Watson’s antics childish, says Lawson
By Adam Cooper, 22 Dec 2009 Adam Cooper is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, Geoff Lawson, Shane Watson, Test cricket
Former Australian paceman Geoff Lawson says Shane Watson behaved like a four-year-old when celebrating taking Chris Gayle’s wicket and will be embarrassed about it in years to come.
Watson was the fourth Australian player disciplined by the International Cricket Council (ICC) during the 2-0 series win over the West Indies, for his over-the-top antics on day four of the third Test at the WACA Ground.
Captain Ricky Ponting has vowed to address team behaviour before the first Test against Pakistan, at the MCG starting Boxing Day, after Mitchell Johnson and Brad Haddin were fined in Perth for bringing the game into disrepute, and Doug Bollinger was reprimanded in Adelaide.
The ICC suspended the West Indies’ Suliemann Benn for two one-day matches for his clash with Haddin and Johnson.
Lawson labelled the Australians “childish” for their recent on-field conduct and said Watson would one day regret his overblown celebrations, which cost him 15 per cent of his match fee.
“That was like a four-year-old jumping up and down having a tantrum, wasn’t it?” Lawson told radio station 2KY.
“He’s always a bit petulant when he’s given out, he’s the man who’s always going for the referral straight away and used them early in the dig.
“There’s a lot of that about what Shane does, and that was a bit of an unusual display.
“If he looks at that in a few years time with his kids, he’ll say `That was embarrassing. Why did I do that?’”
Ponting will address the issue in the team’s pre-match meeting later this week, but Bollinger said on Monday he would try to avoid repeats of him kicking the pitch in disgust when he had an appeal turned down.
“I’ll put my hand up. What happened in Adelaide wasn’t the right thing to do and I’ll make sure I won’t do that again because I don’t need it on my shoulders, people thinking I’m a bit of a spoilt brat,” he said.
“I’ll try not to cross those lines.”
Bollinger expected Australia to be better behaved against Pakistan and said there was no reason why curbing outbursts would have any negative impact on performances.
“It’s not in our nature and I’m sure the blokes will be told to back right off it and not (let it) happen again because it’s not what the fans want, it’s not what we want,” he said.
“We don’t want a bad rap for Cricket Australia (CA) or cricket in general. It shouldn’t happen again and I don’t think it is a part of Australian cricket.”
CA claims its players’ behaviour has improved since 2003, when Steve Waugh’s side devised a code of conduct following Glenn McGrath’s ugly spat with Ramnaresh Sarwan in the Caribbean that year.
CA spokesman Peter Young said chief executive James Sutherland supported Ponting’s plans to remind players of the code, but had no plans to seek a meeting to discuss the issue.
“James has a lot of faith in Ricky’s leadership and supports his move to sit down before the Boxing Day Test match,” Young said.
Young said CA was mindful of the team alienating fans through poor behaviour, but said internal research showed the public’s approval of the team had grown over the past six years.
“While there is the odd bad day – and there was the odd bad day in Perth – for the length of the journey the players’ behaviour has been good since they made the pledge to play hard but fair,” he said.
“The public’s view has improved quite sharply since 2003 and we’re always trying to get it right, as there’s no excuse for not getting it right.”
© AAP 2012Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, Geoff Lawson, Shane Watson, Test cricket

Jeff Dowsing said | December 22nd 2009 @ 9:40am | Report comment
Much talk has centred around the pittance Watson was fined.
To my mind, better to make him sit down and watch himself in action a dozen times. Making a dill of yourself like that in front of so many people, including your friends and family, is punishment enough. He may have acted a fool, but he’s not an idiot. And like Henry says, his kids will probably see it one day.
More ludicrous are calls for Ponting to have ‘done something’. He admonished him on the field and in the media. What more can he do? He can’t stop an impulsive action as it occurs.
MrKistic said | December 22nd 2009 @ 6:16pm | Report comment
If you watch the footage (on YouTube, from Channel 9 as mentioned in other articles about this on The Roar), you can clearly see Ponting also giving Gayle a hands by his side send off. this was pre meditated and worse, Ponting was clearly on board with it.
So when you ask what more he could have done, it’s pointless. As captain participating in this behaviour, he’s as good as instigating it.
