons. The first of course was the appointment of legendary coach Kevin Sheedy as the team’s inaugural coach.

The second, while less obvious may be even more critical. It was the AFL unveiling their strategy to become a force in the region.

It’s not a strategy to convert life long NRL fans, it’s not a strategy to attract to teenagers, and it’s not even a strategy to appeal to the many people interviewed on the street who had no idea who Kevin Sheedy was.

It’s a well-calculated and well mapped out campaign to appeal to one market segment: Mothers.

You just had to take a quick look at the media conference to see the campaign in action. Who was it sitting there introducing the well-respected 61-year-old mentor, to the mothers of Sydney?

Was it the CEO of the AFL Andrew Demetriou? No.

Was it the Chairman of the AFL commission and Rhodes scholar Mike Fitzpatrick? No.

It was Sam Mostyn, a leading businesswoman and the AFL’s first ever-female commissioner. Both Mostyn and Sheedy then proceeded to wax lyrical about the opportunities the new team would give the Western Sydney area.

“I hope the kids grab the opportunity, I hope the parents love the opportunity.” Sheedy said.

This strategy would not have such a good chance of succeeding if not for the season the NRL has just endured.

It started with poster boy number one, Brett Stewart has been charged with the sexual assault of a teenage girl and finished with poster boy number 2, Greg Inglis being charged over the alleged assault of his girlfriend. Interspersed between were countless alcohol fueled incidents by both players and coaches.

This is a strategy that will take time, but with the huge amounts of money and resources the AFL are pumping into the area and the continued oafish behavior of NRL players it just may be effective.

Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.

The Crowd Says (44) | Page 1 of Comments

Michael C said | November 23rd 2009 @ 7:54am | Report comment

Sam Moystyn also happens to be a Sydney local…..that might have had something to do with it.

Reply
- oikee said | November 23rd 2009 @ 11:46am | Report comment
  
  M.C Mothers, ? Hey M.C, just lets say AFL does ok in W, Sydnet, which it might, and once the P.R machine gets into over-drive, and this is a fact, every tiny incident that happens in AFL down in Melbourne, and other places, will be shrewn all over Sydney and Brisbane papers. Now, you talk, and we all talk about lack of expossure to AFL, mate, they are leaving themselves wide open for this to happen.?
  
  You know how i can tell, because last year the AFL went for the throat when rugby league hit the heasdlines with Voilience against women, and the AFL had that function showing woman all having a good time. Tell you what, and i know the Media, your being settup to fail , and fail miseribly.
  Sometimes you need to scratch the surface, because your strength can become your weakness, just look at USA politics. They go back years to find a story. (Matty Johns anyone. )
  
  Reply
Paul J said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:11am | Report comment

Queue the arguement about which code has the worst off field behaviour.

Reply
M1tch said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:13am | Report comment

lol..yes all the off field incidents surely hurt the NRL’s crowds and tv ratings this year? oh wait a minute

Reply
Pippinu said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:18am | Report comment

You might be right about the “mothers” strategy, but there really ain’t no need to talk about off-field behaviour.

Soccer has always appealed to mothers both in Australia and the US, without it even being a deliberate strategy.

That the AFL might subtley use a similar strategy is no big surprise – especially when the AFL too will be working hard to appeal to immigrant families across Sydney, families from sporting backgrounds that do not feature full contact sports.

The AFL has been sanitising its game for decades (in the sense of eliminating unncessary rough play) – and time will show that it was the right thing to do.

Reply
- Redb said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:33am | Report comment
  
  Agree. It has less to do with off field behavior more around issues such as Polynesian kids being too big in junior RL ranks or the fact that Australian football sits between the rugby codes and soccer in terms of rough and tumble.
  
  Redb
  
  Reply
- Dave1 said | November 23rd 2009 @ 3:53pm | Report comment
  
  In the southern states mothers have been know to steer their kids to soccer because they are worried that AFL is too tough.
  
  This doesn’t happen in NSW. The AFL would be thinking to be targeting those kids who would normally be forced by their mothers to play soccer.
  
  Reply
  - AndyRoo said | November 23rd 2009 @ 4:02pm | Report comment
    
    I don’t think that’s a big market. I think the kids that get moved towards less contact sports would only play sport for a couple of years and then drop out.
    
    Has it ever actually happened that a kid wanted to play AFL or Rugby League and his parents said no…you have to play Soccer or Tennis. I just can’t beleive that there are parents in Australia that would actually do that.
    
    Reply
    - Dave1 said | November 23rd 2009 @ 4:08pm | Report comment
      
      heres the stats
      
      http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/2D0179A15287F5BFCA2574E400117321?OpenDocument
      
      Reply
      - AndyRoo said | November 23rd 2009 @ 4:20pm | Report comment
        
        I dont see the stats for the question that asks “is your mother a control freak and secretly wanted a girl”.
        
        If a kid wants to play something else I can’t imagine him having to play Soccer instead. It’s more expensive than Auskick and Mod League for one. And if a parent is that uninformed and ignorant as to think Mod league is dangerous wouldn’t they be worried about their little precious heading the ball or perhaps being kicked by a boat person?
        
        Reply
bever fever said | November 23rd 2009 @ 8:45am | Report comment

Yep gotta agree, i dont think this is about which code is cleaner, i think this is about getting a team going in GWS.

Their are protaganists on both sides of this so called footy war and if you look at it objectively its bunk.

I think if anything junior aussie rules will draw players from basketball and soccer rather than league, and thats going to be hard work.

League in the west will not miss a beat.

Reply
Jaredsbro said | November 23rd 2009 @ 9:19am | Report comment

Nonsense…again I say Not making much sense.

