The curious case of Brett Lee
By Brett McKay, 22 Feb 2010 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Australian Cricket, Brett Lee, Cricket, injury in sport, Twenty20

Australia's Brett Lee celebrates taking the wicket of India's Sachin Tendulkar. AP Photo/Rick Rycroft
Brett Lee has been back in the news in the last week, and depending on which paper or website you were looking at, he’s either crucial to Australia’s future campaigns or he may never play again.
In many ways, he’s the forgotten piece of the ever-growing puzzle that is the Australian fast-bowling attack.
There are a few pieces that maybe aren’t too far away, such as Nathan Bracken and Ben Hilfenhaus, and there’s even a piece with a big question mark on it, earmarked for a second genuine spinner.
But the Brett Lee piece is, at the moment, the great unknown. We don’t know where the piece is, and more importantly, we don’t know where it fits.
Lee hasn’t played a Test Match since Boxing Day 2008, against South Africa. He hasn’t played a One-Day International since last October in India.
In fact, his most recent outings in an Australian shirt have been at promotional city barbeques for the now-complete one-day series, and to give Prince William some bowling tips during a visit to a recovering bushfire-affected Kinglake in Victoria.
Just when, or even if, we’ll see him actually playing cricket again is anyone’s guess.
And I include Lee himself in that too. Just last week Lee told reporters “As far as my cricket goes, anything is possible. I may play one-dayers, or no cricket at all.
“I may never bowl another ball and if that’s the case, I’m so satisfied with my career and my longevity. I’m not saying it’s definitely over, but I’m not sure what I want to be just yet.
“To be perfectly honest, I’m not sure what I still want to do in my cricketing life. I need to get to the stage where, if I want to, I can do what I need to do on the field.
“If it’s the case that I don’t play again, well, that’s the case. There is a part of me that would like to play some sort of cricket again.”
Lee’s words sound deliberately ambiguous to me; not exactly brimming with confidence, but certainly not ruling out any return just yet.
Team-mates and coaching staff are unsurprisingly holding high hopes.
Stuart Clark, himself hoping for a return from injury for New South Wales before the end of this season, came out in support of Lee, and declared his pace and reverse-swing ability as a “must” for the 2011 World Cup, to be held on the subcontinent.
Australian selection overseer, Andrew Hilditch, wasn’t quite looking that far ahead, but was similarly confident this week about Lee’s return, declaring “I think if Brett gets back to full fitness he’ll be very much in the running for both the Twenty20 and one-day sides,” referring to the upcoming limited over series’ against Pakistan and England, both to be played in the Old Dart.
But Lee returning to cricket is quickly becoming the $64 question. Just when will this return be?
And if he can’t show some progress in the next few months, is that it for him?
About a month ago, Lee told CricInfo that he was hopeful of bowling again in around a month’s time, with the third instalment of the IPL seemingly the obvious focus, but I’m working on the fairly safe assumption that this still hasn’t happened yet.
I say it’s a “safe assumption” because if it had happened, we would’ve heard all about it.
But even if we ignore Lee’s injury comeback for the moment and assume he’s fully fit, would he be a certainty to return to any Australian side?
This might seem absurd to even to ask the question; Lee, after all, has 300-plus wickets to his name in both Test and ODI modes.
But exactly where would Lee fit into the current picture?
Mitchell Johnson, now relieved of the new ball, seems comfortable in his skin again, and Dougie Bollinger has very quickly become both a focus of the attack and a crowd favourite.
In Ryan Harris’ 140km/h outswinging yorkers, the Australian attack has suddenly found something very special, and Hilfenhaus and Peter Siddle would almost certainly come straight back into calculations once fit again.
So where does this leave Lee?
Well, my sneaking suspicion is that Lee will soon enough join the growing list of cricketers embarking on what I dubbed sometime ago the “modern retirement”.
Following the likes of Andrew Flintoff, Jacob Oram, Shaun Tait, and Victorian left-armer Dirk Nannes just last week, I expect Lee will soon retire from Test and maybe even First Class cricket, and instead just concentrate on the shorter forms.
He may even decide to follow the lead of Andrew Symonds, and just play Twenty20 cricket where-ever, and for whoever he can land a game and score a pay day.
It would seem a sad, even unfair finale for a bowler who really brought the benefits of express pace back into vogue in this country.
But as Lee himself would know, the reality of professional sport is that injury knows nothing about the concept of fairness.
For a player whose international cricket arrival was delayed by injuries in his late teens and early twenties, it would seem that his career is about to close in that same cruel way.
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- Australian Cricket, Brett Lee, Cricket, injury in sport, Twenty20

Viscount Crouchback said | February 22nd 2010 @ 8:20am | Report comment
Lee would be a big loss for the Aussies in the Ashes, no question. Pietersen and Trott have looked decidedly antsy against Lee-type bowling of late. Does Tait have any hope of making the Ashes squad?
