Racing NSW needs to look after punters
By ScottWoodward.me, 2 Feb 2010 ScottWoodward.me is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- Betfair, betting, Horse Racing, Racing NSW, sportsbet
If every punter in New South Wales had a bet from their heart on the outcome of this week’s landmark court case in Sydney, when leading corporate bookie Sportsbet and exchange Betfair take on Racing NSW, then surely it would be a one horse race.
The most important participants in the racing industry are the punters, as they fuel the clubs who provide the prize money for owners, and they will be cheering for a positive verdict for Sportsbet and Betfair as they strive to provide a better and more competitive product for punters.
The punters of NSW do not even get a mention when Racing NSW CEO Peter V’Landys discusses his concerns about providing for participants.
Daily Telegraph racing editor Ray Thomas recently asked V’Landys: “What do you mean by not providing an
adequate return to participants?”
V’Landys replied: “The racehorse owners in NSW subsidise the industry to the tune of $100 million per annum that’s the difference between their training bills and prizemoney they receive. That loss doesn’t even include the initial cost of buying the horse.
“We need to minimise the gap between owners’ costs and prizemoney. Because owners are losing as a group means that income levels of other participants in the industry remain low ie returns to trainers, strappers etc. Eventually it may get to a point when owners decide not to invest any more so we must close that gap and make investing in racing more attractive”
So there we have a direct quote from the man in charge of Racing NSW clearly stating that he believes that the owners “subsidise the industry”. Maybe he should look at the industry in Hong Kong, who like Victoria, have gone straight past NSW and are thriving, thanks to the punters dollar.
It is simple, give the punters a fair and competitive model and they will invest and the industry benefits.
While Racing NSW continue to campaign for the wealthy breeders and owners of the industry and actively endeavor to maintain an uncompetitive product as a monopoly for their punters, the state will never bridge the gap on Victoria as their strategic priorities are out of order.
Racing NSW are “in bed” with wagering giant Tabcorp, who are trying to take us back to the dark ages where the “jolly green giant” enjoyed a monopoly and could dictate to punters with rude and unfair take out commissions between 15% to 25%, and 10 cent dividend round downs.
Racing NSW care not that 98% of punters lose under the Tabcorp model.
Peter V’Landys has stuck to his guns and has demanded that all corporate bookies and exchanges pay a 1.5% race fields tax based on betting turnover. The bookies claim that this model is not viable and have agreed already with Racing Victoria to pay a 10% fee based of gross profit.
We can excuse a single individual for not understanding how a bookmaking business is funded and what it takes to survive, but V’Landys dogmatic stance has not been challenged by his chairman Alan Brown or any of his board members who include former Tabcorp Board Member Ken Brown and Kim Harding, the former GM of Sky Channel, part owned by Tabcorp.
Maybe the punters have had a bet after all, do they know something?
Corporate bookie Centrebet are not involved directly against Racing NSW, but their shares have surged from 1.13 last December to today’s 1.50, while Tabcorp have remained static around the 7.22 mark for the same period indicating a clear market preference.
This court case is a very expensive exercise for Racing NSW if they are unsuccessful as the industry is struggling under V’landy’s management and the millions required for court costs are valuable funding that could have been invested into the industry.
V’landys is also sitting on $50 million of corporate bookies money that he will have to return plus interest that has been paid pending the court decision.
If the share market has got it wrong and Racing NSW is successful, then the corporate bookies will likely be forced to take their business and hundreds of jobs off shore.
The Victorian model, where the corporate bookies are taxed on gross profit, has proven a winning formula as the state continues to thrive and increase their lead as the premier racing state.
The NSW racing Minister Kev Greene, a prohibitive 1.18 to lose his job at the next election, promised plenty when he was appointed but he has sat back and watched the racing industry in his patch continue to decay under a dinosaur administration.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Other Sports articles
- Victoria Azarenka vs Maria Sharapova: Australian Open women’s final live scores, blog (89)
- The sporting fallacy of the Olympic ‘Games’ (46)
- Sonny Bill needs to start boxing full time (46)
- Djokovic vs Nadal was great, but do we need six-hour finals? (36)
- Sonny Bill looking sharp for his first real test (29)
- Sonny Bill wins title in first round (25)
- Nadal vs Djokovic: The match for the ages (20)
- London’s Olympic Games have a long way to come (9)
- New champ Williams looking to next fight (5)
- Aust and GB aim to convert 4ths to bronze
- Young pitcher signs big deal with Red Sox (7)
- World Cup Darts heartbreak in Hamburg (3)
- Mayweather and Pacquiao have shamed boxing (12)
- Will Tom Brady’s legacy be affected by one drop? (20)
- London’s Olympic Games have a long way to come (9)
- World Cup Darts heartbreak in Hamburg (3)
- Mayweather and Pacquiao have shamed boxing (12)
- Will Tom Brady’s legacy be affected by one drop? (20)
- Sonny Bill needs to start boxing full time (46)
- Lachlan Murdoch squashing FTA sport for Fox’s benefit (4)
- Sonny Bill Williams vs Clarence Tillman III: Live updates, blog [video] (182)
- Explore:
- Betfair, betting, Horse Racing, Racing NSW, sportsbet

sheek said | February 2nd 2010 @ 7:37am | Report comment
Scott,
On another level, do you think the product the punters, & even general horse lovers, are being offered, is the best product available?
