
Reds Quade Cooper is tackled by Chiefs Brendon Leonard in a Super 14 Rugby match, Waikato Stadium, Hamilton, New Zealand, Friday, March 05, 2010. AAP Image/NZPA, Wayne Drought.
It’s Oscar time and The Roar’s Oscar for the pass of the rugby season is Quade Cooper’s no-look/pop-up pass to Will Chambers to put him under the Chiefs posts without a defender laying a hand on him.
The pass was pure magic. It was done so cleverly that one second Cooper had the ball in his hand running at the Chiefs defence, with Reds runners racing through with him, and the next second Chambers was dotting down. The Chiefs defenders didn’t know what had happened until they looked at the big screen.
I hesitate for obvious reasons to say that the episode was rather like a thief in the night unpicking a lock, taking the possession, and getting away before the inhabitants of the house even knew they were being robbed.
The pass confirmed for me that Quade Cooper is the Paganini of the Pass. He is able to get the ball away, with a sympathetic speed and loft for easy handling, in any situation.
The Chambers pass came with him taking the ball to the line (would that other Australian number 10s do the same!). On other occasions he floated long cut-out passes to put his wide men into space. And on other occasions he was able, magically, to get passes away even when he was severely dumped on his back by the unimpressed Chiefs forwards.
The new interpretations of the tackle law (which are, in fact, the old and correct interpretations), require tacklers to release the tackled player, even in ball and all tackles, before the tackler or his team-mates can play at the ball.
This fraction of a second is all Cooper needs when he is tackled to get away his passes.
Cooper, like Benji Marshall, has played a lot of touch football. This is a passing game, at speed. Cooper like Marshall has an amazing variety of passes he has learnt as a touch player, passes he can now release under the new intepretations. The Australian Women’s Seven side won the first IRB World Championship using touch footballers. Perhaps some Super 14 franchises should do the same thing.
The contrast between Cooper’s passing game and that of Berrick Barnes is startling. Barnes was good value under the old interpretations because he was tough enough to hold on in the tackle and place the ball back. Cooper was easily wrapped up ball and all.
Under the new intepretations, which put a premium on holding on to the ball and passing not kicking (Waratahs please note!), Cooper has sparked the Reds (even the seriously under-strength side that played the Chiefs) to two convincing victories against two strong New Zealand sides, the Crusaders and the Chiefs.
Against the Sharks, Barnes resorted to unintelligent kicking, along with Luke Burgess (an Oscar winner for the best imitation of a still life), Daniel Halangahu, Lachlan Turner and Drew Mitchell that drew boos from the normally partisan crowd at the Sydney Football Stadium.
I usually try to stay silent watching games and take notes (as befits someone who is supposed to be an impartial analyst) but I couldn’t help myself on Saturday night yelling out, time after time, as the Waratahs put in brain-dead kicks: ‘No. Noooooo. Don’t kick it!’
My guess is that if a Wallabies side were selected right now that Cooper would be the starting number 10, with Matt Giteau (who is still to show real sharpness) at inside centre. This leaves Barnes – correctly – on the outer, until he gets his running and passing game going.
Of course, Cooper is being fed by Will Genia who looks like being the next long-term Wallaby halfback. In fact, I reckon by the end of his career, depending on injuries and so on, that Genia will be bracketed in the company of Des Connor, Ken Catchpole and John Hipwell as Australia’s greatest halfbacks.
Genia’s long, sweeping one-motion pass from the ground, his decisiveness in running and his defensive game, the way he rounds up kicks and makes hard-shouldered tackles, should be a lesson to Luke Burgess, who is everything Genia isn’t.
Now the Reds have to learn to string wins together. They haven’t won back-to-back wins for several years. On Sunday they play the Western Force at Brisbane. Surely they will defeat a side that is a one-man band on attack, with that man, James O’Connor still being a teenager.
The ACT Brumbies did what they had to do to beat a valiant but limited Lions side. But they are, along with the Western Force, the only side in the tournament yet to score a bonus point.
The Bulls (with a game in hand) are leading the tournament with three wins and three bonus points. The Chiefs, the Hurricanes, and the Crusaders have, like the Brumbies, won three games. But, unlike the Brumbies, all these teams have recorded two bonus points each.
