Any surprises for the tour of New Zealand?
By Brett McKay, 16 Feb 2010 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, New Zealand cricket

New Zealand bowler Chris Martin (2nd left) reacts after dismissing Australian batsman Andrew Symonds. AP Image/Dave Hunt
Despite the rugby season kicking off on Friday night, and even though all this debate (and I use the word loosely) about the supposed death of the 50 over game is, frankly, boring me to tears, I am determined to press on writing about cricket for the time being.
But given I’m not likely to win any fans while trying to find positives in the current one-day series against the West Indies, I’m turning my attention to Australia’s tour of New Zealand in March.
It’s the epitome of the modern cricket tour, this month-long excursion across the Ditch: two Twenty20 and five One-Day Internationals out of the way early, and then two back-to-back Tests. In football season.
It’ll bring back the crowds, for sure.
So then, can we expect any selection surprises? Well, no, probably not.
Such is the lottery of the T20 game sometimes, the touring squad might as well be the first eleven Australian cricketers to pass Customs at Wellington airport. In reality, it’ll be the same side that played Pakistan the other week, and who have two more games against the Windies next week.
Even the team for the one-dayers will be largely the same as what’s currently on show. I would give serious thought to Brad Haddin delaying his departure by a week or so, and playing Tim Paine in the first few outings, but Haddin will probably come straight back in.
One guy I do think would be worthy of inclusion in a probable 13- or 14-man squad is young New South Wales all-rounder Steven Smith. We’ve already seen a little of him in national colours this summer, and truth be told, I thought we would have seen in the one-dayers already.
On the low, slow decks in New Zealand though, Smith is surely worth a punt. His leg-spin is certainly on the improve, and wouldn’t look out of place in tandem with Nathan Hauritz. Smith more than holds his own as a lower-order plunderer of runs, and his sharp fielding is fuelled by the enthusiasm and speed of youth.
Of course, should this come through and Smith does remain for the ODIs, it means he’ll have to forego all or part of his freshly-signed IPL contract with Bangalore. That obviously wouldn’t be a concern of the national selectors – you’d hope – and indeed, the reasons for them picking Smith would be the same as what made Smith an IPL target.
Plus, New Zealand themselves have built their one-day side around three and four pretty handy all-rounders over the years, so I guess there’s also an element of fighting fire with fire behind including Smith. Furthermore, he’d be a better long-term prospect than what Adam Voges is currently offering.
For the two Tests, I’m again not expecting any real surprises. But there will be at least one forced change from the Hobart Test, with Peter Siddle ruled out of cricket for upwards of five months due to stress fractures in his back. And this could be where it gets interesting.
I would expect a Test squad of no more than 13 players. For only two Tests, there’s no real need to take a squad bigger than that, and even in the worst-case scenario, a replacement can always been flown in from home should injury strike.
The current Test team, minus Siddle, will be there. Despite what we may think of the form of certain players, they’re coming off a 5-0 summer. That’s ten of the thirteen then.
Clint McKay was twelfth man for the Pakistan series, and plenty of experts – of both the actual and armchair varieties – are suggesting he should be the man to take Siddle’s place. But I’m not so sure.
McKay has bowled reasonably well in the one-dayers, but in reality, he’s not that much different a bowler to Siddle, and Siddle himself proved over the summer that running in and hitting the deck hard doesn’t always bring the rewards.
On the other hand, Ryan Harris is having the month of his cricketing life, and to disregard such irresistible form with the ball would lack any selection logic. Ignore the colour of his current attire, and that of the ball too, and you’re left with a guy bowling 140km/h-plus outswingers. And if that’s not impressive enough, he’ll pitch them on your front toe for fun. Regularly.
My smokey for the tour has been the subject of an email discussion over the last week with Roar regular and general voice of reason, Greg Russell. Both of us are claiming dibs on the first call for Queensland quick Ben Cutting’s inclusion, resolution of which will have to be for another day (it was me, Greg).