For me, one of the joys of racing growing up as a kid was the variety – you had the 2yo classics, 3yo classics, open wfa, & open sprints, miles, middlers & stayers.
Now, thanks to breeder-owners like John Singleton & Gerry Harvey, understandably looking for a quick return on expensive investments, Australian racing is going down the American path.
Racehorses are past their use-by date at the end of their 3yo racing, & need to be sent off to stud as quickly as possible to reproduce, & start the cycle all over again. On the track, races beyond 1600m are now considered “staying” races!
I noticed at the recent Magic Millions on the Gold Coast, an 1800 metres race was known as the ‘Stayers Hcp’…..
But of course, I’m a lone voice I would reckon. I once reiterated my concerns to my wife’s uncle – an avid punter. After I had lamented how the variety was being lost to racing, he floored me with his response.
“I don’t care about all that”, he said in his nasally accent, waving his hand dismissively. “When I punt I don’t even know the name of the horse, the race, the distance, the jockey, the trainer, or even where the race is being run. I just follow the money & make my bet a minute before race fall”.
Well, that ended the discussion (if it was even that), right there….. !!!!!
Bay35Pablo said | February 2nd 2010 @ 12:52pm | Report comment
sheek, you aren’t the lone voice. I also mourn the move to sprints. How many horses never make it because they are more suited to races longer than 1600m. The irony being our biggest race (the Melbourne Cup) is 3200m, yet most of our horses will never race that distance. The day will come when foreigners win it regularly because all the races here close to that distance will have gone.
MyGeneration said | February 2nd 2010 @ 1:19pm | Report comment
We need to see horses racing for longer than 1 or 2 years, so the casual punter has some chance of developing an emotional investment in them. For mine, that’s the main problem with the focus on 2 year-olds and sprinters. You would think the example of Makybe Diva would be a role model for racing administrators. How many Golden Slipper winners can the average person remember?
ScottWoodward.me said | February 2nd 2010 @ 11:49am | Report comment
Sheek,
In the UK at the moment, the majority of races are > 2 miles, in fact 2 miles is consider “short” especially as most races care jumps.
Most distance horses are over 5 years and it is very expensive to rare and train a horse that long, especially when no punters wish to go to the track.
The funding model in NSW does not work in 2010 but while ever there is an administration aligned with Tabcorp, the industry will continue to struggle.
Racing in NSW needs what the NRL need, an Independent Commission, with an emphasis on INDEPENDENT.
sheek said | February 2nd 2010 @ 12:18pm | Report comment
Thanks Scott,
I guess what I was getting at was…..
Yes, while it’s difficult to nurture horses to 5 years & beyond, requiring great patience & even greater monetary resources, I would have thought the variety of racing to be one of it’s strengths, or was.
I’m only a small-time punter, & I don’t really understand, because I haven’t been following it, the ramifications of what you say. Racing needs variety beyond the hard-core punter, to attract the masses. It needs great trainers, great jockeys, & most especially, great horses at all the distances, that will encourage people to the racetracks to watch them race.
If thoroughbred flat racing loses its variety, then it won’t really be any different to greyhound or harness racing.
And if fans are at the racetrack, & caught up in all the atmosphere & hoopla, they’ll have a bet…..
ScottWoodward.me said | February 2nd 2010 @ 12:43pm | Report comment
I agree that people will go to the track to see good horses, but most weeks, our coverage is so good on TV and in the clubs, that it is more convenient and comfortable to not go.
Our Racing Administrators have been living in a false economy and sitting back and relying on a hand out from the TAB to survive without getting out and being creative and developing new frontiers of which there are many.
It all starts from the front office and unfortunately ours is politically driven and have their heads in the sand.
Redb said | February 2nd 2010 @ 12:54pm | Report comment
I have mates in the Racing Industry who will tell you that V’Landy’s is a control freak, meglomaniac and is highly ligitious. None of the Directors on the Board of Racing NSW dare challenge him.
ScottWoodward.me said | February 2nd 2010 @ 1:09pm | Report comment
Your mates are 100% correct and my mates they echo everything you say.
