Why Tiger Woods will never really be out of the woods
By Spiro Zavos, 10 Apr 2010 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Augusta Masters, Golf, Tiger Woods
Tiger Woods played a wonderful first round at the Masters, with his 68 taking him within two strokes of leading the tournament. It was his best ever opening round at the tournament. A huge drive off the first tee, which rocketed off his driver as if it were turbo-charged, set up his round.
There never has been any question about Woods’ golfing skills, from the time on television as a tiny boy he showed his prowess in front of the golf tragic, Bob Hope.
The real question is whether he will ever recapture that magic that makes fans idolise him, on and off the course.
My belief is that this special magic is gone from Woods.
I take myself as a sort of marker in all of this.
Before his ugly and disgusting private life spilled out into the public gaze, as if someone had taken a knife to the belly of the beast, I had always barracked for him to win any tournament he was playing in.
When he was out of contention, I usually lost interest in the tournament.
Watching him go through his comeback round, I realised that I no longer identified with him to the extent that it was crucial to my current well-being and contentment that he win. It was more like watching someone like Phil Mickelson, a player who is uncannily good.
But so what?
In golf, there are two players who have been idolised.
Arnie Palmer was the hero of the 1960s. Remember ‘Arnie’s Army’?
You could identify with Palmer because he threw caution to the wind and went for the big shots, even when the conventional route was to play for safety.
That Palmer sometimes duffed his shots only increased his lovability factor. He was human, wasn’t he, like the rest of us duffers.
Or at least, human from time to time.
With Woods, the idolisation flowed from a different source, what could be called the Superhuman factor. At his best, he played in a way we (and none of the other great professionals on the tour) could ever hope to emulate.
So we put him on a pedestal and presumed that this glacial excellence, personified with the intense, unsmiling demeanour on the course, was translated into a life outside of golf that was just as especially excellent.
The seemingly endless stories of liaisons with women on the make and reckless gambling create a seamy, sordid image of Woods. Initially, there was the disbelief that someone so focused and controlled on the golf course could be so reckless off it.
But when you thought about it, there was a consistency in all of the behaviour.
The consistency came from the determination to be an absolute control freak in every aspect of his life. And we have seen this oppressive control freak fault line in his character come through in the way he has tried to rehabilitate himself after his private life became a public embarrassment.
That Nike ad, for instance, which featured a grim-faced, staring Tiger Woods in black and white film, blinking towards the end of the clip, with his father coming back from the grave to ask him: “Did you learn anything?”
We all know that Woods’ father was a womaniser. So what was Woods and his PR advisors trying to tell us in the advertisement?
Coming back to the Masters at Augusta, too, was another manipulation.
The Augusta chairman, Hootie Johnson, gave ‘our hero’ a sort of reprimand. But Augusta did not allow blacks to be members until 1990.
Women still aren’t eligible to be members.
There was no way in this socially unreconstructed Masters ambiance that Woods was going to be heckled or challenged.
The commentators and Woods himself felt relieved by the shouts of ‘Go Tiger’ and ‘We love you Tiger.’
But it seemed to me that the reception was muted.
Tom Watson’s admonition that he hoped Woods would respect the game of golf more with his course demeanour seemed to me to a more relevant observation than the fawning of the commentators.
I reckon that for millions of former Tiger fans and fanatics around the world (and I include myself in this), in a metaphorical sense only, Woods will never be out of the woods in our estimation of him as person we admire and idolise.
We will always be astonished by his golfing ability.
But as an icon, it is over.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
The Crowd Says (16) | Page 1 of Comments
Have Your Say
- Explore:
- Augusta Masters, Golf, Tiger Woods


sheek said | April 10th 2010 @ 8:40am | Report comment
Yep, yep, yep & …..yep!
mudskipper said | April 10th 2010 @ 9:51am | Report comment
“The Augusta chairman, Hootie Johnson, gave ‘our hero’ a sort of reprimand. But Augusta did not allow blacks to be members until 1990.”
Is this really true? … How backwards. This makes Tigers private life mistakes rather trivial. I thought the presidential righteous speech from Hootie Johnson was utter twaddle.
Marshall said | April 10th 2010 @ 10:16am | Report comment
I found the Nike ad disgraceful. It made Tiger into the victim we are meant to feel sorry for when the truth is he is anything but the victim.
Harry said | April 10th 2010 @ 10:27am | Report comment
How the heck did the pack that control American golf get so desperate that they had to him back as a figurehead. The adulation that has been shown to him this week will make his head bigger and is an encouragement not to change. What a sorry week for Golf.
sheek said | April 10th 2010 @ 11:04am | Report comment
Eldrick Tiger Cheater Woods is obviously the greatest golfer to play the game.