He is and always has been a joke as captain. Well stage managed though.
Campbell Watts said | December 22nd 2009 @ 12:51pm | Report comment
Watson has this morning justified and defended his juvenile behaviour because apparently Gayle baited him!!!
Gee Shane, haven’t you been sledged before?? Grow up and pull ya head in boy!
PATHETIC BEHAVIOUR! PATHETIC EXCUSS!
Jameswm said | December 22nd 2009 @ 1:16pm | Report comment
It (Watson’s revelation) does give it (the carry-on) some context though.
I normally say sledging a batsman after you’ve got him out is one of the lowest things you can do, but if the batsman baited you first you are certainly entitled to enjoy at least a a smile looking right at them.
If it were me? I’d have maybe said to Gayle “What was that you were saying? What was that again?”.
In the most ill-tempered game I remember playing in, I was captain and got the opposition captain out in their first innings, though I didn’t entirely realise it was him at the time. One or two things may have been said while he was batting but mild – “Let’s have him now”, that sort of thing.
I then proceeded to bat for about 3 hours and was sledged almost every ball I faced, mainly by the opposing captain. At the start of the second day, I spoke to the umpires about it, with the opposition captain present. He said “they started it, it’s fair game” or something similar, but they did tone it down a bit. They should have realised after the first two hours that the sledging wasn’t working and was making me more determined not to get out, but the experience was entirely unpleasant. I play cricket for fun and it wasn’t fun in those circumstances.
They then went in for a 2nd time and I got him out cheaply, again. “That’s twice” is what I said as he walked off, embarrassment and fury both evident. “Who’s winning the game?”, he said. “No thanks to you” was our reply. Frankly he deserved what he got, and more, which is my point.
We then nearly pulled off a miraculous outright victory. I have a feeling I finished with 10 wickets (5 in each innings) and a 50. Little consolation for the 1st innings loss. Too often us older guys (29-31) had to carry the team as the young guys’ (18-21) form went up and down more than John Daly’s weight.
In retrospect I should have written to them through our club, to tell them it shouldn’t be like that.
Campbell Watts said | December 22nd 2009 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
What, you don’t think batsmen sledge the bowlers all the time?
He should have been use to it and he shouldn’t have over-reacted the way he did. Simple as that.
All it really does is show the world Watson’s character is somewhat lacking in my view.
Jeff Dowsing said | December 22nd 2009 @ 1:54pm | Report comment
Secretly CA will be cheering the hullabaloo – with the state of test cricket the way it is (notwithstanding the 2nd & 3rd tests were actually very good games), it’s the best thing to give the ratings and attendances a kick along.
formeropenside said | December 22nd 2009 @ 2:29pm | Report comment
4 years old? My three year old does a better happy dance than the one Watson did.
Watson should never be picked for Australia again, simply on the basis of how lame that dance looked. At least he should be fined for bringing the game into disrepute.
Spiro Zavos said | December 22nd 2009 @ 5:46pm | Report comment
What could Chris Gayle have said that justified Shane Watson’s appalling behaviour? The sooner Watson apologises to Gayle and to the cricket world the better. This attempt to justify the unjustifiable suggests that all the talk that Ricky Ponting is going to have a team meeting about behaviour all just meaningless words.
Any repetition of his year-four small brat behaviour by Watson should see him stood down for several games, and his position in the Australian team put in jeopardy.
AndyS said | December 22nd 2009 @ 6:51pm | Report comment
FFS, isn’t the world full of precious little flowers!? Good thing most of the genuine quicks of the past no longer play. I can’t imagine how much everyone would hate Lillee were he playing now, what with him having a tendency to indicate the direction of the changeroom. But what odds that, if all the Australians played po-faced showing no excitement win or lose, half or more of the correspondents here would be saying that they are arrogantly ignoring the opposition, or that it is just a job to them and they lack passion?
I can’t help but wonder too – how would Lawson feel about bowler that manage to get fined for the extent of their sledging? Presumably such a bowler would be forever motified by such behaviour…although perhaps not enough to keep his opinions to himself?
MrKistic said | December 22nd 2009 @ 10:03pm | Report comment
The same Dennis Lillee that was suspended for two Sheffield Shield matches for ordering drinks during a shortened session against the umpire’s wishes?
