The first month Super 14 report card for the Aussies
By Brett McKay, 9 Mar 2010 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert

Reds players celebrate their win against the Chiefs in a Super 14 Rugby match. AAP Image/NZPA, Wayne Drought
With the Super 14 now a month in, it would seem as good a time as any to start marking the Australian teams, and see which, if any, teams might be heading for the pointy end of the competition ladder.
As I discussed last week, the quality of the rugby this year is a massive improvement on last year, and the teams are more than willing to play ball-in-hand wherever possible. Even in ordinary conditions like what I sat through on Friday night (and somehow stayed dry), the ball is being delivered by hand way more often that it’s being kicked, and it’s a wonderful thing.
For the powers that be that decided to bring in these new breakdown interpretations, they get an A+.
ACT Brumbies (6th after 4 rounds, 12pts from 3 wins, 1 loss, 0 bonus points)
The Brumbies are quickly becoming the Super Rugby equivalent of the St.George/Illawarra Dragons, in that despite promising so much, and with so much playing talent on their roster, they still manage to find new ways to frustrate their fans.
After a month, they’re sitting on three wins and on the cusp of the top four, but I’d be very surprised if they’ve taken much satisfaction out of any of their wins so far. Of those three wins, it would only be the win over the Lions on Friday night that you could call comfortable and even that wasn’t as convincing as it should have been.
The Brumbies can take a positive out of the fact they’ve come back from their Perth and South African tour with two wins from three outings, and that they play seven of their last ten games at home.
But while doing that, they need to have a bloody good look at themselves, and work out how they might start producing much-needed bonus points. For several of the last couple of years the Brumbies have found themselves missing finals births because of a lack of bonus points, and right now, the Brumbies and the Force are the only teams yet to register a BP in 2010.
They’re looking good in patches, the Brumbies, and young players like Christian Lealiifano are shining amongst some much bigger names, but they’re still yet to really click for the full 80 minutes. They get a B+ for the moment, but only really on the strength of the three wins.
Queensland Reds (7th – 10pts: 2W 2L 2BPs)
I’ve got to say this upfront: I’m loving watching the Reds this season. The Reds are playing not unlike they did last year, with that unbridled desire of youth to attack, but now with the added bonus of much improved defence.
There’s no doubt whatsoever that the appointment of Ewen McKenzie as coach has been the catalyst for the Reds apparent resurgence this year, and it’s easy to see his fingerprints all over the greatly enhanced Queensland defensive line.
What’s been really refreshing about McKenzie’s coaching has been his willingness to let his talented young backs loose in attack, where plenty would have assumed he might have reigned that in somewhat.
Whatever he’s doing is working though, and the likes of Wallaby scrumhalf Will Genia and ever-mercurial fly-half Quade Cooper seem to get better every week. Young props Laurie Weeks and Ben Daley are earning plenty of praise, and rookies like Luke Morahan, the Faingaa brothers, and Rod Davies are relishing their opportunities.
Despite an injury toll that would generally bring a lot of excuses, the Reds are the form Australian side after 4 rounds. They get a well-deserved A-, for performing well above expectations, but with some aspects still to improve.
New South Wales Waratahs (10th – 9pts: 2W 2L 1BP)
It’s funny, it seems all the frustrations that the Brumbies bring are quickly forgiven when you watch the Waratahs. Two fairly ordinary performances started the season, they then played some of their best rugby in years in the high-scoring loss to the Bulls in Pretoria, but then reverted back to their default 2009 “game plan” in just beating the Sharks.
The Waratahs have some of the best attacking players, and most mobile forwards in Super Rugby, yet they seem to be no closer to playing rugby under the 2010 interpretations. In some respects, the new applications of the tackle laws were designed for the attacking potential on the ‘Tahs’ list, yet for some reason, they’re mostly still running last year’s patterns.
If the Brumbies are like the Dragons, then the ‘Tahs must be the equivalent of their SFS flatmates, the Sydney Roosters. Like the Roosters though, you can’t imagine ‘Tahs supporters and sponsors putting up with this inconsistency for too long, and if their situation doesn’t improve over the coming weeks, then the pressure will only mount. They get a borderline C+/B-. I’ll let their supporters decide which way the coin falls.
