World game was already scarred before Henry
By Adrian Musolino, 25 Nov 2009 Adrian Musolino is a Roar Expert

France's Captain Thierry Henry runs with the ball during their World Cup qualifying playoff second leg soccer match against Republic of Ireland at Stade de France, in Saint Denis, north outskirts of Paris, Wednesday Nov. 18, 2009. AP Photo/Francois Mori
A week has almost passed since Thierry Henry ‘handed’ France a berth in the World Cup, and the controversy doesn’t seem to be subsiding. In fact the fallout from Henry’s actions has been just as fascinating to watch as the drama that unfolded at the Stade de France.
The worldwide condemnation of Henry has been deserved. It was a shameful act from a player revered as one of the greats.
But Henry is by no means a pioneer of cheating in football.
The modern game has slowly been mutilated by “the end justifies the means” attitude that has pervaded players and coaches.
With every yard they try and gain when creeping up the touchline for a throw in or throwing the ball beyond the spot on which the referee has called a free kick; every dive and wild exaggeration to con the referee; every time a play berates a referee for a call that goes against them, only to applaud a similar ill-fated decision that goes their way; every time a Sir Alex Ferguson uses the media to deride a referee, these acts all have contributed to a culture of conning.
These acts have become acceptable attributes of the makeup of football – part of the game.
Henry’s handball was just an exaggerated example of a con, on the international stage at a crucial juncture in determining which nation would be heading the game’s biggest stage. Blatant, yes, but the result would have been no different had he dived, won a penalty and sent France through from a spot-kick.
In that second when the ball first made contact with his left hand, in his calculated football brain, Henry deduced he could get away with it a second time because such acts are ‘part of the game’, the justification for the divers, simulators and the like.
Henry would have become a sporting immortal had he admitted to his handball immediately and the goal not counted.
But what player in modern sports would do such a thing?
Had he admitted to his crime, the goal been disallowed and France missed out on World Cup qualification, what would the reaction have been in Paris? He would have been chastised in his homeland. Better peace at home and international hatred rather than the other way round, perhaps.
There are few, if any, athletes at the elite level of most sports who would, in the same position, admit to such an act. That’s the tragedy of modern sport.
Socceroo Jason Culina, writing for The World Game, claims: “If you can get away it, why not? Had that happened to me, I wouldn’t have said anything in the heat of the moment and I probably wouldn’t have said anything after the game either.”
This admission would probably be echoed by many professional footballers.
Henry’s greatest folly was his post-goal behaviour.
He may have been sparred some of the hatred had he hung his head in shame rather than the indecisive actions of someone who knew they had just got away with murder.
The debate must move away from Henry’s role in the handball to how football officialdom can avoid such scenarios.
What is clear is FIFA must have an extra official behind each goal, as has been done in the Europa League this season, to, hopefully, limit such incidents.
A replay, as has been called for ad nauseam, is simply not possible in this scenario under FIFA laws, and although in principal it would be a fair outcome, as terrible as it is to admit, the precedent would be as damaging, with far greater long-term consequences, than doing nothing.
If relegated, could Birmingham not demand a replay of their EPL match with Liverpool following David Ngog’s dive that robbed them of all three points?
There are countless other examples that could be quoted here.
But FIFA can’t do nothing.
Henry must be banned from the World Cup, either from the group stage or the whole competition, for bringing the game into disrepute.
But they must ensure it is not just Henry who is made an example of but all the divers, simulators and cheaters who get away with such incidents on a smaller scale, not to mention the match-fixing controversy that has been overshadowed by Henry’s handball.
This is FIFA’s great chance to set about a change in the culture of modern day football.
To do nothing is to accept this as just ‘part of the game’ and a generation of kids will follow in Henry’s example.
In his TWG column, Culina concludes: “But he (Henry) did (it) and unfortunately, that’s football sometimes.”
That is indeed modern football.
I am in no way condoning Henry’s action by comparing it to those of a diver or the like. He is a cheat, pure and simple, and his career will forever be tarnished by his shameful actions in not only handling the ball so blatantly but also the manner in which he conducted himself after.
But he is by no means the first, or will he be the last.
A week has past and we wait for FIFA. President Blatter has, according to a statement, “called an extraordinary meeting of the Executive Committee” to be held in Cape Town, two days before the World Cup draw.
“For the Good of the Game” is one of their favourite slogans branded about under the Fair Play campaign. For the good of the game they must act, not just with Henry but also all the other cheats.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- Football World Cup, france football, Thierry Henry, World Football

GazGoldCoast said | November 25th 2009 @ 3:54am | Report comment
To be fair to Culina, he also said the Henry handball was embarrassing, and he called for the introduction of extra linesmen behind the goals. As far as eliminating cheating goes, the other big option is of course the video ref, but Culina and many others think this would stop the game too often.
I am not so sure that it would. In most incidents where a video ref would be called in, the game has already been stopped. The onus would be on the ref to use the video to double-check calls rather than blowing the whistle just so he has time to check the screen.
Aside from that, one can only hope that the fallout from this Henry incident encourages more players to think twice. Thierry seems quite remorseful and even called for the game to be replayed. Maybe if Maradonna had shown more remorse years ago then Henry would not have tried the same thing. France may be going to the World Cup, but Henry will pay a hefty personal price for this.