Brett McKay said | February 22nd 2010 @ 8:27am | Report comment
Viscount, Tait’s retired from First Class cricket completely, citing his body’s unlikely ability to withstand any more than 10 overs per game. So no, no real hope…
Your point about Pietersen and Trott is well made though, and whoever the Australian attack comprises next summer, they’d be doing themselves a favour if they pulled out the tapes of McGrath using the pace and bounce to pummel Pietersen’s ribs on the last visit down this way.
Lee could do that, if fit, no doubt at all. But for mine, I’m not holding out much hope of seeing him in the Baggy Green again..
southernwaratah said | February 22nd 2010 @ 9:11am | Report comment
Bollinger will be the man to do the rib tickling during the Ashes, I doubt either of the 2 mentioned will have encountered a hostile left armer like him before. Let just hope Johnson will be in form for day 1 in Brisbane…
Viscount Crouchback said | February 22nd 2010 @ 10:48am | Report comment
Yes – or better still, watch a tape of Dale Steyn forcing Pietersen onto the back foot with a couple of short balls (no more than that) before bowling full, straight balls with a hint of swing that would either thwack into KP’s pads or induce a skittish jerk towards leg. Pietersen didn’t seem to fancy Steyn at all – and Trott looked worse still. It’s been quite some time since I’ve seen English batsmen look so uncomfortable against raw pace. (Admittedly, Johannesburg is one of the sportier pitches in world cricket).
Pity about Tait, but Mitchell Johnson will probably fancy his chances if his radar is working.
Brett McKay said | February 22nd 2010 @ 11:26am | Report comment
yeah true, Steyn was more than a handful at home (and continued to be in India too). Mind you, I’m expecting nothing less than a good old fashioned ‘Gabba green-top first up next summer, and then after the Poms have dealt with that, and then the batting paradise in Adelaide, it’s off too Perth, which is quickly re-finding it’s pace again….
JohnB said | February 22nd 2010 @ 9:04am | Report comment
Brett M – I don’t think Brett Lee brought express pace back into vogue (since it never went out of vogue)!
You’d have to wonder with his injury history in recent times and his age whether he would ever be able to get back to something like his best, so as to be able to get back into a test side, even if there weren’t a fair number of other aspirants around. He hasn’t threatened to change his approach so as to be a test contender without pace as his main weapon (like Dennis Lillee or Ray Lindwall were able to). Whether he can get healthy enough to bowl in limited overs – a different question. If he can, great. If he can’t, like he essentially says, he’s had a great career and hats off to him.
Still leaves that other Lee puzzle – why was he so much more effective when he first started in test cricket?
Brett McKay said | February 22nd 2010 @ 9:24am | Report comment
John, I say he brought express pace “back” because before he emerged, we’d had a long line of fast-med/med-fast bowlers (think McGrath, Gillespie, Kaspa, Reiffel, Fleming, etc) for whom their effort ball might have got to 140km/h.
Lee suddenly was consistently into that mid-140s, even pushing 150 and beyond when the conditions suited and the planets alligned. That’s all I really meant..
Funnily enough, it was his pace that probably lowered his effectiveness, in my opinion, and to answer your question. There for a while, he seemed pre-occupied with bowling the fastest ball ever, even engaging in something of an unofficial “race” to 100mph with Shoaib Akhtar. I recall the Sydney Test in 2004 (S.Waugh’s last), where India batted for what felt like a week, and they just picked Lee’s line and placed it through the closest gap. Lee finished the Test with few or no wickets for bloody heaps.
As he’s discovered reverse swing in recent years, he’s regained that “weapon” element again, and I guess that’s why it would be sad to see injury pull stumps on his career…
vas said | February 22nd 2010 @ 9:15am | Report comment
Brett Lee is a crucial piece to the puzzle. As I wrote in my Roar piece last week: http://www.theroar.com.au/2010/02/17/world-cup-cricket-dream-still-a-work-in-progress/, the attack still looks like it lacks a leader.
As I mentioned, the recent successes of Bollinger, Harris and McKay have been inflated against some pretty sub-standard opposition. You may be right about Bollinger, but I am still yet to see Harris and McKay perform against better batitng lineups. Of course, you can only do well against the teams you play, but heading to a World Cup year, Harris and McKay will still need to answer some questions.
To win a World Cup, you need leaders. I’m not sure that by the time next year comes, either Bollinger or Johnson will have amassed enough experience to manfully lead an attack that will be pitched against a variety of opposition in one-off contests. That makes the return of both Brett Lee and Nathan Bracken imperative to Australia’s hopes.
I don’t think Brett Lee will play Test cricket again, but I have no doubt he should be our pace leader (form and fitness pending) for the World Cup next year. The extreme pace and reverse swing will be a deadly weapon. If Lee isn’t fit, I’d pick Shaun Tait. We need that kind of bowler to run through opposition.
