Hard to believe, but Hauritz is winning me over
By Brett McKay, 12 Jan 2010 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Cricket, Nathan Hauritz, Test cricket

Australian bowler Nathan Hauritz celebrates dismissing Pakistan's Mohammad Aamer. AAP Image/Julian Smith
There’s no two ways about this. This is a column I never would have dreamt writing not all that long ago. I’m sure I’m not the first person to admit that I’ve never been a big fan of Nathan Hauritz as a spin-bowling option.
Just as I maintain about Cameron White now, I also used to think Hauritz was missing the little thing that might make him a useful tweaker: the ability to spin the ball.
So when suddenly Hauritz was taken to India in 2004 instead of Stuart MacGill, the general feeling among my cricket discussion circle was that he was the token “work experience” selection, much like Dan Cullen going to Bangladesh a few years later.
“Surely he won’t get anywhere near the Test team…” we all assumed at the time.
Of course it’s history now that Hauritz is the owner of Baggy Green no.390, having made his debut in the Fourth Test of that Indian series. Taking five wickets for the match, his scalps included the prize wickets of VVS Laxman and Sachin Tendulkar in the second innings.
But reality is a funny beast, and Hauritz copped a harsh lesson in it, where by the end of the following summer, he’d lost his spot in the Queensland side. It got even worse after the 2005/06 summer where having played only a few limited overs state games, Hauritz took a massive gamble and headed south to New South Wales with no state contract and well behind the likes of MacGill and the also just-relocated Beau Casson.
The move payed immediate dividends with Hauritz playing a few First Class matches for NSW in 2006/07, but more so in the limited-overs game, where his form was quite solid. This continued the following season, and suddenly Hauritz found himself back in Australian contention for the first time since 2003.
Hauritz kept plugging away for NSW, and after a whirlwind period following the retirements of Shane Warne, MacGill and Brad Hogg, the Australian spin bowling ranks went into a flat spin.
Suddenly, it seemed that any spinner in the country showing any degree of form was in contention, and we saw Casson, White, Jason Krejza, no-one, Hauritz, Krejza again, Hauritz again, Marcus North, and Bryce McGain playing the part in Tests.
Hauritz by this point was a fixture in the one-day side too, and was starting to emerge as the answer to the nation’s proverbial and literal spinning puzzle. When the squad for the 2009 Ashes series was named, Hauritz was the sole spinner.
But still, something about Hauritz didn’t sit well with me. From the very first moment he made his international debut in a one-dayer in South Africa in 2002, the sight of Hauritz in Australian colours just didn’t look right. The side just had a weird appearance about it, much like when a P-plater puts modern chrome wheels and low-profile tyres on a 25 year-old BMW.
You knew he could do the job, but it was very rarely a smooth ride.
Even when I wrote my early Ashes series column, “Is Hauritz the answer to Australia’s spin woes?” I still wasn’t that convinced. I was happy for him to be the sole spinner in England, and I was happy to support him, but I had lingering doubts.
His Ashes series in the end was quite reasonable I thought, given the amount of doubt and negative comment that surrounded him, both by the public, and the selectors. Perhaps the ultimate compliment for his place in the side is the now widely-held belief that his omission was a major factor in not winning the Fifth and deciding test at The Oval.
Since the Ashes series though, Hauritz’s demeanour and attitude about his cricket has been really refreshing. Where once he came across as having a sense of entitlement, now we see him in media interviews as relaxed and even nonchalant, and leading the way in self-deprecation, almost as if to beat anyone else to it.
And you can see it the field too. Hauritz seems to lead the way in laughing at himself, and picking the difference between his reactions to going for a boundary and taking a wicket can be quite difficult.
Yet this also washes over the real story here, which is the meteoric rise in Hauritz’s bowling. His bowling this summer is light years ahead of what he used to serve up. His lines, flight, and even his much-derided turn have all improved markedly, and have been exactly what you want from a front-line off-spinner. He’s quickly become the perfect foil for the Australian quicks.
His patience is becoming a feature too; no doubt a result of an over-hyped chat with Shane Warne. Whenever a batsman is going after him, you can see he just keeps on with his job, waiting for the breakthrough to come like it inevitably does.
His response to selection Chairman Andrew Hilditch’s demand that he show he can bowl teams out was perfect: back-to-back five-wicket hauls in Melbourne and Sydney.
