Tensions boil as trio charged over ‘terrible’ incident
By Daniel Brettig, 18 Dec 2009 Daniel Brettig is a Roar Pro
Brad Haddin, Mitchell Johnson and Sulieman Benn have been charged with bringing the game into disrepute after a series of ugly, physical exchanges on day two of the final Test between Australia and the West Indies.
Haddin is believed to have pleaded guilty to the charge, with the official ICC verdicts to follow overnight.
In an episode described as “terrible” by Cricket Australia chairman Jack Clarke, Johnson and Benn initially bumped into each other when Johnson was attempting a run at the WACA ground, and two balls later Haddin became involved.
His verbal provocation of Benn saw the Caribbean spinner threaten to hurl the ball at Haddin, and the Australian ‘keeper’s subsequent words brought tensions to an even higher pitch.
Benn pointed his finger angrily towards Haddin as the players converged at the end of the over, and when Johnson brushed into Benn’s line the pair had a brief shoving match that required intervention by umpire Billy Bowden.
Match referee Chris Broad charged the provocative Haddin, Johnson and Benn under the ICC code of conduct, meaning all could face a fine of up to 50 per cent of their match fees.
West Indies skipper Chris Gayle said Benn had not instigated any of the contact.
“Benn wasn’t involved in that, if you watch the television you saw who made physical contact,” he said.
“We’ll be discussing it with the match referee.” Though he admitted to not seeing the start of the incident, Clarke said any instances of physical contact were “an absolute no no”.
“No one wants to see that, no, it’s terrible,” he said.
“I am not going to prejudge anything. I didn’t see the start of the incident.
“There’s systems to handling matters, it’s got to go through match referees and ICC things before we start getting involved.
“(Physical contact) is an absolute no no, I think we all accept that.”
Broad suspended Indian batsman Gautam Gambhir for making physical contact with Australian allrounder Shane Watson in the third Test at New Delhi in 2008, a decision that was upheld despite an appeal by the BCCI.
Australian batsman Marcus North described Benn as an “unusual” case.
“He’s an unusual guy,” North said.
“This is Test cricket and there’s a contest out there and both teams play it hard and hopefully they don’t cross the line.
“Both teams have played in a pretty good spirit this series and again, it’s a competitive sport.”
© AAP 2012Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.

Bunratty c said | December 18th 2009 @ 10:38am | Report comment
what a load of baloney! Nasty verbal abuse is fine but mild handbag stuff is labelled ‘terrible’ and ‘an absolute no-no’. Give me a break.
Campbell Watts said | December 18th 2009 @ 12:54pm | Report comment
God there’s nothing really in this! But….
If Benn is suspended as I believe he’s been so should Johnson!!!!
Watching the replay you clearly see Johnson move in front of Benn when he’s approaching Hadden – then Johnson does all the pushing – not Benn.
Hadden’s a nigler – what keepers not??
Move on please and lets play ball!
Fisher Price said | December 18th 2009 @ 1:11pm | Report comment
The bigger issue is Johnson’s bowling. I’ve been banging on about it for a couple of years and though many think he justifies his ICC cricketer of the year tag, the Ashes and this series have not proven me wrong. He’s too inconsistent/expensive to be a spearhead.
Last year against NZ he was dreadful, but got that haul against SA in Perth and since then (and further reinforced by his batting returns) people thinks the sun shines out of his posterior.
Since the start of the Ashes he’s been releases the pressure on the batsman more or less every time he comes on and though he has a knack of getting wickets they’re often the result of extravagant shots and coming at quite a cost.
Brett McKay said | December 18th 2009 @ 1:47pm | Report comment
Benn has been handed a 2 ODI suspension, Haddin 25% and Johnson 10% match fee fines…
eric said | December 18th 2009 @ 2:02pm | Report comment
Can’t wait for Roebuck to call for Pontings head over this, ugly australians abusing downtrodden battlers, a la Harbhajan.
No-one expects cricket to be played in silence, but the push and shove is a no-no.
The comments about Johnstons bowling are interesting. He certainly bowls a lot of tripe, but comes up with the odd awkward or unplayable ball, at a lively pace. The ABC commentators claim he is NOT a new ball bowler, but a better first changer. Maybe.
Dave1 said | December 19th 2009 @ 3:38pm | Report comment
you dont need Roebuck when youve got Mike Coward
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,26500749-23209,00.html
“Conduct unbecoming: Brad Haddin inflames delicate situation in Perth……..
…..Brad Haddin inflamed a delicate situation by recklessly brandishing his bat in Benn’s direction. ……
…..Haddin has played the game long enough to understand that players from different cultures interpret actions and gestures in different ways and his pointing of his bat in such a manner was unacceptable…..”
Bunratty c said | December 20th 2009 @ 1:49am | Report comment
now let me get this straight……players touching each other results in fines; however there is no ‘outrage’, no disciplinary action given to bowlers who intentionally barrage batsmen with short balls, usually aiming at their heads/faces and upper body areas? Commentators and ex-fast bowlers chuckle when someone gets hit in the grill or when ‘blood is spilled on the pitch’, usually followed by the bowler feigning concern for the stricken batsman.
Ponting comes in to bat in the 2nd innings and Channel 12 commentators quote ex-fast bowlers unanimously agreeing that Roach should be aiming to hurt Ponting again by trying to hit his injured elbow. This is ‘cricket’? Commentators piously shout that youngsters should not see players laying hands on each other but see no contradiction in players showing real intent to injure?
Dave1 said | December 20th 2009 @ 1:13pm | Report comment
Thats ciricket and thats why batsman wear padding.
Whats Channel 12?
eric said | December 20th 2009 @ 9:42pm | Report comment
That’s right. Bowling fast is quite legal. Push and shove is unnecessary and illegal. Just like tackling hard is legal in rugby, but not around the neck and head. That’s sport, hard play within defined limits. I love it.
Bunratty c said | December 21st 2009 @ 1:08am | Report comment
Dave1/eric….it is the intent to injure that I was making reference to/objecting to. If one of your sons had been hit in the elbow (eg Ponting….from a legitimate fast ball that he took his eyes off….and incidentally, Ponting had no protective padding over this area) and gamely returned to bat after receiving treatment; and you heard a supporter of the bowling team shout out to hit him again (arm, head etc…even though your son was wearing as much protection as possible), would you join in and yell “that’s sport (son), hard play within defined limits. I love it.”
My point is that cricket was not intended to be a contact sport (“Push and shove is unnecessary and illegal”) however, intent to injure is blithely nodded and winked at (and you admit, you love it) and should be stopped before someone is seriously injured/maimed or killed, irrespective of how much “padding” batsmen wear.