Gambling on matches a risky bet for the NRL
By Steve Kaless, 10 Dec 2009 Steve Kaless is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- NRL, Rugby League, State Of Origin, TAB Sportsbet
As 2009 draws to a close, so will end one of the most controversy laden years for NRL off the field. Barely a week seemed to go by without another player being splashed all over the papers for “all the wrong reasons.”
The NRL has steeled itself to get tough on players and clubs in 2010 and has even hired a private investigator to assess all matters of mis-behaviour.
But while most people will see this as reviewing “alcohol related incidents” at various nightspots, one wonders how much attention is being given the threat of match-fixing and point shaving in rugby league.
There was a brief storm when the Roosters capitulated against the Cowboys this year and a number of bookies cited suspicious betting patterns. In truth, that wasn’t the only game of the season involving the Roosters which had the same odd patterns.
Their penultimate game against the Storm, where a minus 18 start quickly blew out to a minus 26, rose a few eyebrows, while their round three match against the Tigers also gave off some odd impressions.
This is, of course, only relevant if you look at that sort of thing, and the NRL most certainly should.
This is not because any match-fixing has been proven or even alleged, but because the greater the presence of gambling has in a sport, the more its officials must work to maintain the sport’s integrity.
It’s also naïve.
If match-fixing can hit the world’s biggest sports, why not rugby league?
Gambling on rugby league is Australia is growing at an incredible rate. TAB Sportsbet saw a 17 percent growth in their rugby league market last year, which built on a 14 percent growth the year before, to see the code account for 20 percent of their total sales.
The first State of Origin match this year held a record $5 million dollars for the TAB while the NRL Grand Final has become the premier event for the TAB, with this year’s sales holding $9.5 million.
Remember, these figures are for TAB Sportsbet alone and don’t take into account the other Australian bookmakers and the plethora that are available online to the savvy (or desperate) punter.
It is estimated that the yearly nationwide pool in rugby league betting is around $300 million dollars per year.
Much of the growth comes down to the fact that the demographics that enjoys rugby league also enjoys a punt. And the two’s relationship are getting stronger and stronger.
Mobile betting vans out the front of matches and Footy TAB machines in pubs always have men queuing prior to matches in order to have their flutter.
In August 2008, the government lifted the advertising restrictions on bookmakers to allow them to advertise nationally, and as such, there was the surge in advertising by bookies of rugby league clubs and during rugby league matches this season.
The NRL supported the idea as previously, while they created this enormous betting market, they were unable to earn any income from the millions punted.
But now the genie is out of the bottle, does the NRL have the resources to maintain its rage?
The key to any monitoring is to watch the betting patterns, and when a game stands out, it should warrant further investigation. Even the fact that greater scrutiny will be placed on matches should act as a strong deterrent.
The biggest problem with any gambling issues is finding the smoking gun.
Anyone actually involved in a rort is rarely going to be stupid enough to put a bet on themselves. And how can you prove that if a friend or even relative did have a wager, it wasn’t just based on a hunch.
If anything, the Roosters Vs Cowboys match provided good evidence of that. Plenty of pro-punters were certain of a fix, but the club and NRL said no, and most of public just saw the bookies as whingers for putting the hapless Roosters up as favourites.
Should the problem rear its head again in 2010, it may not be so easy to explain away.
© AAP 2012Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- Gallop and some of his precious Sydney NRL clubs must go (101)
- The NRL is back baby! (65)
- The NRL needs a vision (50)
- The NRL’s scariest players (50)
- Bulldogs setting benchmark for Sydney’s NRL clubs (46)
- Channel Nine needs NRL-cricket ODI compromise (35)
- NRL tackle count rule a surefire winner (33)
- Federal Court has it wrong on sports broadcast copyright (34)
- An open letter to Channel Nine (77)
- The NRL’s scariest players (56)
- Is the All Stars match increasing the divide? (24)
- Channel Nine needs NRL-cricket ODI compromise (35)
- The NRL needs a vision (52)
- New breed of NRL players continue to develop (24)
- Explore:
- NRL, Rugby League, State Of Origin, TAB Sportsbet
oikee said | December 10th 2009 @ 7:35am | Report comment
Agree with most of what you have said Steve, but we need betting, most other sports bet on their matches. I was thinking, maybe we could kick teams out of the comp if they are found out, now that will send the best message. You only have to look at Europeon football scandal recently to see it was the players making money off the deals as well. So clubs should cop the full force of any indiscretions. Also drugs, these are other problems, that Olmypic runner who was found out, must of been some money made their as well. So rugby league is no different to other sports around the world.
