The first month Super 14 report card for the Aussies
By Brett McKay, 9 Mar 2010 Brett McKay is a Roar Expert

Reds players celebrate their win against the Chiefs in a Super 14 Rugby match. AAP Image/NZPA, Wayne Drought
With the Super 14 now a month in, it would seem as good a time as any to start marking the Australian teams, and see which, if any, teams might be heading for the pointy end of the competition ladder.
As I discussed last week, the quality of the rugby this year is a massive improvement on last year, and the teams are more than willing to play ball-in-hand wherever possible. Even in ordinary conditions like what I sat through on Friday night (and somehow stayed dry), the ball is being delivered by hand way more often that it’s being kicked, and it’s a wonderful thing.
For the powers that be that decided to bring in these new breakdown interpretations, they get an A+.
ACT Brumbies (6th after 4 rounds, 12pts from 3 wins, 1 loss, 0 bonus points)
The Brumbies are quickly becoming the Super Rugby equivalent of the St.George/Illawarra Dragons, in that despite promising so much, and with so much playing talent on their roster, they still manage to find new ways to frustrate their fans.
After a month, they’re sitting on three wins and on the cusp of the top four, but I’d be very surprised if they’ve taken much satisfaction out of any of their wins so far. Of those three wins, it would only be the win over the Lions on Friday night that you could call comfortable and even that wasn’t as convincing as it should have been.
The Brumbies can take a positive out of the fact they’ve come back from their Perth and South African tour with two wins from three outings, and that they play seven of their last ten games at home.
But while doing that, they need to have a bloody good look at themselves, and work out how they might start producing much-needed bonus points. For several of the last couple of years the Brumbies have found themselves missing finals births because of a lack of bonus points, and right now, the Brumbies and the Force are the only teams yet to register a BP in 2010.
They’re looking good in patches, the Brumbies, and young players like Christian Lealiifano are shining amongst some much bigger names, but they’re still yet to really click for the full 80 minutes. They get a B+ for the moment, but only really on the strength of the three wins.
Queensland Reds (7th – 10pts: 2W 2L 2BPs)
I’ve got to say this upfront: I’m loving watching the Reds this season. The Reds are playing not unlike they did last year, with that unbridled desire of youth to attack, but now with the added bonus of much improved defence.
There’s no doubt whatsoever that the appointment of Ewen McKenzie as coach has been the catalyst for the Reds apparent resurgence this year, and it’s easy to see his fingerprints all over the greatly enhanced Queensland defensive line.
What’s been really refreshing about McKenzie’s coaching has been his willingness to let his talented young backs loose in attack, where plenty would have assumed he might have reigned that in somewhat.
Whatever he’s doing is working though, and the likes of Wallaby scrumhalf Will Genia and ever-mercurial fly-half Quade Cooper seem to get better every week. Young props Laurie Weeks and Ben Daley are earning plenty of praise, and rookies like Luke Morahan, the Faingaa brothers, and Rod Davies are relishing their opportunities.
Despite an injury toll that would generally bring a lot of excuses, the Reds are the form Australian side after 4 rounds. They get a well-deserved A-, for performing well above expectations, but with some aspects still to improve.
New South Wales Waratahs (10th – 9pts: 2W 2L 1BP)
It’s funny, it seems all the frustrations that the Brumbies bring are quickly forgiven when you watch the Waratahs. Two fairly ordinary performances started the season, they then played some of their best rugby in years in the high-scoring loss to the Bulls in Pretoria, but then reverted back to their default 2009 “game plan” in just beating the Sharks.
The Waratahs have some of the best attacking players, and most mobile forwards in Super Rugby, yet they seem to be no closer to playing rugby under the 2010 interpretations. In some respects, the new applications of the tackle laws were designed for the attacking potential on the ‘Tahs’ list, yet for some reason, they’re mostly still running last year’s patterns.
If the Brumbies are like the Dragons, then the ‘Tahs must be the equivalent of their SFS flatmates, the Sydney Roosters. Like the Roosters though, you can’t imagine ‘Tahs supporters and sponsors putting up with this inconsistency for too long, and if their situation doesn’t improve over the coming weeks, then the pressure will only mount. They get a borderline C+/B-. I’ll let their supporters decide which way the coin falls.
