It’s time Ponting reigned in his men
By mactheblack, 23 Dec 2009 The Crowd is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, Ricky Ponting, Shane Watson

Australian cricket captain Ricky Ponting, left, runs-in to congratulate bowler Shane Watson. AP Photo/Gautam Singh
I am surprised at some section of the media’s reaction to Australia’s Shane Watson (and Sulieman Benn’s) behaviour in their recent Test against the West Indies.
Surprised only because they should know that the Aussies have not really toned down their sledging habits.
I use the expression toned down, because I am not for a game of Test cricket being limited to a five-day exhibition of gentlemanly conduct of the old school variety. Let’s put the needle back into the game, but the players have to act within certain limitations of course.
But to get back to my point, I think Australia had given notice that they would address their behaviour after having to swallow their own medicine in their Test series against India Down Under a few seasons ago.
Then there was the McGrath-Sarwan incident a few years before that in the West Indies, that threatened to spiral out of control.
Of course, Sarwan’s comments against McGrath as reported was a case of a player going too far, but fortunately the two players ‘kissed and made up’ and buried the incident.
Of course, many fans worldwide regard Australia as the undisputed kings of sledging.
Watson’s histrionics can be viewed as a type of sledging – rubbing it in – in an attempt to inflict the maximum hurt on the batsman in question, Chris Gayle.
But that’s cricket, I suppose, a great leveller as they say.
Gayle was the one on top in the first innings, smashing the Aussies to all parts of the ground before surrendering meekly in the second innings for 21.
Maybe Watson should be reminded of that – he could be on the receiving end soon enough of his own type of behaviour.
But the question remains, despite the fact that captain Ricky Ponting has pointed out that team behaviour would be addressed – and it’s not the first time he has – whether the Aussies have actually even made a bid to bury the sledging tag that has been slapped upon them is highly questionable.
Benn is castigated on this forum about his behaviour (‘flannelled fool’), but couldn’t Mitchell Johnson have acted with restraint after Benn had done the right thing, to charge after or follow up the ball, in the incident involving fellow-batsman Brad Haddin?
Obviously this bloke was irked after being reprimanded by one of the batsman for an incident that happens often on a cricket field – a bowler and batsman colliding mid-pitch.
I think the expression used on this forum, against Watson and Benn, could be extended to Haddin and Johnson too. Ponting should do the honourable thing and ‘talk his talk’ and rein in his men if they are wanting to shake off the sledging tag.
Teams like the West Indies, India and even South Africa are giving it back all they’ve got to the ‘kings of the sledge’ – and possibly the actions of Watson, was his way of reminding the opposition that there’s ‘none as vocal as we are’.
If Ponting is indeed managing to control the behaviour of his team, then players like Watson would not be acting the way he did.
Maybe there should also be a reminder that there is nothing better, than countering the intense rivalry that is brought to boiling point through sledging, at times, by doing the job on the field of play – with both bat and ball.
Gayle’s riposte in hammering the hapless Aussies around the park in the first innings, could have been his way of sending out a warning that he’ll let his bat to the talking – and that’s how it should be.
It was only a year ago that South Africa beat the Aussies in a series on home soil, a clear indication that they would not be bullied away from home.
I emphasise that series, because it is part of cricketing folklore that South Africa in the past could not cope with the Aussies’ mind games – and were beaten even before they had taken to the field.
The Warne-Cullinan case, a classic case in point. Warne in fact referred to Cullinan as: “my bunny”.
Unfortunately, it seems that despite the ICC fines and the reprimands, the Chappell-inspired tactic as was alluded on this forum, that was continued on Steve Waugh’s watch, and carried through to Ponting’s era, (sledging) has been borrowed by most of their cricket rivals.
‘We’ll give back as good as we have got’ against the Aussies seems to be the refrain among the other cricketing nations.
Sledging unfortunately has become part of the game – it may not be as intense as before, but the subtle way in which it is done, does not water it down.
Ponting and his men are making a farce of the ICC fines policy, and my guess is that sledging is not going to disappear any time soon.
