Viduka shows the way to embrace football’s roots
By Davidde Corran, 5 Mar 2010 Davidde Corran is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- A-League, football, Mark Viduka, Socceroos
Related coverage
- Football news
- A-League news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- Socceroos 2014 FIFA World Cup Qualifying news

The Australian Socceroos' Mark Viduka kicks the ball in the Australia v Japan opening Group F match at the Soccer World Cup in Kaiserslautern, Germany, Monday, June 12, 2006. This is Australia's first World Cup finals appearance in 32 years. AAP Image/Dave Hunt
Last Friday, the Melbourne Knights announced Mark Viduka would be the team’s number one ticket holder for the new Victorian Premier League season.
In an article on the Knights’ website, the former NSL club also revealed that former Socceroo Danny Tiatto would be joining the club for two games as a guest player.
Interesting news that mostly went unnoticed. In particular, it’s another fascinating chapter in Mark Viduka’s football life.
The thing that disappoints me most about the way many remember Viduka as a player are the doubts over his motivations when it came to the national team.
People have pulled out everything from his relatively low goal tally for the national team, through to his hesitation in making a definitive decision on the Socceroos over the last few years as evidence of his misplaced loyalties. Such doubts couldn’t be further from the truth.
My favourite story about big ‘Dukes’ comes from the lead up to the 2007 Asian Cup.
In mid-June 2007, Graham Arnold made two calls within a few days to Viduka who had just joined English Premier League side Newcastle United. Arnold asked him to come play for the Socceroos in the Asian Cup.
On both occasions Viduka refused saying he “needed the time off”. In the end, and despite publicly admitting how crucial to the Socceroos Viduka was, Arnold conceded defeat and moved on to trying to fill the Australian captain’s ample void.
Less then a week later though Arnold’s phone rang. It was Viduka. The then 31-year old explained to ‘Arnie’ that he hadn’t been able to sleep since his decision to miss the Asian Cup. Viduka had changed his mind and would be wearing the green and gold a few weeks later where he hit the best goal-scoring form of his international career.
The exertions of missing another off-season to play in the heat and humidity of South East Asia took it’s toll on Viduka’s body though, as he limped through the next two seasons with Newcastle.
Its safe to say that Viduka’s passion for the green and gold sabotaged the twilight of his Premier League career.
Mark Viduka’s decision to become the number one ticket holder at the Knights has once again shown his passion and loyalty for both his country and heritage.
In the Socceroos era of ‘Luca$h’, the former Leeds striker stands almost alone as being about something other then just the money.
For me Viduka and Tiatto’s, return to the Melbourne Knights is further proof of the need to reunite Australia’s fractured football community.
When the A-League launched five years ago, Football Federation Australia’s myopic focus on “the next generation” of clubs was the right one at the time. However, the time to re-connect with Australia’s football heritage passed long ago.
So how should FFA embrace the older generation of clubs while still ensuring the game has a bright financial future? So far I can only think of three much talked about options.
A-League division 2
A-League division 2 – three words that seem to illicit as many pleas of “yes please” as they do accusations of “europhilia” (as if it’s a bad thing to want Australian football to mirror some of the best elements of the world’s most popular leagues).
The idea of bringing together the strongest clubs from the state leagues (and possibly some new franchises that missed out on recent A-League licenses) into a national second division is certainly alluring.
However the continuing state of peril that North Queensland Fury find themselves in, (link) is a reminder of how fragile an existence much of Australian football is living in at the moment.
I don’t believe relegation and promotion is anywhere near as foreign of an idea to Australian sport as many believe, but certainly the A-League is still some way off being able to sustain such troubles.
The state leagues have managed to sustain themselves since the A-League launched and surely a united national league would only strengthen the financial position of the biggest clubs in these competitions.
FFA Cup
A national knockout competition open to almost all levels of the game. Many states already have similar competitions so surely a national version, that remains regional until the A-League teams come in, would be a viable alternative.
I certainly believe such a tournament would also be a good way for FFA to test the waters in football’s traditional backyards.
However, while many would like to see such a competition modelled on England’s FA Cup, in truth that’s a competition that has been faltering since the 1990’s (if not earlier). It’s a trend that is generally mirrored right across Europe. Despite recent renovations, Italy’s Coppa Italia still leaves most Italians feeling under whelmed.
