<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Zealand punches well above its weight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/</link>
	<description>Your Sports Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:27:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Siva Samoa</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-276272</link>
		<dc:creator>Siva Samoa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 01:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-276272</guid>
		<description>I think those numbers are wrong. 140,279 are the numbers of rugby players who played the game in all level in NZ .
The 183,310 in rugby union and 423,584 in rugby league in Australia is the participation numbers which include kids attending coaching clinics and after school activities , There is no way that Australia has 423,584 rugby league players playing the game at all levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think those numbers are wrong. 140,279 are the numbers of rugby players who played the game in all level in NZ .<br />
The 183,310 in rugby union and 423,584 in rugby league in Australia is the participation numbers which include kids attending coaching clinics and after school activities , There is no way that Australia has 423,584 rugby league players playing the game at all levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-271006</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 02:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-271006</guid>
		<description>That survey specifically isn&#039;t a measure of registered players. It merely asks what people do for physical activity and it only requires them to have done an activity once in the last 12 months to qualfy. You&#039;re not comparing apples with apples. When you do compare registered adult players (and indeed overall registered players of all ages) Aus has more than NZ. 

If you could link to a study done in Aus with the same methodology perhaps you could make a similar point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That survey specifically isn&#8217;t a measure of registered players. It merely asks what people do for physical activity and it only requires them to have done an activity once in the last 12 months to qualfy. You&#8217;re not comparing apples with apples. When you do compare registered adult players (and indeed overall registered players of all ages) Aus has more than NZ. </p>
<p>If you could link to a study done in Aus with the same methodology perhaps you could make a similar point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-270959</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 01:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-270959</guid>
		<description>All numbers are for all ages. All are organised forms of the game as well (as opposed to random games in the back-yard). I don&#039;t think the ARU have accurate figures for womans rugby, apart from that I think all the figures are pretty accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All numbers are for all ages. All are organised forms of the game as well (as opposed to random games in the back-yard). I don&#8217;t think the ARU have accurate figures for womans rugby, apart from that I think all the figures are pretty accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave1</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-270600</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-270600</guid>
		<description>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sport_in_New_Zealand

&quot;.....Participation in Sport&quot; states that 158,100 New Zealand adults participated in Rugby Union in the previous twelve months ......&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sport_in_New_Zealand" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sport_in_New_Zealand</a></p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;..Participation in Sport&#8221; states that 158,100 New Zealand adults participated in Rugby Union in the previous twelve months &#8230;&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-270596</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 07:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-270596</guid>
		<description>Those numbers aren&#039;t for adults in NZ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those numbers aren&#8217;t for adults in NZ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave1</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-270507</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-270507</guid>
		<description>Those figures show a participating figure for adults playing rugby in New Zealand.
 
The Australian figure is for all ages because according to the ARU annual report in 2008

http://www.rugby.com.au/aru/images/aru_annual_report_2008_revised_reduced.pdf

37,179 adults played Rugby in Australia

Their are a lot more rugby players in New Zealand hence their great success at the game</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those figures show a participating figure for adults playing rugby in New Zealand.</p>
<p>The Australian figure is for all ages because according to the ARU annual report in 2008</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rugby.com.au/aru/images/aru_annual_report_2008_revised_reduced.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.rugby.com.au/aru/images/aru_annual_report_2008_revised_reduced.pdf</a></p>
<p>37,179 adults played Rugby in Australia</p>
<p>Their are a lot more rugby players in New Zealand hence their great success at the game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohtani's jacket</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-270499</link>
		<dc:creator>ohtani's jacket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 02:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-270499</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a subject I spend a lot of time thinking about. I&#039;d just like some examples to see whether I agree with them or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a subject I spend a lot of time thinking about. I&#8217;d just like some examples to see whether I agree with them or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-269820</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-269820</guid>
		<description>I reckon it&#039;s more to do with diplomatic etiquette myself.  Canada and the US also send out their fireys so in that respect they are also our mates, no more or no less than NZ are anyway.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reckon it&#8217;s more to do with diplomatic etiquette myself.  Canada and the US also send out their fireys so in that respect they are also our mates, no more or no less than NZ are anyway.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katzilla</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-269816</link>
		<dc:creator>katzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 05:04:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-269816</guid>
		<description>&#039;No worries about the Jo Blakes etc however we are again up aginst it re. the fires&#039;

Don&#039;t worry repub, if the fires get out of control like last last year then you can be sure NZ will send over fire fighters to help...................thats just what mates do ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;No worries about the Jo Blakes etc however we are again up aginst it re. the fires&#8217;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry repub, if the fires get out of control like last last year then you can be sure NZ will send over fire fighters to help&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.thats just what mates do <img src='http://cdn0.theroar.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-269718</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-269718</guid>
		<description>OJ

So are you saying we are the same culturally -  then why are you not a state if that&#039;s the case?

