Waratahs are in the top four, but can it last?
By Spiro Zavos, 22 Mar 2010 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Chris Hickey, Phil Waugh, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, Waratahs, Western Force

The Waratahs Berrick Barnes kicks the ball against the Sharks during their Super 14 rugby match in Sydney on Saturday, March 7, 2010. AAP Image/Paul Miller.
Six weeks into the 2010 Super 14 tournament, the NSW Waratahs are in the top four. But is this elevated position a case of flattering only to deceive?
The other three leading sides are there without any qualms about whether they’ve been promoted above the level of their abilities. Can we say the same about the Waratahs?
The Bulls are the unbeat-a-Bulls at Pretoria. They have won 15 Super 14 matches on the trot at home. New Zealand rugby writers are beginning to wonder whether the team are the new Crusaders, the second Super Rugby dynasty since the tournament started in 1996.
They started the season blowing away South African, Australian and New Zealand sides by taking the ball up hard from first phase play and then setting up their big runners from second phase play.
But against the revitalised Hurricanes they went back to their traditional game of booting up-and-unders or launching driving mauls. These are tactics that the new interpretations have supposedly de-powered this season. But if referees allow kicking teams to take catchers out (in the pretence of playing at the ball) or allowing any number of stoppages for driving mauls until there is no other option but to drop it down, the Bulls will remain unbeatable.
There should be a call now, as well, to referees to be really strict on teams forming the maul at the lineout, something that the hapless Paul Mark actually got right and was (unfairly) disciplined as a consequence. Also, there should be no leeway when the maul stops.
The point here is that the maul goes against the most important principle of rugby in that there should be a continual contest for the ball. There can be no contest if the ball is parked down the back of the maul, with the bound forwards in front of it technically off-side. Defending sides should be rewarded for stopping the maul, which is the only real defence against it.
The issue for the Bulls is whether they can transport their Pretoria game, which is best played at altitude, to Australia and New Zealand. When they play the Western Force in Perth we should get an idea of just how unbeatable the team really is.
This presumes that the Western Force will play as determinedly as they did against the Waratahs. You can’t help thinking, though, watching the Western Force that there are still issues between the majority of the players and the coach.
The team desperately needs a new and Australian coach who will hopefully drop Nathan Sharpe as captain and build a new squad around David Pocock as captain and a number of the younger players.
This brings us to the Waratahs and another team, I believe, that certainly needs a new coach and new captain to replace Phil Waugh (this is sacrilege, I know).
After the match, Waugh said one of the only interesting things I’ve ever heard a player or a coach say in those idiotic on-field interviews. ‘We probably didn’t kick enough in the first half,’ he noted when he was asked about the way the match went and the strong effort put up by the Western Force.
The kicking by Berrick Barnes and others was actually quite good. Generally it was for field position. But you don’t score tries and put pressure on other sides by kicking the ball to them. Gossip has it, though, that Waugh is the leader of the kicking tactics.
It must drive forwards crazy when they fight to win some possession only to have a back boot the ball to the opposition. And under the new interpretations – except for when the South African Jaco Peyser is refereeing – teams can hold on to the ball for long periods of time and mount sustained attacks once they get hold of it.
Peyser ensured a Waratahs victory when he penalised the Western Force several times on the Waratahs tryline when Waugh was blatantly grabbing the ball before the tackled player could play it.
Thankfully, Luke Burgess has rid himself of his kicking habit. But like a smoker who alleviates his cravings with fast food, he now runs excessively across the field before passing. This is almost as bad (but at least the ball is not delivered to the opposition) as kicking the ball away. A number of Waratahs players are carrying injuries and bruises from the hospital passes delivered to them by Burgess.
The Waratahs coach, Chris Hickey, will be under pressure if his side doesn’t make the finals. I always believe that 90 per cent of good coaching lies in accurate selecting. Hickey seems to have got the forwards right. This is a plus for him. The Waratahs pack, especially the loose forwards, have a bit of mongrel and an appetite for the rampage about them.
But the backs are a mess. They did not create or make one line break against the Western Force. Nor did they look like making such a break. Last week I called for the immediate introduction into the starting back line of Josh Holmes, Rob Horne and Kurtley Beale. Surely this has to happen next week.
The halves do not have much energy in engaging the opposition loose forwards, in contrast with Will Genia and Quade Cooper of the Reds.
With Berrick Barnes and Tom Carter in the centres there is not much penetration and too much plod, especially from Carter.
Drew Mitchell is playing splendidly. But he is a one-man band in the back three. There is no guile or real pace from Sosene Anesi. Lachlan Turner is coasting. He had one run out of trouble against the Western Force. But he is too willing to kick the ball away rather than bolt away with it. He does not seem to be involved in any set movements, either.
But then the Waratahs backline does not appear to have many moves in its bag of tricks. They occasionally shovel the ball along the line and appear to hope that something will happen.
