Eels’ Homebush gambit positive move for NRL
By Steve Kaless, 26 Feb 2010 Steve Kaless is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- John Ribot, NRL, Parramatta Eels, paul osborne, Rugby League

Bulldogs defence in action during the NRL, Round 6, Parramatta Eels v Bulldogs match at ANZ Stadium in Sydney, Sunday, April 19, 2009. The Bulldogs beat the Eels 48-18. AAP Image/Action Photographics, Grant Trouville
As a rugby league fan who has often been frustrated by the small-minded nature of many of the game’s club bosses and administrators in the past, I had to applaud the stance of Parramatta CEO Paul Osborne this week.
Osborne, spying a monster crowd for his team’s season opener against the well supported Dragons, has made the call to up sticks and shift to Homebush.
Now, as any long time reader would know, I’m no fan of Homebush as a venue. But my dislike stems from watching games with crowds of 15,000 rattling around inside the beast’s belly.
This is different.
Osborne knows he would sell out Parramatta Stadium in the blink of an eye and could get triple that at Homebush.
The former politician witnessed the potential when more than 70,000 Bulldogs and Eels clicked through the turnstiles last year and he is keen to build on that platform.
These sorts of crowds work at Homebush, and the Eels have the right balance between playing the majority of matches at the superb Parramatta Stadium while potentially relocating the blockbusters to the former home of the Olympics.
With the players staying on the straight and narrow this offseason, the code doesn’t want to be faced with some story about school kids missing out on watching their heroes play (with the AFL’s Andrew D lurking in the background, stroking an Auskick footy), even though most of the cheeky rugrats will get in for free with their school passes.
But with the new breed of CEO like Osborne understanding the value of spreading the game rather than protecting their own turf, 2010 looks like it will get off on the right foot.
Speaking of administrators, I was struck this week how times had changed.
I was discussing the game with a few diehard fans this week, who were all bemoaning the length of time it was taking the ARL and QRL to hand over power to the new independent commission.
These guys were, though, the very same chanting “A-A-ARL!” during the Super League war and prattling in the same chairs at the same pub that the game mustn’t be run by businessmen.
Of course, there are some big differences, but it’s still a big jump to go from the game’s ultimate gatekeepers to the ones holding the game back.
At least they were still suspicious of John Ribot’s motives.
Finally, I’ll note with interest the turnout at the Charity Shield on Saturday, as both the Dragons and Rabbitohs seem to have plenty of optimism bouncing around the walls at present.
Rabbitohs fans are notorious for crawling out of the woodwork, so I wonder how many will pin their colours to the mast at the first opportunity of 2010?
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- John Ribot, NRL, Parramatta Eels, paul osborne, Rugby League

M1tch said | February 26th 2010 @ 5:06am | Report comment
Good article Steve and I agree about its a great move from the Eels to take the game to homebush. Its a shame the Dragons didnt think the same come round 26 and finals last year.
Also I wouldnt be suprised to see two crowds of 30 000 for the charity sheild and also the round 1 souths v roosters
Crosscoder said | February 26th 2010 @ 6:20am | Report comment
Thinking outside the square is what it is all about.Ensuring the maximum number of fans can attend,and at the same time it helps the code.The Dragons unfortunately last year in a semi thought of 18,000 to hope for a win,instead of 40,000 to hope for a win at ANZ stadium.
Yes it may have put out a few supporters,but it would have made a hell of a lot more supporters happier .The club would have received 100s of thousands more in gate money.Bad business decision IMO.The game is professional and the Eels CEO has acted professionally for the good of the game as a whole.Thumbs up to him.
oikee said | February 26th 2010 @ 6:46am | Report comment
Good to see we are moving in the right direction. The more encourageing aspect to me is memberships. Full memberships.
Common sense needs to be made with big stadiums, if you dont think you can get 40 thousand, play the game at a smaller venue, by all means. I have nothing against the smaller stadiums, i think we need them, the tigers would be lost without the small venues for their supporters.
I am still holding out hope for the IC this year, the game seems to have a warm fuzzy feel about it now. The players look happier, the fans look happier, hopefully 2010 is a turning point for the game.