The differneces are too numerouse to expound on here but if you knew your history it shoud be obvious i would have thought

Ora

No not all.  Much of what I have expressed here is in fact a widely held sentiment amongst Australians, it&#039;s just that most Ozzies are way to polite to air it.

Hate is a strong word but then NZers should know more about that emotion, since NZ holds a collectively obsessive disdain of all things Ozzie.  You are indeed a constant source of bemusemnt to us posumms, since on one hand you spend an inordinate amount of time piously deriding this country and it&#039;s people, all the while coveting everything about us. 

When rarely challenged over this affliction of national proportion, you simply spit the dummy, villifying the messenger rather than taking any of it on board.; truth be told, you mob spend way too much energy scrutinising Australia when you would be well advised to start putting your own house in order. 

No worries about the Jo Blakes etc however we are again up aginst it re. the fires.

Good day and good luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OJ</p>
<p>So are you saying we are the same culturally &#8211;  then why are you not a state if that&#8217;s the case?</p>
<p>The differneces are too numerouse to expound on here but if you knew your history it shoud be obvious i would have thought</p>
<p>Ora</p>
<p>No not all.  Much of what I have expressed here is in fact a widely held sentiment amongst Australians, it&#8217;s just that most Ozzies are way to polite to air it.</p>
<p>Hate is a strong word but then NZers should know more about that emotion, since NZ holds a collectively obsessive disdain of all things Ozzie.  You are indeed a constant source of bemusemnt to us posumms, since on one hand you spend an inordinate amount of time piously deriding this country and it&#8217;s people, all the while coveting everything about us. </p>
<p>When rarely challenged over this affliction of national proportion, you simply spit the dummy, villifying the messenger rather than taking any of it on board.; truth be told, you mob spend way too much energy scrutinising Australia when you would be well advised to start putting your own house in order. </p>
<p>No worries about the Jo Blakes etc however we are again up aginst it re. the fires.</p>
<p>Good day and good luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ohtani's jacket</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-269368</link>
		<dc:creator>ohtani's jacket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-269368</guid>
		<description>What is this overt and public display of NZ patriotism/nationalism? What do you call Australia day?

What&#039;s the difference between New Zealanders and Australians culturally?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is this overt and public display of NZ patriotism/nationalism? What do you call Australia day?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s the difference between New Zealanders and Australians culturally?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-1/#comment-269331</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 13:10:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-269331</guid>
		<description>and the wallabies have won more union world cups.
and more league world cups.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and the wallabies have won more union world cups.<br />
and more league world cups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ora</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-269251</link>
		<dc:creator>Ora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-269251</guid>
		<description>I would say Republican that you are a an embarassment to many Australians, your loathing and deep seated hatred for new Zealand is so obvious.

What I&#039;d say is don&#039;t hate us because your not us!!!

have a good evening mate I hope the snakes and spiders dont bite</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say Republican that you are a an embarassment to many Australians, your loathing and deep seated hatred for new Zealand is so obvious.</p>
<p>What I&#8217;d say is don&#8217;t hate us because your not us!!!</p>
<p>have a good evening mate I hope the snakes and spiders dont bite</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-269241</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:47:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-269241</guid>
		<description>Katzilla

If i happened to know you, yes then i reckon we potentially could be mates.

Our countries are not &#039;matey&#039; in that respect and I am sure you know exactly what I am trying to convey here.

I like your style however, cobber, digger blue....