Now I’m an AFL fan, not exactly avid but I love the game (which is something I can’t say about Soccer which douses my cred a bit doesn’t it ) but the main target for Aussie rules in Sydney needs to be those who are disaffected with the main code Rugby League. Which one of you Vicball ( ) bloggers, I think it was Pipinu, but I can’t remember fore shore said that every code has a part of the demographic it marginalises. None can help it as this is the product of the two states which have influenced Australia’s sporting character the most biting at each other since the 1850s

Anyway Mothers are rarely marginalised by any code of Football, disaffected maybe, but they’re not the same thing are they? I mean the NRL’s not looking too flash in its policies about Player discipline (but more importantly preventing player irresponsibility in the first place) but to put one’s child in another code of Football will disadvantage them in the normal State education system IMO

Yes Polynesians appear threatening, but there doesn’t seem to be any other sport that the majority of non GPS schools are happy to back these days. Because of this I would think Mothers would have a stronger desire to see their sons with the best chance of success, which Aussie rules in Sydney does not provide. See not every Timmy is good enough to excell at Rugby League, which for mine makes it more likely that Mothers will go with the Status Quo, unless they want to ostracise their kids…?

Reply
Pippinu said | November 23rd 2009 @ 9:29am | Report comment

Jaredsbro
Once again, an impenetrable post.

But you touch on one point, even if it doesn’t immediately make a lot of sense, I think there is something in there worth exploring – and it’s the point about mothers not necessarily feeling marginalised by any code, maybe disaffected, but not marginalised.

I can see something profound in that – but I’m not immediately sure what it means.

Then you mention that mothers will push their sons in the direction most likely to give success (which we can take in the broad sense: income, social acceptance, etc)

I think there is truth in that – but does the prospect of sporting scholoarships, and earning $50,000 per annum as a first year 18 yo rookie assist in changing the perception on that front?

Maybe.

Reply
- Jaredsbro said | November 23rd 2009 @ 9:59am | Report comment
  
  Thanks Pipinu. I wonder why I’ve suddenly become flavour of the month with you but any encouragement from you means quite something round these parts so cudos where cudos is due
  
  Yeah the way I see it Public and Private school mentalities could not be any more different these days from how it used to be in Australia anyway. It used to be the case that in Sydney and to a lesser extent Melbourne RU was the sport of choice of Richie Riches and their Mothers/Fathers. Public schools of course tended towards the Working Class sports, which are the two major codes of Football, and this is still much of a much-ness.
  
  But Private has moved towards boutique sports and unfortunately Soccer fans that includes the round ball game in Sydney at least anyway, unless you happen to be an Italian or a Greek or something, or from one of these ‘ethnic’ neighbourhoods. I think it’s part of the whole let’s be different, ie let’s not be homogenous ie Mothers tend to want their babies to be more individual/stand out these days…of course what a parent perceives as signifying ‘standing out’ is so totally not the same as what the child themselves perceive…
  
  So in some sense it comes down to what school you attend, but it’s not THAT simple and/or deterministic
  
  But the key is that I don’t think safety is the main concern to be honest, so obviously Soccer will still have it’s niche, but I see RU being most under threat, certainly if Republican is to be believed…
  
  Reply
  - Redb said | November 23rd 2009 @ 10:08am | Report comment
    
    I dont know where you get your information from but rugby union has always been a minor choice in private schools in Melbourne. Australian football would easily be the number one football code in private schools and has been for decades.
    
    In fact the first game of Australian football was between two Melbourne private schools such is its heritage.
    
    Redb
    
    Reply
    - Jaredsbro said | November 23rd 2009 @ 10:46am | Report comment
      
      True in terms of numbers and as it is the case in Sydney (not in terms of numbers but in terms of a general marginal sport within the wider mainstream system.) My point was that public schools have as much of an agenda to push when it comes to being part of a mainstream image as private has of wanting to be different (which of course for them means being better or something equally as conspicuous)
      
      Neither public or private want to disadvantage their ‘patrons’ any more than they see as a necessary part of the education of a young adult
      
      Reply
      - oikee said | November 23rd 2009 @ 11:59am | Report comment
        
        Yes, you are spot on, and also Public schools also need to be recognised, so they adapt to rugby league and Soccer because they know that one day, if they produce stars for their school, it encourages more students to acheive and want to play this game, which receives them more recognition.
        If you look at the Melbourne Storms progress, you would notice they are growing around the public schools in certain areas. One day these schools would have produced a Kangaroo or Socceroo.. And then we see it grow more.
        
        Reply
James said | November 23rd 2009 @ 9:40am | Report comment

It was reported that the AFL did not want to be seen as making this appointment….hence no Demetriou or Fitzpatrick…who delibrately stayed at home. You expect the president or ceo of a club to be making this decision, but given it is still in the AFL’s control, Sam was the perfect fit for the reasons given above (mother, Sydney sider etc)

Reply
Michael C Jordan said | November 23rd 2009 @ 3:48pm | Report comment

Thanks for all the comments. That was pretty much the response I was expecting.

If there is anyone who would like to read or comment on anything else I’ve written please visit my new blog at http://www.thefinalsiren.blogspot.com There isn’t a lot there at the moment but I am hoping to update it daily.

Hope to hear from you.

Thanks

Michael C Jordan

Reply
Westcoast929406 said | November 23rd 2009 @ 4:42pm | Report comment

It looks like some mothers -and fathers are listening Michael C Jordan in the West Sydney Region – Talk about a melting plot of nations which our game will get a share of.
How big a share – That is what everyone will be watching.
http://www.realfooty.com.au/news/rfnews/mickey-o-dips-into-sydneys-melting-pot/2009/11/21/1258220007495.html

Reply