You only have to go to Harold Park trots on a Friday and it is like a ghost town with no bookies and no punters which is the legacy of when Peter V’Landys was the CEO. When he started there were over 40 bookies at HP and the place was packed with atmosphere and punters everywhere.
sheek said | February 2nd 2010 @ 2:22pm | Report comment
Scott,
Yes, the TV coverage is excellent, as you could also argue for other sports. But even for the stay-at-home sports fan, those other fans who have made the effort to go to the venue, add to the atmosphere.
Imagine if we all stayed home watching all our sport on TV. I think even the sporting organisations & media outlets would dread that.
It’s a long time ago, but when I first started following the races as a young kid over 40 years ago, the balance seemed better then. Sure, perhaps the stayers were the heroes back then, but media coverage & fan adulation was fairly evenly split between stayers, middlers, milers, sprinters, the wfa champions, 3yo & 2yo stars.
There was no live coverage, but you had Radio Australia broadcasting every Saturday, & local broadcasts midweek, plus the famous bookies fielding at every race meeting, big or small. Fans made an effort to go to the races, & there was genuine interest in the horses apart from the punting.
MyGeneration said | February 2nd 2010 @ 1:11pm | Report comment
And if Racing NSW wins, does V’Landy’s think that punters will continue to put there hard-earned into a betting model that’s stacked against them, when there are so many alternatives, and growing all the time? He’s fighting for a greater share of a rapidly diminishing pie. BTW, what was his recommendation for the Racing NSW CEO job, anyway? He never seemed to do much for the harness racing industry whilst he was in charge.
ScottWoodward.me said | February 2nd 2010 @ 3:29pm | Report comment
People who I respect who have met with him all say it is like talking to a brick wall.
He has had a charmed run in the corporate world, and if the market is correct, thankfully, it will come to and end as surely someone with guts on the board will tap him on the shoulder and we can have some fresh ideas that will embrace a modern landscape and propel NSW Racing as it should.
I am sure that if he losses as expected, he will not walk and try to “skin the cat” another way by implementing a copy write Tax. Hopefully his Chairman Alan Brown will step in and take control.
We live in hope.
simonjzw said | February 2nd 2010 @ 1:42pm | Report comment
Couldn’t agree more with the sentiments addressed in this article and all the responses.
But how about those breeding conglomerates that charge upto $200 000 for a stallion service fee (50 times per year!) being made to contribute more to the industry so the owners get a better deal?
Maybe then there’d be less reliance on the punter’s money and we could get better returns (from whatever beeting agency we choose to use)?
sheek said | February 2nd 2010 @ 2:36pm | Report comment
As MG says, we are basically being short-changed if horses are retired after their 2yo & 3yo season & sent straight to stud. How many more great memories could some of our champion race horses have given us? How many more match races could we have witnessed between several champions?
Forget the punt, fans would flock to the race tracks to see Octagonal, Saintly, Filante, Nothin Like A Dane, Might And Power, Doriemus, etc race each other regularly, as they did back in the mid-90s between 1600 metres & 2400 metres.
Except that they all did so too infrequently.
Further, as MG says, who remembers the winners of the Golden Slipper? As our greatest 2yo race, that’s fine. But the push by people in NSW, & I would suggest, wealthy owner-breeders like Singleton & Harvey, to make the GS our greatest (wealthiest) race, is absolutely ludicrous!
Imagine if the IOC decided that the 100 metres Olympics sprint should be a dash for 12 year old boys & girls??? That’s what the Golden Slipper is – a helter-skelter sprint for juvenile, inexperienced race horses. Hardly the kind of race to hold up to the world as your best.
But as we know, the GS is driven by the vested self-interests of prominent owner-breeders.
It just seems to me that thoroughbred racing, especially in NSW, is shooting itself in the foot due to the blind leadership of some, & selfish self-interest of others. But it doesn’t have to be this way…..
ScottWoodward.me said | February 2nd 2010 @ 3:41pm | Report comment
Sheek
If you are concerned about losing our good horses, then your name sake His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid al Maktoum has shipped several plane loads of Peter Snowden’s best race horses to Dubai to race.
Our most promising race horse at the moment is Denman who looks to have the world at his feet, but dont get too excited, as the Sheikh wants him soon in Dubai. This is one of the fat cat owners who Peter V’Landys considers the most important participants in racing.
Jason Cave said | February 3rd 2010 @ 12:47pm | Report comment
And remember, this is the same Peter V’Landys who as part of the Harold Park committee in his time as Harness Racing NSW CEO for one of the most extraordinary decisions in Miralce Mile history, when in 1997 the Harold Park club invited little-known Manaville into the field ahead of one of the all-time greats in Our Sir Vancelot. Manaville finished last, Our Sir Vancelot went on to win a number of Inter Dominions.
ScottWoodward.me said | February 3rd 2010 @ 9:18pm | Report comment
You have a memory like an elephant Jason
paddy said | February 7th 2010 @ 11:16am | Report comment
Scott,
This case has been running a week.
Why is there nothing about it in the press ?
Or am i missing something ?