Western Force (14th – 0pts: 0W 3L 0BPs)
No matter which you way you look at the Force’s start to the season, it’s not pretty. Three losses from their first three outings, and a causality list that would give some hospitals a good run, highlights just how bad they’re going.
They lost their marquee signing, former South African flyhalf Andre Pretorius, before the season began, and since then, their injury toll has worsened to the point where it might just be easier to name the players still fit.
From that respect, the bye over the weekend just gone came at absolutely the perfect time for the Force, as it gives them extra time to get some players fit again, and work their hurried new signings from Japan, favourite son Scott Staniforth and former All Black David Hill, into their systems.
But on the other side of the coin, the bye also means no points, and all other teams edge further away. For the Force to get some semblance of credibility back into their 2010 campaign they have to beat the Reds in Brisbane this weekend; it’s that simple. For now, the Force get a D; not unexpected, but with some mitigating circumstances acknowledged.
Recommend this story.
Follow Brett McKay on Twitter: @BMcSport
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- ACT Brumbies, NSW Waratahs, Queensland Reds, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, Western Force


March 9th 2010 @ 9:41am
Sam Taulelei said | March 9th 2010 @ 9:41am | Report comment
Fairly fair and accurate assessment Brett.
Move forward 12 months and ask yourself how would these performances rate? Because in 12 months time there will be no more round robin games where every team plays each other once so derby matches will be all that you can gauge your teams form on until the cross conference games.
If you have four or five teams of relative ability then derby matches are great from a playing and watching perspective, if you have teams ravaged by injury and unable to perform to their potential then it creates an unbalanced conference which may mislead fans, players and coaches about their team’s true ability.
I know that JON was pushing hard for an increase in derby matches to maximise public interest and local press coverage in Australia, but personally I will have more of an interest to see how teams fare in the cross conference games next year especially in a world cup year.
March 9th 2010 @ 11:23am
Brett McKay said | March 9th 2010 @ 11:23am | Report comment
thanks Sam – my intention is to revisit this topic again after round 9, and then again after round 14, to see how the Aussie teams have progressed/regressed. I’d love to able to do the same for the SA and NZ sides, but I just don’t get to see them enough at the moment to do so, and so any ratings applied wouldn’t be that credible I’d think..
You do make some good points about next year’s format though, and even more so when you consider that not all teams will be played across the conferences. You can just see the expectations of Australian supporters being crushed next year when the first cross-conference match ends in a smash-up in Pretoria or Christchurch (or worse, Bloemfontein or Dunedin).
Once we get to that cross-conference phase though, Super Rugby will take on a real Heineken Cup appearence, and I’m looking forward to that just as much as the increase in local games..
March 9th 2010 @ 10:17am
ballboy said | March 9th 2010 @ 10:17am | Report comment
I agree with your grades Brett – Tahs on C+ at best though.
As a Brumbie supporter I too am getting frustrated with their inability to put a team away and claim those bonus points. Hopefully the rain will stay away this weekend and the boys can get to running wide again.
I’m actually tipping the Lions to beat the Tahs. They have gotten out of jail twice already this season and there will be huge pressure on them to have a big win. Pressure I just don’t think they will cope with. As for the Reds, yep, I’m a big fan nas well. Love to see them knock over a few of the top sides – as they have already done.
March 9th 2010 @ 10:25am
Go_the_Wannabe's said | March 9th 2010 @ 10:25am | Report comment
The Reds had nothing to lose last year so they threw it around. High risk, high return rugby, good luck to them. Unfortunately it didn’t work last year but this year (and you have to give them credit) they stuck with it and improved their defense at the same time. Credit to McKenzie because if they were losing he would get it in the neck……again.
Maybe the Tahs need to bottom out and play some ‘nothing to lose rugby’ instead of hoping conservative rugby will get them over the line all the time? Maybe it would do them good to lose more regularly and drop towards the bottom and then have a red hot go instead of being also rans every season? At least it would be entertaining.
Brumbies are looking the best of the Aussies. Good cattle, good coach and solid start to the season. They have a culture of winning and look destined for the finals again.
Force are not done yet (if it wasn’t for bad luck, they’d have no luck at all). We’re only 4 games in and the only way is up for the Force. Don’t be surprised if there’s an upset or three during the rest of the season.