This gets us back to the coaching staff. You could say that Michael Foley has done an excellent job with the forwards, that Scott Wisemantel, the skills coach, needs to get the backs playing smarter and more constructive rugby, and Chris Hickey needs to start selecting a side that reflects the best of the talent in his squad.
The obvious answer to all of this, of course, is to say: ‘We can’t be doing too much wrong if we are in the top four.’ Winners are grinners, as the adage says.
But can the Waratahs keep on winning with their present pedestrian style?
On Saturday night against the Blues we will get a better indication of what the answer is to this question. The Blues are an erratic team but against the ACT Brumbies at Eden Park they played more effectively than they have for some time. Rene Ranger proved too much for the Brumbies outside backs to handle.
If Ranger can be kept in check and if the backs play with the pace, efficiency and skill of the forwards, the Waratahs can entrench themselves in their top four placing, a nice position to hold in the run in to the finals.
Will this happen, though?
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- Chris Hickey, Phil Waugh, Rugby Union, Super Rugby, Waratahs, Western Force


March 22nd 2010 @ 10:49am
Rin said | March 22nd 2010 @ 10:49am | Report comment
Yes Spiro, Mitchell has to go:
(1) I believe he is a terrible coach;
(2) has done nothing with the resources that were available to him;
(3) is a terrible recruiter, did we really need to get so many props (dunning, cowen, fairbrother, henderson, longbottom), yet have no hooker?, recruits old timers who struggle around the park or are injury prone i.e. pretorious, barthelemewz. harris
I hope he gets the boot at the end of season.
Rin
March 22nd 2010 @ 11:50am
Spiro Zavos said | March 22nd 2010 @ 11:50am | Report comment
van der Merwe, the maul is not a ruck. The ELVs allowed, correctly, for the maul to be pulled down. This excellent reform was not endorsed under the revised ELVs formula. Most referees are punctilious about no allowing sides to have more than two stop-starts. When they don’t abide by this law the maul is impossible to stop. This offends all the principles of rugby, and is extremely boring to watch.
There is a tendency, too, by some referees not to police the offside law following high kicks. Once again, if referees do ensure that players stand out of the 10m and don’t move before the kicker puts them onside, we’ll get some real rugby with running the ball back.
March 22nd 2010 @ 2:48pm
Bob Mcgregor said | March 22nd 2010 @ 2:48pm | Report comment
Agree totally, Spiro. Rarely are the assistant referees watching chasers in front of the kickers. Like-wise the rolling maul which remains a blight on our game. Why is the ball carrier allowed to take his shoulder off the maul – look around – and re-engage?
For years I’ve suggested the best way to fight it is to not engage it. The ball carrier has to be designated as truck and trailer and penalized.
March 22nd 2010 @ 7:04pm
scarlet said | March 22nd 2010 @ 7:04pm | Report comment
The rolling maul is a small part of the game and I can’t understand the constant desire to legislate against parts of the forwards game that some people don’t agree with in the sake of a perpetual quest for ‘better product’. A rolling maul off an attacking five metre lineout is a very useful weapon to create a bit of space elsewhere in the defensive line. I agree with not allowing re-engagement and stop start though.
Instead of complaining about that why not complain about a far greater blight on the game such as crooked feeds in to the scrum?
I also had the opportunity to watch a game from the ’70′s between Mosely and a Rugby Writers Invitation XV that was pretty much a Lions XV. That was a game full of running rugby, without endless scrum resets albeit with what now look like strange line outs. A cracking game full of running rugby with the ball in hand and exciting forward play and solid scrummaging and rucking – lovely stuff. Maybe we should look back at what the game was like and see whether we have improved the game by the rule changes?
March 22nd 2010 @ 7:21pm
mitzter said | March 22nd 2010 @ 7:21pm | Report comment
of course the ball carrier should not be allowed to rejoin at a different point ala neil back style. Penalty straight away!
BUT I love the maul and was so glad the collapsing elv didn’t pass – it is a beautiful thing that is tough, strong and highly technical but most importantly gets the forwards operating as a pack.
I also agree with other comment that you are hypocritical of the maul in relation to the ruck, often the ball sits there (protected by the ref because he has said ‘hands off’ or ‘red’s ball’ or something) while the forwards set up again for another pointless one off barge that sucks in one defender. Also as has been pointed out before the scrum is similar to the maul contest for the ball is only at the beginning and then it goes to a pushing match with the ball safely at the back – a scrum could technically be pushed 20 meters up field as well and there is nothing the defence can do except PUSH!
March 22nd 2010 @ 11:51am
CK said | March 22nd 2010 @ 11:51am | Report comment
HARRY – i’m with you. Get rid of Anesi and put Turner to fullback. It’s his [turner's] natural position anyway and will be able to inject himself into the game.