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katzilla</p>
<p>If i happened to know you, yes then i reckon we potentially could be mates.</p>
<p>Our countries are not &#8216;matey&#8217; in that respect and I am sure you know exactly what I am trying to convey here.</p>
<p>I like your style however, cobber, digger blue&#8230;.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katzilla</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-269196</link>
		<dc:creator>katzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 07:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-269196</guid>
		<description>&#039;I tire of this misplaced sentiment that says we are best mates, we are not mates at all.&#039;

Speak for yourself &#039;Mate&#039; ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;I tire of this misplaced sentiment that says we are best mates, we are not mates at all.&#8217;</p>
<p>Speak for yourself &#8216;Mate&#8217; <img src='http://cdn0.theroar.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-268956</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 01:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268956</guid>
		<description>Jaredsbro

Conversely the Amin of League in NZ is very ordinary from what many are saying however this has NOT rendered NZ un competitive with Oz, on the contrary I would say Kiwis are superior in League presently, especially considering their playing numbers, admin, structural apparatus and grass roots.  

So how does that explain Unions lack of pedigree in Oz?  I still maintain this has much to do with where it sits in the national sporting psyche, which is very low compared to other codes.  NZ are still devout in their support of Union which does translate to  how they perform compared to Oz.  There is absolutely no doubting that Union is huge proportionately speaking in NZ, compared to Australia and I maintain that is the difference.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaredsbro</p>
<p>Conversely the Amin of League in NZ is very ordinary from what many are saying however this has NOT rendered NZ un competitive with Oz, on the contrary I would say Kiwis are superior in League presently, especially considering their playing numbers, admin, structural apparatus and grass roots.  </p>
<p>So how does that explain Unions lack of pedigree in Oz?  I still maintain this has much to do with where it sits in the national sporting psyche, which is very low compared to other codes.  NZ are still devout in their support of Union which does translate to  how they perform compared to Oz.  There is absolutely no doubting that Union is huge proportionately speaking in NZ, compared to Australia and I maintain that is the difference.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-268936</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2009 00:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268936</guid>
		<description>The referance I made to patriotism was something I read in a very credible periodical that is dedicated to Australian social commentary, as opposed to some half baked googled poll.

This was actually referring to Australia&#039;s lack of &#039;overt&#039; patriotism, drawing analogies with countries that display their patriotism/ nationalism in a more public manner.  The usual suspects graced this list of around twenty countries including the U.S, Norway, Korea, a few European and Middle Eastern countries and to my suprise NZ, which was in the top five to ten from memory.

I am not privvy to the methodology or criteria used in producing this particular list  however I do respect the credibility of this publication and have been going through my back issues, in the hope of offering further referance in this respect.

I have no doubt we Australians are a patriotic mob, that was not the issue here,  however what should be realised is that there exists cultural nuances that influence the ways in which patriotism is experienced and acted out. 

NZ are a small country that punch above their weight in a sporting sense with a cultural profile to match, which can be attributed to an overt patriotic desire to be noticed despite this.  For a country of only 5mill they certainly are ubiquitously in the worlds face and far from being the demure collective they inwardly profess to be.

Can I also reitterate that Australia and NZ are NOT the same culturally and it is about time that those on both sides of the ditch accepted this.  I tire of this misplaced sentiment that says we are best mates, we are not mates at all.  We are countires that share some quite looosley connected historic ties to England and we happen to be geopgraphically close.  

