Examining the Waratah paradox
Roar Pro By itsuckstobeyou, 11 Mar 2010 itsuckstobeyou is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- NSW Waratahs, Rugby Union, Super Rugby
The NSW Waratahs are faced with a seemingly impossible choice: to win ugly or to lose pretty. Against the Sharks, their fans cast their vote.
It is no secret that the Waratahs have adopted a ‘negative’ brand of rugby over the past few seasons. In many respects, this decision has been justified by the success of sides who have adopted such a game-plan. Of the six finalists over the course of the last three seasons, it could be argued that four of the sides, the Bulls (twice), the Sharks and the Waratahs themselves, focussed on starving their opposition of territory and momentum with intelligent (albeit incessant) kicking and slowing down of the opposing breakdown, scoring tries, primarily, from the set piece. These sides followed the international model of ‘points accumulation’, made fashionable by the victorious English side in the 2003 RWC and likewise, the South African side in 2007.
The switch to the ‘points accumulation’ ethos saw the Waratahs move from 2nd-last on the table in 2007 to 2nd in 2008. This fact it seems, is hard to ignore for a new coach just entering the frame.
Since Chris Hickey’s appointment as coach for the 2009 season, it would appear that the objective for the Waratahs is to do what they did in 2008, only better. It appeared then that the fans were results driven, seemingly flocking to games when the Tahs were winning, regardless of their style of play.
The resulting season saw the Waratahs finish a respectable 5th, missing out on the finals by just one try and winning the same number of games as they had the season prior. Not to be ignored however, was the franchise’s all-time leading try-scorer, possession-starved winger Lote Tuqiri, finishing the season with a solitary try. This was symptomatic of a side who had stuck to ‘Plan A’ far too rigidly, playing the odds that tight rugby would win enough games for them to make the finals. The true impact of the failure of ‘Plan A’ was felt at the SFS, where despite winning their first four games, Waratahs home crowds dwindled, down 12 per cent (approx. 3500); a point seemingly ignored by Hickey and the powers that be at the Waratahs.
It was easy to see how the downturn in crowds could be dismissed as an anomaly. As promised, they did what they had done the season before, they won as many games as they had in 2008 and finished only one win behind the Bulls who finished 1st. There was a global financial crisis. The NRL was having its best season in at least a decade. The match against the flailing Reds, which in previous years would have sold out, not surprisingly came up short in crowd numbers. A 12 per cent drop could be acceptable under these circumstances. The Waratahs, tried and true, saw no reason to abandon ‘Plan A’.
During this season, Hickey made moves to strengthen his game-plan. The Waratahs signed Drew Mitchell in April 2009, a traditional winger with an ability to finish, but more importantly for Hickey, a prodigious boot and a solid defender. In July he signed Berrick Barnes. Of all the number 10’s in Australia, Barnes is probably the strongest at defending the vital channel one off the ruck. Despite showing little imagination or flair in attack thus far, he has an intelligent kicking game, almost equal to that of Matt Giteau.
These two players were ideal for Hickey’s version of the ‘points accumulation’ game-plan. Mitchell’s kicking ability made him preferable to Tuqiri, and Barnes would be the final piece in the jigsaw, a superior defender and kicker to his predecessors in Beale and Halangahu.
It wasn’t until January, 2010, that the franchises met with the ARU to agree on an edict that the sides would play an entertaining style of Rugby. The Waratahs had no choice but to agree. The franchises also agreed to new law interpretations which made turnovers far more difficult to execute.
Attacking from your own side of halfway would become a far more inviting prospect than kicking the ball to your opponents back three and defending the counter-attack.
Unfortunately for the Waratahs, they had built a squad on the basis that the defending team has all the rights. The wheels were set in motion long ago and it was too late for them to abandon their game-plan.
After 63 minutes of the Waratahs round 4 clash with the Shark, the Waratahs fans, rightfully, had had enough. They had watched the New Zealand sides, the South African sides (with the exception of the Sharks) and the Reds embrace an entertaining brand of rugby, unseen in Australia since the Brumbies golden era. They had paid their increasingly hard earned money to watch the same thing they had watched for the past few years, only this time, it didn’t cut the mustard. They booed their own team, the ultimate shame for any sporting side.
So how do the Waratahs appease their fans?
The obvious answer is to play ‘pretty’ and win. The problem is that Chris Hickey has assembled this squad on the notion that playing ‘ugly’ wins matches. Either the squad is incapable of winning pretty, or at the very least, Hickey believes this to be so. To play the style which the fans are vocally demanding would come at the cost of victory.
