There was a fair bit made by Ricki Herbert about Chris Payne’s hand-ball goal on Saturday night, and how it changed the game. He obviously had a point, but I felt that focus deflected the attention away from some serious errors in the Wellington game-plan.
Watching the early going from my vantage point at the SFS, I was surprised to see Wellington sitting back so deep and playing such a conservative game built on containment.
Any time you see Tim Brown and Vince Lia sitting deep alongside Manny Muscat, refusing to bomb-on, you know Wellington are looking only to frustrate.
And with Chris Greenacre, Paul Ifill and Leo Bertos dropping off, letting Sydney knock it around in their own half, you knew Wellington were looking for a smash-and-grab.
But it was clear, very early on, that it wasn’t going to work, and it would be only a matter of time before Alex Brosque and Mark Bridge would unlock the Phoenix back-line, despite it being so miserly of late.
When Chris Payne came on early for a ham-strung John Aloisi, adding more mobility to Sydney’s forward line, it was almost inevitable the ‘Nix would crack, especially with the two fullbacks, Troy Hearfield and Tony Lochhead, struggling to stay compact in the face of Sydney’s wide-play.
When Sydney are in the mood, at home, and can stretch opposition defences, they inevitably create space in the middle for the classy feet of Karol Kisel, Bridge and Brosque to take full advantage.
Even watching it live I felt Wellington had erred and that the game-plan would rely on a lot of luck, and some outstanding performances from Liam Reddy, Andrew Durante and Jon McKain.
While the trio have been producing it consistently for much of the past few months, I felt Wellington’s best hope was to come out and have a go at Sydney.
In Ifill and Bertos they have two outstanding attackers, and in Brown and Lia they have two guys with an ability to ghost into the box late when they’re on the front foot.
And with the momentum built up recently, a healthy contingent of travelling fans, and the groundswell of goodwill both here and across the ditch, Wellington, I felt, had to get on the front foot.
Throw into the mix a Sydney side that must have had its confidence dented by the major semi final loss to Melbourne, and you expected Herbert to come to Sydney and have a real go at Vitezslav Lavicka. They had nothing to lose.
The fact they came out and started playing as soon as they went behind only confirmed they had the ability to take it to Sydney.
Obviously Payne’s controversial goal, coming so soon after Durante scored his first A-League goal, halted whatever momentum the Phoenix had just built through the equaliser, and calmed Sydney’s nerves.
After the break, as Durante pointed out in the post match press conference, Wellington had no choice but to come out and play with a high line, and this obviously played right into Brosque, Bridge and Payne’s hands (no pun intended).
Perhaps the pace of Brosque, in particular, was the reason Herbert was reluctant to start with a high line, but Phoenix fans will be left wondering what Ifill, Brown and Bertos might have been able to do if Wellington got forward and had a go from the start.
Follow Tony on Twitter @TonyTannousTRBA
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.

Eamonn Flanagan said | March 15th 2010 @ 8:51am | Report comment
Good one Tony.
Reckon Ricky knew despite their great season that away from home, even in their last two games their defensive unit was hardly sound enough to hold out Sydney if they pushed forward. Tarek Elrich and Matt Thompson should have been playing on Saturday shouldn’t they?
And of course there is the trap. Start as a defensive unit hoping to grab a goal as the game goes on…no chance! Not when your defence is this tight.
Ricky knows the weaknesses of his team, and there are many, but performances by Lochhead and others giving Kisel that space (first goal) Durrante’s defensive cover (third goal) hardly helped any plan, defensive or otherwise.
AA said | March 15th 2010 @ 10:23am | Report comment
It took at least extra time at home for Wellington to outlast both Perth and Newcastle, so this game was the first genuine test for them, being away from home and playing a team that finished higher than them in the league table.
Sydney, when they want to, can rock anyone on any given day.
It depends on what mood they bring to Melbourne that will determine the winner of the Grand Final.
Australian Football said | March 15th 2010 @ 1:13pm | Report comment
Tony,
to be honest I think I would have had the same game plan as Ricky––after losing all three encounters with the SFC in the season proper. Yes I would have been of the same mind in trying and hold SFC for the first 20mins and then push forward to grab a winner. Unfortunately for Ricky he was brought undone. We must remember the circumstances that the Nix came into the match with as the third best team––playing away from home and a long weary flight to Sydney and no home 12th man. I think it was reasonable to assume that the SFC were going to come out of the blocks hard and fast and press the Nix right from the start.
However, I think we should be discussing the impact that Brosque and Bridge had on the game. I think in Bridge, SFC has found a number 10––if Nicky Carle does not come on board next season. Bridge’s last two games have been brilliant and will fill the role perfectly. Brosque and Aloisi/Payne up on the shoulders of the central defenders with Bridge taking over from Corica have created and forged a formidable attacking trio for next season. Bridge has found his spot in the team as the creative No. 10, behind the two strikers and he will grow in stature and only get better next season. I can’t wait to see how he performs in that role next week against MV, now with Aloisi a doubtful starter with Payne ready to take his spot.
——-
AF
James said | March 15th 2010 @ 5:04pm | Report comment
Thanks for another excellent tactical review Tony. I agree, Herbert should have had a go.
Sylvester said | March 15th 2010 @ 8:35pm | Report comment
I can imagine that Herbert, realising that his team lacked the overall class of Sydney, was aiming to contain the opposition and then have a real go in the 2nd half.
If that was the case, I don’t think that’s an unreasonable plan. However, it relied on them not conceding early goals, which of course they did.
clayton said | March 15th 2010 @ 9:43pm | Report comment
was curious so i had a quick look at wikipedia. no-one has won the championship from 3rd or lower.
my guess is that the teams in slots 3 – 6 feel like they have played their grandfinal already and run out of gas after a couple of knockout games.
i think it is gonna take something special for a team to win the championship from 3rd or 4th on the ladder …
i really enjoyed watching welly and their last home final – it was almost like a different team turned up in sydney.