Ben Somerford

By Ben Somerford
November 25th 2009 @ 6:00am


ADVERTISEMENT
View The Roar's top AFL writers.

McPhee will be a free hit at the Dockers

Essendon's Adam McPhee leaves the field after the AFL Round 21 match between the Fremantle Dockers and the Essendon Bombers at Subiaco. Slattery Images

Essendon's Adam McPhee leaves the field after the AFL Round 21 match between the Fremantle Dockers and the Essendon Bombers at Subiaco. Slattery Images

At first glance it’s tempting to agree with the chorus of criticism from the likes of AFL commentator Dwayne Russell and Herald Sun journo Craig Hutchison directed at Fremantle’s decision to recruit Essendon’s Adam McPhee.

McPhee is expected to join the Dockers on a three-year deal in the pre-season draft, becoming the fourth Essendon player to head to Freo since ex-Bombers man Mark Harvey took over as coach in 2007.

But at 27-years-old the 2004 All-Australian and Essendon Best & Fairest winner hasn’t been at his best in the last few years although he still remains a good AFL player.

And ironically McPhee actually began his AFL career at Fremantle before heading to Melbourne only to return west well into his twenties, much like Peter Bell and Heath Black have before.

Add to that with Freo’s inglorious recruitment history and the fact that they’re supposed to be following a youth policy right now, and it seems signing up McPhee is a bad call.

Earlier this week, Hutchison was scathing in his assessment of the move writing, “The hard, cold, brutal truth for Fremantle is that Gold Coast, now, is closer to a premiership than the flailing Dockers.

“And the three-year offer to Adam McPhee does little but remind us all just how bad the Dockers have been built.”

Basically, it seems the Dockers are making the same old mistakes again.

Indeed, jumping to that conclusion is easy to do because the Dockers have a history of dodgy recruiting policies and failing to follow through with plans.

But that assumption is based on history rather than what is happening now and Fremantle insist recruiting a 27-year-old like McPhee is part of their ‘youth policy’.

Fremantle assistant coach Chris Bond explained this week, “The plan was made in 2008 what we wanted to do. We got 14 new players last year in the national and rookie draft.

“We will take eight players in the national and rookie drafts this year. And we have said all along if there was a chance to get a player in the pre-season draft – and hopefully Adam McPhee falls our way – we are getting him for a free hit.”

There’s no doubt Fremantle have firmly promoted youth since that decision in 2008, with the club becoming the first since the Brisbane Lions in 2005 (who were re-building after their golden era) to have 11 debutants in one season.

And they enjoyed some good success with that policy in 2009, with debutants Stephen Hill, Nic Suban, Hayden Ballentyne and Greg Broughton all looking capable of enjoying long AFL careers.

And doing the sums on Bond’s previous quote, considering their turnover in the last two seasons, the Dockers could field a whole 22-man side of first or second-year players in 2010.

But blindly throwing youngsters into the pressure cooker of AFL footy isn’t ideal. For every success, there’s a failure, and exposing some of the strugglers to loss after loss can burn them for ever.

Indeed, there’s more to developing a good footballer than just blind faith and that’s where McPhee’s recruitment comes into it.

This is a very young side who could do with an experienced player or two.

We shouldn’t forget McPhee is a pretty good AFL player who will help the Dockers stay competitive whilst they blood the youngsters. Avoiding demoralizing, weekly losses is important for young sides.

And players like McPhee have a role to play in development by setting the standard and leading by example and with experienced types well and truly outnumbered nowadays at Fremantle, the recruit will be handy in this facet.

The Dockers will hope to replicate Hawthorn’s 2008 Premiership success after their concerted youth policy in the preceding years, but it shouldn’t be ignored that the Hawks struggled in 2009 when experienced players like Trent Croad and Shane Crawford were absent.

Hutchison does point out McPhee’s arrival will mean whenever he plays one youngster will have to miss out, but in a weak, youthful side such as the Dockers, opportunities will be fairly readily available anyway for the rookies.

Nevertheless it is easy to think the Dockers just never learn, but ignoring their inglorious past, there’s more to this story than meets the eye in the context of where they are and what they are losing (very little).

The Dockers have a fresh-faced youthful list right now and adding an experienced body like McPhee will help.

And while some critics believe McPhee won’t prove a hit at Freo, the Dockers know he is after all just a ‘free hit’.

Like this content? Buzz it up!

Free Email updates:

Our daily emails are only sent if there is content for the sport or that author. You can subscribe to multiple daily emails; or get the daily Roar email with all our content in it. We value privacy. More...

 

Crowd Says (18)

  •   Boo Cheers
    View Redb's Roar profile

    Redb said  | November 25th 2009 @ 7:03am | Report comment

    No problem with him going to McPheemantle. He is a very good contested mark but a dumb footballer who makes poor decisions.

    Redb

  •   Boo Cheers

    Jimmy Drama said  | November 25th 2009 @ 10:11am | Report comment

    I believe McPhee will provide much needed firepower up forward. With the following as the leading goal scorers for 2009, a swing man like McPhee will add value to Freo FC.

    2008 Goals Freo
    Matthew Pavlich 28
    Luke McPharlin 20
    David Mundy 15
    Brett Peake 14
    Des Headland 13

  •   Boo Cheers

    Gibbo said  | November 25th 2009 @ 11:08am | Report comment

    i figured he’d play at the back and hopefully free u mcpharlin to spend more time forward.

    he’ll be a good player in a poor team – his supporting cast at the dockers will make him look better by comparison.