Why the Brumbies can’t achieve bonus points suggests a lack of direction, in the Cooper manner, in the backline. I would point the finger, too, at Josh Valentine who seems to have succumbed to an attack of the Burgesses, the symptoms of which are a tendency to stand over the ball at rucks, even when it is out, as if it were a time bomb that is going to explode if anyone touches it.
The other general point that emerged from the round, is that now we are into it’s fifth round the hard travelling is beginning to wreck a harsh toll on teams going to and coming back from South Africa.
The Chiefs, for instance, started brilliantly against the Reds with three tries in the first 20 minutes, and then their legs went and they couldn’t summon up the energy to stop the Reds comeback. The Chiefs, too, are rightly furious that they played on a Friday night rather than a Saturday or a Sunday (as the Reds are next week).
The Waratahs also started brightly before hitting the energy (or lack of energy) wall. Hopefully they should be able to emulate the first 40 minutes or so of their play against the Bulls against a Lions side that is all heart and little skill.
The Hurricanes who played in Wellington two weekends ago against the Lions also started well against the Cheetahs before their energy levels dropped. They were also playing at altitude which intensified the agony of the exhaustion they suffered.
We’ll get a better idea of how valid this theory is, though, when the Hurricanes play the impressive Stormers at Cape Town. They will be acclimatised. If they have any pretensions to being a finals side they should come away with a victory. That’s a big ‘if,’ of course.
But after a series of results that decimated my tips on The Roar, I am searching for a theory, any theory, that can explain why I got most of the winners wrong in the last round.
I’m backing the Reds and Quade Cooper next week. Surely it’s time the back-to-back winning hoodoo is broken by the Reds?
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- Quade Cooper, Queensland Reds, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, waikato chiefs, Will Chambers


March 8th 2010 @ 8:46am
Corvus said | March 8th 2010 @ 8:46am | Report comment
I’ll put the question out there would the Reds be playing like they are with Barnes in the side? I don’t think they would. Certainly not if Barnes were playing 10. Barnes is a good 12 but I am impressed by Faingaa in that position.
March 8th 2010 @ 8:48am
Gary Russell-Sharam said | March 8th 2010 @ 8:48am | Report comment
The reference to Campese in relation to Cooper is apt, a little bit of flawed genious. I also agree that Cooper should give away his Cunnamulla two step and just give the pass, a couple of times he delayed only to the detriment of the player outside him. Even though Will Chambers was on the end of a perfect pass from Cooper to score a try I see nothing to suggest that he has come to grips with Rugby he was horrendous late in the second half dropping a ball 5 metre out from a certain try and then minutes later stuffing up an up-and-under. You might say the pass was dificult to catch but if you’re a paid professional you would expect a better skill set than what he showed. A 5 year stint in league is a long time to be away from Union and schoolboy rugby is light years away from super 14 level. If the Reds can win this week I might start to get enthused but until then I will sit and watch. One great performance was “Daly” at tight head he has been the form tight head in the competition this season and also playes well in the loose. The comment that Barnes should miss out at Wallaby level is short sighted he must be rueing the day he signed with the Waratahs the ball he gets from Burgess is awful, the problem is compounded when he is running at inside centre, by the time he gets the ball his options are next to nil I would suggest to all Roarers that Giteau should be a little nervous about his place in the Wallabies side not Barnes, Gits hasn’t fired a shot yet and looks stale. The Brumbies are the luckiest super 14 team in the comp they’ve managed to scrap some uninspired wins together but look like a team of stars not a star team.
March 8th 2010 @ 9:36am
Hoy said | March 8th 2010 @ 9:36am | Report comment
I have to agree with most of what you have said here Gary.
Yes, Barnes an Gits should sweat their positions. Do you think they are? Probably not. The problem is certain Wallabies are protected species. Even though Cooper is the best 5/8 at the moment, and neither Barnes nor Gits are playing that well, there is not a chance in hell that either will be dropped. That leaves three players, and neither the national team’s vice captain, nor precious Giteau, will be dropped before Cooper, no matter how bad they are playing. If Cooper officially beats either of them, I will be one stunned mullet.
Therein lies a bit of a problem with Aus Rugby. People cry out that depth is an issue. Well I don’t think it really is the problem.
