The curious case of the D’Oliveira affair
By sheek, 22 Dec 2009 The Crowd is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Basil D'Oliveira, Cricket, South African cricket, Test cricket
Having witnessed recently the farcical climate change debate in Copenhagen, my mind was taken back to perhaps an even more farcical event in cricket – the ‘D’Oliveira affair’, which took place back in 1968, 41 years ago.
Basil D’Oliveira was born in South Africa on 24 September, 1931. He had one small, well, make that a major problem of the time – he was born to mixed race parents.
That is, white and black.
Denied the opportunity to represent his native country because of the colour bar, D’Oliveira emigrated to England, where he had to endure a then seven year qualification period.
D’Oliveira eventually made his test debut against the formidable West Indies in 1966, when he was 34 and a half years old. At a time when most test cricketers were winding down their career, D’Oliveira was winding his up.
Fast forward to 1968, and after a disappointing series in the Caribbean, D’Oliveira was selected for the first Ashes test against Australia.
England lost heavily, with D’Oliveira scoring nought and 87 not out.
Dolly, as he was affectionately nicknamed by the fans, was dropped for the second test. The reason given being by the selectors that the team needed a third paceman (bowling allrounder) in the attack.
England were denied winning two of the next three tests through rain.
Meanwhile, unwanted and rejected, Dolly lost form in county cricket. It would appear the selectors’ decision to deliberately drop him in view of the upcoming tour of South Africa in 1968/69 was proceeding to plan.
Then came the final (5th) test. Roger Prideaux, promoted to replace the injured Geoff Boycott, himself was injured, and Dolly was called in as the replacement. Dolly hit a magnificent 158 to guide England to victory and square the series.
But when the touring team to South Africa was announced, Dolly’s name was missing. If events to this point had appeared farcical, well they quickly turned to tragedy.
Back in April 1967, South African prime minister Mr Vorster had stated, ” Visiting teams of mixed race would be able to tour the country if they were teams from countries with which South African had traditional ties and if no political capital was made out of the situation”.
This statement clearly paved the way for D’Oliveira’s selection to be accepted. Because the 1967 New Zealand All Blacks tour had been cancelled, the South African government had been compelled to have a rethink.
In order to ensure cricket and rugby teams were allowed to continue touring the country, non-whites would be afforded the status of ‘temporary whites’ while touring the country.
According to English chairman of selectors Doug Insole, Dolly was viewed primarily as a batsman, even thought he averaged better than a wicket per test and one and a half wickets per first class match.
At some point around here, you must wonder if the British government got involved. After the announcement of the touring team, fast bowler Tom Cartwright was ruled out through injury, and replaced by … D’Oliveira!
The selectors had replaced a bowler with a batsman!
Naturally, the South African government smelt a rat. They refused D’Oliveria’s nomination, and consequently, the British government called off the tour.
It appears the MCC, who ran English and Welsh cricket at the time, had deliberately dropped Dolly off the radar (early in the season) so he would not be selected to tour SA, and therefore cause anyone embarassment or offence.
But as the occasion drew near to selection time, it appears the British government wanted Dolly selected so they could make political play.
D’Oliveira was a fine cricketer.
He played 44 tests for his adopted country England, averaging 40.06 with the bat, with 5 centuries. He also took 47 wickets at 39.55 each.
