Andy fails to fire against an opponent that does
By Alan Nicolea, 1 Feb 2010 Alan Nicolea is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Andy Murray, Australian Open, Grand slam, Roger Federer, Tennis
As Roger Federer once again begins a new season with another Grand Slam title under his belt, questions will be asked of Australian Open finalist Andy Murray and his lack of ability to take charge of the moments that can make or break a player’s career.
Over the course of Federer’s straight sets victory against Murray, both players produced the vast array of shot making worthy of their respective rankings on the ATP tour.
During the opening two games of the first set, Federer was in complete control, hitting a backhand and forehand winner to break Murray’s serve to go two nil up.
The 22 year old, however, hit back with aplomb, breaking Federer’s serve immediately, thanks largely to his supreme court coverage.
Murray was able to get back into the set by playing brilliant counter-punching tennis, as the Briton produced a terrific backhand pass down the line and a clinical running forehand to get back on serve.
If the first four games had demonstrated anything, it was that Murray had the capabilities to get the better of Federer in a Grand Slam final.
The 2008 US Open runner-up clearly has all the shots needed to torment Federer from the baseline, while his movement on court is clearly unrivalled by anyone else besides the world No.1.
Murray’s first serve has also become a real weapon of late, often generating speeds of up to 212km.
Five games into the first set however revealed some telling truths about Murray’s inability to produce when it counts.
With the score level at 2-2, Murray was presented with two break point opportunities against the Federer serve, only to squander both and end up losing the game.
Instead of coming to terms with his lost opportunity, Murray clearly let it get the best of him against an opponent who only needs one chance to establish a dominant position for the rest of the match.
And so after coming close to breaking Federer’s serve, Murray was broken the very next game and found himself down one set and with a foot on the runners up podium.
It had appeared the world No.4 put the major deficit behind him by winning the first game of the second set comfortably.
The moment Federer was presented with an opportunity to break however, Murray’s game deserted him once again, as the Swiss maestro came up with some spectacular forehand winners to break early in the second set.
After attaining the break, Federer gained control, seemingly playing with the freedom that comes with winning so many Grand Slam titles.
Despite going up two sets to love, there was still enough life in Murray to suggest he had what it took to come back and end a 74 year Grand Slam drought for British tennis.
After finally displaying some long overdue resolve in a Grand Slam final, Murray managed to break Federer’s serve for a critical 4-2 lead in the third set.
The drastic momentum shift should have allowed a player of Murray’s calibre to serve the set out, inturn extend a final that had another Federer whitewash written all over it.
Despite playing down the huge pressure placed on him by the British press, Murray once again crumbled in the face of a unique opportunity that doesn’t often present itself.
During the tiebreaker, Murray failed to convert five set points in what must have been an agonising sight for British fans back home.
Rather than produce the tennis that has netted him 14 titles in a glittering career, Murray’s game had deserted him, in particular his forehand and second serve.
It was no surprise in the end that an unforced backhand error sealed Murray’s fate in an Australian Open that promised so much.
Whilst there is no doubting Murray has the game to be a great player, he clearly doesn’t produce it enough on the big moments to warrant a place in the history books, unlike his victorious opponent Roger Federer.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Other Sports articles
- Victoria Azarenka vs Maria Sharapova: Australian Open women’s final live scores, blog (89)
- The sporting fallacy of the Olympic ‘Games’ (46)
- Sonny Bill needs to start boxing full time (46)
- Djokovic vs Nadal was great, but do we need six-hour finals? (36)
- Sonny Bill looking sharp for his first real test (29)
- Sonny Bill wins title in first round (25)
- Nadal vs Djokovic: The match for the ages (20)
- Real boxing still exists: here’s where to find it
- London’s Olympic Games have a long way to come (10)
- New champ Williams looking to next fight (5)
- Aust and GB aim to convert 4ths to bronze
- Young pitcher signs big deal with Red Sox (7)
- World Cup Darts heartbreak in Hamburg (3)
- Mayweather and Pacquiao have shamed boxing (13)
- Real boxing still exists: here’s where to find it (0)
- London’s Olympic Games have a long way to come (10)
- World Cup Darts heartbreak in Hamburg (3)
- Mayweather and Pacquiao have shamed boxing (13)
- Will Tom Brady’s legacy be affected by one drop? (20)
- Sonny Bill needs to start boxing full time (46)
- Lachlan Murdoch squashing FTA sport for Fox’s benefit (4)
- Explore:
- Andy Murray, Australian Open, Grand slam, Roger Federer, Tennis

Mr cheese said | February 1st 2010 @ 2:14am | Report comment
Roger Federer is a terrific bloke. He is an honourable Englishman after what he did to Murray. Again.
We should give him the freedom of London.
Menawhile, Andy Murray can cry into his haggis soup. Tennis is boring to watch, but it’s always great to see a Scot lose. Who are the Jocks playing in their first 6 Nations match ? FRANCE ! Brilliant. More Scottish failure…
How well will they do in South Africa this summer………..????????????????????????
Froar said | February 1st 2010 @ 2:33am | Report comment
Murray has grown up. Why dont you?