Western Force (14th – 0pts: 0W 3L 0BPs)
No matter which you way you look at the Force’s start to the season, it’s not pretty. Three losses from their first three outings, and a causality list that would give some hospitals a good run, highlights just how bad they’re going.
They lost their marquee signing, former South African flyhalf Andre Pretorius, before the season began, and since then, their injury toll has worsened to the point where it might just be easier to name the players still fit.
From that respect, the bye over the weekend just gone came at absolutely the perfect time for the Force, as it gives them extra time to get some players fit again, and work their hurried new signings from Japan, favourite son Scott Staniforth and former All Black David Hill, into their systems.
But on the other side of the coin, the bye also means no points, and all other teams edge further away. For the Force to get some semblance of credibility back into their 2010 campaign they have to beat the Reds in Brisbane this weekend; it’s that simple. For now, the Force get a D; not unexpected, but with some mitigating circumstances acknowledged.
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- ACT Brumbies, NSW Waratahs, Queensland Reds, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, Western Force

Seiran said | March 9th 2010 @ 3:32am | Report comment
I think your scoring is pretty much spot on Brett! Personally I would score the waratahs with a C+, they played so well in the opening games but that last performance was an absolute shocker.
As a guy who’s blood runs blue I have to admit that over the past 10 years or so I have developed a somewhat perverse, secret liking to watching the reds play rugby. In the past few years it has been mainly because they were so bad I was simply just backing the underdogs…but this year! Their style of play is great, their passion is for all to see and Cooper is a man on fire.
If Cooper keeps playing like he has been I won’t be at all surprised if he finds himself as the run on fly-half for the Wallabies with Giteau competing with Barnes for the inside centre position. He is passing ball pretty cleanly this season and his kicking has also improved. I’m presuming all the run on time he got in the november tours has given him a hunger to keep that yellow jersey.
jools-usa said | March 9th 2010 @ 4:29am | Report comment
Hey Brett,
Sorry to change subject but didn’t see any S 14 games as bloody Setanta has sold out to Fox & we’re still waiting for rugby
coverage!
So any improvement last weekend in scrum settngs versus resets, or are different refs still having
different cadences?
Thanks
Jools-USA
Brett McKay said | March 9th 2010 @ 7:54am | Report comment
Seiran, there’s nothing perverse and secret about liking the Reds currently, there’s plenty of supporters of other S14 sides – from all three countries – saying exactly the same thing this season. Yes they still make some mistakes, but in my mind, a mistake trying something is way better than a mistake trying nothing.
Keep your blood running blue, by all means, but a bit of Red is very good for the rugby soul right now…
Jools, there’s been more commentary in this last week around the variable speeds of the ref’s crouch-touch-pause-engage calls, and the variations seem to be a deliberate thing by the sounds. Whether that’s working or not as intended is probably still open for debate.
Steve Walsh got into a good consistent rhythm during the Brumbies-Lions game, and I can’t recall too many resets, nor early engagement penalties (though I’m sure there were some). I know the Waratahs and Sharks were camped in the NW corner of the SFS for what seemed like an eternity, but was actually only 7 minutes, at one stage, but the resets and penalties in that instance were more to do with the Sharks losing a du Plessis for 10 minutes.
I didn’t see any NZ or SA games this weekend, so can’t really comment on scrum situations elsewhere…
Justin said | March 9th 2010 @ 8:08am | Report comment
Its a big opportunity for the ACT, QLD and NSW this week. Looking at the fixture they will all be fave’s to win. If they do they can start to cement spots in the top half of the comp. Teams from 2-5 all play each other this week. The Chiefs play the Saders and Stormers play the Canes.
A nice 4 try win for the Brumbies would put them into the top 4 with the Reds (who will have a tough match against the Force) possibly up to 5th. They must win as they have plenty of away matches to come.
