Thrills and upsets in frenetic Super 14 second round
By Spiro Zavos, 22 Feb 2010 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Brumbies, Reds, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, Waratahs, Western Force
Related coverage
- Western Force news
- ACT Brumbies news
- NSW Waratahs news
- Queensland Reds news
- Rugby Union news
- Super Rugby news

Queensland's Anthony Faingaa gets into space during the Super 14 match between the Queensland Reds and the Canterbury Crusaders at Suncorp Stadium in Brisbane, Friday, Feb. 19, 2010. (AAP Image/Dave Hunt)
As I watched my tips going down the drain in the first three matches of the frenetic Super 14 second round, I remembered the old adage that journalists are prophets of the past.
We can tell you exactly why something happened after it has happened. But we are like everyone else, including alleged clairvoyants, in that we can’t accurately predict the future. And this is as it should be. One of the attractions of big time sports is its glorious uncertainty (to coin a cliche).
The opening match of the second round saw the Highlanders at home against the flaky Blues.
This seemed like an obvious win to the Highlanders who were impressive the week before against the Crusaders. But Jimmy Cowan decided (or was told by his coaches) to kick away all the good ball won for his side by a good pack.
The Blues are much better with the ball in their hands than defending, so Cowan actually was kicking the Blues back into the game. Another kick, an attempted charge down and the Blues were racing away for a 70m try that sealed the match for them.
Match one tip lost.
Then came the upset of the tournament so far, I reckon with a rampant Reds side reducing the Crusaders to a mistake-ridden mess by direct running in the backs and forwards, and some stern defence that forced more turnovers than the Crusaders have surrendered in total for a number of years.
The key to the Reds’ victory was great running from Quade Cooper and Peter Hynes from fullback, and another superb display of passing and running at halfback from Will Genia.
This was the first victory by the Reds, resplendent in their new red colours (which clashed unfortunately with the Crusaders’ away kit), in 11 years. It also meant that my second tip was down the drain.
The Cheetahs defeated the toothless Sharks with the Sharks kicking away good ball as if they were playing under the old interpretations. This was the first away win the Cheetahs have recorded in three seasons. Another tip down the drain.
Then came one of the more remarkable games ever played in Super Rugby, or in any other rugby tournament for that matter. A team that scores 65 points as the Lions did against the Chiefs and LOSES is something that might happen in a T20 cricket match but never in rugby.
The Chiefs, of course, played beautifully with the ball in hand. From the kick-off, for instance, they ran the ball from their goal line, with Richard Kahui making a terrific break, and almost scored at the other end of the field.
But their defence, tactical awareness and kicking were appalling. What is it with New Zealand teams playing brain-dead rugby so often?
Stephen Donald might have scored 32 points but he allowed the Lions back into the game when his side was about 30 points up and 15 minutes to play and altitude had got to his players. Donald put a chip kick through from inside his 22.
The Lions duly regathered the ball, scored and then scored and scored and got within a converted try of an unlikely victory. With time up the Chiefs halfback Brendon Leonard continued the brain dead tactics by kicking the ball up field rather than out. The Lions replied with a final try.
At least I got a point by picking the Chiefs to win.
And another point with my pick that the Hurricanes would defeat the weakened Western Force. In the end this was an easy victory on the scoreboard. But in the 20 minutes after half time the game was in the balance with the Force only 13 points down and on a roll.
The Hurricanes couldn’t get their hands on the ball. When they finally got possession Piri Weepu continued the New Zealand tradition of brain dead play by kicking the ball down field for the Force to run it back at the Hurricanes.
I tipped against the two Australian sides playing in South Africa. I didn’t want to do this but I couldn’t see how the Waratahs could defeat the Bulls, a side that looks like the best in the tournament so far. The Brumbies were competitive for an hour and then started making mistakes and were penalised by the South African referee, Mark Lawrence.
The Brumbies pack, with a nonsense of a forward in Justin Harrison in the second row, is not good enough in the set pieces to allow the Brumbies to be a realistic contender, at this stage in the tournament.
Matt Giteau underplayed his hand at five-eighths. Rocky Elsom had a storming game in the loose. But there is not much firepower in the outside backs. Admittedly, though, the Brumbies won’t face many sides this season, if any others, as strong as the Bulls and as well-coached.
While there was some comfort for the Brumbies in their defeat, the same can’t be said for the Waratahs in their defeat by the Stormers. They have no discernible winning pattern or style of play. They kick the ball away continually when the new interpretations scream out for teams to keep their hands on the ball.
Luke Burgess is embarrassing at halfback with his poor passing and indecision when setting up plays. Again, like the Brumbies, their pace out wide should be there (it is on paper) but there doesn’t seem to be much action from the back three.
After the first three upsets, I had a chat with my son, and publisher of The Roar, Zac. He commiserated with me and advised that I should be more heuristic with my tips in the future.
Heuristic? I looked the word up and discovered that it means creating solutions based on experience, with a sort of trial and error system.