An attack of Lee, Bollinger and Johnson (with Bracken and Harris as backup) looks the goods for us.
Brett McKay said | February 22nd 2010 @ 11:22am | Report comment
Vas, I think you’re underselling Harris a touch – 140kmh outswinging yorkers will undo plenty of batsmen of the highest standard too….
No arguement about McKay though, you’d have noticed I didn’t mention him, and just last week I overlooked him for NZ…
vas said | February 22nd 2010 @ 12:20pm | Report comment
Don’t get me wrong Brett. I undersell Harris purely because I haven’t seen him outside of Australia, or under a pressure situation yet. I have no arguments against what he’s done so far, but only contending he still has questions to answer before we laud him the finished article. Bear in mind he still hasn’t played 10 ODIs yet, so it’s too early to make judgements either way.
Compare Harris to Brett Lee. Harris is doing everything Brett Lee can, but Lee has vast amounts of experience, which is crucial to winning multi-team tournaments. If Brett Lee does not make it, I would pick Shaun Tait. The reason we won the 2007 WC was due to the balance of the attack. We need a strike bowler capable of crushing toes and stumps and extracting reverse swing.
Brett McKay said | February 22nd 2010 @ 12:55pm | Report comment
Vas, Harris is doing everything Lee could – whether he still can or not is just one of the $64 questions I referred to. I expect Harris will do quite well in NZ, the conditions over there should be very conducive to what he does best. And he’s also your man for landing yorkers on front toes..
formeropenside said | February 22nd 2010 @ 1:52pm | Report comment
Brett Lee had two good periods in his whole career, and proved that a 150kmh half volley is still a half volley over and over again.
I cant see him represeting Australia again. At least I hope not.
Brett McKay said | February 22nd 2010 @ 2:03pm | Report comment
fair point FOS, and I guess that’s what I was getting at in my recollections of Sydney 2004 to JohnB above…
vas said | February 22nd 2010 @ 4:30pm | Report comment
brett, i want to see harris bowl in india. that will be his litmus test. so far he’s put himself in the frame, nothing more. bollinger and johnson are the established members, while the queue features harris, mckay, lee, bracken, siddle, tait and nannes.
harris’ strength has been to move the new ball. this will be negated in india (unless there is dew), so the real ability for fast bowlers is reverse swing. we have no better exponent of this than brett lee.
and again, experience is key. an attack of harris, bollinger and johnson may be found wanting in a crucial stage simply because they lack the know-how to do it when it matters. succeeding under pressure is an artform only known through experience. while lee’s status of being a good test bowler may be in doubt, he will finish up one of the greatest ODI bowlers ever. His figures prove this.
That’s enough for me. If he’s fit and firing, he should be the man to lead our attack. I just am loath to making conclusions on harris based on only a few ODIs. We said the same thing about Siddle last season, and he’s lost his touch of late. So the verdict is still out on Harris. Fitness pending, it isn’t on Lee.
Brett McKay said | February 22nd 2010 @ 5:05pm | Report comment
Vas, the question about Lee isn’t one of ability though, it’s form and fitness. And if that form and fitness doesn’t materalise for another 6 months, you’d have to agree Lee’s chances of a return wouldn’t appear so certain.
My whole position is that we just don’t know where Lee’s at. We don’t know if he’s a week, month, or year away from bowling again, or even if ever at all. There’s no doubting his contributions or past deeds or even ability. But there’s a massive question mark on when or if he’ll return. And until we can be more certain about either option, there would seem to be little point in including Lee in any planning..
formeropenside said | February 22nd 2010 @ 7:05pm | Report comment
When did Lee ever perform in India?
Whiteline said | February 22nd 2010 @ 6:09pm | Report comment
Given that Lee has stated that he is satisfied with what he has achieved etc suggests it’s as good as over.
Onto our pace attack in NZ, let’s be honest lads, it doesn’t matter who goes over there, they will do well. New Zealand’s batting is on a par with Pakistan and West Indies. Strap yourselves in for some more woeful international cricket boys.
Brett McKay said | February 23rd 2010 @ 7:11am | Report comment
I’m not quite so sure it will be the walkover you’re expecting, Whiteline. New Zealand seem to have this happy knack of saving their very best cricket for Australia, and it’s hard to see new coach Mark Greatbach preparing them for mediocrity. This could well be the best test for the newish Australian attack actually…
Hansie said | February 22nd 2010 @ 6:50pm | Report comment
I think Lee will follow Tait and Nannes and retire from the longer forms of the game.
Brett McKay said | February 23rd 2010 @ 7:09am | Report comment
Having seen the bare bones of his situation highlighted like they were in this column, it seems Brett Lee will retire from Test cricket this week. It may also have been a conversation he had with Andrew Flintoff, it’s hard to say. I’m sure both played their part in Lee coming to his decision…
http://www.smh.com.au/sport/cricket/freddie-convinces-lee-to-call-stumps-20100222-orxr.html