I think some of the problem is with Australia’s loyalty (for want of a better word) to players. For example:
last year, Gits was playing rather poorly at 10. Everyone knew he should have been playing 12. Why wasn’t he played at 12? Why wasn’t he dropped altogether if he wasn’t playing well?
Now that Barnes is the country’s vice captain, what happens when he has a shock year (much like he is having) and really doesn’t deserve to be picked? I am not a fan of either Faingaa really, but the centre one is playing better than Barnes this year. Do you think he will be picked? No, of course he won’t. Would O’Connor (a good 12, often played out of position) be picked at 12? No. So if the Wallabies were picked today, they will be picking a drastically out of form Barnes, who let’s be honest, has been badly affected by the Tah’s game plan and poor play, and someone we already know can’t play 5/8, Gits.
Realistically, the Wallabies are not really picked on form. Or if a player is picked on form, more often that not, they end up playing an unnatural position, just so they are in the team. That is large chunk of the problem I think. It could be a simplistic view, but it is my view nonetheless.
March 8th 2010 @ 4:44pm
AndyS said | March 8th 2010 @ 4:44pm | Report comment
I wonder in the slightly longer term though. Post-2011 both Gits and Barnes are tipped to be off. In Giteau’s case particularly, did anyone catch Paul on the Rugby Club making the statement that “he got me back” when given the push by Nucifora. And who is tipped as the next Wallabies coach…?
March 9th 2010 @ 10:22pm
mcxd said | March 9th 2010 @ 10:22pm | Report comment
Andy, if Nucifora is the next Australian coach my lifelong love of australian rugby will come to an immediate end.
March 8th 2010 @ 9:12am
Farthing said | March 8th 2010 @ 9:12am | Report comment
Anybody else think Barnes has been kind of average this year? A few decent kicks and tackles but I can’t remember him creating a try, or a break, maybe a half break…
If Kurtley Beale had been doing so little there would be a huge chorus to drop him.
A lot of people hate Quade Cooper’s little skip but when there is nothing on at least the defence has to keep an eye on him. Berrick Barnes could use a skip.
I think people underestimate that skip. I have been a youth worker in Sydney’s west and every kid does the skip. At first i told them get rid of it, stupid idea. They ignored me so I tried to prove my point by catching them in the air and flattening them, time and time again they made me look stupid for committing to a tackle while they were airborne and watching them scoot off in another direction when they landed.
II found it easier tackling hard running men, you have to watch the skip super close. It forces you to hang off the attacking player.
March 8th 2010 @ 5:28pm
Mick Gold Coast QLD said | March 8th 2010 @ 5:28pm | Report comment
Barnes would be looking better if he was playing in a rugby backline.
March 8th 2010 @ 9:56am
sheek said | March 8th 2010 @ 9:56am | Report comment
Of course, the original Paganini – Mark Ella – would have been very pleased!!!!!
March 8th 2010 @ 10:19am
ohtani's jacket said | March 8th 2010 @ 10:19am | Report comment
The Wallabies will get owned if they play Cooper and Giteau together.
March 8th 2010 @ 10:51am
formeropenside said | March 8th 2010 @ 10:51am | Report comment
Well, they did play together on the 09 EOYT, and 2 from 4 isn’t a great outcome, so I have to agree with you there.
March 8th 2010 @ 12:58pm
The Other Reds Fan. said | March 8th 2010 @ 12:58pm | Report comment
They just need to swap them around.
March 8th 2010 @ 10:23am
Rob said | March 8th 2010 @ 10:23am | Report comment
Spiro’s comment re the Waratah’s game – surely it comes back to the coaching, game plan, same problem last year, the coach hasn’t “got it”, to me it is quite frustrating to see a reasonably talented side play well below potential. The game plan is pedestrian and the selections reinforce an already poor plan. On Saturday it was almost comical, the forward s secure the ball then what we do now? I would put a bet on there will be a new coach at the Waratahs in 2011.