On the flip side, while England’s FA Cup has lost it’s lustre since the Wembley final stopped being the only regularly televised game in England, the lack of an A-League free to air deal could be exploited to a cup tournament’s gain.
Keeping the Status Quo
It would be easy to assume that by leaving things as they are FFA wouldn’t be jeopardising the game’s future by trying any financially risky innovations, but I’m not so sure.
The longer Australia’s football past and present remains segregated; the game’s future will never reach its potential. The longer the older generation continues to get the cold shoulder, the harder it will be for FFA to reconnect with them in the future.
The big point that many keep coming back to is a fear of youths with ill-conceived ideas of national pride causing trouble at and around football events. Instead of combating this problem, I feel we’ve run scared.
There are great people at these clubs that have offered so much to the game in the past and they have more to offer in the future.
FFA shouldn’t let a minority hold back the growth of the game. Instead, along with clubs and local government, I’d like to see FFA actively use the game to tackle these problems. A brave approach of engagement, education and no nonsense tolerance.
Personally, while I have a preference for which approach should be taken and have written about it on this site in the past, I am more concerned by the thought of continuing to not do anything to embrace much of football’s roots then by which path to re-engagement we take.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- A-League, football, Mark Viduka, Socceroos


March 5th 2010 @ 11:02am
Killer_Tomatoes said | March 5th 2010 @ 11:02am | Report comment
I don’t see why ACL places are so important? So what you will, but having 4 places in the ACL in a 12 team league seems reidicuolous, and devalues those positions to the clubs who truly earned them, by winning the league or finals
March 5th 2010 @ 11:31am
TheMagnificent11 said | March 5th 2010 @ 11:31am | Report comment
The ACL places are not so important; I just thought I’d mention it as an added benefit of promotion-relegation. Also I don’t the promotion-relegation should be put in until we have at least 16 teams (long way off). With 16 teams you have a 30 round competition. I think this 30 round competition should be supplemented with a cup competition (mentioned in my previous post). I don’t think we can support much more than that until A-League clubs get their own home grounds; scheduling is too hard with ground sharing with AFL and NRL. So, I think a 30 round season that runs from October to Feb/March is ideal. And, I don’t see A-League clubs getting their own grounds in the next 20 years.
March 5th 2010 @ 11:47am
Killer_Tomatoes said | March 5th 2010 @ 11:47am | Report comment
I personally think that anymore expansion, beyond Heart and Rovers would be ridiculously stupid for the forseeable future. We’ve already seen what can happen in that sense with GCU/Roar, where a lot of Brisbanes support on GC disappeared due to putting a team in an area that was perhaps not ready for it and now, rather than have one successful team (crowdwise) we’ve got two teams struggling very badly (I’m aware there are other issues at play with Roar, eg. ticket pricing, kickoff times). Basically, by introducing Heart and Rovers, they’re already essentially going to canabilise two of the only clubs who get a regular support of above 10K in SFC and MV, doing so anywhere else in the near future could be suicide.
ACL spots are not that important to me, we should worry about doing things at our own pace, and even a stand alone A2 league is, at present, not a realistic possibility.
March 5th 2010 @ 12:29pm
TheMagnificent11 said | March 5th 2010 @ 12:29pm | Report comment
I would say the Roar and GC’s bad crowds have been due to bad management. They both hiked their prices way too high ($30 for the cheap seats is ridiculous). When the Roar dropped their prices, they didn’t even advertise it anywhere other than the Roar website and the Courier Mail.
Also, neither does enough community engagement. How hard is it to give out some free junior passes on junior sign-on days (every junior 12 and under should be able to get in for free during school holidays and one or two games at the start and end of the season). Send players (even youth players) to take some junior clinics at local clubs (don’t ask the kids to come to your clinics and then charge them for it). Get the kids interested and their parents will follow (if the price is right).
NQ Fury averaged 7,000 this season, which is quite respectable. They had descent community engagement. Unfortunately all their investor are pulling out.
Adelaide also had great crowds due to their members get to bring 3 friends to Friday night games thing. The idea is to get more first time customers. If they don’t like the product, well there’s not a lot you can do about that, but at least make an effort to get more first time customers.