23 wickets at a decent average and economy, his first and now second Test five-wicket innings, career-best figures, a couple of Test fifties with the bat; it really has been a Boy’s Own summer.
And he’s winning me over to boot.
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- Cricket, Nathan Hauritz, Test cricket

Justin said | January 12th 2010 @ 6:30am | Report comment
I’ll reserve judgment until he can take bags against a strong batting lineup.
His Sydney effort was due in the most part to tailenders slogging average balls.
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2010 @ 7:32am | Report comment
Justin, I expect (hope?) to get a lot comments along the lines of what you’ve said there, and I wasn’t that far removed from your opinion this time last year.
But I think this too easily overlooks Hauritz’s performances this summer. He can, afterall, only bowl at the batsman taking strike in front of him, and so it’s hardly his fault Australia are “only” playing Pakistan.
His five-fa’s were well earned in Melbourne and Sydney, and in both innings he bowled with the lines and flight that induced the shots they did. So what if a batsman is trying to hit him out of the park? He’s still got enough deception with his flight or bounce or turn (ask Faisal Iqbal in Melbourne) to beat the batsman, and for that he deserves credit. He’s a much improved bolwer…
Justin said | January 12th 2010 @ 8:30am | Report comment
Brett I understand what you are saying and I think he has improved also but I also believe his recent hauls have been flattering.
Melbourne he deserved his 5 but I cant agree on Sydney, woeful batting gifted AUS the match, I really dont think that can be denied. His econ rate has shot up, in Sydney going at around 4.5 an over.
Perhaps the econ rate shows why he has got more wickets this series. The Paks dont rate him, have gone after him, particularly the lower order and messed up. You just gotta love Pakistan!
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2010 @ 8:47am | Report comment
Justin that’s true, Pakistan now heading to Hobart are still saying they don’t rate him, but again, he can only control where and what he bowls. If he’s putting the ball in the spot where the Pakis think they can get to him and they fail, then what more can he do??
His enonomy rate against Pakistan is higher than against the West Indies this summer, but overall, 23 wickets at an economy rate around 3.5rpo, and at an average in the mid-20s is nothing to be sneezed at…
vinay verma said | January 12th 2010 @ 7:57am | Report comment
Brett,there is a tendency to look at offspinners as medium pacers in drag. The truth is that offspinning ,good offspinning,is a difficult art. Unless you have a doosra,which I believe is difficult to bowl legally(forget the 15 degree flex)you can only rely on line,length and variations of flight and loop. When you look at the history there have only been five or six great offspinners…Laker,Prasanna,Gibbs and Ramadhin being the top four. Of these Sonny Ramadhin turned them the most and had a legbreak and straight one to confuse the batsmen.
The other value of a good offspinner is keeping one end tight and giving the quicks a rest.The value of an offspinner should be measured in the overall quality he brings to the team and not just the number of wickets,though this cannot hurt. Hauritz is a vital cog in this current team and will improve further as his self belief grows,
In closing ,Krezja should not think he does not have a chance. He should work harder and keep developing. He,too,has the talent and needs to start believing in himself. An offspinner has to prove he can do more than bowl..field well and contribute runs down the order. And Hauritz is doing all this. You cant ask for more.
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2010 @ 8:11am | Report comment
completely agree Vinay, and I see a lot of Tim May in Hauritz’s lines and flight at the moment. He’s never going to bowl that square-turning delivery that everyone seems to expect all spinner to have (for which the blame lays squarely at the feet of Messrs Warne and MacGill), but he’s got the subtle deceptions about him now.
Hobart will be a big test of his talents. Peter Lalor wrote a great piece in The Oz last Friday, after interviewing Hauritz, and when he asked Hauritz how he goes at Bellerive, Hauritz replied in his typical manner this summer, “Horrible, just like every other ground in Australia.”
Bellerive though this year has been playing a little slower than normal, so I’m sure Hauritz will once again be a major factor..
vinay verma said | January 12th 2010 @ 8:56am | Report comment
Scyld Berry from Wisden thinks Hauritz is going to be taken apart by a good batsman sometime soon. Akmal did that for an over but Hauritz keeps coming back. Tendulkar did this to Warne in his pomp,so yes a good/great batsman will take to spinners on a flat track and all a spinner can do is keep it tight. Spinners would make good chaplains(except Warney)
Chris said | January 12th 2010 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
Vinay – do you consider Murali do be a “great offspinner”?
vinay verma said | January 12th 2010 @ 2:54pm | Report comment
Chris,great spinner yes,the greatest offspinner,no. That belongs to Prasanna,with Ramadhin a close second. The Greatest spinner is Warne,without question.