As for Anesi – he goes missing like a soccer fan at a flare sale! We know his mum hasn’t had to wash his jersey since round 1.
March 22nd 2010 @ 11:59am
Rugby1 said | March 22nd 2010 @ 11:59am | Report comment
Ha ha ha lol lol that’s a good one CK!
March 22nd 2010 @ 12:27pm
Blinky Bill of Bellingen said | March 22nd 2010 @ 12:27pm | Report comment
As mentioned above “There is a tendency, too, by some referees not to police the offside law following high kicks.”
Two areas of restart that make me really wonder are ball not fed straight at scrum time and kick restarts with runners in front of the kicker.
March 22nd 2010 @ 12:51pm
Matt said | March 22nd 2010 @ 12:51pm | Report comment
For evidence of the value of a centre who can penetrate the defence, see what Ranger did to the Brumbies last weekend.
March 22nd 2010 @ 1:09pm
Jameswm said | March 22nd 2010 @ 1:09pm | Report comment
If you’re going to drop Amesi, put Beale in at fullback, with a roaming commission in attack. Simple. Beale even played on the wing for the Wallabies – and did very well by all accounts. He is quick. But most of all he is dangerous with the ball.
Have to disagree but Hangers is not a club plodder. He absolutely dominates the club game and he can cut loose with his step and running game, but he can also control a game like a traditional 5/8.
The problem is they don’t do the simple things
1. run from deep
2. catch the ball at pace
3. put the ball in front of the receiver
4. stand closer
5. back up
Get that happening and you have thrust all of a sudden.
March 24th 2010 @ 9:49am
Short-Blind. said | March 24th 2010 @ 9:49am | Report comment
Totally agree James – its really schoolboy basics and thats why I wonder what Hickey/Wise are doing. Why aren’t the NSW legends being brought in ie Campo, M Ella, Hawker etc to tutor this lot? Maybe politics and old enmities really are ruining NSW rugby.
March 22nd 2010 @ 1:50pm
Gerry said | March 22nd 2010 @ 1:50pm | Report comment
Spiro what insight do you have to say there are still issues between the players and John Mitchell.
As far as we know in the West the Committee has gone.
March 22nd 2010 @ 2:33pm
Bob Mcgregor said | March 22nd 2010 @ 2:33pm | Report comment
Agree with overall thrust of the article and suggestions contained therein.
It was embarrassing to watch the Tah’s effort against the Force. Everything seems to be happening in slow motion and apart from the forwards ‘go forward’ there appeared to be little desire to try and execute at pace. Why our return runners jog back with the ball leaves me speechless. Compare with the Stormer’s Obana who pins his ears back and takes on the line with pace, thereby increasing his chances of breaking the defensive line.
Turner requires a reality check as he is rarely out of second gear. Same for Anesi. Time to get Holmes, Beale and Horne into the starting line up to hopefully pick up the pace.
Holmes is much faster clearing the ball than Burgess – and more accurate – as his contribution against the Lions showed [where Burgess had little game time due to blood bins etc]. Carter is pedestrian at best in attack and it’s now time for Horne to show us his wares.
Time also for Beale to start at full back. Have been calling for him to play in this position for 18 months which would be catalyst for him to address his defensive weakness. I still believe he could the next Clive Churchill albeit in our code given the chance. I note the Sunday Telegraph stated that Hickey was spoken to by Robbie Deans along that line.
Hopefully such changes will happen for the Blues game.
If we cannot win this game at home we can forget about making the semi finals as the harder games await us.
March 22nd 2010 @ 2:39pm
Burgs said | March 22nd 2010 @ 2:39pm | Report comment
“You can’t help thinking, though, watching the Western Force that there are still issues between the majority of the players and the coach.
The team desperately needs a new and Australian coach who will hopefully drop Nathan Sharpe as captain and build a new squad around David Pocock as captain and a number of the younger players.”
Would love you to expand on that Spiro because, without any further evidence other than armchair speculation, I think you are way way off the mark.
In case you haven’t noticed David Pocock has been injured, for the most part our junior players have been average and our Captain has been playing and leading exceptionally well.
There are times when I am sure journalists think of a concept and then try and build a story around it.
If you want to witch hunt the West then try and find some conspiracy in why we have had so many injuries rather than this BS about player/coach disharmony and leadership issues.
March 22nd 2010 @ 6:41pm
mudskipper said | March 22nd 2010 @ 6:41pm | Report comment
So you think its John Mitchell’s time to punch the card and get a cab to the airport… I expect his VC is out and about… but he got such a good contract he’ll likely say for the cash in 2011 regardless. I don’t even think he is talking to the media or the public…. He has gone to ground and is minding his pubic profile… You’ll have to wait Burgs… 2012 is year zero for the force…
JM might come good in 2011 but he can’t recruit and if you can’t get player to the West you wont be a contender… Pocock has the right stuff… make him captain this year…