March 5th 2010 @ 12:56pm
AndyRoo said | March 5th 2010 @ 12:56pm | Report comment
I tend to agree Killer. However reading the latest about Canberra and Tasmania if there are future expansions that is how it should proceed.
We have now past the stage where blindly putting dots on the map in all the vacant areas is good enough and more considered expansions are the way to go from now on.
Canberra plan to field a team in the NYL this year or the year after under the same umbrella as the existing womens team with a potential future A league team in mind. A couple of years running both a NYL and W league team should put them in better stead than say Nth Qld who had to start from zero in their first season.
March 5th 2010 @ 1:09pm
TheMagnificent11 said | March 5th 2010 @ 1:09pm | Report comment
Haven’t Canberra already fielded a NYL team for two seasons via the AIS? They also have had a women’s team for the past two seasons. They should get the next license. When the best time to expand again is up for debate. I get the impression that the FFA want to expand as quickly as possible to get more games. More games means more TV and advertising revenue. Hopefully the extra money will be invested wisely.
March 5th 2010 @ 1:19pm
AndyRoo said | March 5th 2010 @ 1:19pm | Report comment
They don’t run the AIS team and the AIS team is full of kids from all over the country.
Their going to get a real Canberra team…well planning too.
March 5th 2010 @ 1:28pm
TheMagnificent11 said | March 5th 2010 @ 1:28pm | Report comment
Yes they don’t run the AIS team, but there’s no reason why that team couldn’t be the feeder team for a Canberra A-League team. Furthermore, what’s the point in having two NYL teams in Canberra? Canberra is not a big city. You may argue that kids in Canberra don’t have a set pathway because the AIS is full of kids from around the country. However, I think you’ll find that any descent footballer in Canberra would move the Sydney or Melbourne to play in the state league (NYL teams tend to get picked from the best young talent in the state leagues).
March 5th 2010 @ 1:49pm
AndyRoo said | March 5th 2010 @ 1:49pm | Report comment
TheMagnificent11
The plan is that the next crop of players from teams like Woden Valley (Luke Pilkington), Belnorth (Patafta), Tuggeranong United (Nikolai Topor-Stanley), Canberra FC (Stephen Lustica, Andrew Baresic) and ACTAS (Dane Milovanovic, Codey Larkin) can all remain locally and when it comes time to field an A league side they allready have some players. It also gives the opperational staff some experience.
If your 16/17 and from Canberra a NYL team where you can remain at home will sound better than playing in the NSWPL for most.
Feels more like a club than a franchise for mine and it’s kind of similar to what GC17 and GWS are doing.
March 5th 2010 @ 2:05pm
TheMagnificent11 said | March 5th 2010 @ 2:05pm | Report comment
Fair enough.
However, I think we’ve got a little off topic. My original point was that state league clubs should get a chance to compete against A-League clubs via a cup competition and promotion play-off system (this was following up on the point in the article). There a lots of people who support these clubs who don’t support the A-League. I think we got on expansion because I said you’d need at least 14 teams in the A-League before you look at promotion and relegation. I don’t live in Canberra, so I’m not in position to comment the best way to set up their club to approach the A-League.
March 5th 2010 @ 1:23pm
Rob said | March 5th 2010 @ 1:23pm | Report comment
I like the Canberra approach. It makes perfect sense, and I would love that to be the model for a Tasmanian, a Wollongong, and perhaps a Darwin (pie in the sky here) team into the future. It is a nice way to introduce the brand, give the female players and young male players somewhere to aim at, and also to bring the community into the development of the club. It might help make the “community ownership” model a reality, and stabilise the finances of these clubs as they move towards a fully-fledged A-League license.
Impressed by the Canberra plan!
March 5th 2010 @ 2:59pm
Gweeds said | March 5th 2010 @ 2:59pm | Report comment
I agree with most of the comments here. However apart from Viduka which is undoubtedly an Australian football hero, the very important issue that Davidde asks is:
When the A-League launched five years ago, Football Federation Australia’s myopic focus on “the next generation” of clubs was the right one at the time. However, the time to re-connect with Australia’s football heritage passed long ago.
So how should FFA embrace the older generation of clubs while still ensuring the game has a bright financial future?