For the main part we simply tolerate each other out of some sort of P.C. obligation which can be attributed to such dated institutions as ANZAC.  This is an alliance of mythical proportion that has little relevance to the  NZ or Australia of the 21st Century and as stated in a previous post, harbours some pious resentment from the Kiwi perspective, which should be no suprise to us really.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The referance I made to patriotism was something I read in a very credible periodical that is dedicated to Australian social commentary, as opposed to some half baked googled poll.</p>
<p>This was actually referring to Australia&#8217;s lack of &#8216;overt&#8217; patriotism, drawing analogies with countries that display their patriotism/ nationalism in a more public manner.  The usual suspects graced this list of around twenty countries including the U.S, Norway, Korea, a few European and Middle Eastern countries and to my suprise NZ, which was in the top five to ten from memory.</p>
<p>I am not privvy to the methodology or criteria used in producing this particular list  however I do respect the credibility of this publication and have been going through my back issues, in the hope of offering further referance in this respect.</p>
<p>I have no doubt we Australians are a patriotic mob, that was not the issue here,  however what should be realised is that there exists cultural nuances that influence the ways in which patriotism is experienced and acted out. </p>
<p>NZ are a small country that punch above their weight in a sporting sense with a cultural profile to match, which can be attributed to an overt patriotic desire to be noticed despite this.  For a country of only 5mill they certainly are ubiquitously in the worlds face and far from being the demure collective they inwardly profess to be.</p>
<p>Can I also reitterate that Australia and NZ are NOT the same culturally and it is about time that those on both sides of the ditch accepted this.  I tire of this misplaced sentiment that says we are best mates, we are not mates at all.  We are countires that share some quite looosley connected historic ties to England and we happen to be geopgraphically close.  </p>
<p>For the main part we simply tolerate each other out of some sort of P.C. obligation which can be attributed to such dated institutions as ANZAC.  This is an alliance of mythical proportion that has little relevance to the  NZ or Australia of the 21st Century and as stated in a previous post, harbours some pious resentment from the Kiwi perspective, which should be no suprise to us really.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick from Giralang</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-268740</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick from Giralang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 21:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268740</guid>
		<description>Might have something to do with the % of maori and islander players that make up the population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Might have something to do with the % of maori and islander players that make up the population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katzilla</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-268727</link>
		<dc:creator>katzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268727</guid>
		<description>&#039;Kiwis are in fact quite resentful of the attention Oz commands through ANZAC compared to them as with just about anything else you care to mention.&#039;

The only people that give Australia more attention in the ANZAC legacy are Australians.
And when I say that, I don&#039;t mean the actually soldiers who can call themselves ANZACs, every Australian vet i&#039;ve spoken to is immediate in their respect for the NZ soldiers they fought with once they find out im a Kiwi.
That same respect isn&#039;t carried on by the Australian ANZAC day PR machine.
Everyday NZers give due respect to the contribution of our brothers across the Tasman, it is most definately not the other way round.
Its not resentment, its respect and the expectation that the same respect is reciprocated.

You can&#039;t spell ANZAC without NZ, likewise with Australia.
Although NZAC looks better on paper then AAC ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Kiwis are in fact quite resentful of the attention Oz commands through ANZAC compared to them as with just about anything else you care to mention.&#8217;</p>
<p>The only people that give Australia more attention in the ANZAC legacy are Australians.<br />
And when I say that, I don&#8217;t mean the actually soldiers who can call themselves ANZACs, every Australian vet i&#8217;ve spoken to is immediate in their respect for the NZ soldiers they fought with once they find out im a Kiwi.<br />
That same respect isn&#8217;t carried on by the Australian ANZAC day PR machine.<br />
Everyday NZers give due respect to the contribution of our brothers across the Tasman, it is most definately not the other way round.<br />
Its not resentment, its respect and the expectation that the same respect is reciprocated.</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t spell ANZAC without NZ, likewise with Australia.<br />
Although NZAC looks better on paper then AAC <img src='http://cdn0.theroar.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-268585</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268585</guid>
		<description>rugbyfuture

All I can say is this is a tired and overstated sentiment fueled by years of politically exploitive pathos.  Kiwis are in fact quite resentful of the attention Oz commands through ANZAC compared to them as with just about anything else you care to mention.

They have certainly come out of the woodwork again here.

Good night and good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rugbyfuture</p>
<p>All I can say is this is a tired and overstated sentiment fueled by years of politically exploitive pathos.  Kiwis are in fact quite resentful of the attention Oz commands through ANZAC compared to them as with just about anything else you care to mention.</p>
<p>They have certainly come out of the woodwork again here.</p>
<p>Good night and good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaredsbro</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-268578</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaredsbro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268578</guid>
		<description>Nah uh, wrong again Republican. It&#039;s not about the strength of the elite showponies it is mostly about the grassroots when it comes to the strength of a country&#039;s sporting machine. Sure you&#039;ve got to win medals/WCs ever so often or Premierships if you follow one of those unilateral sports, but essentially sport is about having strong grassroots. Of course if one&#039;s measure of sporting achievement is sporting glory my above statement is irrelevant, but if sporting success is largely cultural as I presume it is, the overall apparatus needs to be examined. Now Australia hasn&#039;t got the strongest roots in RU it seems but the numbers of people playing indicate that the problem is the administrators fault first and popular opinion/the media&#039;s opinion second.