Freud of Football said | November 25th 2009 @ 4:59am | Report comment
Flog that dead horse Adrian, FLOG IT GOOD!
Marshall said | November 25th 2009 @ 6:20am | Report comment
Culina’s views are really telling and I’m a bit surprised he wrote that. I wonder if he had done the same to get the Socceroos to a World Cup what the reaction in Australia would have been?
Paulo Roberto Sanchotene said | November 25th 2009 @ 7:26am | Report comment
If you are going to cheat, please, do it well. What Henry did wasn’t a simple handball. It was just ridiculous. The first touch could even be consider LEGAL, because there are margins to say it wasn’t intentional. But the second…
By any reason, every dive (or considered dive), every handball, every agression, or every simulation should become a reason to punish or suspend a player, even (or mainly) if the referee hasn’t seen it. There are obviously “game calls”, that are too close to be sure: has he dived or been touched? Has he handled the ball intentionally or not? If this is the case, there must be no punishment.
I just can’t find any reasonable explanation that perhaps the ball touched Henry’s hand an not the other way around.
“Henry must be banned from the World Cup, either from the group stage or the whole competition, for bringing the game into disrepute“. Exactly!
Pippinu said | November 25th 2009 @ 7:40am | Report comment
It’s a bit of an exaggeration to say that the World Game is already scarred.
And it’s also an exaggeration to talk of “worldwide condemnation”.
I listened to the BBC World program the following two nights, and fans phoned in and texted from all around the world and virtually none of these fans were the least bit perturbed at what Henry had done.
The truth is that the average fan around the world accepts this sort of stuff as part and parcel of the game.
The obvious response to the concerns expressed by some is that all forms of professional football try and push the envelop during a game – and that’s true.
The key thing about soccer, for all of its bold boast as the beautiful game (and it occasionally is capable of reminding us of this bold boast) is that with only 2.3 goals scored per game, the motivation and rewards to con are absolutely immense, such that a player’s career can be focused more on that aspect than dazzling us with wonderful ball skills.
But – it’s only in places like Australia where you will find such observations – the rest of the world could not care less about that!!
keeper11 said | November 25th 2009 @ 8:41am | Report comment
Adrian…are you Ray Gatt possibly??
Sweeping sockah ‘crisis’/ shame/ scandal etc headlines and negative cr*petorials are standard practise from his ilk …..
Maybe ..
you could also have quoted the reaction from French media and fans who also critisize the practise of their captain and countryman….
thats too me is a sign of healthy sceptisicm and a global succxesful sport that is capable of self-reflection and self-critiiscm..
..’our’ beloved footy codes seem never have to face such scrutiny or insight…
by all means focus on the Henry. 3 officials and FIFA for inaction….but sweeping statements like that..
….leave it for the news-limited hacks and their agendas…
David said | November 25th 2009 @ 9:08am | Report comment
Lol if anyone here plays a sport i play indoor when i cheat or foul a player or the ball hit my hand dont put my hand up and say i did it. It lets ur team down if the ref dont see it then its not the players problem in imo.
The Bear said | November 25th 2009 @ 9:40am | Report comment
I heard Wilkshire’s goal against Oman was handled. If true, that’s a pity.
Tom said | November 25th 2009 @ 10:07am | Report comment
The central point that Adrian makes is spot on. Football has grown to accept the gamesmanship of its players as a part of the game, which has made it harder to sincerely condemn the worst incidents like Henry’s handball.
What FIFA should be doing is taking this incident as a sign that there perhaps there is a groundswell of discontent about this fact and start to find ways to clamp down on the worst incidents in a meaningful way.
Marshall said | November 25th 2009 @ 2:58pm | Report comment
Agreed. They need to act or risk letting the inmates run the show
AndyRoo said | November 25th 2009 @ 10:17am | Report comment
Their was a similar article on Football 365 from John Nic which got me thinking about how much poor sportsmanship we put up with in football. I am sure it happens in other sports but I don’t really care so much about them. The other sport I watch a lot of is Rugby League and in that game their are plenty of oppurtunities to see physical harm occur to the cheaters so I still go home happy.
The cheating in Football is not enough to bother me too much but I would like the game to be cleaned up a lot. But to suggest such you get attacked for being anti football. I am not, I just think that if their was less poor sportsmanship it would be better.
We also get told their are different cultures involved …. which is true but a bit of strong leadership from Fifa on a few areas of the game would be appretiated.
Players taking their shirt of obviosly bothers some culture that Ia m not apart off or why else would they clamp down on something so harmless so they should accept we dont like abusing the Ref.
If there is one thing I could get FIFA to clean up that would be it. Players chasing the ref is a big put off.
True Tah said | November 25th 2009 @ 11:32am | Report comment
AndyRoo
in sports like league, rugby and American football, there is a sense of natural justice inherent within the game, i.e. if you do cheat, someone will be out to get you in retribution. I guess in futbol, cause physical contact is forbidden, you are relying on the referee to pick it up, but thats something that cannot ever be changed.
I wonder why futbol players do not adopt some of the post-touchdown dances done in the NFL, which IMO are a lot more creative and interesting than some skinny bloke showing off his chest. Maybe they could take dance lessons from NRL players?