Brett McKay said | March 9th 2010 @ 8:32am | Report comment
Justin, I’d have to agree with that, and I had noticed the draw for this weekend too. Big chance for some major table movement with top teams taking points off each other, and to sure up a few rocky season starts as well.
I wouldn’t completely write-off the Force though, they could well come out with a nothing-to-lose attitude, and who knows what that might produce. It’s a real danger game for the Reds, in my opinion (althought the 1630 kickoff in Brisbane will help their cause).
ACT and NSW are essentially playing for their seasons. Not so much to save them, but rather to define them. You’d think BP-wins are a must for both..
Rickety Knees said | March 9th 2010 @ 8:39am | Report comment
Have to agree with you Brett – the Brumbies and the Tahs are both teams filled with champions but are not playing as a champion team whereas the Reds have few champions but are playing like a champion team. I can’t say much about the Brumbies but at the Tahs I wonder how they are just not getting the message.
kingplaymaker said | March 9th 2010 @ 8:46am | Report comment
I agree with the judgements here. It’s sad that with the best group of players NSW is doing worst.
Obviously the key to the Queensland revival was the removal of a bad coach and the replacement with a better one.
Presumably the secret for NSW would be to remove a really bad coach and replace him with frankly anyone else.
Chris Hickey is certainly doing worse than any other Super 14 coach especially considering the superb group of players at his disposal. He must be doing untold damage to rugby in Sydney at the same time.
The only thing to do is take the hard decision and let him go: perhaps offering the position to a successful coach such as Michael Cheika.
Brett McKay said | March 9th 2010 @ 8:52am | Report comment
but KPM, you’d like to presume that Hickey was able to come up with their brilliant attacking plan against the Bulls the other week, and I realise that the Sharks are a bit of a defensive side, so some tweaking might have been required. So Hickey, presumably I say again, would seem smart enough to alter the plan as required. I’m not convinced Hickey is the start and end of the Tahs’ problems though.
So two questions:
1. Can he revert them to all-out attack against the Lions this week? and
2. Will the captain let him?
Colin N said | March 9th 2010 @ 8:58am | Report comment
2. Why not change the captain?
I don’t know much about Hickey, but is he an inherently conservative coach?
Watching the Waratahs this season, though, reminds me of Sale over the past two seasons, winning games by individual players producing moments of brilliance, rather than a team pulling together to play to a coherant game plan.
Sale haver suffered for that this season.
Sam said | March 9th 2010 @ 9:09am | Report comment
I think if he tries to dump the captain he may suffer the same fate as David Nucifora and Ewen McKenzie.
Brett McKay said | March 9th 2010 @ 9:40am | Report comment
Colin, I don’t recall the Hickey-coached Eastwood sides of five or six years ago being this conservative, and while they had some very good, attacking players (several Donnellys, Matt Burke, and others) they weren’t the calibre of the Wallaby-laden Tahs backline. Hickey even said himself when he took the Tahs job that he wanted to play expansive rugby, but it’s been easier to find evidence of the Tasmanian Tiger in that time.
It just makes you wonder what the real reason was for Todd Louden not getting the gig as was expected at the time. Was he too liberal in his attacking plans??
kingplaymaker said | March 9th 2010 @ 9:21am | Report comment
Brett in this connection it’s interesting to look at Ewen Mckenzie. I watched Stade Francais pretty often and their only tactic when they got the ball was to hammer it up in the air and hope for the best. This was despite having a wonderful backline with Gasnier and Bastareaud in the centres, one of the best fly-halves in the world in Hernandez, Mirco Bergamsco out wide, and mobile forwards to support a running game such as Sergio Parisse. As a result they lost countless games when literally all they had to do was run the ball on occasion. For a club with ambitions to draw large crowds it wasn’t great either. So Mckenzie was fired.
It seems he has learnt that this gameplan at least under his direction leads to losing matches and being fired. So he has changed. So will Hickey learn the same lesson too?