Sam, yeah I definitely agree that there is some factor we&#039;re not taking account of...like maybe the demographics of RU in Australia, they are much the same as NZers Cricketers, ie they have a North Shore Mentality. Ambitous on the surface (ie so they can fit in with their trendy team mates) but not too much deeper they have an mentality of entitlement, believing that they&#039;re owed much and that to get what they want they must only try as hard as is required of them, not willing to go any further than that. Sorry for the generalisations but the parallels between the Rugbies is barking up the wrong tree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah uh, wrong again Republican. It&#8217;s not about the strength of the elite showponies it is mostly about the grassroots when it comes to the strength of a country&#8217;s sporting machine. Sure you&#8217;ve got to win medals/WCs ever so often or Premierships if you follow one of those unilateral sports, but essentially sport is about having strong grassroots. Of course if one&#8217;s measure of sporting achievement is sporting glory my above statement is irrelevant, but if sporting success is largely cultural as I presume it is, the overall apparatus needs to be examined. Now Australia hasn&#8217;t got the strongest roots in RU it seems but the numbers of people playing indicate that the problem is the administrators fault first and popular opinion/the media&#8217;s opinion second.</p>
<p>Sam, yeah I definitely agree that there is some factor we&#8217;re not taking account of&#8230;like maybe the demographics of RU in Australia, they are much the same as NZers Cricketers, ie they have a North Shore Mentality. Ambitous on the surface (ie so they can fit in with their trendy team mates) but not too much deeper they have an mentality of entitlement, believing that they&#8217;re owed much and that to get what they want they must only try as hard as is required of them, not willing to go any further than that. Sorry for the generalisations but the parallels between the Rugbies is barking up the wrong tree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaredsbro</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-1/#comment-268573</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaredsbro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268573</guid>
		<description>Wrong again. Sailing is not a mainstream sport, it is perceived to many be big (dirty) business and the media (even TV One, the provider of coverage for the America&#039;s Cup etc seems to be tuning in to the rumblings out there) thus people are losing interest. 

Also Republican to artificially-inseminate (pardon the lowly agricultural analogy ;) ) a sporting culture that has never existed before and cannot hope to attain mainstream appeal is to deny the culture that has gone before. One wise man once said to me that the reason Australia are so good at Cricket is not your shrewdness in terms of your talent rosters, but the weight of tradition/legacies. Same apparently applies to Baseball in the US (particularly the Yankee half of NY) but my point is that by creating new cultures the end result cheapens the overall measure of success.

The DNA argument is becoming less and less valid. But y&#039;know it is quite convenient isn&#039;t it, if your people were convicts and your family line&#039;s been free for generations...that the toughness they needed to cope is somehow transferred to you Aussies ten generations or so later ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong again. Sailing is not a mainstream sport, it is perceived to many be big (dirty) business and the media (even TV One, the provider of coverage for the America&#8217;s Cup etc seems to be tuning in to the rumblings out there) thus people are losing interest. </p>
<p>Also Republican to artificially-inseminate (pardon the lowly agricultural analogy <img src='http://cdn0.theroar.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) a sporting culture that has never existed before and cannot hope to attain mainstream appeal is to deny the culture that has gone before. One wise man once said to me that the reason Australia are so good at Cricket is not your shrewdness in terms of your talent rosters, but the weight of tradition/legacies. Same apparently applies to Baseball in the US (particularly the Yankee half of NY) but my point is that by creating new cultures the end result cheapens the overall measure of success.</p>
<p>The DNA argument is becoming less and less valid. But y&#8217;know it is quite convenient isn&#8217;t it, if your people were convicts and your family line&#8217;s been free for generations&#8230;that the toughness they needed to cope is somehow transferred to you Aussies ten generations or so later <img src='http://cdn0.theroar.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaredsbro</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-1/#comment-268570</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaredsbro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268570</guid>
		<description>True, but swimming is not a sport that is pereceived to be mainstream...but Rowing now is. It&#039;s just the system Australia should be using and clipping the AOC&#039;s ears every few years to keep it/them/Coates in check. The reality is not actually determined by results exactly but what is perceived to be the most popular sports. Thus RL lost out with its drop in numbers, I believe Soccer&#039;s now more funded than it has been (Men and Women). The problem tho is that just like in OZ the media has a huge part to play in the popularity (perceived or just plain hallucinagenic) of a sport/sports.