Maybe it will if Ponting decides to honestly rein in his men, especially given the widely held belief that the art of sledging originated from Down Under.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Cricket articles
- What we do and don’t know about our Baggy Greens (112)
- Success of Twenty20 spells trouble for ODI cricket (106)
- Channel 9 commentators an annoyance this summer (99)
- Media should call stumps on Rodney Hogg (93)
- One Day Cricket is suffering from Middle Child Syndrome (89)
- Cricket Australia must take a stand against racist spectators (86)
- Dave’s Warner-ful switch-hit panned by precious critics (84)
- Australia vs Sri Lanka, Perth ODI: cricket live scores, commentary (196)
- Hall of Fame for Indian legend Gavaskar
- Sri Lanka to target ‘weak’ Aussie bowlers
- India backing Rohit Sharma to find form
- Game-by-game preview of round 19
- Twenty20 cricket not up to the test (5)
- Like father, like son: Alister McDermott on a fast track to the Test team (30)
- Australia vs Sri Lanka, Perth ODI: cricket live scores, commentary (196)
- Twenty20 cricket not up to the test (5)
- Pakistan’s win over England a triumph of character (21)
- Steve Waugh is right about cricket’s succession plan (5)
- India vs Sri Lanka, Perth ODI: cricket live scores, commentary (180)
- Let’s talk about selection, Test fans (28)
- Pakistan win shows what’s beautiful about the game (13)
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, Ricky Ponting, Shane Watson

vinay verma said | December 23rd 2009 @ 6:50am | Report comment
Mactheblack, cricket is ,indeed, a great leveller. With the advent of increased TV coverage the spectator is now privy to a lot of what happens in the middle. A point not made though is that the authority of the on field umpires has over the years been watered down. In this age of committees and endless reviews the Umpires have become mere coathangers and are not allowed to even call a bowler for chucking. They have to report this to the Referee. A strong umpire like Tom Brooks or Dickie Bird would have defused unnecessary sledging befor it became a problem. Umpires need to be given back some of the powers. To admonish and sanction on the run.
Most of the flashpoints of the last twenty years owe their genesis to matters long before the actual incident. And it is usually a culmination of many seemeingly unrelated incidents. If you take the harbhajan/ Symonds case this started in India and it was more the spectators than the players instigating it. It carried on to Australia and it was inevitable that harbhajan and Symonds,both not blessed with tact,would duel at 12 paces. The subsequent inquiries and so called diplomatic rifts were the work of a media that fuelled the storyline in a bid to maximise the “incident” It could easily have been fixed by a public handshake between the two.
The bad blood between Australia and SAF started with Merv Hughes being abused at the Bullring in the nineties and then Adam Gilchrist being taunted many years later. There are players who cross the line and it is upto the Captain and the on field umpires to sort this out on the spot. Not let it fester and become an “incident” Journalists on both sides of the divide also have a duty not to inflame the situation. Coming to the Watson incident it was immature and Watson is the loser. Gayle has enhanced his “coolness” Cricket will deal with Watson in due course and in years to come he will regret his immaturity. But that is all it is and it does not mean all Australians should be thus labelled. We have to be careful of stereotyping whole countries because of one person. And this applies to all countries and all players,spectators and media.
There is much to celebrate with emerging talents like Duminy,Barath,Broad, and established greats like Kallis,Tendulkar,Ponting,Dravid still playing the game. I,for one,would much rather concentrate on the actual cricket in the middle.
jmo said | December 23rd 2009 @ 1:48pm | Report comment
It’s a good thing that on-field umpires can’t call a bowler for chucking any more. They should be looking for overstep / no-ball, then pronto look up at the stumps – and should be more than content if their regular job is done properly. Chucking and other deeper questions of the game best left to a review panel that is detached from any involvement in the match.
You are right about Gayle he has enhanced his reputation for coolness and handled the whole Watson incident really well.
Is there such a thing as “too cool”? – having found their potential in the latter parts of the series the Windies might have in the back of their minds that being less cool and more fired up (ala Watson) at various stages and particularly in Brisbane could have delivered them a memorable series win.
vinay verma said | December 23rd 2009 @ 3:52pm | Report comment
JMO,There’s two on the field; the square leg umpire has the job to look at chucking.
And yes,you can be too cool like the Windies were when they went on strike. When they forget about the bling they can be a competitive side.I believe,after the scarring of Brisbane,they were happy not to lose in Adelaide. Almost a moral victory and they tried hard in Perth. A lot of credit to Garner for this.
jmo said | December 23rd 2009 @ 4:32pm | Report comment
Yeah that makes sense Vinay, the square leg guy would have a lot better view of the bowling action and less distractions.