And to survive, we need betting, can we afford to be the only code not betting.? You might have to give up your day job otherwise, rugby league would not last long without income. Cheers.
Ian Whitchurch said | December 10th 2009 @ 9:14am | Report comment
Oikee,
What cut does rugby league get out of Tabcorp etc’s wagers ?
That isnt snark, its an honest question.
Steve Kaless said | December 10th 2009 @ 10:32am | Report comment
Ian,
That is a good question, my understanding is they income they derive is from sponsorship, not from actual beting but I may check on that.
Oikee,
I’m not for one minute suggesting banning gambling, if anything hat would make any potential problem worse, I’m simply arguing for viligance in the monitoring and a realistic view of potential problems.
Cheers
oikee said | December 10th 2009 @ 11:18am | Report comment
Yes, and i agreed with your post Steve, 1st thing i said, and i also mentioned what happened this year in Europe, with gambling syndicates. Players were involved, goes right back to the early Yankies games, remember,. I think even Babe Ruth was involved in throwing games. ?
Cheers.
Anyhow, yes i agree, and the solution, ban the team from playing, now if that does not send a message, along with criminal justice, I dont know what will. But to be realistic, greed is bigger than god.
oikee said | December 10th 2009 @ 10:40am | Report comment
Ian, they have their own betting companies in which the NRL gets a percentage of the Profits, i was just reading about it not long ago. If you can recall earlier this year , there was a big write-up about the NRL and Sportsbet it might have been, but i know there is profitering made out of it, remember the Broncos it might have been, wanted to align themselves with that betting agency, but the NRL stopped it from happening, because they had another agency involved with the game. Awile ago, but i could look it up and give you some sites to read. ? I will have alook now, if you post back, i know your interested. cheers.
Ian Whitchurch said | December 10th 2009 @ 11:28am | Report comment
Oikee,
Yeah, I’d like to see something more solid
Russell Bussian said | December 10th 2009 @ 11:46am | Report comment
My understanding is that the NRL receives lump sum sponsorships from betting companies rather than profit sharing. I wasn’t aware of then receiving say 1% of net profit. The sponsorship might work out around that but at least it doesn’t give the NRL a financial incentive to increase betting turnover.
Those other Roosters game Steve mentioned as possible suspicious games could be right. That game in Melbourne was played on a wet night and I found it odd that all the big punters were looking to back the Storm giving a big start in the rain. That is the opposite of what they would usually do.
oikee said | December 10th 2009 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
Yes, sorry, i was wrong, it was sponsership deals, and the peice i was reading must have been for a sponsership deal with a different agency, sorry, my mistake.
But to add to your question, with the game being so close now,” last can beat 1st “, how would you find out if there was a scam being played out, i could put 100 thousand on the sharks to beat Parramatta, next year. What would that mean, they beat them this year. I recall the game, the shark crowd went ballistic, cheers.
Cotton McKnight said | December 10th 2009 @ 12:28pm | Report comment
oikee, you said we need betting. Could you explain what you mean by this? I’ll be up front, I don’t like gambling much, I’ve seen too many people, personally, that have had real problems with it, doing real damage. But I can also see the fun in putting on a bet. I am not trying to ban it. But I am concerned that as A sponsor to NRL and channel nine, the promotion of it make me a bit uncomfortable. Peter Sterling and Rabs telling us the ongoing odds, but making sure we bet responsibly.
Mick from Giralang said | December 10th 2009 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
Spot on Cotton. I find the personal endorsement of betting during the match commentary sickening. Sterling of all people would know the misery that current and ex footballers, not to mention ordinary punters, have suffered through addiction to gambling.
Steve, I agree with the thrust of your article but I think the Roosters accusations have been overblown. Glenn Munsie from Sportsbet is on the record as saying they had no problems with the match against the Cowboys. An NRL investigation also found nothing wrong. Much of the SMH article which laid the original accusations against the Roosters has subsequently been debunked.
None of that of course means the game can afford to be complacent about the impact of betting. There have been well publicised betting scandals involving the AFL and soccer in recent years and rugby league is not immune from the same sort of risks.
oikee said | December 10th 2009 @ 3:13pm | Report comment
And Mick, one thing mate, i am not having a go at you, but i was one of those gamblers, and nearly lost my house and marriage over it at the time. It does not effect me these adds , or probably many of the millions of gamblers out there. I was one, i do know.