But participation rates are not good enough as otherwise the RL situation could/will happen all over again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, but swimming is not a sport that is pereceived to be mainstream&#8230;but Rowing now is. It&#8217;s just the system Australia should be using and clipping the AOC&#8217;s ears every few years to keep it/them/Coates in check. The reality is not actually determined by results exactly but what is perceived to be the most popular sports. Thus RL lost out with its drop in numbers, I believe Soccer&#8217;s now more funded than it has been (Men and Women). The problem tho is that just like in OZ the media has a huge part to play in the popularity (perceived or just plain hallucinagenic) of a sport/sports.</p>
<p>But participation rates are not good enough as otherwise the RL situation could/will happen all over again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaredsbro</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-1/#comment-268564</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaredsbro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 09:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268564</guid>
		<description>Is that more of your tripe Republican there, or is it just an underhanded compliment? ;) You&#039;ve got a real anti-Kiwi streak mate, and in spite of what you think we Kiwis don&#039;t hate you Aussies. We do however resort to stereotypes, just like you guys do!!!!

Also I doubt Aussies are less Nationalistic and I&#039;m certain enough to bank on my soon-to-be CC home ( :) ) that you Aussies care more bout sport than us. And your Govt actually gets involved in sport, which would be a travesty here. Oh wait I should add pumping in X number of dollars to see your nation perform at the Olympics, whereas we just pay to have big tournies played here (sounds a bit like the Melburnians personally)

As I stated on my last attack of your posts Republican, NZ is actuallt known worldwide more for our landscape than for any cultural prowess (and yes sport is actually a thing of culture... :o)

Oh and the reason we&#039;re in the NRL and will probably have an AFL team one day is because we&#039;re family, also we&#039;re a &quot;State&quot; that could be called bellweather if it were in the US. We like what is good and we trash what is bad more often than not. Making us a good guide as to what sports/cultural texts a la Packed to the Rafters have a wide appeal (which rated really well here in spite of the often overly Nationalistic jingoism which is the usual for Aussie TV programs that we get a la Sea Patrol) And we also tend to do things across the entire nation (tho RL might not apply here)

Mate reading your last paragraphs it&#039;s obvious you won&#039;t like it when a NZ-descended PM comes to rule the roost in OZ, which seems more likely now. Your rhetoric of competing nation states etc is actually a generation or two too old, as more NZers go over to OZ there will be an increasing flow of capital (financial but also Social-Cultural aswell)

Also in spite of what you think we do have a slightly different cultural millieu than the one you espouse, largely the fact that we are apparently quite a learned people at least in terms of the Anglosphere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that more of your tripe Republican there, or is it just an underhanded compliment? <img src='http://cdn0.theroar.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  You&#8217;ve got a real anti-Kiwi streak mate, and in spite of what you think we Kiwis don&#8217;t hate you Aussies. We do however resort to stereotypes, just like you guys do!!!!</p>
<p>Also I doubt Aussies are less Nationalistic and I&#8217;m certain enough to bank on my soon-to-be CC home ( <img src='http://cdn0.theroar.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) that you Aussies care more bout sport than us. And your Govt actually gets involved in sport, which would be a travesty here. Oh wait I should add pumping in X number of dollars to see your nation perform at the Olympics, whereas we just pay to have big tournies played here (sounds a bit like the Melburnians personally)</p>
<p>As I stated on my last attack of your posts Republican, NZ is actuallt known worldwide more for our landscape than for any cultural prowess (and yes sport is actually a thing of culture&#8230; <img src='http://cdn1.theroar.com.au/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':o' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
<p>Oh and the reason we&#8217;re in the NRL and will probably have an AFL team one day is because we&#8217;re family, also we&#8217;re a &#8220;State&#8221; that could be called bellweather if it were in the US. We like what is good and we trash what is bad more often than not. Making us a good guide as to what sports/cultural texts a la Packed to the Rafters have a wide appeal (which rated really well here in spite of the often overly Nationalistic jingoism which is the usual for Aussie TV programs that we get a la Sea Patrol) And we also tend to do things across the entire nation (tho RL might not apply here)</p>
<p>Mate reading your last paragraphs it&#8217;s obvious you won&#8217;t like it when a NZ-descended PM comes to rule the roost in OZ, which seems more likely now. Your rhetoric of competing nation states etc is actually a generation or two too old, as more NZers go over to OZ there will be an increasing flow of capital (financial but also Social-Cultural aswell)</p>
<p>Also in spite of what you think we do have a slightly different cultural millieu than the one you espouse, largely the fact that we are apparently quite a learned people at least in terms of the Anglosphere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siva Samoa</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-268541</link>
		<dc:creator>Siva Samoa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 08:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268541</guid>
		<description>NZ didn&#039;t have the NPC 40 yéars ago but théy did háve intér próvincial and ranfurly shield games among the proviñce.
NZ rugby league team is doing well because all of its players play in the Australian rugby league competition (NRL)  and Superleague. The All Blacks are home grown players playing their rugby in ÑZ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NZ didn&#8217;t have the NPC 40 yéars ago but théy did háve intér próvincial and ranfurly shield games among the proviñce.<br />
NZ rugby league team is doing well because all of its players play in the Australian rugby league competition (NRL)  and Superleague. The All Blacks are home grown players playing their rugby in ÑZ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katzilla</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-1/#comment-268437</link>
		<dc:creator>katzilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:42:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268437</guid>
		<description>&#039;however even landlocked countries are now competing on the WSC these days, because they have the $’s that allow them the mobility to pursue such whimsical luxury.&#039;