The fans have made it clear. They are prepared to wear that cost.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- NSW Waratahs, Rugby Union, Super Rugby
March 11th 2010 @ 9:25pm
andystath said | March 11th 2010 @ 9:25pm | Report comment
March 12th 2010 @ 7:49am
stu said | March 12th 2010 @ 7:49am | Report comment
The waratahs too depressing to go and watch live
I’m sure i’ll get roasted for this but from 2005 – 2007 the waratahs played more often than not exciting rugby – i think that this was because of Peter Hewat. Hewat was a speculator, he wasn’t the fastest nor the best defender but in setting up an attack he was great.
With his absence the tahs have no spark and it is easier to play a fwd focussed game
I also think that the tah fwds and the coach don’t trust their backline and perhaps quite rightly – last week the pick and goes from 2 yards out were never going to break thru – fast ball out wide with a strong back three (if they can catch the actual ball) was always on – but with burgess’s passing game and carter’s catching game that isn’t a real option either…better to try for a penalty.
March 13th 2010 @ 2:35am
johno said | March 13th 2010 @ 2:35am | Report comment
If the Warratahs hadn’t fired Mckenzie, they would have started to win pretty by now, but since they did, it will take another two seasons for them to start doing this. There will be the occasional run away such as against the Lions but that’s all it will be an occasional happening against an underperforming team.
The type of rugby you are hoping for does not come from one, two or three seasons and the more pressure put on this team to start performing in this way, the longer it will take for them to sort out their game!
The Bulls didn’t just start off playing the type of rugby they’re playing now, it has taken them at least ten seasons to get here. In the late nineties they were in an absolute shambles. Heyneke Meyer was as close to being fired as Bakkies is to being overly robust.
But the structures and processes that he has put into place was with a long term goal in mind. This constant whining about winning in style prevented the Tahs from getting to the semi’s last year. It’s the same sickness that’s affecting the Stormers fans as well.
If given the choice between coming out on top all ugly and battered, or lying at the bottom of the rugby pile all pretty, I’ll go with ugly, because sometime somewhere down the line ugly is going to start getting pretty as the players and coaches get versed in there systems, etc.
Remember this is Super 14 things happen at the speed of light in relation to the type of rugby that the average Waratah player plays the rest of the season, the step up from NPC and Currie Cup is already considerable, but Aus players don’t even have that step to help them stay sharp.
And then there’s the travelling factor, which means that the Tahs and Brumbies effectively crossed ten time zones in the space of three weeks.
March 13th 2010 @ 5:26pm
itsuckstobeyou said | March 13th 2010 @ 5:26pm | Report comment
I’d take it one step further and say it’s not just a new coach, but a new backline. It’s easy to forget how young and inexperienced the backline is.
Of the backline they fielded on Friday, Drew Mitchell is the most capped back at age 25.
Further, there are only two players who have played for the Waratahs more than two years, Turner and Halangahu who only debuted in 2007. 3 out of the 7 debuted for the Waratahs this year.
I agree with you entirely. As a coach it would be easy to come to the conclusion that tight rugby is the only winning formula, at least against more competitive sides than the Lions, Cheetahs etc.
March 13th 2010 @ 5:53am
Ora said | March 13th 2010 @ 5:53am | Report comment
How insane was that score last night, the Lions seemed to shut up shop and go home. I am really worried for this team how they can capitulate so badly and give up like they did is beyond comprehension. The Tahs were good don’t get me wrong but 73 points come on lets get real here. When the chiefs scored 72 it was hailed a disaster and they did it on the High Veldt. The Tahs do it at home against a team that looked like they’d rather be sitting in customs waiting to head back to South Africa. Mitchell had a solid game as did Beale, I am left wondering how much one can take from this game.
March 13th 2010 @ 6:09pm
itsuckstobeyou said | March 13th 2010 @ 6:09pm | Report comment
I rarely enjoy blow-outs, but this one was an exception. As I’ve said, I’m not a Waratahs fan but it’s good to see the Wallaby wingers bagging a truck load.
The good news for Waratahs fans is that over the next few weeks, they’re up against some pretty meager opposition. They have the Force (A), Blues (H) and the Cheetahs (H).
I’d like to think that the thing we can take from this game is that the Tahs will chance their arm against these sorts of sides.
March 13th 2010 @ 9:21am
bennalong said | March 13th 2010 @ 9:21am | Report comment
Johno gives the other side really well, and if you read LAS up the top you get a pretty good clue to the Paradox.
It’s not in the nature of humans to play a game well unless they postulate they’ll win if they execute their game plan.
It’s in the nature of NSW Rugby to win…….at all costs.
Throw in law changes and therefore abysmal standards of reffing that we continue to see, and then add the fantastic defense the Tahs have constructed, and you get CONSERVATISM.
And it won games because the laws gave penalties so frequently against the attacking team
It takes years to really ‘get’ Crusaders style, which I believe allows ‘chancing your arm’ to accompany solid defense. Witness the Wallabies under the man who coaches the Crusaders style.
But the Tahs have the players to do it………….and the will……….and the reason!