Seems that perhaps that the Australia Cricket Board of the day was actually more harsh than the current bunch of administrators.
Also, I don’t remember Dennis Lillee ever jumping around like a squealing child.
AndyS said | December 23rd 2009 @ 2:27pm | Report comment
Yes, that’s the one, the guy who defied the umpires for ten minutes when they told him to change clanky bats or occasionally kicked the stumps after bowling someone ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDJ2sBtp4MA ). Hadn’t really noticed it before, but that looks a fair squeal at 5:55 too…
I’m not condoning Watson’s behaviour particularly, but folk seem so intent on taking all the colour and life out of the game. Think on what stories have entered the mythology of the game and a great many of them involve players stepping over the line and getting at each other – anyone know a few classic sledges? But what stories will folks be telling their grandkids in 25years time or posting on the future equivalent of youtube – riveting stuff like the time Roach referred a decision but then it stood despite nothing on hot-spot? It is a competitive sport, played between competitive people and they are going to get carried away sometimes. It happens and anyone that feels it should be ruthlessly stamped out of the game probably doesn’t need to look a whole lot further than the mirror when asking why Test cricket might be struggling.
MrKistic said | December 24th 2009 @ 8:46am | Report comment
Funnily enough, the don’t show so much of the tra-la-la skipping Dennis Lillee in his highlight reels! That’s pretty funny. But seriously, he’s just destroyed their batting lineup and has a bit of a skip in the batsman’s general direction – hardly a crime. I agree with you completely too, we need colour in the game or it will die a slow and painful death. And I’m not talking about bloody pink balls either. But there’s good sledging & celebrating, and then there’s what Watson did. I think we all agree Watson has come across as a tool and he’s going to have to live with that – although he’s since said he’s okay with it and not embarrassed, which shows just what a tool he is.
whiteline said | December 22nd 2009 @ 8:17pm | Report comment
Jeff
If you are the boss of a well respected company and one of your sales staff abuses a client… are you going to say that because you are at head office while this went on that ‘you have no control over what your staff member does when they are out of your sight?’ I’d suspect not.
Ponting is a first class Bogan – always has been and unfortunately it seems always will be. Couldn’t lead a horse to drink old Ricky. Unfortunately CA has a CEO and board who refuse to make any hard calls and conyinue to hide behind a culture of inaction. The sooner CA appoints a leader rather than the best batsman the better the game in australia will be.
Junior said | December 22nd 2009 @ 9:04pm | Report comment
mr watson today claimed he was “not embarrassed” and that he was only showing “raw emotion” that he cannot really control.
two points:
(i) one wonders what it would take for mr watson to be embarrassed.
(ii) he pled guilty in front of chris broad but somehow his comments suggest he believes he did nothing wrong.
he should apologise profusely, he should be banned for at least one test match and he should be given a public dressing down by the skipper for his churlish behaviour.
the man has only just managed to string together six consecutive test matches due to his pantheon of injuries and he is carrying on like this. lord help us if he ever converts one of those 50s.
pull your head in mr watson.
Jeff Dowsing said | December 23rd 2009 @ 7:30am | Report comment
Whiteline, if I was the boss of a well respected company and one of my staff abused a client, the staff member would be punished and told to pull their head in. That is pretty much what Ponting/CA have done. But realistically, no, you cannot have control over impulsive actions of another adult (or child). That is why there is a police force, a legal system, rules, contracts, dismissal laws, Spirit of Cricket doctrines etc etc.
Playing cricket at international level is an emotional, passionate game. Sometimes players, being human, overstep the mark. In context with other highly competitive team sports, this is a storm in a teacup. As I said earlier, looking like a bit of a tool in front of millions will be Watson’s cross to bear.
I’m no wrap for Ponting’s captaincy, he’s an ordinary tactician at times. In this instance I just don’t see Ponting as being blameworthy. The behaviour of the team in general has been almost impeccable since the infamous India SCG test (which was also blown out of proportion).
MrKistic said | December 23rd 2009 @ 12:08pm | Report comment
Ponting was also giving Gayle a similar send off – check the video. In which case he was complicit with the whole thing and totally blameworthy.
Seems these incidents are always being blown out of proportion – compared to what though?