Rickety Knees said | January 12th 2010 @ 8:06am | Report comment
Brett – the signs are good and I like what he brings with his batting. However, I am withholding my final endorsement until after the Ashes next year. I hope they take Smith to NZ and bat him at 6 – in place of North – and give him 4 or 5 overs per innings. As discussed yesterday Smith’s figues are no worse than Warne’s when he started.
This would then allow us to go into tests with 4 fast/medium bowlers (including Watson) and two spinners (not including Katich or Clarke who both have 5 fors in Test Crciket).
Gee if we can’t bowl a side out with that attack ……
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2010 @ 8:20am | Report comment
Rickety, I’m also quite sure Smith will play some ODI this local summer too. Hauritz has been confirmed to have a small crack in his thumb from the Mohammad Yousuf chest-mark, and while it’s not cuasing any problems, I’d be surprised if it wasn’t cited as a reason to “rest” him during the one-dayers..
drewster said | January 12th 2010 @ 8:06am | Report comment
Have to agree Brett. His bowling is a great improvement. But the true test is going to be against sides like India, Sri Lanka and South Africa. This will show how far he has really come. I, like you are being slowly won over by his performances.
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2010 @ 8:24am | Report comment
and Drewster, I’m sure that you – like me – don’t like readily admitting we might ultimately be wrong in the long run!! Hauritz is bowling well, and he’s starting to believe he’s the best spinner in Australia…
M1tch said | January 12th 2010 @ 8:23am | Report comment
LOL, I agree with the thread. I had major major doubts over him, but he is actually doing something with the ball and taking wickets. He aint a Warne, but then again nobody ever will be.
Roger said | January 12th 2010 @ 8:24am | Report comment
If we all close our eyes and imagine a world where there never was a Shane Warne, then Nathan Huaritz is a credible, even better than average spinner (G Matthews, Tim May, P Taylor anyone). Warnie has changed what we expect from spinners…I for one am happy for a spinner to take on average 3-4 wickets a Test, average 20 w bat and sometime bag a handful of wickets on crumbling dry tops.
If anything, Warnie and Mcgrath took pressure off our previous quicks,meaning teams played a straight bat to Warnie and Pidgeon, then tried to score (and get out) to Kasper, Reiffel, Giillespie, Lee, Bichel etc. ‘But for’ Warnie their figures would not been as good.
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2010 @ 8:50am | Report comment
exactly the point I was making to Vinay above, Roger. Against your criteria there, Hauritz is even over-achieving!!
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2010 @ 8:43am | Report comment
Here’s one for the Victorian conspiracy theorists.
In discussions after proof-reading this for me yesterday, one of my mates said through very tight-fitting sky blue glasses, said that Hauritz “..wouldn’t be playing Test cricket if he stayed in Qld”
Now while it was said to me in his typically blinkered NSW view, I also think it’s a classic case of the truth often being said in jest…
Rickety Knees said | January 12th 2010 @ 8:55am | Report comment
Brett – I keep on hearing this one too. NSW does not have a representative on the selection panel and has not for about 10 years.
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2010 @ 9:13am | Report comment
of course that is true Rickety, but I couldn’t pass up the chance to fish for Victorians. I miss Pippinu…
spiro zavos said | January 12th 2010 @ 9:17am | Report comment
Nathan Hauritz has to start spinning the ball, instead of floating it down and to stop wearting his baggy green cap as if he were playing for the Yankees before I can warm to him as Australia’s best spinner.
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2010 @ 9:40am | Report comment
Spiro, there’s no doubt Hauritz is spinning the ball more now than he was. Admittedly that’s not setting the bar real high, and as we’ve discussed above here, he’s never going to be a square-turning bowler. Off-spinners rarely are. Where he’s getting his big improvements this season is his lines, his flight, and even bounce. He’s getting the little deceptions that beat the batsman, particularly when they’re going after him like Pakistan have and will continue to do. Daniel Vettori’s not a big turner of the ball either.