I agree 100% with that statement. The old Soccer Australia and how football was administered was so discredited that it had to be dismantled and re-build again. Unfortunately the ‘ethnic tag’ was an issue to marked football as a new entity open to all. It might have not been the reality, but in a market perception is all.
But in the process we have alienated lots of people. People that know about football, love the game and its culture. So we have able administrators who can attract world class coaches for the national team, get us into Asia and set up a national tournament, but being mainly from other codes may not understand its culture. So we have this obsession with ‘family friendly atmosphere’ (as if a passionate football crowd cannot be football friendly…..but I digress) and as many have said the technical quality of the NSL was higher than the A League. After all the NSL produced the Vidukas, the Brescianos, the Grellas and the Emertons. That is probably because the NSL teams were run by people who knew football. Pity that at the end they couldn’t see that their resistance to change was leading the sport into a black hole, and it took a Federal Government to create a circuit breaker.
If we are able to combine the administrative skills of the FFA with the know how and passion of the traditional football people it would be of enormous benefit to football.
I don’t think a second division is viable. Just on the sheer size of Australia alone the logistics are difficult. The ‘FFA Cup’ idea is the way to go. The teams of the state leagues can then join the A-League teams in a competition. I think this would be more beneficial for football as a whole than adding more teams to the A-League in questionable locations or markets.
March 6th 2010 @ 2:17pm
Davidde Corran said | March 6th 2010 @ 2:17pm | Report comment
Great points Gweeds, especially on linking the passion of traditional football people with FFA’s organisational and professional skills.
March 5th 2010 @ 3:20pm
Griffo said | March 5th 2010 @ 3:20pm | Report comment
One of the biggest problems also is the gulf between the professional A-league clubs and the amateur state league clubs: not all of that gulf is financial, but is a big part of participating in a national league on a regular basis.
Eight years in the J-League took stock and had to change the financial model to survive and grow. Also was the plan to create many more professional clubs over the long term.
While that sounds good, as we see here clubs initially are in a precarious position financially (and fan base) so what hope does the state clubs have?
I don’t think right now a A2 League would work (financially) nor an FA Cup style comp for similar reasons, but a hybrid might work.
Currently Northern NSW is re-instigating the State Cup for all teams of any level. If all state federations did this, then a pool of 12 winners or finalists could form a pool to compete against the 12 A-League teams for an FFA Cup. This could be done preseason, the A-League clubs could travel to the home ground of the state-based club (financially viable, publicity generating, exposure to the professional player). This could be trialled over 2-3 years to get some measure of how this is received.
March 5th 2010 @ 3:36pm
TheMagnificent11 said | March 5th 2010 @ 3:36pm | Report comment
I think you’ll find that only the bigger state league clubs really stand a chance of making the A-League e.g. clubs from Melbourne and Sydney. Those state comps are way ahead of the rest. And, teams like South Melbourne, Melbourne Knights, Sydney United and Marconi are quite well supported. They have very deep roots in their communities. That is the reason they are big clubs, they’ve got lots of juniors and which leads to a lot of families supporting them.
Also, if a smaller club does win promotion, it would be a big deal in their community. People who don’t usually watch football would probably go along to support them. In their eyes they are supporting their community, not just football. The one or two franchises per city thing is good in most aspects but it lacks this sort of support.
March 5th 2010 @ 8:48pm
Mick said | March 5th 2010 @ 8:48pm | Report comment
FFA cuop, a-league 2nd divison, you got to be dreaming, the ffa can not get the fixturing & start / finish for a-league season right
Hey lets finish the season 3 months before the world cup so players have to leave the country, good move ffa.
Viduka never seemed like the type of guy that would want a send off & would be very happy being the number 1 ticket holder for MK
March 6th 2010 @ 2:06pm
David V. said | March 6th 2010 @ 2:06pm | Report comment
Ethnic clubs have a limited future. They will either have to change or die, because the communities that supported them are being diluted and bred out.
March 6th 2010 @ 2:18pm
Davidde Corran said | March 6th 2010 @ 2:18pm | Report comment
Ah, what an astute point. I think many are starting to realise this and that is why so many are willing to dilute this connection to become involved in the A-League or an A2 league.