So what does the experience of the first two rounds tell us?
First, teams that keep the ball in hand and only kick when necessary and then for touch will do well. Second, the better teams have strong running back games from their back three. Third, these teams are very fit. One of the players was quoted as saying that he has never experienced such fast rugby as in the first round match.
Fourth, teams need solid set piece, which rules out the Force with Matt Dunning not even being able to time his touch let alone keep his side of the scrum up.
Other heuristic opinions are always to back the the Hurricanes, Chiefs, Stormers and Bulls playing at home (and the Bulls away from home, I reckon too): remember that when Craig Joubert, the referee in the Reds – Crusaders match, referees the home side generally wins.
And that local teams refereed by local referees generally win.
For the record, the local referees next weeks are Chris Pollock NZ with the Crusaders – Sharks: Craig Joubert RSA with Stormers – Brumbies: ‘Aussie’ Steve Walsh with the Reds – Blues: Marius Jonker RSA with Bulls – Waratahs.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- Brumbies, Reds, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, Waratahs, Western Force


February 22nd 2010 @ 4:34pm
stuff happens said | February 22nd 2010 @ 4:34pm | Report comment
One of the major differences at the start of this Year’s S14 is that the SA teams seem far fitter & better prepared than in previous years. In the past they have often had a lazy start in early matches made more difficult by a long road trip soon after.
The Stormers forwards bashed the Waratahs at the b’down. Their loosies, including the guy who came on for Schalk, were outstanding.In the first half their hooker Leibenburg (sic) was like a suicide pilot. I’d say the ‘Tahs were surprised by the ferocity of some of the exchanges.They’d never admit it but they looked pleased to be off the paddock at the end.
The Bulls are really tough to handle at Loftus ( and maybe in lots of other places too ) and it’s worth remembering that they were without Bakkies and Roussow and Habana of course is in Cape Town .100 + points in two matches and in both games the opposition did not play badly at all for much of the game.When they hit the road we’ll know more but they still look the team to beat.
February 22nd 2010 @ 8:03pm
deepinthought said | February 22nd 2010 @ 8:03pm | Report comment
“First, teams that keep the ball in hand and only kick when necessary and then for touch will do well. Second, the better teams have strong running back games from their back three. Third, these teams are very fit”
spot on, thank you Ewan McKenzie.
February 22nd 2010 @ 10:40pm
JamesB said | February 22nd 2010 @ 10:40pm | Report comment
NZ teams are so brain dead they have won more Super titles than any other nation. Yeah right!
February 23rd 2010 @ 1:33am
ohtani's jacket said | February 23rd 2010 @ 1:33am | Report comment
Yeah, that was a weird comment considering the Force were never in that game. Not even for a second.
February 23rd 2010 @ 3:01am
jools-usa said | February 23rd 2010 @ 3:01am | Report comment
Spiro,
Only game Setanta carried was Force vs Hurricanes & we knew the injury-ridden Force
would succumb, BUT Force played hearts out with constant 1st half defence, then some nifty
play to earn a couple of tries.
What I saw was the Force newbies playing with abandon (fun), happy to get their chance in the limelight & some
young talent that bodes well.
Jules -USA
February 23rd 2010 @ 3:08am
Zolton said | February 23rd 2010 @ 3:08am | Report comment
Jools, as a fellow US resident, I suggest you sign up for http://www.rugbyzone.com. I pay a small subscription fee and watch all the Super 14 games live and/or replayed online with great picture quality, Well worth it.
February 23rd 2010 @ 12:35pm
tubby said | February 23rd 2010 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
waratahs had an awful game plan and executed it badly. barnes clearly under orders to kick for the corners, yet the stormers won 22 out of 23 on their own throw. Did someone not notice a 7 foot tall lock in the stormers line up?
one of the highlights of the weekwas watching liebenberg hit the ball up, he’s buzzing with energy when he winds up.
February 23rd 2010 @ 4:08pm
Howi said | February 23rd 2010 @ 4:08pm | Report comment
“Luke Burgess is embarrassing at halfback with his poor passing and indecision when setting up plays.”
I said this all last year. He made a few impressive RUNS from halfback for the Wallabies and this kept him getting picked for so long. But he NEVER showed that he can pass accurately or quickly – and the Wallabies, amongst other reasons, suffered terribly for it. Surely you pick a halfback on their passing before their running.
And now look at Genia. ‘Nuf said.
February 25th 2010 @ 1:29am
Michael H said | February 25th 2010 @ 1:29am | Report comment
Lots of positives for Australian rugby this week.
Anthony Fainga’a made a break in the second half. Absolutely thrilling. I always wanted Australia to produce our version of a devastating “Ma’a Nonu”, striking fear into opponents. Hopefully Fainga’a can continue to make those linebreaks!!!
Totally agree with all of the above about how the waratahs got smashed head-into-the-turf by the stormers. Bulls, Canes, crusaders to win super 14