And if we’re criticising him based on how he wears his cap, then that just confirms that we’ve run out of things to chip him on. That’s almost a back-handed compliment…
RickG said | January 12th 2010 @ 11:47am | Report comment
I think of this comment Spiro every time I see him with his cap on! You’re right, it just doesn’t look right – he does pull it down too far. However, his captain does this too, and his ‘daggy green’ needs a bit of a touch up asap.
offy said | January 12th 2010 @ 10:59am | Report comment
Vinay – “When you look at the history there have been only five or six great offspinners – Laker, Prasanna, Gibbs and Ramadhin being the top four”
Muralitharan – 735 test wickets @ 21.95 – 475 ODI wickets @ 22.85 – want to revise your list of top offspinners now Vinay?
Would he make your top 10? How do you forget the highest wicket taker in the history of the game is an offy?
Rickety Knees said | January 12th 2010 @ 1:28pm | Report comment
Offy – deduct 15% and take out all the tests against Bangaladesh and Zimbabawe perhaps he is not ….
offy said | January 12th 2010 @ 2:12pm | Report comment
Come on ‘Rickety’ – look at the figures and tell me how Murali could not be the number one offy ever – regardless of who he played against – he has at some time in his career ripped through every testt playing nations batting orders and won test matches consistently for his country.
As for Hauritz – and mind you I dont think these two bowlers names should even be mentioned in the same reply- one being the best and the other one – the worst, but I couldnt be bothered starting a new one. My way of getting some idea about a bowler is to think about how they would go playing against ordinary cricketers – and by that I mean – your good country or suburban cricketer.
eg – Warne plays for Kooringal Colts (Wagga) – bowls badly but gets 5 or 6 for not many. Mitch Johnson – same story – they both bowl well and they pick up 8 or 9 each. Hauritz – bowls badly – 0 for plenty – bowls well – 2 – 50 – well you get the idea
I guess what I’m saying is that he is not very good and the sooner we move on the better.
Michael C said | January 12th 2010 @ 2:12pm | Report comment
when people offer up taking out the tests against Bangladesh and the Zimbo’s, it’s a bit harsh – -
it can perhaps be argued in comparison with S.K.Warne as playing during the same era,
but, do we look at the Bradman record and say that we really should only view his figures against England and discount his stats vs the minnows of West Indies, NZ and India who all appeared in test ranks for the first time across 1928-1932??
Should we discount any Jim Laker stats vs Pakistan who first appeared in 1952 as ‘minnows’??
It’s got zero to do with Murili that Australia hasn’t played these other nations as much as Sri Lanka has.
and, importantly, no one disputes Richard Hadlee as a great player – but, back in the ’80s, NZ was just about the most regular opponent for Sri Lanka in their early days in Test Cricket….how many Hadlee wickets should be discounted??
Rickety Knees said | January 12th 2010 @ 2:44pm | Report comment
Murali s a chucker full stop. The ICC changed the rules to make his bowling legal. Sorry Guys everybody else played under one set of rules and Muralii under another. IMHO they should have separate records – one for 15%ers and the others for legitimate bowlers.
Michael C said | January 12th 2010 @ 2:53pm | Report comment
yeah, the chucker aspect though is far more grey than was first thought – and especially for the fast bowlers for whom the arm action was far harder to deduce by the eye.
That many of the great fast bowlers delivered illegal deliveries at times,
the main argument really is whether 15 degrees is fair for BOTH fast bowlers and spin bowlers,
but, it also depends upon the position viewed from and still for Murali – that if he can’t physically straighten his arm any further…..then should he be banned because of his abnormality??
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2010 @ 2:40pm | Report comment
and MC it’s all moot anyway becuase Vinay never quoted stats in the first place. For all we know, and he may confirm this, his declaration that “..there have been only five or six great offspinners…” could well just be his opinion…
How you argue against anyone’s opinion with stats – nevermind hypothetical outings in Wagga grade cricket – is something I’ll never know…
Brett McKay said | January 12th 2010 @ 2:04pm | Report comment
Offy, in Vinay’s defence, he did only name four of his “five or six great offspinners”. It would be just as easy to assume that Murali is among that group as it would be to assume as you’ve done that Vinay overlooked him…