  •   Boo Cheers

    Droo said  | November 25th 2009 @ 11:36am | Report comment

    Firstly, Fremantle aren’t that weak – remember that last year they had no aspirations to finals as they are in a declared building phase. In fact, 09 went better than many expected. Freo were ravaged by injuries in 09, and I believe that tempered the youngsters who were prematurely sent into battle.

    Secondly McPhee isn’t seen as a critical component – just a bit of added experience to rub off on the real squad, and some depth in case of injury. Freo would not sacrifice any of their current players to get him; in that sense he is a ‘free hit’ who they can accommodate in their salary cap.

    Thirdly, none of the mature players that Freo have recruited through trade deals in the past few years have been disappointments. The Tarrant decision was ridiculed, yet later vaunted as one of the AFL successes of 09. Kepler Bradley (still a young man) is a secret weapon – the invisible man who makes a solid contribution without anyone noticing. Solomon is the friendly giant who mentors the pups in the hard game. Mark Johnson came as part of a bigger trade deal and wasn’t actively chased, though played his career out solidly and loyally.

    •   Boo Cheers
      View Redb's Roar profile

      Redb said  | November 26th 2009 @ 7:06am | Report comment

      Out of all the players Essendon hand passed to Fremantle including now Mc Phee, Dean Soloman was the only true loss.

      •   Boo Cheers

        Johno said  | December 1st 2009 @ 11:30am | Report comment

        Out of all the playerswho have come from Essendon to Freo – Solly, Johnson, Keplar, McPhee – The bombers only got something in return for Solly. If I were a bomber fan I’d be asking why didn’t Knights do something about getting pick 56 for Bradley or being able to recognise that McPhee was looking to head West. Somethings not right at bomberland at the moment, the treatment of Lloyd was appalling, he could easily have stayed on for another year.

  •   Boo Cheers

    ren said  | November 25th 2009 @ 12:09pm | Report comment

    its a freebie- should provide a good examle in terms of work ethic on the training track to ouryoung brigade.

    the only negative for mine is the length of the contract especially when considering the haselby negotiations ear;ier tis year.

    personally i would like to see him up foward more than back, keeping mcpharlin down back. in my opinion poor kicks and decision makers should be kept ot of defense where their mistakes are more easily punished by the opposition.

  •   Boo Cheers

    Henry said  | November 25th 2009 @ 5:42pm | Report comment

    Great Article. Finally a journalist who actually understands the situation.

  •   Boo Cheers

    davelee said  | November 25th 2009 @ 6:21pm | Report comment

    tend to agree. if he comes for free then whats the big deal. and if theyve got a young list he’ll come in quite handy.

    i thnk hutchy is struggling for stories.

  •   Boo Cheers

    davelee said  | November 25th 2009 @ 6:25pm | Report comment

    whats with the preseason draft anyway. are melbourne and richmond (whove got the 1st 2 picks before freo) gonna take anybody decent anyway? didnt melbourne get liam jurrah in the PSD last season? and richmond, geez they need anybody decent.

    •   Boo Cheers
      View Redb's Roar profile

      Redb said  | November 26th 2009 @ 7:04am | Report comment

      I think Liam Jurrah was rookie listed by Melbourne?

      •   Boo Cheers

        Johno said  | December 1st 2009 @ 11:33am | Report comment

        Nope – he was first in the pre season draft, never rookie listed

  •   Boo Cheers

    bever fever said  | November 25th 2009 @ 9:29pm | Report comment

    I barrack for the dockers and this is our year for sure. (that being next year)

    •   Boo Cheers
      View Redb's Roar profile

      Redb said  | November 26th 2009 @ 7:03am | Report comment

      Out of the two teams in the west, I reckon West Coast will go better than Fremantle.

    •   Boo Cheers
      View Hazey the Bear's Roar profile

      Hazey the Bear said  | November 27th 2009 @ 8:12pm | Report comment

      You barrack for the Dockers? You have my condolences…

  •   Boo Cheers
    View gazz's Roar profile

    gazz said  | November 28th 2009 @ 11:55am | Report comment

    once a docker, always a docker….docker shocker!

  •   Boo Cheers

    Sue said  | November 28th 2009 @ 7:08pm | Report comment

    It seems to be all about money for McPhee. What happened to the guys who played for the love of the game. Loyalty is out the door it seems with McPhee. “Get me out of Freo, I want to go home” so Essendon picked him up and now he is getting older and not playing so well at all in the last seasons its “I want three years get me back to Freo”. I used to enjoy watching you play Adam, but now I am glad you are going. You have just got too damn greedy and think you were worth more than you are.

  •   Boo Cheers

    bever fever said  | November 28th 2009 @ 8:10pm | Report comment

    Money aside, Adam has come back to toast premiership glory with the Dockers.

    As usual next year we will have 40k of members and before they sign on they have promised not to stand and clap any of our losing finals teams off the ground.

    We have a bunch of great kids and some players returning from injury, i should get onto sportsbet now to get the odds on a flag and at the very least a top four finish.

Have your Say

If you like this article, Subscribe! Subscribe to our daily email

Please be sure to enter your name and email before submitting this comment. Please also refer to our comments policy

 

Hot debate

What you're Roaring!

By signing up to the daily The Roar email you'll receive all the new articles and sports opinion that we put up on the website each day - delivered direct into your inbox. For free. We think it's the best way to receive our content.

Our emails contain the article along with the images - just like on the website.