In the world of sports, if you had a graph where one axis was recognition of contribution and the other accountability, you would have referees sitting close to the bottom on recognition and way out to the left on the accountability.
It is a case of all the criticism, with none of the praise.
Meanwhile, sports journalists would be the opposite, nestled high on their perch of recognition with the comfortable safety net of knowing accountability is not a burden they have to bear.
Publicly regarded journalists belittle the performance of a referee only to be told the man in the middle got the ruling right. Does this bring forth an apology?
No, of course not, that would require treating the referee as social equal. Rather, the criticism takes a different tangent: “it is a stupid rule?”
So now we want our referees not to enforce the rules of the game but to be some great arbiter of justice, a wise King Solomon of leather and chalk.
Five minutes later, when a penalty is given in a manner deemed inconsistent with one from last week, it is now asked why they just can’t follow the simple rule book.
They are now a cowboy who thinks they are bigger than the game.
Of course, there would never be any mention of how the penalty from last week was an error and roundly criticised by all. We yearn for yesteryear when referees valued consistency and thus kept on simply repeating their mistakes week after week.
Refereeing successfully appears to be impossible, with those publicly judging you moving the goal posts for success with more speed and agility than Hayne and Slater combined.
Maybe you get lucky for a few games, but eventually you will fail.
What is very odd is that once the dust settles and the siren has sounded, the only people held to a perfect standard are the officials.
A touch judge misses a blatant forward pass, he spends the next few weeks in reserve grade with question marks placed on his career prospects. His bosses are questioned and the game is descending into a quagmire of disgrace.
A footballer, however, murders a try through a mental error, lack of application or just freak bad luck, and you see him go around next week, with fans cheering and commentators gushing.
Yes, mistakes get made. Some on the weekend are an example.
But regardless of the systems put in place, mistakes will always be made because we are reliant on imperfect people to execute a perfect job.
We deride the quality of refereeing today, but it is a giant leap forward from what we previously had. Rulings are far more consistent and our criticisms have become pettier.
Forward passes, slight of hand deception of the referee, knock-ons in the ruck, off-sides, on-kicks, favouritism so pronounced (but I believe unintentional), you wondered why he didn’t have a 14 on his back and a jersey, and such wild inconsistencies between referees’ interpretations that it felt like watching a different sport each week.
That’s without even delving into episodes, now consigned to folklore, like 7th tackles in Grand Finals, sin binning a guy who was on lying on the ground for being punched, or distracting the ref whilst drop punting goal line drop outs in the wet.
Anyone regretting the decline in refereeing either hasn’t watched a lot of rugby league or has a very poor memory.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby League articles
- NSW State of Origin 2012 team announced; expert reaction (221)
- Five hit ups: the talking points from State of Origin one (221)
- That Origin try: Did Inglis score or did the refs get it wrong? (186)
- Make this the last Origin in Melbourne (181)
- League and Union: we should embrace the different codes (141)
- An answer to Sydney NRL crowd problems? (120)
- Who missed out on NSW State of Origin selection (115)
- Melbourne Storm vs Brisbane Broncos: NRL live scores, blog (5)
- South Sydney Rabbitohs vs Canberra Raiders: NRL live scores, blog (10)
- NSW should stop whinging and ask why they couldn’t score points (122)
- WIZ: Melbourne State of Origin was a winner (33)
- A Ray of sunshine in modern sports commentary (33)
- Price would have led players off in Origin (23)
- League Round 12 preview panel
- Melbourne Storm vs Brisbane Broncos: NRL live scores, blog (5)
- South Sydney Rabbitohs vs Canberra Raiders: NRL live scores, blog (10)
- NSW should stop whinging and ask why they couldn’t score points (122)
- A Ray of sunshine in modern sports commentary (33)
- The mystical powers of the video referee’s box (5)
- Referee inexperience was Origin’s worst decision (9)
- What can Channel Nine learn from other sports? (11)
- Explore:
- NRL, nrl referees, Rugby League


March 24th 2010 @ 7:57am
Brett McKay said | March 24th 2010 @ 7:57am | Report comment
Mushi, don’t forget orders to ref the boss’ son differently….
March 24th 2010 @ 11:28am
PuntPal said | March 24th 2010 @ 11:28am | Report comment
Brett and Mushi, how about you come back to my article and debate me on my points.
I clearly never said an explcit order was given to ref his son differently, its not needed. As stupid as the refs appear on the field, they know how to get ahead in the world…maybe not, but the potential for this bias has no place in 2010 National Rugby League
Leave Daddy Boy Rugby League Politics back in u12s. I dealt with that rubbish back then and thought we were playing a professional sport.
March 24th 2010 @ 9:10pm
Walshy said | March 24th 2010 @ 9:10pm | Report comment
Players get dropped as well as referees. So stop whinging
March 25th 2010 @ 2:53pm
PuntPal said | March 25th 2010 @ 2:53pm | Report comment
Mushi – I don’t agree with this piece
1) Players do get dropped, so do coaches. Refs are actually very lucky and your argument is wrong, they rarely get dropped – there has to be a public outcry for it to happen
2) Commentators often apologise to refs when they make a unfair criticism – do you even watch footy?
3) Are you trying to say that because Refs used to be worse, its unreasonable to criticise them now. Isnt that like saying to a patient that has a doctor stuff up his knee operation “Well too bad, back in the old days they would have cut it off so just be thankful for what you got!”
In the year 2010, the NRL is a highly professional sport. Our marketing is great and the product is fantastic…but the one thing that is annoying people off week in week out are the refs and their inconsistencies. The rules are too gret and have been cobbled together by morons.
As I have also demonstrated in my article (an article you refuse to debate me now that I have torn you a new one) Robert Finch – as referee boss – must bear the blame. He has numerous chances to improve the refs we have on offer (i.e. recruit some new guys – maybe even ex players or something) and improve the rule interpretations