Your right I think money (depending how much) can cancel out every type of enviromental advantage.
Just need to look at the Americas Cup - How a landlocked country won that? Buy out the other teams sailors and go for gold.
Americas cup bought. As you say NZ will always do well because alot of people (not that many but more then alot of countries) have access to sailing.

But of course Money should always lose out to Money + Enviromental advantages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;however even landlocked countries are now competing on the WSC these days, because they have the $’s that allow them the mobility to pursue such whimsical luxury.&#8217;</p>
<p>Your right I think money (depending how much) can cancel out every type of enviromental advantage.<br />
Just need to look at the Americas Cup &#8211; How a landlocked country won that? Buy out the other teams sailors and go for gold.<br />
Americas cup bought. As you say NZ will always do well because alot of people (not that many but more then alot of countries) have access to sailing.</p>
<p>But of course Money should always lose out to Money + Enviromental advantages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-268414</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 04:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268414</guid>
		<description>Yet they manage to be more than competitive with Oz in League despite this. 

Is this inherent to their DNA, that they seem somehow predisposed to play the thugby codes with such aplomb? 

I actually believe the Polynesian physique is well suited to both League and Union.   The % of Maori and Islander players that make up the bulk of respective Kiwi national rugby sides is quite compelling indeed.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet they manage to be more than competitive with Oz in League despite this. </p>
<p>Is this inherent to their DNA, that they seem somehow predisposed to play the thugby codes with such aplomb? </p>
<p>I actually believe the Polynesian physique is well suited to both League and Union.   The % of Maori and Islander players that make up the bulk of respective Kiwi national rugby sides is quite compelling indeed.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-268398</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268398</guid>
		<description>I agree the quality of rugby in NZ is definitely higher. However an extra 40,000 players in Australia? That is significant. But the winning record of the All Blacks over Australia is pretty massive even when the quality and organisation of the NPC is taken into account. They didn&#039;t even have an NPC 40 years ago, and the record was just as good back then. I&#039;m just putting the stats up here, not trying to find a reason why NZ has a high winning percentage though. 

I don&#039;t know about Leagues growth in NZ, when looking up those statistics I found the SPARC report on the NZRL. It makes for pretty sober reading. Doesn&#039;t give one great confidence in the admin of league in NZ. The state of the game, from an administrative point of view, is just shocking. It would be interesting to see what a little support from the ARL would do for the NZRL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree the quality of rugby in NZ is definitely higher. However an extra 40,000 players in Australia? That is significant. But the winning record of the All Blacks over Australia is pretty massive even when the quality and organisation of the NPC is taken into account. They didn&#8217;t even have an NPC 40 years ago, and the record was just as good back then. I&#8217;m just putting the stats up here, not trying to find a reason why NZ has a high winning percentage though. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know about Leagues growth in NZ, when looking up those statistics I found the SPARC report on the NZRL. It makes for pretty sober reading. Doesn&#8217;t give one great confidence in the admin of league in NZ. The state of the game, from an administrative point of view, is just shocking. It would be interesting to see what a little support from the ARL would do for the NZRL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-268384</link>
		<dc:creator>Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268384</guid>
		<description>Sam

