Tensions boil as trio charged over ‘terrible’ incident
By Daniel Brettig, 18 Dec 2009 Daniel Brettig is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Australian Cricket, Brad Haddin, Cricket, Mitchell Johnson, Sulieman Benn, West Indies cricket
Related coverage
Brad Haddin, Mitchell Johnson and Sulieman Benn have been charged with bringing the game into disrepute after a series of ugly, physical exchanges on day two of the final Test between Australia and the West Indies.
Haddin is believed to have pleaded guilty to the charge, with the official ICC verdicts to follow overnight.
In an episode described as “terrible” by Cricket Australia chairman Jack Clarke, Johnson and Benn initially bumped into each other when Johnson was attempting a run at the WACA ground, and two balls later Haddin became involved.
His verbal provocation of Benn saw the Caribbean spinner threaten to hurl the ball at Haddin, and the Australian ‘keeper’s subsequent words brought tensions to an even higher pitch.
Benn pointed his finger angrily towards Haddin as the players converged at the end of the over, and when Johnson brushed into Benn’s line the pair had a brief shoving match that required intervention by umpire Billy Bowden.
Match referee Chris Broad charged the provocative Haddin, Johnson and Benn under the ICC code of conduct, meaning all could face a fine of up to 50 per cent of their match fees.
West Indies skipper Chris Gayle said Benn had not instigated any of the contact.
“Benn wasn’t involved in that, if you watch the television you saw who made physical contact,” he said.
“We’ll be discussing it with the match referee.” Though he admitted to not seeing the start of the incident, Clarke said any instances of physical contact were “an absolute no no”.
“No one wants to see that, no, it’s terrible,” he said.
“I am not going to prejudge anything. I didn’t see the start of the incident.
“There’s systems to handling matters, it’s got to go through match referees and ICC things before we start getting involved.
“(Physical contact) is an absolute no no, I think we all accept that.”
Broad suspended Indian batsman Gautam Gambhir for making physical contact with Australian allrounder Shane Watson in the third Test at New Delhi in 2008, a decision that was upheld despite an appeal by the BCCI.
Australian batsman Marcus North described Benn as an “unusual” case.
“He’s an unusual guy,” North said.
“This is Test cricket and there’s a contest out there and both teams play it hard and hopefully they don’t cross the line.
“Both teams have played in a pretty good spirit this series and again, it’s a competitive sport.”
© AAP 2012Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.


December 21st 2009 @ 7:43am
eric said | December 21st 2009 @ 7:43am | Report comment
Bunratty, Ponting had the choice to stay “retired hurt”. By returning to bat he made a statement that he was up for it, no quarter asked for. Just as Rick McCosker did years ago. If my son was captain of Australia, and one of the best batsmen in the world, I certainly wouldn’t be asking bowlers to go easy on him. This is Test cricket.
December 21st 2009 @ 8:34am
Bunratty c said | December 21st 2009 @ 8:34am | Report comment
Eric, you missed my point (perhaps I stated it clumsily). The injured ‘son’ I was referring to was one who was , say 13 or 14 years old and not Ricky Ponting. I would think you might have a different stance on someone intentionally trying to injure him.
In Test cricket, I have the impression that intent with malice is tacitly approved. Cricket should be about clever bowling, wonderful batting and exceptional fielding allowing one team to win out against another. I don’t think that bowling with intent to knock someone out of a game lies within the ‘spirit’ of the game, especially if that player is forced to miss future games through injury. Do you?
BTW, this post applies to cricket globally.
December 21st 2009 @ 12:50pm
eric said | December 21st 2009 @ 12:50pm | Report comment
One of the things that makes top level sport interesting is the performance of those skills you mention under pressure, including fast bowling. Look, if I was fast enough and good enough, and given the opportunity, I would love to hit Tony Greig on the helmet. No qualms at all. No different to Stirling Mortlock wanting to flatten hs All Black opponent in a rugby Test. But fair enough, I wouldn’t want to cause brain damage or anything to Greig, so you’d aim for his head!
There are laws to protect batsmen, including the general dangerous or intimidatory bowling law. This could be invoked if a 13 or 14 year old was out of his depth against an unusually fast bowler in junior cricket.
When was the last Test batsmen seriously hurt by a deliberate bouncer?