Have the Waratahs kicked their kicking habit?
By Spiro Zavos, 14 Mar 2010 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Chris Hickey, Drew Mitchell, Josh Holmes, Luke Burgess, NSW Waratahs, Rugby Union, Super Rugby

The Waratahs Josh Holmes reacts to scoring against the Lions during their Super 14 rugby match in Sydney on Friday, March 12, 2010. (AAP Image/Paul Miller)
You can’t complain about a side that scores 11 tries, most of them from flowing interplay between backs and forwards. So full credit to the NSW Waratahs for finally getting their act together and playing the sort of rugby that would have made the Waratahs of 1928/29 proud of them.
The Waratahs of 80 years ago prided themselves on never kicking, a tactic they picked up from the wonderful 1919AIF side that toured Australia to bring back rugby back to the nation after the game, at the senior level, had been closed down during the First World War.
When Gary Pearse, as CEO of NSW Rugby, attempted to revive the state team now more than 20 years ago he deliberately re-branded it as the NSW Waratahs. The hope was that this homage to that wonderful side of 80 years ago would inspire the modern equivalent.
It’s taken all the games in the 2010 tournament so far (except for a brilliant 40 minutes against the Bulls) for the Waratahs to live up to the traditions of their name.
There were a couple of needless kicks early on (Lachlan Turner just run, don’t needlessly boot the ball away!) But then the running game started to be rolled out. The big forwards were rampant and Drew Mitchell was direct and lethal with his finishing.
Of course, the Lions don’t seem to regard defence as part of the rugby game. They are a side that is robust with the ball in hand. But on defence they don’t seem to have patterns or systems, or even a willingness to stop attacks once they are flowing towards them.
And dare it be said, they were not playing with a South African referee. Vinny Munro, the excellent New Zealand referee, handled the game with a fine understanding of the ebb and flow of the game, and a correctly tough approach to interference of the ball in the rucks and mauls.
When Carlos Spencer got stroppy about a ruling Munro put him in his place and suggested that he’d march the Lions back 10m at a time, back to the try line, if he continued the arguing.
Waratahs were more intelligent at the breakdown, too, than in the past. If the ball is correctly taken in and support it well, then the best thing to do is concede the ruck and wait for a mistake. This was done and we didn’t see Phil Waugh conceding penalties (or in danger of conceding if the referee was on to him) as in previous games.
I was taken to task by a reader of The Roar for suggesting a couple of matches ago (when he was bizarrely, in my opinion awarded Man of the Match) that Luke Burgess should be dropped. This match confirmed this opinion. It was noticeable how much lift the Waratahs attack got when Josh Holmes was running the play.
It’s time, too, to drop Tom Carter, a favourite of coach Chris Hickey who re-signed him last week for a couple more seasons. Carter was caught from behind in one dash to the line. His passing is ponderous and when Rob Horne came on at centre he gave the back attack a sharpness that has been lacking this season.
The Waratahs match against the ACT Brumbies in a couple of weeks time is shaping up to be a cracker. I thought the Brumbies were strong, physically and mentally, against the Sharks. They gave up too many penalties, which kept the Sharks in the game. But their attack looked good, especially when Matt Giteau took the ball to the line.
My main complaint about the Brumbies is that Josh Valentine tends to force his number 10 to stand deep in the pocket with the angle of his passes. He needs to pass flatter to give a strong backline (although Stirling Mortlock looked a shadow of his former powerful self) a chance.
The Brumbies in fact have played well all season. Their loss to the Bulls came after they were leading at half-time and then (they claim) conceded seven successive penalties.
This brings us to the issue of the refereeing. There were no complaints this round from any of the teams that had neutral referees. And this is as it should be.
Although John Smit won the quip of the round when a touch judge decision went against his team. ”Did Marks make the call?’ he asked.
Old captains are like old elephants in that they never forget. Smit plays at the pace of an old elephant these days, as well
Back to the Waratahs. It is one thing to be adventurous against the Lions, a team that has won only a handful of games in Australia in Super Rugby.
Now they have to start playing running rugby against stronger teams, starting with the Western Force next week. So have the Waratahs kicked the kicking habit?