March 8th 2010 @ 10:34am
Jock said | March 8th 2010 @ 10:34am | Report comment
Guys we must remember that selectors – not only select the in form player – they select the player most likely to perform in a given position based on the players around him – not all players suit playing with each other – having said that the style of rugby being played/coached at the tahs and brumbies at the moment may not bring out the best in the players concerned – sometimes its not just the cattle – but the coach,
An out of form well coached player alongside a player in form, may well excel
March 8th 2010 @ 10:47am
OldManEmu said | March 8th 2010 @ 10:47am | Report comment
I thought Halangahu tried to play positively to begin with but he was getting very slow ball from his forwards and any ball that did come quickly was inevitably slowed by Burgess fooling around with it. A few times Halangahu seemed to look to go wide but he had no one running onto the ball or standing deep.
I agree that Barnes has not played well to date, that Cooper seems to be the best Number 10 at present and I would not be surprised if Halangahu is firmly in the sights of the Wallabies selectors.
I watched Clermont v Perpignan last night and Brock James had a very good game at 10 for Clermont. I wonder if the Rebels, or any other Super Rugby franschise for that matter have him on their shopping list
March 8th 2010 @ 1:45pm
max power said | March 8th 2010 @ 1:45pm | Report comment
I feel a bit sorry for Brock James. The Hurricanes tried to sign him a few years ago after he had a corker of an NPC season but couldn’t because he was Australian. He then signed with the Force and hardly got given a chance and now from all reports he’s killing it over in France. I bet the Force wish he was still there given their current situation.
March 8th 2010 @ 11:57pm
ThelmaWrites said | March 8th 2010 @ 11:57pm | Report comment
When Halangahu plays with Sydney Uni, the backline has decoys, chip kicks, grubber kicks, cut-off passes etc; it’s slick and they demolish their opponents. Why don’t we see these with the Waratahs?
BTW, who was the half-back who replaced Luke Burgess in the 68th minute against the Sharks? I googled Josh Holmes and it turns out he’s a Brumbie.
March 9th 2010 @ 10:21pm
mcxd said | March 9th 2010 @ 10:21pm | Report comment
Thelma, it was Josh Holmes. Holmes returned to the tahs after a couple of years from the brumbies this year.
March 9th 2010 @ 11:16pm
ThelmaWrites said | March 9th 2010 @ 11:16pm | Report comment
Thanks, mcxd. I was quite impressed when he came on for Luke Burgess. He took control, barked at the fowards, took quick looks at the field, and his passes were crisp.
March 8th 2010 @ 10:52am
eric said | March 8th 2010 @ 10:52am | Report comment
So is a Cunnamulla two-step an entrechat-dix? Is that an insult to the people of Cunnamulla?
Rob, maybe Hickey will coach Tahs next year after the current coach moves on!
March 8th 2010 @ 12:36pm
Apelu Tielu said | March 8th 2010 @ 12:36pm | Report comment
Spiro,
Cooper is showing great poise in attack. He looks beautiful in attack, but he is a terrible defender. At test level he has to be good in both areas as Larkham was. So I won’t be surprised if he is not the Wallabies’ no. 10.
On another matter, one of the things that has baffled me has been why the rolling maul is allowed when obstruction in other times is not. I asked Eddie Jones this when he was Wallabies coach. He agreed the rolling maul, with the ball carrier at the back of the maul and shielded from the opposition by team mates in front, is illegal according to the Laws of the game, but he said the problem was it has been part of rugby for a long time. I think that was a very poor excuse. If it is illegal for players to form a wall around their team mate with the ball after a take from a kick or a line out, as it was correctly ruled against the Sharks last Saturday, then it should also be illegal for players to form a wall around a team mate with the ball in a rolling maul, even if it began with a ball carrier in contact with the opposition. To me, the rolling maul is still one ugly part of the game; the scrum is another. If a team is almost guaranteed to get the ball in their feed, why bother with contested scrums that eat up so much game time? Scrums are still a major time waster.
I think the correct interpretation of the tackle has been working well so far, but I noticed in the Blues-Crusaders match that there were times where the Crusaders’ tackler(s) had not released the ball carrier but their support players were already ripping the ball off. This is a worry if the referees forget that they have to rule on the actions of tackler first. I think Phil Waugh did the same on Saturday and got away with it.
March 8th 2010 @ 1:58pm
formeropenside said | March 8th 2010 @ 1:58pm | Report comment
Scrummaging, rucking and mauling is the heart of rugby. Rucking is mostly dead now, and you want to kill of proper scrums and mauling too (to the extent use it or lose it has not made mauling risky)?