Related coverage
- Wellington Phoenix news
- Football news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- Socceroos 2014 FIFA World Cup Qualifying news
New Zealand coach Ricki Herbert, left, and captain Ryan Nelsen reacts after their team's 1-0 win over Bahrain in the World Cup qualifying playoff second leg soccer match at Westpac Stadium in Wellington, New Zealand, Saturday, Nov. 14, 2009. (AP Photo/NZPA, Ross Setford)
I’m still shaking my head in disbelief at the astonishing attack on Football Federation Australia made in New Zealand’s Sunday Times yesterday. In the article, writer Simon Plumb implores readers not to “hold your breath waiting for an annual Socceroos-All Whites clash – the arrogant Aussies don’t want to know about it.”
“Despite agreeing to a May 24 clash in Melbourne as a pre-World Cup friendly, Football Federation Australia officials are not interested in creating a Bledisloe Cup-styled regular encounter.
“The FFA are content to use New Zealand’s only A-League franchise, the Phoenix, as a convenient cash cow but when it comes to providing Kiwi soccer fans with an annual trans-Tasman clash, the prospect is falling on deaf ears.”
Now I realise Sunday News has a similar reputation to The Daily Telegraph, and I’d hate to come across as an arrogant or even irritating Aussie, but that doesn’t mean that hyperbole laden articles that are based on tenuous arguments should go unchallenged.
For their part, when asked whether its realistic for Australia and New Zealand to discuss a regular fixture between the two countries, an FFA spokesperson responded with a trite, “Not realistic at all. Football is an international game and a very different proposition to rugby and cricket.”
While FFA would do well to choose their words better when referring to competitive codes, it’s a reasonable point.
It goes without saying, or at least I thought it did, that football is a much more global game than any of the other codes played by Australia and New Zealand. That means the context in which football sides from both nations would meet is entirely different.
The Wallabies and All Blacks play against each other so often because it’s difficult to find top class opposition beyond a handful of nations. The same can be said, albeit to different degrees, for league and cricket.
This isn’t the case with football and it is in both nations interests for our national teams to be continuously exposed to high-class opposition of varying styles. Which isn’t something that would be achieved by an annual ANZAC fixture.
So FFA needs to work within that environment to protect and develop the game in Australia. Their job isn’t “providing Kiwi soccer fans with an annual trans-Tasman clash” as Plumb might have you believe.
Sunday News is also unhappy with FFA’s monopoly over their OWN finals series and that when it comes to gate receipts, “FFA pockets the lot”.
In truth there is a problem with a finals series in which clubs lose money by competing in it.
It’s not so much who pockets gate receipts (or makes up the difference as in Gold Coast last week) but the lack of any form of prize money that is the issue and Sunday News would do well not to get the problem mixed up in a farcical Australian agenda against Wellington Phoenix.
Still here’s another agenda for you: FFA stops supporting New Zealand football and lets the game rot away in Oceania without any local professional football.
The All Whites will enjoy their moment in the sun come South Africa this year but it’ll be a tough ask for them to make it to another World Cup in the near future.
I don’t for a second propose this, in fact just last Friday I wrote about how each nation can, and must, continue to support one another’s football development, but there are those who have.
While many are grateful for the Phoenix’s presence in the A-League and are enjoying New Zealand football’s mild renaissance, rash articles like Plumb’s work against all those interested in trans-Tasman development.
Plumb finishes his article by quoting Football NZ boss Michael Glading’s support for an annual fixture between our two nations but claiming that “it looks like (Glading’s) words will be falling on deaf ears.”
Well, good. Lets hope they do.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.


March 1st 2010 @ 1:44pm
Ben of Phnom Penh said | March 1st 2010 @ 1:44pm | Report comment
Part of the problem is that it would be a friendly, and this isn’t really what the proponent of the article is proposing. Given our already crowded calendar with Asian and World Cup qualifying there is little space for an additional regular competitive fixture to be played in either Australia or New Zealand.
I think the basic idea of ensuring the rivalry continues has merit, however the context requires rethinking. As suggested by ‘Mister Football’ an annual u-23 style clash, or something along these lines, would be well worth considering.
March 1st 2010 @ 2:52pm
AA said | March 1st 2010 @ 2:52pm | Report comment
Yay! Someone went with it. Hey Davidde, next time can you thank the person that supplied this article to you!
March 1st 2010 @ 3:02pm
Ora said | March 1st 2010 @ 3:02pm | Report comment
Funny that the little insular kiwi hater returns
March 1st 2010 @ 3:04pm
AA said | March 1st 2010 @ 3:04pm | Report comment
Following me in here were you? You went silent after this article was shown in the author’s other piece. Funny that.
March 1st 2010 @ 3:58pm
Ora said | March 1st 2010 @ 3:58pm | Report comment
No I wasn’t AA you are the one who went silent, i like most other people just do not think it’s worth commenting on. This is just a worthless piece of rubbish from a tabloid journo who even I hadn’t heard of until I seen this ridiculous thread which is also about provocation more than anything, a subtle yet very direct attempt to conjour up something that is not even there.
But lets talk about going quiet we are all still waiting with baited breath to see what contacts and information you have re the WP come on laddy don’t try be a hero with zero substance
March 1st 2010 @ 5:45pm
Davidde Corran said | March 1st 2010 @ 5:45pm | Report comment
Thanks, AA. Sorry if you felt like I didn’t appreciate your contribution.
March 1st 2010 @ 3:02pm
Midfielder said | March 1st 2010 @ 3:02pm | Report comment
The article is being laughed at in NZ by football folk … but they are fearful how both Australia & AFC react … the problem when times are strained and they are now for NZ Football … you need media support … not another code’s writers pouring cold water on your good news story…
The problem with these type of articles, and the same applies in Australia, is in the othe codes there would appear 20 other main stream press articles to say it is rubbish… that does not happen when the edetorial inches a code is given is only a certain size… So no one actually questions the article in the paper or on talk back…
There was also the article in the NZ Herald were two RU jurno’s went and openly said they where sad some much passion was shown at a “” soccer match”"” …. just shows how far both countries have to go … and why sites like this are so important …
I worked in NZ for about 3 years … RU rule the media in NZ, and have build rugby into a massive international sport … with the world’s third most watched sporting event in the Rugby WC according to them ….
March 1st 2010 @ 4:07pm
Damo said | March 1st 2010 @ 4:07pm | Report comment
And it’s not?
March 1st 2010 @ 9:29pm
Midfielder said | March 1st 2010 @ 9:29pm | Report comment
You are kidding … it is not
March 13th 2010 @ 6:36am
Michael said | March 13th 2010 @ 6:36am | Report comment
…. Look, as an an ex apt NZ living in Aussie I love following the fortunes of the socceroes… however,i also follow the the all whites.. I watched them play mexico and I was impressed about the the way they played… the socceroes may be surprsed by the improvment of the all whites when they play them in may
….on the other hand… I dont see the socceroes in the same light as the 2006 team which had excitment and talent wrtten all over it and a wealth of exceptional young talent knocking on the door to get into the 1st 11….I dont see the same or a pool of players with exceptional talent on the fringe but rather the near same players albeit older and with some exceptions in 2010 team…will be interesting to see how both stack up against each other…… lack of games before the w/cup for the socceroes bar one with the all whites does not seem to be a good move…