Not only is Union far greater on a per cap basis in NZ but so too is the quality of it&#039;s domestic comps so in this respect, Australian Union numbers are quite misleading.  The structure of our domestic comps and the limited demographic from which we derive our playing elite need to also be considered.  We have two WC&#039;s to our name which is incredible when compared to the expectation and pedigree of NZ Union no matter what the stats.

As far as League goes, I would have to say that Australia should be extremely concerned because League in NZ, if taken seriously, would decimate Australia&#039;s status without a shadow of a doubt.  Australian League has for too long been the big fish in a very small pond.  

Now the ARL are about to experience decades of eating humble pie me thinks, courtesy of the Kiwis and a benevolence in being the catalyst to Leagues growth in that country.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sam</p>
<p>Not only is Union far greater on a per cap basis in NZ but so too is the quality of it&#8217;s domestic comps so in this respect, Australian Union numbers are quite misleading.  The structure of our domestic comps and the limited demographic from which we derive our playing elite need to also be considered.  We have two WC&#8217;s to our name which is incredible when compared to the expectation and pedigree of NZ Union no matter what the stats.</p>
<p>As far as League goes, I would have to say that Australia should be extremely concerned because League in NZ, if taken seriously, would decimate Australia&#8217;s status without a shadow of a doubt.  Australian League has for too long been the big fish in a very small pond.  </p>
<p>Now the ARL are about to experience decades of eating humble pie me thinks, courtesy of the Kiwis and a benevolence in being the catalyst to Leagues growth in that country.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://www.theroar.com.au/2009/12/15/new-zealand-punches-well-above-its-weight/comment-page-2/#comment-268333</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theroar.com.au/?p=26287#comment-268333</guid>
		<description>With the help of google I found some more interesting statistics. Here are the total participation rates according to the NZRU, ARU, ARL and for NZRL the NZ Sport and Recreation Council (SPARC). Note SPARC did an independent review of NZ Rugby League so their figure is very reliable:

Rugby League in Australia - 423,584
Rugby League in NZ (estimate from SPARC) - 17,000
Rugby union in Australia - 183,310
Rugby union in NZ - 140,279

Note all these figures are for 2008. I find the difference in participation rates between NZ and Australia in league staggering. The problems NZ Rugby League has had over the last couple of years has been covered pretty well in the NZ media but you can see why SPARC was sent in. Pretty incredible that they even come close to beating Australia as often as they do.

As for the rugby union figures, probably kills the myth that more people play rugby in NZ than Australia. On a per capita basis it&#039;s clearly higher but overall it&#039;s not. Comparing the winning record of the All Blacks and Wallabies is quite interesting when you look at participation numbers, one would expect them to be more similar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the help of google I found some more interesting statistics. Here are the total participation rates according to the NZRU, ARU, ARL and for NZRL the NZ Sport and Recreation Council (SPARC). Note SPARC did an independent review of NZ Rugby League so their figure is very reliable:</p>
<p>Rugby League in Australia &#8211; 423,584<br />
Rugby League in NZ (estimate from SPARC) &#8211; 17,000<br />
Rugby union in Australia &#8211; 183,310<br />
Rugby union in NZ &#8211; 140,279</p>
<p>Note all these figures are for 2008. I find the difference in participation rates between NZ and Australia in league staggering. The problems NZ Rugby League has had over the last couple of years has been covered pretty well in the NZ media but you can see why SPARC was sent in. Pretty incredible that they even come close to beating Australia as often as they do.</p>
<p>As for the rugby union figures, probably kills the myth that more people play rugby in NZ than Australia. On a per capita basis it&#8217;s clearly higher but overall it&#8217;s not. Comparing the winning record of the All Blacks and Wallabies is quite interesting when you look at participation numbers, one would expect them to be more similar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 1171/1211 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn1.theroar.com.au

Served from: www.theroar.com.au @ 2012-02-11 04:47:31 -->