The short of it is that Cutting is the best-performed bowler in the Sheffield Shield by daylight. 33 wickets from 7 matches, and at an average of just over 20, puts him a long way in front of the next-best state seamer, and at 22, he’d be the first of “the next wave” of young quicks putting their hand up. Never mind the future, Cutting is ready to go now.
This leaves me with one spot. Greg had concerns about possible reserve batsmen options, and offered up Michael Klinger, but I’m going to solve that by not taking one. In my mind, Australia will probably need a proper second spinner in New Zealand, rather than a part-timer.
But Marcus North, the guy we’re told is the second spin option, hasn’t bowled in the last three Tests, with Simon Katich being preferred in Melbourne and Hobart.
And so despite still not believing he’s ready for this, Steven Smith has to be the one. Jason Krezja has dropped so far off the radar he’s lost his Tasmanian spot, and there really is no-one else. I honestly think Smith is a good 18 months off being ready for Test cricket, but Cricket Australia have declared him the heir apparent, and unfortunately, the spin cupboard is getting a little bare again.
Of course that means I’ve just killed off Smith’s Indian summer completely. So perhaps that would be the surprise of the New Zealand tour after all.
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Cricket, New Zealand cricket

M1tch said | February 16th 2010 @ 5:48am | Report comment
Harris over McKay for sure, the only thing that hurts Klinger’s chances is he is a opener and with Wato winning AB Medal I cant see them putting him down the order
vinay verma said | February 16th 2010 @ 7:26am | Report comment
Brett,I have gleaned some positives from the summer. Pollard,Akmal,Aamer,the superb fielding and catching both at domestic and International level.Steve Smith’s one hander,Ponting’s swoop at gully and Hind’s catch to get rid of Watson on Sunday.
Coming to NZ spare a thought for our poor cousins across the ditch. They have more to lose by missing the first few weeks of the IPL. And perhaps their minds will be on ruppees and five star hotels. Shane Bond saw this coming and decided to retire from Tests..he cannot be blamed and is still owed money by the ICL.
I would throw Smith and Philip Hughes into the touring party.Bat Watson at six and not take North. I would pick Hastings or Hazlewood ahead of Mckay. Harris has to be in as he is a readymade replacement for Hilfenhaus. The rest pick themselves.I am predicting a stellar 12 months for Simon Katich. Good to see him get Test Cricketer of the year. He brings so much to the table.
Sylvester said | February 16th 2010 @ 9:01pm | Report comment
“Shane Bond saw this coming and decided to retire from Tests.”
I doubt Bond was thinking about rupees when he came back into the NZ fold. He was committed to a test cricket comeback, otherwise he would have only made himself available for limited overs. I bet he would have loved one last crack at the Aussies in the upcoming series.
Jameswm said | February 16th 2010 @ 7:58am | Report comment
No McKay – he’s a workmanlike one day bowler but not a test option. I’d pick Nannes ahead of him too. Our bowlers in rough order right now, with Sids not considered through injury, would be
Johnson
Bollinger
Hilfy (if he’s come back OK)
Harris
Nannes
McKay
Did I forget anyone? Cutting, Heazlewood and Pattinson are the young ones coming through. How quick is Cutting?
vinay verma said | February 16th 2010 @ 8:03am | Report comment
Cutting is high 130′s,Pattison is out for the forseeable future. I would not discount Lee as an option down the track. He is going to play the IPL,if fit.