March 9th 2010 @ 10:36am
ohtani's jacket said | March 9th 2010 @ 10:36am | Report comment
Bonus point wins can be counter productive. Look at how many soft games the Chiefs and Hurricanes had in the first three weeks. I don’t think there’s any real need to blow sides off the park.
March 9th 2010 @ 10:45am
Harry said | March 9th 2010 @ 10:45am | Report comment
Assuming (a very large assumption) your not taking the piss, bonus points are in fact very important for the fragile Australian pysche – all it takes is one good attacking perforamnce from the Tahs for instance – doesn’t matter who the Oppo are – and the Sydneysiders are full of confidence, wondering who they’ll play the S14 final and comparing the current crop to the 1928 Waratahs.
More to the point OJ, whats your assessment of the Kiwi teams progress to date?
March 9th 2010 @ 10:57am
ohtani's jacket said | March 9th 2010 @ 10:57am | Report comment
I think the New Zealand sides are middle of the pack like they were last year. The only way we’re winning a Super 14 title is if we get a home final. Even if we get three semi-finalists like last year, South African rugby still looks stronger overall than NZ rugby.
March 9th 2010 @ 11:06am
Harry said | March 9th 2010 @ 11:06am | Report comment
Can see the Bulls and Saders in the final 4 – Canes, Brumbies, Chiefs, Auckland and possibly the Stormers to battle for the other 2 positions. If the Bulls get home semi’s they’ll win. Don’t think the Saffa’s will be as strong this year as they were last year in the 3N.
March 9th 2010 @ 11:22am
ohtani's jacket said | March 9th 2010 @ 11:22am | Report comment
The Boks have the potential to run rampant in the Tri-Nations like the Bulls have been doing at Loftus. It’s just a matter of tactics and the right formation. They make struggle starting on the road this year but I would put them as favourites.
March 9th 2010 @ 11:07am
Ora said | March 9th 2010 @ 11:07am | Report comment
The NZ sides are rather run of the mill at the moment there is no denying that however run of the mill is alot better than rubbish. The Bulls have got my money this year, they have two very important things goping for them 1 and there is no denying it they have one of if not the best draw this year and it is hugely in their favour, anything but a home final would have to be an almighty failure on their account. 2 they have a team that seems to want it more than anyone else.
But hey whats a third title they will equal the Blues but are still a long way shy of the Crusaders record.
I think the only team that may upset them at home in a final at this stage of the competition would be the Brumbies, the are a sound unit who will lift when the pressure is on, I personally believe they were hard done by on the high veldt by some dubious calls.
March 9th 2010 @ 10:41am
reds fan said | March 9th 2010 @ 10:41am | Report comment
A- is a bit too much for the Reds. B+ for mine. To be any kind of A you should at least have a better than 50% win ratio.
Waratahs should also be a B+. 50% win ratio – winning your first game at home after doing the SA trip isn’t easy. The Chiefs couldn’t manage it.
On that score the Brumbies should be A-. They have the 3 wins, but the way they have got them hasn’t been convincing. Heaven help opposition teams when they eventually find their mojo.
March 9th 2010 @ 11:09am
Brett McKay said | March 9th 2010 @ 11:09am | Report comment
Reds, I used a bit more than just number of wins in coming to my assessments though, trying to look at numerous other subjective criteria (like style and expectation), as I’ve touched on throughout the piece. If it just on straight wins, the marks could easily have just been A-B-B-D, but I don’t think anyone would really think the Brumbies and Tahs deserve those ratings.
Either way, if the only points of disagreement is the ratings themselves, then the main points of the column stand, don’t they….
March 9th 2010 @ 12:13pm
reds fan said | March 9th 2010 @ 12:13pm | Report comment
Absolutely. I just get scared when I see the Reds getting talked about positively…. its seems so .. so … unnatural… i’m in constant fear that any positive talk will jinx them.
March 9th 2010 @ 11:14am
ballboy said | March 9th 2010 @ 11:14am | Report comment
Just came across the Tahs Half yearly report card, stuff down the bottom of the bag with a half eaten sandwich and the obligatory banana.
W. Tah – Year 10
English B-
Wara has applied himself to some aspects of this course and, on occasions, has tackled the literary content with vigour. However, his sentence structure lacks cohesion and too many times he sits idly, waiting for the bell to ring. A more consistent effort is required.