So far, so good is all that can be said for now.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- Chris Hickey, Drew Mitchell, Josh Holmes, Luke Burgess, NSW Waratahs, Rugby Union, Super Rugby


March 14th 2010 @ 12:28pm
Rockin Rod said | March 14th 2010 @ 12:28pm | Report comment
Red Rooster, Holmes was offered another contract at Brumbies but turned it down for the Waratahs offer. He knew valo was coming over and he is very chumby with gits. He preffered to come back to NSW as Burgess has been very ordinary the past 2 seasons. With Hickey gone at Eastwood, he returned home to Warringah but he knew Brett would start. Showing Robbie Deans he can play 12 aswell would be of more value to the Wallabies being on the bench behind Genia.He is that fast he could cover wing in a real emergency.
March 14th 2010 @ 1:01pm
Red Rooster said | March 14th 2010 @ 1:01pm | Report comment
RR – I dont disagree but it still begs the question about his base game as a halfback. He has not got in front of Sheehan, Valentine or Burgess as a halfback but may as you say be the best of all of them as an allround impact player. This does not mean he will replace Burgess within 2 weeks. He was tried as a starter at the Brumbies and was always rotated out
March 14th 2010 @ 3:14pm
max power said | March 14th 2010 @ 3:14pm | Report comment
The main reason he was played at 12 for Warringah was for team balance. Sheehan is one of the most dominant players in the club comp but he can only really play 9. Holmes was more than capable playing in 12 as he showed. He apparently once carved up Turinui in a Waratahs internal trial at 12 before he went down to the Brumbies. And Rockin Rod you’re right he is. He was the 3rd fastest player in the Waratahs squad in 2007 behind Tuqiri and Turner.
March 14th 2010 @ 9:15pm
Red Rooster said | March 14th 2010 @ 9:15pm | Report comment
MP – so the player who touches the ball the most in the game and is one of the most influential is Sheehan ahead of Holmes at Warringah? If he is a great halfback then he should own the position. You have not explained why he sits behind the others at the s14 level
I am not disagreeing he is a great and even fast player, just not the best halfback – play him at centre or on the wing perhaps
March 15th 2010 @ 6:35am
LeftArmSpinner said | March 15th 2010 @ 6:35am | Report comment
I suggest that everyone diving for the hyperbole book after Friday evening, take a deep breath, a few chill pills, put their spectacles on and then watch the Reds V Force replay.
There are two significant differences in the two performances, despite the similar thrashing suggested by the scoreboard.
Firstly, other than Mitchell’s try under the posts, all the Waratahs tries were from counter attack, commencing with the Lions making a mistake. These opportunities will be few and far between against better teams.
The Reds, on the other hand, ran straight at the Force’s defence, and either put a move on or used sleight of hand to break through. The try to Ioane, also under the posts, from an inside pass from Cooper, was real rugby. Cooper, standing on the short side saw that there was nothing on, moved to the open side, called the play, arranged the players and then executed the play: he took the standard inside pass play, and added another dummy runner and threw the inside pass two channels in. Simple, but brilliant! Ioane did the rest.
Secondly, Wisemantel remains silent as to his strategy for the backs. Jim Mckay, the Reds backs coach, is much more forthcoming and in tune with back play fundamentals. He is from the world famous Randwick club and its long history of running rugby.
He was quoted by the Fox Sports commentators as saying “Run straight, put the ball in front of the catcher and then back up.” Genia and Cooper are playing world class rugby and the Reds supporters and crowds will return. They would be mad not to!
March 15th 2010 @ 7:42am
Justin said | March 15th 2010 @ 7:42am | Report comment
LAS – agree completely.
Another master class from Genia/Cooper yesterday. I love the way the Reds pack plays too. Hard up the middle, make their tackles with aggression and get up to go again. They set the platform for WG/QC to weave their magic.
It was noticeable in comments by Rod Kafer that the push is in now (IMO) for WG/QC to be the halves for Australia if their form continues. He said Cooper was by far the best 5/8 in Aus at the moment. That wont go down well with Gits and Barnes but you would have to be blind freddy to deny it. Their option taking is brilliant and they have the skill set to calculated risks that so often come off.
Hats off to Mooney as well. The Fainga Bros are coming on brilliantly. I thought SF was the worst player in AUS at the start of this year and stated so on here. Yesterday he wasnt as dynamic as previous weeks but his throwing was the best I have seen it. Mooney deserves much credit for seeing the talent of these guys and others like Daley and Weekes and giving them time over the past year or two.
McKenzie has put in some good systems but dont forget what Mooney has done to get this squad together.