I learnt my lesson, and now own my own home, paid for, so its up to the individual, same applies to drugs mate. You stick that needle in your arm, hey, you took that choice, nobody forced you. So dont let guilt of humanity run you into the ground, as long as you are a good person, be happy. Cheers mate.
Mick from Giralang said | December 10th 2009 @ 3:57pm | Report comment
Agree with you Oikee, I have a mate whose life was shattered by gambling addiction unfortunately he has yet to turn things around like you have. I am not suggesting rugby league should end its association with gambling completely after all it’s a legal activity and gamblign and sport have gone together since day one. It just annoys the hell out of me that they’re using the commentary team to push the envelope during games.
oikee said | December 10th 2009 @ 5:02pm | Report comment
Yes, i watch alot of rugby league on Fox, so Sterlo dont really bother me, what bothers me is getting a fix of anything rugby league in the off season.
Anyhow, this might cheer us up, love this video. Enjoy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_slM5Hmsp6g
The Answer said | December 10th 2009 @ 10:58pm | Report comment
Sterlo still appears on Fox as they take the Nine feed on those games.
The problem with Sterlo and Rabs punting tips (apart from the fact they come from dreadful punters) seem to be more down to the Channel Nine production decisions rather than betting per se.
Steve Kaless said | December 10th 2009 @ 9:22pm | Report comment
Cotton, I agree I found the advertising of the running odds during the game quite off. Interestingly, according to Sportsbet those ‘ads’ from Rabs and Sterlo don’t actually increase the bet in play market much at all, but just the brand awareness, so surely there must be a strong arument on the ‘why bother’ front.
Sadly like cotton jerseys the days of watching a match without being bombarded by odds are probably behind us.
oikee said | December 10th 2009 @ 1:22pm | Report comment
OK, we dont need betting, but people do bet on games. So putting some money back into your code from these proceeds seems ok in this world we live. As for Gambling, i am with you, i dont even bet on the Melbourne cup. We all have choice, you just sometimes have to learn the hard way, if you get what i mean. ? Yes, i gave up gambling about 15 years ago.
Bet responsibly, true, but does not work for some people. I also learnt the hard way. Part of lifes lessons. I for one know the evils of gambling, so i am on your side, but still does not stop the government from reaping profits from betting.
oikee said | December 10th 2009 @ 3:00pm | Report comment
Well quite frankly i dont know why you guys are carrying on about betting, mate, what are we doing here , ? trying to save the world from gambling, the government indorses gambling, The USA allows for Poppy growing in Afganistan, the Chinese government allows for a 100 ton quota of ivory into china, we all beleived bush about weapons of mass destruction, and we let our kids go to schoolies week. ???
Gambling is one of lifes painful reminders of why we are human. Along with every other evil. Lets not turn this into a save the world , when we can’t even endorse a engine emmisions program which is compulsary in England, and europe, now who’s talking about saving the last 1500 tigers in the wild, ???? You want to save them, put them in a zoo. Even then, we will read a report how the guards smuggled them out for a nice price tag. Remember 1 thing, we all have lust and greed before us, its up to the individual to say no. Your the one with duty of care, to yourself and others, but your not responsible for there doings.
Hope that answered your question fully Cotton, i really did not have time before, was off to the bank to cancel a evil, my credit card.
Tifosi said | December 10th 2009 @ 4:57pm | Report comment
Leave the betting.
But no betting ads, no commentators telling me odds either. You think seeing rabbits and sterlo talking odds are bad, hearing Richie Benaud say it at the cricket must be the worst thing i have seen on tv.
In conclusion betting yes, advertising the betting during games. NO.
Justin said | December 10th 2009 @ 9:16pm | Report comment
Spot on, those that want a bet (me!) should be entitled too but I dont need it rammed down my throat every 30 secs
AndyRoo said | December 14th 2009 @ 4:45pm | Report comment
Yeh I think this should be a case for self regulation. The betting agencies should pick up on this mood and keep it more low key, if they go over the top their will be a ground swell against them and they will cop legislation like tobacco. Just because they are currently allowed to do something desn’t mean they should.
The HAL does a bit at half time where the normal commentators give you the half time price, I think thats as far as it should go, no need to talk about it when the game is on.
Justin said | December 14th 2009 @ 4:54pm | Report comment
Watching the NZ v Pak cricket Test and I would love to bet that some of the comms have had a bet on the match! Refer to prices every 30mins or so and you can tell who has backed what outcome just by listening to their passion for the way the game is developing at different times. Quite funny really.