Maths C-
Wara needs to go back to the basics and familiarise himself with the elements of counting. His inability to count what’s in front of him leads to poor options and incorrect decisions. I encourage Wara to trust his natural instincts more in the maths room.
Science C-
It has been a tough start to the year for Mr. Tah. His lack of imagination and experimentation in the lab has resulted in outdated formulas being rehashed over and over again. It is time to light the Bunsen burner and start mixing his elements.
History A+
Wara is an exceptional history student. He appreciates the importance of history to such an extent that he seems quite comfortable living permanently in the history books. Like all great historians, change is gradual and Wara should be congratulated for embracing this concept.
Languages B-
I don’t know what language course Wara believes this is but no-one can understand a word he is saying. Not only is he struggling with the basics of language, he doesn’t listen in class and ignores all set texts. He needs to open his mind and his ears if we are to expect improvement.
Sport B-
Wara has enormous potential in PE but is yet to realise it. He has forgotten his uniform on more than one occasion which has meant he must simply watch his colleagues run around. Wara also seems to have a heightened sense of his own ability. It is time to go back to basics and start fulfilling his natural potential.
March 9th 2010 @ 11:21am
Colin N said | March 9th 2010 @ 11:21am | Report comment
Brilliant!!
March 9th 2010 @ 11:27am
Brett McKay said | March 9th 2010 @ 11:27am | Report comment
that’s Post of the Day right there, great stuff Ballboy…
March 9th 2010 @ 11:36am
Harry said | March 9th 2010 @ 11:36am | Report comment
Very good.
March 9th 2010 @ 11:41am
JK said | March 9th 2010 @ 11:41am | Report comment
Classic!
March 9th 2010 @ 11:46am
Tragic said | March 9th 2010 @ 11:46am | Report comment
Excellent report card, ballboy.
March 9th 2010 @ 12:07pm
Soldoutfan said | March 9th 2010 @ 12:07pm | Report comment
You get a free laptop too! Top effort ballboy!
March 10th 2010 @ 11:09am
Chop said | March 10th 2010 @ 11:09am | Report comment
The only bit missing ball boy was ‘Would achieve more if he actually focussed in class, execution is sadly lacking.’
March 9th 2010 @ 1:32pm
LA said | March 9th 2010 @ 1:32pm | Report comment
Jools,
If you got Setanta through Directv, make sure you cancel your subscription. They are automatically transferring people to Fox Soccer Channel and billing for it.
No more Super 14 in the U.S – thinking of moving home
March 9th 2010 @ 2:43pm
Working Class Rugger said | March 9th 2010 @ 2:43pm | Report comment
LA
I thought I had read the FSC were going to broadcast Super 14 alongside the other existing Setanta Rugby (GP and ML)content.
March 9th 2010 @ 2:29pm
chris, syd Aust said | March 9th 2010 @ 2:29pm | Report comment
Jools and LA – watch the super14 on justin.tv – usually someone is streaming the games live. Browse the titles under sports or try search “rguby” or “super 14″. Obviously some games will be hard to watch with the time diff thou – cheers
March 9th 2010 @ 2:34pm
Brett McKay said | March 9th 2010 @ 2:34pm | Report comment
or guys, if you’ve prefer a slightly more definite and legal method, check out http://www.rugbyzone.com from which you’d be able to stream the game live in the US. About $50US for the S14 season pass, from memory…
March 9th 2010 @ 4:42pm
breakaway said | March 9th 2010 @ 4:42pm | Report comment
Thanks for the insights. It seems to me that return travel from Sth Africa was a factor in the heavy-legged performances of the Brumbies, Tahs and Chiefs, yet the two Australian teams got away with wins which could prove important in the long run. The Brumbies have had no injuries and will play virtually the same 15 for the fifth week in a row, and their pack has more grunt than any since Owen Finnigan retired, so their back are getting the ball going forward. They got over the Lions line at least four times for disallowed tries last week, any one of which would have racked up the elusive BP. I think they have the most potential to succeed, but I don’t rule out the gritty determination of a Phil Waugh-led Tahs
March 9th 2010 @ 6:50pm
Brett McKay said | March 9th 2010 @ 6:50pm | Report comment
Breakaway, you make a good point about the return travel, and it will certainly be interesting to see over the rest of the comp which teams can win immediately after returning from the Republic..