Mr cheese said | February 1st 2010 @ 8:07am | Report comment
Murray has not grown up. I do not need to grow up.
I do enjoy watching Scots lose. As I said, tennis is not the most fascinating sport but it’s good to see Murray get smashed.
Anyone But Murray ? Yes, please….
ohtani's jacket said | February 1st 2010 @ 7:16am | Report comment
Thought Murray played somewhat conservatively myself. Playing defensively and then opening up his shotmaking worked against Rafa, but there wasn’t enough power on his shots in the final. Haven’t seen Federer play like that in a while, though. Man, he didn’t want that going beyond a third set, did he? If Murray had won that third set, it may have been a long night in Melbourne despite Murray showing signs of fatigue.
Ora said | February 1st 2010 @ 7:22am | Report comment
Murray seemed down on confidence, Federer didn’t even look like he was tryiong until the third set and then it wasn’t like he ws trying that hard. It was like he was toying with the lad.
Murray had stage fright which is understandable.
This was definitely not a final to remember
Dogz R Barkn said | February 1st 2010 @ 9:17am | Report comment
You just have to admire Federer, there were plenty of moments during the 3rd set when you thought Murray had worked his way back into the match, but Federer managed to find something extra on each occasion, and in the end, Murray just ran out of ideas, and he’ll know deep down that he fell well short of Federer’s level (which is in no way an embarassing admission).
Brett McKay said | February 1st 2010 @ 9:20am | Report comment
g’day Alan, glad to see you back in the swing of things again. Full credit to Murray for pushing Federer in that epic third set, but Federer – as he was against Tsonga in the semi – was just so clinical in victory. He’s made his last six sets of the Aus Open look like he was playing against social punters. Just a phenominal player, pure and simple.
But, Murray needs to look at this tournament as a major stepping stone, and no doubt this will not be his last GS Final. Perhaps the old “you need to lose one before you can win one” adage applies here. As Federer said in the presentation, he is too good a player not to win a major at some point.
Mr Cheese’s comments seem to echo the quote from Simon Barnes from The Times, who in a quote Ch7 used in the pre-match wrote that by the end of the final, “Murray will be the greatest living British human or a Scottish choker.”
Oh, those wacky Poms….
Mr cheese said | February 2nd 2010 @ 4:59am | Report comment
No.
Andy Murray is just an uncouth Jock. That’s it. That’s all he is. And Simon Barnes is over-rated too.
Brett McKay said | February 2nd 2010 @ 8:43am | Report comment
Well thanks for your opinion then, how very 13th century of you…
Alan Nicolea said | February 1st 2010 @ 10:58am | Report comment
Brett
It will certainly not be his last final that’s for sure. I give him a huge chance at Wimbledon and the US Open. But then again, the likes of Djokovic, Del Potro and Nadal will have something to say about that. Federer does not look like slowing down anytime soon either. Will he reach the magical 20 mark?
Brett McKay said | February 1st 2010 @ 11:53am | Report comment
Alan, on this last week’s form, it’s hard to see him not winning four more Majors. On this last week’s form, he could well have claimed no.20 this time next year…
ohtani's jacket said | February 1st 2010 @ 2:53pm | Report comment
I dunno if I wanna see him win 20. Seems excessive. 18 would be a good number.
Brett McKay said | February 1st 2010 @ 3:04pm | Report comment
So OJ, you can only see him winning two more majors for his career??
ohtani's jacket said | February 1st 2010 @ 3:14pm | Report comment
I’d rather see him win 18 titles but 20 is a possibility.
For a while there it seemed like 15 would be a challenge. I’d like to see him win 8 Wimbledon titles. I think that would be fitting.
prowling panther said | February 1st 2010 @ 11:26am | Report comment
i wish i was Federer. Unbeatable, beautiful to watch, a great person. Just about the perfect human being…
Who Needs Melon said | February 1st 2010 @ 12:13pm | Report comment
I hope I’m not putting the kiss of death on him but I think Murray will be No.1 one day. I too thought he played a little conservatively for much of the match. But he’s a fiesty Scot and next time he’s in a situation like this he’ll be less backward about coming forward.
I feel Federer plays his cards close to his chest a lot of the time – i.e. he never reveals too much early in tournaments but lifts whenever he needs to. There are a bunch of stunningly good players clawing their way over each other to get up the ladder right behind him now though and many have beaten him Federer before. It’s a great time for mens tennis.
Viscount Crouchback said | February 1st 2010 @ 2:19pm | Report comment
I thought Murray lost his nerve on the big points. He also seems incapable of hitting a flat, powerful forehand into an open court to finish off a point. He kept looping it and allowing Federer to recover.
Whether he’ll rectify those mental and technical frailties is anyone’s guess, but he certainly doesn’t lack for determination.
Hansie said | February 1st 2010 @ 4:28pm | Report comment
I thought Murray played pretty well. Let’s not forget that he lost to the greatest player of all time, who had only conceded one set (to a white hot Davydenko) on the run through the 4th round, the quarter final and the semi final. Murray pushed Federer a lot more than either Tsonga or Hewitt. Put him up against any other player, Murray played well enough to win.