Benji signing a long term deal, now all we need is Jonny Thurston to come to the party, and all fans will be happy, united and ready to rock and roll.
Redb said | February 26th 2010 @ 6:48am | Report comment
Steve,
Your dig at Andrew D is harmless but it does fly in the face of the fact that Demetriou (the RL slayer) has met with various RL officials over establishing a RL Independent Commission.
I guess the paranoid amongst the league fraternity will suggest its a plan to destablise it
oikee said | February 26th 2010 @ 7:13am | Report comment
Yes Redb, we are going to steal all your good ideas, then crush you with your own medicine.
Redb said | February 26th 2010 @ 7:20am | Report comment
Just thought it worth pointing out.
AGO74 said | February 26th 2010 @ 7:59am | Report comment
I think the paranoia is coming from you redb the way you pop up daily on NRL and football pieces bagging out those respective supporters who dare to criticise the AFL.
Redb said | February 26th 2010 @ 8:01am | Report comment
miss the point entirely.
AGO74 said | February 26th 2010 @ 8:03am | Report comment
of course.
Redb said | February 26th 2010 @ 8:04am | Report comment
you cant back up your claim.
Paul J said | February 26th 2010 @ 8:06am | Report comment
We’ve seen RL coaches help AFL teams with tackling and AFL coaches help RL teams with kicking, it’s good to see.
Two QRL boys asked to speak to Andrew D about a commission and he said yes. Good stuff.
Paul J said | February 26th 2010 @ 8:03am | Report comment
The RL slayer?
Ozzie has used some common sense on this issue, hopefully it will be contagious.
Redb said | February 26th 2010 @ 8:21am | Report comment
was being facetious
Steve Kaless said | February 26th 2010 @ 12:31pm | Report comment
Redb,
My point was more that the press always hams up these photos of some kid who the NRL have stolen christmas from for having the nerve to sell out a match.
There is usually some claim from a parent that they may now consider playing Union, although Andy D looks to have taken over the role of pantomine villian. Just think of the child catcher from Chitty Chitty Bang Bang.
Good to see you on your toes on a Friday.
Redb said | February 26th 2010 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
no worries Steve. A big crowd with two tribes will be great fun.
mds1970 said | February 26th 2010 @ 7:07am | Report comment
Shifting the game to Homebush is a no-brainer. Play at Parramatta, and there’ll be 20,000 there and 20,000 locked out. Play at Homebush and a bumper crowd of 40,000 plus will be a blockbuster opening to the season. In these competitive sporting times, can rugby league afford to be turning people away?
When St George decided to play their semi at Kogarah last year, they turned away thousands of people. That’s bad PR the game doesn’t need. And the home ground advantage didn’t do them any good, they lost anyway.
AGO74 said | February 26th 2010 @ 7:55am | Report comment
Finally NRL seems to have administrators who see the bigger picture. As opposed to idiots like Doust who schedule the round 2 blockbuster against Canterbury in Wollongong?!?!?! No offence to Wollongong based Dragons fans but if you play this at Homebush you would get another 40,000+ crowd and make a stack more cash for your club. With Doust’s style of thinking he should be working for the QRL. Local grounds like Leichhardt, Kogarah etc are fanastic when you know it will be a 15,000 crowd will be in attendance. But for the big matches when you know you can get 35,000, 40,000 or more (which is happening more and more each season) then you have to play it at Homebush. It’s good for the fans and it looks even better for the game. Hopefully the Commission will help to avoid these self-serving gooses like Doust be overruled.
Speaking of the Commish which is also raised in Steve’s piece, it’s not the same situation with respect to business people running the game in respect of the commission versus Super League. Super League was a corporation attempting a takeover of a sport and looking after their own interests first and anybody else’s a very distant 2nd.
Dogz R Barkn said | February 26th 2010 @ 8:09am | Report comment
Good move by Parra and the NRL .
Springs said | February 26th 2010 @ 8:32am | Report comment
Great move by Osbourne, but I would like to see one of the games against Bulldogs or Souths moved back to Parramatta. Only because at least one of these games do not attract over 20,000 people and the fact that we already play both the teams at Homebush. Moving the Bulldogs game to Parramatta will, hopefully, bring 20,000 fans in, while the Bulldogs home game against Parra will attract 30,000 plus. A better option than two 20-25,000 crowds at ANZ.