And had he been a single man having all those affairs, he would have been my hero also, no doubt about it. That’s what a heterosexual single young man ought to do – have as much sex with as many consenting beautiful women as he can!
But we all make commitments in life, & it’s a measure of our character as to how true we remain to those commitments, whether they be personal, business, sporting, or whatever. Sometimes those commitments unravel for all sorts of reasons, right or wrong, good or bad, but at least we should try to commit.
Trust & integrity are supposed to be two of the most valuable characteristics a human being can have. More than ostentatious wealth & single-minded brilliance in a particular field.
I wouldn’t want to be in the trenches in war with Woods. He would only hang around for as long as there was something in it for him.
Truly great golfer, but very ordinary human being. That’s just my personal view.
James said | April 10th 2010 @ 11:08am | Report comment
I second that. Cheating is becoming a fair too accepted behaviour amongst younger generations and seeing Woods adored by the media once again will only instil the believe that everyone gets a second chance.
Zac Zavos said | April 10th 2010 @ 9:30pm | Report comment
Very well said Sheek.
The voice of people like Sheek, Vinay and others is what makes The Roar so much more than just a sport blog. Thanks.
pothale said | April 10th 2010 @ 9:51pm | Report comment
Zac – for understandable reasons, your praise above did not mention the article’s author.
It’s a lovely piece of writing which gathers together neatly in a personal observation a sense of the disillusion and disenchantment with the Woods icon that many of us have been thinking, but have been unable to articulate. Always the mark of a fine writer in my view.
Salut, Spiro.
Zac Zavos said | April 12th 2010 @ 8:11am | Report comment
Thanks making this comment Pothale. I couldn’t agree more.
vinay verma said | April 10th 2010 @ 11:10am | Report comment
Tiger Woods is not the first husband to cheat on his wife. There are politicians, businessmen and priests who live lives of duplicity. It does not make it right but this is the reality. That Woods and Nike are exploiting the consumer under false pretenses is the bigger crime. I do not believe ,for one moment,that Nike were not aware of his philandering. I would not be surprised if the women were present at the Nike after golf parties. The fans have no one to blame but themselves. It is buyer beware in this world. The sporting pages are littered with the Maradonnas, Bests,Dalys, Tysons and Cousins. We also have the Peles,the John Eales the Watsons and Tendulkars. Take the good with the bad and move on.
My advice is watch the sport or the sportsman for what he is rather than what you would like him to be. We are,in ourselves,not all that perfect that we can moralise about Woods. There are more important things in life.
sheek said | April 10th 2010 @ 12:12pm | Report comment
Vinay,
Very true. For his philandering, Woods has to answer to his own wife & family.
But the Tiger Woods brand name has been very cynical & very controlled, making massive money at the expense of adoring, gullible fans. But I guess that’s the problem of the adoring, gullible fans to deal with.
But yes, there are more important things in life, like enjoying our own families & friends…..
jmo said | April 10th 2010 @ 12:05pm | Report comment
When I heard about Tiger’s indescretions I made a morality based decision to never again drive a golf ball 300m down the center of the fairway as that is something that he would do. And I’ve bravely maintained that silent form of protest to this day.
Seriously though, now’s probably the best time to become a Tiger fan. One of the things he said that stood out is that he feels like a huge weight is now off his shoulders. All the years people idolised him he was in fact leading a double life. But now he’s fessed up and turned a corner and henceforth there’ll be a lot less of the Tiger Inc. superhuman control freak sideshow that was a barrier to non hero worshippers becoming fans (although it’s impossible not to at least give credit to his phenominal golfing abilites).
jmo said | April 12th 2010 @ 9:35am | Report comment
Spoke too soon it seems – sorry not a lot of clarity in what I had to say either. I was trying to say that we’ve seen the last of Tiger Woods as a walking TV commercial.
Unfortunately no. In the post round interview he made it quite clear he’s only in it to win and anything less is not acceptable (the usual angry outbursts at bad shots were clues to this before he even said it). The hope was that he had finally put “the” game ahead of “his” game but looks like it’s business as usual.
John said | April 12th 2010 @ 5:10pm | Report comment
A few people want to be careful their halos do not slip down and strangle them. Nobody is perfect.
Woods is a golfer. Icons are for imbeciles.
steveDarke said | April 14th 2010 @ 10:05pm | Report comment
Exactly. The guy has some skill at hitting a small ball with a stick – who said anything about icons? Seriously Spiro, if Tiger was your icon, then you have a problem, not Tiger
Nelson Mandela, Mother Theresa, Florence Nightingale…icons, yeah sure…Tiger Woods?…seriously?
Vesuvio said | July 3rd 2010 @ 7:58pm | Report comment
that pretty well sums it up.