Brett McKay said | March 9th 2010 @ 9:49am | Report comment
KPM, as I’v just said above to Colin N, I can’t recall Hickey coaching Eastwood this way in all those GF years, so it does make you wonder. I’m sure some of the Tah regulars would have some thoughts on this too…
kingplaymaker said | March 9th 2010 @ 10:03am | Report comment
Brett it could be a woolly dinosaur behind the scenes it’s true. If it is, this dinosaur is hardly helping rugby over there very much in any way! Let’s hope they get some attacking play on the boil soon.
Wavell Wakefield said | March 11th 2010 @ 2:44am | Report comment
‘I watched Stade Francais pretty often and their only tactic when they got the ball was to hammer it up in the air and hope for the best. This was despite having a wonderful backline with Gasnier and Bastareaud in the centres, one of the best fly-halves in the world in Hernandez, Mirco Bergamsco out wide’
A wonderful backline? With Mirco Bergamsco, Liebenberg, Beauxis, Oelschig, Bastareaud, Arias and Southwell? Really? Btw, Gasnier hardly played centre. Also, had you watched a lot of Stade then you would have noticed something I noticed, kingplaymaker, that whenever Hernandez chose to put up a garryowen or go for a long-range drop goal that McKenzie would actually grimace on the touchline. That Hernandez utilises exactly the same techniques for Argentina makes me think that the excessive kicking was his idea.
Also, McKenzie wasn’t sacked for Stade kicking the ball. Stade ran the ball endlessly during McKenzie’s second season and Stade still lost. McKenzie was sacked because it was claimed that the players had lost confidence in him and that he spoke ‘rubbish’.
Sam said | March 9th 2010 @ 8:50am | Report comment
I agree with most of the points in the article, but would hold off on giving the Reds an A-. They’ve exceeded expectations which is great, but until they string two consecutive wins together I’m gonna have to label them pretenders. I’ve enjoyed watching them, they’re entertaining and play a positive game-plan (as opposed to their Southern neighbours), but the win on Friday was hardly convincing (the difference being the boot of Coopers), and they should never have lost to the Waratahs. They’re heading in the right direction, but I’m just a little apprehensive to crack out the champagne.
Harry said | March 9th 2010 @ 9:10am | Report comment
Excellent asessement, but it can all change this week, for the better hopefully with convincing displays at home by the Tahs and Brumbies … they both need bonus point wins, and really there’s no reason why that can’t happen, although the Sharks showed that they aren’t as bad as their start says.
Go the Reds and although I hope the Force do come good after their terrible injury toll, please not let it be this week, and Van Humphreys now legendary exhortation is followed though.
Harry said | March 9th 2010 @ 9:16am | Report comment
Before the season started I said I would be happy for the Reds to have a single figure finish out the 14 teams, well its looking good for, realistically, a finish around 6th to 9th. Such a result would represent real progress, they are still a very young team.
Frankly I can’t see the Tahs making the semi’s, the Force will be competing for the spoon with the Lions and Sharks and may well get it alas, which leaves the Brumbies – will they be content to bask in their own smugness and the now distant glorious past, or will they get their act together and give the comp a real shake?
formeropenside said | March 9th 2010 @ 9:17am | Report comment
The Reds are a B, not an A-. They should have beaten the Tahds, and should have played differently against the Blues in the wet. Arguably a refereeing decision cost them both games (the Peter Hynes penalty, the no-try to Chambers) but they are 2 from 4 not 4 from 4 as they should be. Three games in Sth Africa is a hard ask, and that is coming up after the Force game.
Hopefully though this hopeful sentiment bubbles along, making it harder for the Rebels to poach quality like Hynes and hopefully attracting some errant Queenslanders home.
A loss to the Farce this weekend would be devastating for the Reds. Hopefully that wont happen.
Comrade Bear said | March 9th 2010 @ 10:25am | Report comment
Agreed – definitely not an A- for the Reds.
Following the loss to the Tahs – it is looking as though this weeks game against the W Force is looking to be the most important of the season – a loss would result in another exodus of players and Qld being cellar dwellars again for a few more years.
Link has definitely been accepted – time for him to become the end of a leg and coach Qld to an ‘A’ anything at seasons end.