AGO74 said | February 26th 2010 @ 9:19am | Report comment
Unless Parra go from the penthouse to *&^%house (most unlikely) there is no way that the Bulldogs or Bunnies matches won’t sell-out Parra Stadium. Leave ‘em at Homebush. Your club may have to pay a $150k ‘penalty’ to Parra Stadium Trust for moving Dragons game but they are going to make spades more than that by playing those 3 games at Homebush.
Springs said | February 26th 2010 @ 9:27am | Report comment
The Bulldogs and Rabbitohs matches would not have sold out Parra last year, Bulldogs game got 18K and the Souths game got only 10K (given it was raining quite heavily). I know they would sell out Parra this year, but in the case of the Souths game, last year the Round 2 clash, Souths home game, got only 20,871. I would rather see that at Parramatta, and then have possibly 30,000 at the return clash at ANZ. For the Bulldogs games, we could have 20,000 at parramatta and 40,000 at ANZ, rather than two 30,000 crowds at ANZ. And if the Eels home game ooks like it will lock out 20,000 fans, than we can easily move it back to ANZ.
oikee said | February 26th 2010 @ 9:00am | Report comment
Doust is a old dinosaur, we all seen this last year. His common sense to league is zero. The sooner he retires the better off the Dragons.
Yes we dont need all games played at big stadium, but surely the second round match (Dragons, Bulldogs) must be played at the bigger stadium.
See this annoys me, we all see the common sense of this, but we still have these gravy train fools running the clubs. IC so we can overule this nonsense.
Its amazing how good Parramatta are going now they retired that other old dinosaur, who run the club into the ground.
The next thing we need to have is membership voter rights, so we can get rid of these dinosaurs so your club can thrive.
Springs said | February 26th 2010 @ 9:28am | Report comment
oikee didn’t Wollongong just see the Dragons v Bulldogs trial last week? A ridiculous decision to have them play at the exact same venue just four weeks later.
oikee said | February 26th 2010 @ 10:59am | Report comment
The sad fact of the matter is, these people in charge think that “twitter” is a bird off a cartoon called “Sylvester and tweety bird.
They have no idea of how to grow the game, they have lived in their little inclosed stadiums all their lives, and think memeberships where only for their mates.
Look, rugby league is a vibrant modern game, full of superstars and going places, the only place these old dino’s are going is a retirement home.
Get the mover shakers into CEO positions, gee whiz, even ACDC could do a better job. At least they are in touch with the youth.
Mick from Giralang said | February 26th 2010 @ 4:40pm | Report comment
As a sidebar, Wollongong is getting a new 30 million dollar grandstand (on the western side) which will boost capacity to about 24,000. Won’t be ready for 2-3 years though.
oikee said | February 27th 2010 @ 3:54pm | Report comment
Sounds like our Commission, wont be ready for 2-3 years, after which the t/v deal would have already bolted. Its a sad day for the game, these dino’s still running, and ruining our game.
Dogs Of War said | February 27th 2010 @ 4:43pm | Report comment
The IC will be up and running before the end of the year. I don’t mind them taking a little longer to get it right, and make sure everybody is happy with the setup and conditions, because once it is formed, I can see plenty of changes happening.
Dogz R Barkn said | February 26th 2010 @ 11:31am | Report comment
What do people think of the Dragons’ new one-off jersey?
I can’t help thinking that too much is being made of something that will only be worn once.
Anon said | February 26th 2010 @ 12:42pm | Report comment
It’s silly that the Dragons even considered this. They have so many decent jersey’s to wear, so why bring a new colour into the mix. Now they have got rid of anything to do with Illawara, why not at least give them the charity shield at the bare minimum to celebrate part of there history.
MyGeneration said | February 26th 2010 @ 12:49pm | Report comment
It’s for charity, isn’t it? What’s the problem? Remember last year when the Panthers wore pink, and the Sea Eagles matched them with pink beards. All good.
M1tch said | February 26th 2010 @ 1:09pm | Report comment
its worked..
its got people talking about something else other than their 2 losses in finals last year