March 15th 2010 @ 6:43am
LeftArmSpinner said | March 15th 2010 @ 6:43am | Report comment
In answer to the question in the headline: No. It is there under the surface and will come out again when it is least needed, i.e. when they come up against a good team who is playing real rugby as it now de riggeur under the new interpretations (of exsting laws!)
Just look at the degredation of players such as Burgess, Barnes and Beale as play makers compared to the blossoming of Genia and Cooper.
March 15th 2010 @ 7:30am
TembaVJ said | March 15th 2010 @ 7:30am | Report comment
I am so over talking about the Tahs and their habits one week question mark the next week crap… There were other good games on the weekend, where are the articles on them, does everyone here only want to read about the Tahs and “crap/maybe not” they are? For years now roares have been begging for exciting games now that they get them they don’t talk about the good games but only the confused looking Tahs.
Even when they are smashing their “opposition” they still bore me I don’t know what it is but I don’t think they stand a chance in this comp… so can we please discus some of the other games that took place in the last 3 weeks? I am a big fan of the Roar but lately it seems like a fan site for the NSW Waratahs.
The Highlanders made a serious come back on the Bulls who look very dangerous when they focus. The Crusaders Starting to pickup the pace… the Reds Australia’s best hope and absolute breath of fresh air compared the too much talked about Tahs.
The Stormers just as dangerous and travel well…
Sorry if you are a Tah’s man I am not taking this away from you but this conversation is turning slightly predictable… Here is what will happen, they will win against the Force (everyone goes mad at the return of the champs in blue) and then will frustratingly lose against stronger teams and be branded hopeless again.
March 15th 2010 @ 7:39am
JK said | March 15th 2010 @ 7:39am | Report comment
But….the article is about the Tah’s
From what I gather Temba, there are Tah fans and then there’s everybody else, they seemed to have become the team everybody loves to hate, there are those that praise them and there are those that denigrate them, then the praisers turn into defenders and so and so on.
But your right enough now……anyone one wanna talk about Lara Bingle?
March 15th 2010 @ 8:04am
Brett McKay said | March 15th 2010 @ 8:04am | Report comment
who??
March 15th 2010 @ 10:03am
Rickety Knees said | March 15th 2010 @ 10:03am | Report comment
This site should have a banner on the homepage “THIS IS A BINGLE FREE ZONE”
March 15th 2010 @ 10:49am
TembaVJ said | March 15th 2010 @ 10:49am | Report comment
Lara’s Bingle is Brian Lara pulling a off cutter from Glen McGrath onto his stumps for a duck.
March 15th 2010 @ 8:05am
LeftArmSpinner said | March 15th 2010 @ 8:05am | Report comment
temba, got it in one.
March 15th 2010 @ 11:37am
zeedok said | March 15th 2010 @ 11:37am | Report comment
Everyone loves to bash the Tahs . . . (**DISCLAIMER – I am a Tahs fan**)
The Tahs performance was exceptional on Friday. They were brave in attack no matter what was happening and their first movement on every occasion was to run first, then kick if there was nothing on. Need I remind everyone that they did not take a single penalty shot at goal – not a single one. Oh, and also, they only had 40% of the pill (and still scored 11 tries). Their defense (apart from Drew’s nightmare) was outstanding. The team that put 65 points on the Chiefs could only get one genuine try!!
No doubt, the Reds are playing attractive rugby more consistently, and it could still go pear shaped for the Tahs if they back off the “run from any and everywhere” mentality, but Friday’s performance was very, very good — make no mistake about that.
@Spiro — I’m not sure which Brumbies game you were watching — I thought they kicked at least as much as the Tahs did the week before. Giteau looked ordinary and the wingers didn’t even get the ball. My wife, who was rivetted watching the Tahs and the Reds had to go and get her book to deal with the boredom of the Brumbies performance.
How about a little balance here — nail the team that performs poorly (and negatively) and praise the team that pretty much did what all of us (and the ARU) wanted . . . emphatically.
March 15th 2010 @ 12:02pm
TembaVJ said | March 15th 2010 @ 12:02pm | Report comment
With those stats (no penalties and 40%) the top 4 teams would smear the Tahs into oblivion… They would have kicked even their mothers at the post had they faced the bulls so ill wait before claiming them as a renewed running team. The Lions defence is as good as using a strainer for a coffee mug.
The reds look good, they are playing with passion and guts.
March 15th 2010 @ 6:28pm
ballboy said | March 15th 2010 @ 6:28pm | Report comment
Zeedok – you have 6 more days of sunshine. Enjoy it while it lasts.