Dolly was a man of quiet dignity and deep integrity. He was a much finer human being than those politicians who attempted to use him for their political sport.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- What we do and don’t know about our Baggy Greens (112)
- Success of Twenty20 spells trouble for ODI cricket (106)
- Channel 9 commentators an annoyance this summer (102)
- One Day Cricket is suffering from Middle Child Syndrome (89)
- Cricket Australia must take a stand against racist spectators (89)
- Dave’s Warner-ful switch-hit panned by precious critics (84)
- Khawaja shouldn’t have been Shaun from the Test side (71)
- Clarke stars as Australia beat Sri Lanka
- Australia vs Sri Lanka, Perth ODI: cricket live scores, commentary (197)
- Hall of Fame for Indian legend Gavaskar
- Sri Lanka to target ‘weak’ Aussie bowlers
- India backing Rohit Sharma to find form
- Game-by-game preview of round 19
- Twenty20 cricket not up to the test (6)
- Australia vs Sri Lanka, Perth ODI: cricket live scores, commentary (197)
- Twenty20 cricket not up to the test (6)
- Pakistan’s win over England a triumph of character (21)
- Steve Waugh is right about cricket’s succession plan (5)
- India vs Sri Lanka, Perth ODI: cricket live scores, commentary (180)
- Let’s talk about selection, Test fans (28)
- Pakistan win shows what’s beautiful about the game (13)
- Explore:
- Basil D'Oliveira, Cricket, South African cricket, Test cricket

Brett McKay said | December 22nd 2009 @ 10:24am | Report comment
Thanks Sheek, yet another important lesson in sporting history that we should know about (I guess I’m primarily talking about those around my age or younger). I knew loosely of the ‘D’Oliveira affair’, but certainly not the details that you’ve provided here.
It really was a different time, Apartheid, and yet it makes me wonder why there was so much consternation toward the likes of Stuart MacGill when he declared he couldn’t rightly tour Zimbabwe. It would seem that not that long ago governments were always ready to use sport for the purposes of politics..
Jim Boyce said | December 22nd 2009 @ 9:57pm | Report comment
Sheek – I don’t know if you have read “Basil D’Oliveira – Cricket and Conspiracy the untold story” by Peter Oborne but given your interest it is worth a look. It was published in 2004. I lived in England at that time and the machinations of the MCC were a revelation.
sheek said | December 23rd 2009 @ 7:25am | Report comment
Jim,
Thanks for that. No, I haven’t read D’Oliveira’s book, & my story above was gleaned from articles I have read around the traps.
At first I thought the English selectors must have been incredibly myopic & vacuous, unable to decide if Dolly should be in the team or our, or whether he was a batsman or batting allrounder.
But the names (all famous in English cricket) of Doug Insole, Alec,Bedser, Peter May, Don Kenyon, Gubby Allen, Arthur Gilligan & skipper Colin Cowdrey deserve respect, at least on the surface.
However, without knowing the full story it would appear the English cricket selectors (& MCC) were having their strings pulled by the British government.
The irony is, had the selectors played a ‘straight bat’, to use a quaint cricketing term, D’Oliveira’s selection would have proceeded without a hitch. That is, had they selected him in the first place as a specialist batsman.
However, the culprit appears to be the British government, who was callously willing to use D’Oliveira as a pawn to embarrass the South African government & their apartheid policy. Very messy in the end.
Would you be willing to share your thoughts further of that time? I only really got interested in cricket just after this episode occurred, so it is not first-hand knowledge for me.
Jim Boyce said | December 23rd 2009 @ 12:58pm | Report comment
Sheek – i realy enjoy your articles and then the way you follow through with observations on the various contributions. I am 68 and more or less retired whatever that means. However I am the President of the Manly, Warringah And Pittwater Historical Society, now 85 years old and one of the oldest historical societies in Australia. As you may gather I am particularly interested in sporting history and having been involved in the 1970s in the protests against South African racially selected teams, I was interested in the D’Oliveira book of which I have a copy. Oborne was the editor of The Spectator which could be said to support the Consevative side of politics and his book won a number of prizes in that year(2004) from various history groups. The story that he presented was how certain figures in the MCC had a much closed dialogue with Vorster and the South African government than was generally percieved. I would be interested in your collection of articles and would be happy to lend you the book . I don’t know the protocol of The Roar for this type of thing but my email address is jimboyce2@unwired.com.au if you want to follow this up. The then UK Labour government may have been involved but what impressed me at the time was how all the rugby fraternity were for Dollie as he was affecctionately known. Everyone liked the way he had a go without any histrionics and he let his batting and bowling do the talking.