Though regarding the Murali episode, Darrell Hair was calling Murali from behind the stumps at the time.
Hard as I tried, I couldn’t see any difference between the 7 deliveries (of Murali’s) that were called and his other ones that were not called. The bowling action was always the same.
How umpire Hair could have made such an analysis as to differentiate the good from the bad, from one limited angle, in a split second, then have the time and presence of mind to refocus on overstep then stumps, delivery after delivery, is beyond comprehension.
If I had to do all that I would need a cup of tea after the first over! Let alone 5 days of it, assuming he was being fair and subjecting the bowling action of EVERY player on both sides to scrutiny.
kordova said | December 23rd 2009 @ 1:52pm | Report comment
a strong umpire like darrell hair?
why not include him on your list…
he rightfully called mulli and then they changed the rules to suit the latter…
vinay verma said | December 23rd 2009 @ 3:55pm | Report comment
Agree,Kordova, Hair was a strong umpire and he was badly treated by the ICC. But he is now happily in charge of the NSW Umpires and doing a great job. Following on from the forfeited Test, Michael Holding resigned in disgust from the ICC Technical committe. He got tired of the politics of convenience.
vinay verma said | December 24th 2009 @ 4:07pm | Report comment
G’day Danny,the name is so familiar,but excuse me If I cant recollect. If you played for the roosters you would have been good. yes, Darrell is well and still as forthright as ever.
Cheers
Fisher Price said | December 23rd 2009 @ 8:33am | Report comment
McGrath – a noted, abusive sledger – was the one who went too far in the Sarwan incident.
Campbell Watts said | December 23rd 2009 @ 11:45am | Report comment
Too right FP
The grumpy sod copped a beaut sledge from Sarwan and threw the toys out of the cot!
Sledging is fine – it’ll never disappear – but pathetic carry-on like Watson’s is just embarrassing! Sledging should be witty,
sharp, subversive – not jumping around shouting “ha ha!” when you finally get a player out!
Classic sledges make it into the folklore of the game – think Watson’s will?
kordova said | December 23rd 2009 @ 2:02pm | Report comment
ben somerford can write an article, i’ll tell you that for free… i like the cut of that fella’s jib…
Jaffa said | December 23rd 2009 @ 9:21pm | Report comment
Ponting may REIGN over his men , if you like to think of him as a monarch, but if you are suggesting that he should be imposing his authority and curtailing their inappropriate behaviour, then you might suggest that he needs to REIN them in (as in pull hard on a horse’s reins to make it stop)
Hazey the Bear said | December 24th 2009 @ 5:49am | Report comment
In fairness to mac, the article itself has the correct spelling (see last sentence) – perhaps the mispelling of the article’s title is the fault of the editors who chose it?
I believe that the only one who thinks that Ponting is a monarch is himself…
Hazey the Bear said | December 24th 2009 @ 5:41am | Report comment
“Benn is castigated on this forum about his behaviour (’flannelled fool’), but couldn’t Mitchell Johnson have acted with restraint after Benn had done the right thing, to charge after or follow up the ball, in the incident involving fellow-batsman Brad Haddin?
Obviously this bloke was irked after being reprimanded by one of the batsman for an incident that happens often on a cricket field – a bowler and batsman colliding mid-pitch. ”
I don’t understand this comment…I mean as you say, a mid-pitch collision is common, and if Haddin hadn’t pointed his bat at Benn, then nothing more would be said about it. I’ve seen the replay oh so many times of the first incident (Mitchell and Benn), and both players were simply doing what they should – Benn goin for the ball, Johnson goin for the run. What’s the problem there? In my opinion, there wasn’t one, until Haddin acted like a buffoon.
And as for Johnson “being irked at being reprimanded” – I haven’t heard a single word about Johnson’s reaction in all of this, except that he pleaded guilty and copped a fine. Where’s the irk?!? Since the whole thing came out, I always thought that Johnson’s mistake was pushing Benn away after he reached over the top of him to confront Haddin. Or am I wrong?
M1tch said | December 28th 2009 @ 8:40pm | Report comment
I just wish Gayle had of decked Watson…
Sledging in cricket sometimes doesnt seem right, I dont like it these days, but Aussies have gotton worse since they’ve started losing series, pretty simple as well aussies can dish it out but cant take it..ie: McGrath v Sarwan