Fisher Price said | February 16th 2010 @ 10:25am | Report comment
Lee isn’t good enough.
vas said | February 16th 2010 @ 8:36am | Report comment
Assuming it’s a 14 man squad:
Ponting (c)
Clarke
M Hussey
Watson
Katich
North
White
Haddin
Hauritz
Smith
Bolllinger
Johnson
Harris
McKay
Worlds Biggest said | February 16th 2010 @ 9:04am | Report comment
I love my Cricket but this summer apart from first two Tests against Pakis has been an absolute yawn. Endless and mindless ODI’s has been a complete non event for me. The durge continues across the ditch against the Kiwis as the forgettable summer of Cricket continues. All this in a country where everyone is now in Rugby mode and will care little for the Cricket.
cosmos forever said | February 18th 2010 @ 8:52pm | Report comment
agree – just let the summer die Cricket Australia…
Spiro Zavos said | February 16th 2010 @ 9:42am | Report comment
Vinay, one of the positives perhaps, too, is Afridi discovering a new fruit, old cricket balls for the export market. Steve Smith is the find of the summer and the Australian selectors must pick him in the Test squad, at least to get him in the frame for the end of the year when Australia will need all the bowling they have to take 20 wickets against a defensively-minded England side in the Ashes series.
vinay verma said | February 16th 2010 @ 11:09am | Report comment
Spiro,if he had done that at Kolkata he may have given it a religious conotation. Ironic,him biting the forbidden fruit.What was more ludicrous was Ramiz Raja pleading that ball tampering be given legal sanction. Today there is a report that a Pakistani Senator has asked for more punitive action because Afridi has “brought shame on the pakistani people”
Agree Steve Smith must be in all three forms of the game. He is exciting for the game. Puts bums on seats and we need characters and extroverts. The Australian team has perked up with the recent injection of new blood. And the English certainly dont like legspin. Richie Benaud proved that at Old Trafford over 40 years ago. And the spectre of Warne hangs over their heads.
southernwaratah said | February 16th 2010 @ 10:16am | Report comment
Test? North to be dropped and Smith the bolter for the tour for me to bat at 6 and bowl, the selectors will be keen for some test time for him and Hughes before the Ashes.
I noted yesterday that Harmison is keen for another tour to Australia…
Jameswm said | February 16th 2010 @ 11:05am | Report comment
Vas I wold say Hilfy for McKay, assuming Hilfy is fit. Otherwise Nannes. And White in the test squad? not yet – others like Klinger, Jaques and Rogers would be ahead of him. And Hughes, though I wouldn’t send him over there.
So
Watson
Katich
Ponting (c)
Clarke
M Hussey
Haddin
Smith
Johnson
Hauritz
Bolllinger
Harris
and then as the three subs
Hilfenhaus
North
and one other. MacDonald might even be OK over there, or one of the batsmen I proposed. Or a 5th quick. Really though, take 13, and if someone gets injured, fly a sub over
eric said | February 16th 2010 @ 11:09am | Report comment
Brett can you tell me what “hitting the deck hard” means, as opposed to bowling fast? While your at it, tell me what defines a “clean hitter” .
vinay verma said | February 16th 2010 @ 11:37am | Report comment
Eric,I recall a litle discussion in July last hear where you enquired about “energy through the crease” and I attempted to answer it. I hope with a degree of conviction. I will attempt to put in lay terms the concept of hitting the deck hard. Take the case of Siddle and Merv Hughes on one side and Hilfenhaus and Ryan Harris on the other side. Siddle hits the deck “hard” and delivers what they call a “heavy” ball. It jars the hands . However there is not much movement in the air or off the deck so it is hard and fast and usually straight. Now most good batsmen would not find this hard to keep out. On the other hand Harris and Hilfy bowl at the smae speed but swerve and seam it making it altogether more difficult for the batter.
Clean hitters are the likes of Gilchrist and Haddin. Bat speed,timing and finding the sweet spot.Reflexes,hand eye coordination come into this. On the other hand someone like Pollard muscles the ball. Mistimed shots of the toe of the bat still go for four and sometimes six. Ponting on song is a clean hitter and for a little fellow hits the ball a long way. He is long off the tee in golf also. I hope I have made some sense,Eric.
Joseph Ryan said | February 16th 2010 @ 11:17am | Report comment
What about Andrew McDonald – just scored 120 and 39 not out against NSW, as well as taking a coupel of 3-fors. Good all round form!