How to revolutionise Test cricket
By jimmy_01, 5 Dec 2009 jimmy_01 is a Roar Rookie
- Tagged:
- Cricket, Test cricket, two-tier Test cricket

England's Stuart Broad, centre, celebrates with teammates the wicket of Australia's Brad Haddin on the second day of the fifth cricket test match between England and Australia at The Oval cricket ground in London, Friday, Aug.21, 2009. AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth
In recent weeks, many ideas have been thrown around aiming on trying to improve Test cricket and make it more exciting. In the past, Test cricket had captured the hearts of cricket lovers across the nation, but now in the time of Twenty20 and attacking one day cricket, domestic competitions have seemed to become more popular that the most pure form.
One idea that has arisen is the introduction of a two tiered system.
Through this, Test cricket could expand, create grand finals at the end of yearly periods, and create more tension and angst in losing Tests.
In the current era, many fans don’t care if Australia loses a Test match and a series. But with the introduction of a new format, there will be more attacking and aggressive Test cricket in the future.
Here’s the system that could be introduced:
Tiered Test Cricket system
Tier one (based on current rankings)
1.South Africa
2.Sri Lanka
3.India
4.Australia
5.England
Tier 2
1. Pakistan
2. New Zealand
3. West Indies
4. Bangladesh
5. Zimbabwe
Every year, each team would play each other team in their tier three times in a three match series, either home or away.
If, say, England were relegated, Australia would still be able to play them in a series having the same meaning and relevance as before and not having an effect on the tiered system.
In this way, teams like the West Indies could play yearly Tests against teams from tier one to earn the money that they need to support their players.
The Ashes series would still be played every second year, and in this way, each team would play 16-18 Tests a year, similar to the current amount.
*Except in the year of a Test World Cup where the competition becomes two matches against each team.
* Pakistan would host their matches in UAE in either Dubai or the Capital of UAE, or play matches in their opponent’s home territory with profits going to Pakistan cricket.
This structure would involve a points system, where each team is a awarded points for wins, wickets and runs.
Win-10 points
Draw-4 points
Wickets-.25 points
Runs-.01points
Series win-5 points
*If structure doesn’t succeed, then a first innings win could be added instead of a draw.
Extra points awarded for winning matches and the series, and lower points awarded for drawing, encouraging aggressive cricket.
Each tier would have a winning final for the first and second place teams and a losing final for the fourth and fifth placed teams. The winner of tier 2 would play the loser of tier one, with the winner gaining a place in the higher tier the following year.
The finals will be played on the higher ranked teams’ home ground and the third placed teams of each tier would play each other in a one-off Test.
The grand final would be massive and the crowds would flock from every in hope that their team can come out on top and secure a victory important for the future of their countries cricket.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- What we do and don’t know about our Baggy Greens (112)
- Success of Twenty20 spells trouble for ODI cricket (106)
- Channel 9 commentators an annoyance this summer (97)
- Media should call stumps on Rodney Hogg (93)
- One Day Cricket is suffering from Middle Child Syndrome (89)
- Dave’s Warner-ful switch-hit panned by precious critics (82)
- Cricket Australia must take a stand against racist spectators (76)
- Pakistan’s win over England a triumph of character (18)
- Steve Waugh is right about cricket’s succession plan (3)
- India vs Sri Lanka, Perth ODI: cricket live scores, commentary (180)
- Let’s talk about selection, Test fans (28)
- Khawaja shouldn’t have been Shaun from the Test side (71)
- Hussey harbours Test cricket goal (2)
- Channel 9 commentators an annoyance this summer (99)
- Pakistan’s win over England a triumph of character (18)
- Steve Waugh is right about cricket’s succession plan (3)
- India vs Sri Lanka, Perth ODI: cricket live scores, commentary (180)
- Let’s talk about selection, Test fans (28)
- Pakistan win shows what’s beautiful about the game (12)
- Stats say Kallis is greatest of his generation (27)
- Haddin and Healy, two gloves in a pod (49)
- Explore:
- Cricket, Test cricket, two-tier Test cricket

Freud of Football said | December 5th 2009 @ 5:49am | Report comment
I think most people that know a little about the game (as well as it’s important history) with the exception of SK Warne have already thrown this one in the bin.
The second tiered teams can’t afford that segregation and cricket can’t afford to be made up predominantly of 5 teams.
You’ll make the rich richer and the poor bankrupt.
Matthew Stephen said | December 5th 2009 @ 6:16am | Report comment
I agree fully. Its time this idea be tossed out and instead of working out ways to get rid of the weaker sides work on development to get all ten nations up to a competiitive level. That will regenerate interest in the game again.
davido said | December 6th 2009 @ 11:00pm | Report comment
Basically, as I understand it, you are suggesting a league based system for test cricket.
This is not such a bad idea but it is probably spoiled by the two tier notion. Having two tiers is probably counter productive and awkward given their are only 10 teams.
Why not just have a simple league system of ten teams that play home and away with some sort of finals at the end of the year?
I agree that this may add meaning to the hodgepodge cash cow driven scheduling we have now.