Related coverage
- Melbourne Victory news
- St Kilda Saints news
- Melbourne Storm news
- Rugby League news
- NRL news
- Melbourne Rebels news
- Melbourne Heart news

John Hartigan, chairman and chief executive of News Limited (left) with Chief Executive Officer of the National Rugby League David Gallop (centre) and Melbourne Storm Chariman Rob Moodie. AAP Image/Tracey Nearmy
No matter which code or club your allegiances lie with, all Australian sporting fans should have felt extremely saddened by the news of the NRL’s Melbourne Storm salary cap breaches that rocked Australia yesterday.
The severity of the punishments are unprecedented in this country and mark a dark day for sport – particularly for the fans of the club and code who have been cheated out of a fair sporting contest, and had their commitment to the game trampled on by the putrid greed of a select few.
Whatever your thoughts on the punishment, the consensus must be that the code should not rest until the perpetrators of this cover up and those who knew of it are thrown out of the game.
David Gallop may have been the target for critics of the game as it dealt with issues surrounding rebuilding following the Super League war, countless player misdemeanours and indiscretions and preparing the League for independence in a climate of expansionist threats from rival codes, but he has stood tall as his colleagues in the game continually let both him and the NRL down.
Considering he was prepared to make such an example of the Storm, let alone remain in his post following another catastrophe, is heroic in itself.
The implications of this saga will run deep, and not just in the NRL’s base.
For Rugby, the Storm’s catastrophe at first look appears to have swung the door wide open for the Super 15 expansion franchise, the Melbourne Rebels, to sweep into town and consume the Storm’s disgruntled supporter base.
The imminent departure of CEO Brian Waldron, all but implicated yesterday by chairman of News Ltd John Hartigan for his role when CEO of the Storm, is the only option for the franchise to distance itself from any link to the Storm, especially in a city where the differences between League and Union still need to be explained to confused Victorians.
In the process of creating their own brand and image, the Rebels can at least move on post-Waldron, with a weakened Storm now an easier target.
While a staunch divide may exist between Union and League fans in the eastern seaboard states, such a division is not as a fractured in Victoria, and it will be unquestionably easier for the Rebels to build a fan-base should the Storm – particularly its players and coach – be further implicated.
The AFL, meanwhile, will investigate player contracts at St Kilda during Waldron’s three-year stint at the club, with The Sydney Morning Herald hinting at possible irregularities in his dealings with players.
While the AFL’s Andrew Demetriou claimed the AFL would be prepared to strip premierships from clubs found breaching its own salary cap, one wonders whether they would really have that courage had, say, the Sydney Swans been in breach of the cap, particularly when comparing its own lukewarm salary cap punishments to its own clubs in the past.
Would the AFL have been prepared to all but sacrifice a market such as Sydney for the sake of making a point for fairness in its regulations?
It remains to be seen.
But this is what the NRL has done; risked the future of the code in Australia’s second biggest market (biggest sporting market?) for the integrity of the competition.
For football, questions surrounding the Storm’s sustainability will undoubtedly impact on A-League clubs, the Melbourne Victory and Melbourne Heart, with co-tenancy agreements in place at AAMI Park (the new rectangular stadium in Melbourne).
Like the Rebels, expansion side Heart will benefit from a damaged Storm brand in the intensely competitive Melbourne sporting market, even if it’s as intangible as a weakened Storm playing for nothing as the Heart ramp up their own campaign before their debut.
AAMI Park, the home of the Heart, is set to open with a League international between Australia and New Zealand on the 7th May 2010, a further attempt by the game to connect with Victorian sports fans.
But the Storm’s cheating could well condemn the NRL’s future in Melbourne, very sadly.
If players and coaching staff are implicated as knowing the goings on within the club and its secret payments to them, then the brand will be damaged even more severely than if it were a select few who could be removed like a tumor.
But how can they go on?
With nothing to play for aside from pride for the remainder of the season, the Storm will become touring pariahs in the NRL, mocked and jeered as cheats wherever they go, playing for nothing more than hopeful redemption.
As for the fans, how many will turn up to Etihad Stadium on ANZAC Day – a day the AFL owns in Melbourne – to see the Storm face the Warriors in what is now a dead rubber?
The crowd they can generate on Sunday may well be the first true indicator of whether the Storm is a sustainable franchise going forward.
And should they rebound into the coming seasons, will a Melbourne audience be interested in seeing a legitimately salary capped side squander in the mid-pack following the halcyon days of multiple premierships?
Again, it remains to be seen.
Is the bond really strong enough between fans and club?
Italian football giants Juventus, for example, were stripped of Serie A titles for match-fixing and sent packing into the second division, found redemption and the continued support of their fans. But they are a club of rich tradition with deep cultural ties to Turin.
The Storm doesn’t have that in Melbourne.
The punishment of no points for the remainder of the season may sound ludicrous when put into the context of playing on this season, but what else could the NRL do to a club who had so comprehensively rorted the system, including into this season with a $700,000 breach of its salary cap already?
Allowing them to continue this season, even with a zero points as of this round, was not an option, particularly with a squad of such gifted players that, as we now know, was only able to be kept together by breaking the rules.
The Storm, from the very beginning, were strangers in a strange land – an anomaly of a club born out a messy divorce of the Super League wars and sustained through the deep pockets of its custodians, namely News Limited, and the support of the NRL itself.
While it found its niche crowd in the Victorian capital, averaging around the 15,000 mark, it never threatened to topple even the weakest of AFL clubs in the winter sporting market.
But greed merchants corrupted the soul (and lets hope there are few of them) of a club that promised much.
The NRL deserves to be in Melbourne, just as the Storm deserves another chance under new leadership and with the scum evacuated from its offices.
Let’s hope they get the chance at redemption.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.

Kurt said | April 23rd 2010 @ 4:48am | Report comment
It’s difficult to take much positive out of this, but you have to admire Gallop’s courage at taking such a strong stance on this issue. It’s hard to imagine any other NRL club administrators running similar scams in the future. It is also likely to act as a warning to other sports with salary caps including the AFL and A-League. For example, let’s say the AFL uncovers a similar rort at one of their clubs in the future – with the bar for punishment being set so high, its inconceivable that they could do anything other than strip premierships (assuming the club has won any) just as the NRL has done.
So the truth is we all owe thanks to Gallop for taking such a strong stance.
Ken said | April 23rd 2010 @ 8:17am | Report comment
‘It’s hard to imagine any other NRL club administrators running similar scams in the future. ‘
I hope so, although considering Melbourne started this scheme up just a couple of years after the Dogs went from almost certain minor premiers to wooden spooners in ’02 I’m not sure. Although I guess they were allowed to keep most of their players and went on to win a premiership a couple of years later before it all went downhill player-wise.
mcxd said | April 23rd 2010 @ 5:32am | Report comment
Not that big a league fan myself but i cant help feel gutted for some (or most) of the Storm players as well as their fans. I really do hope they pick themselves up after this mess. I cant see them getting anywhere near the heights of their recent years but good luck to them.
AndrewMc said | April 23rd 2010 @ 5:37am | Report comment
I can’t wait to see the crowd figures on sunday. What does everyone think it will be? I would be surprised if it was over 2000.
zach said | April 23rd 2010 @ 11:47pm | Report comment
IMO they will get a better crowd than normal – Melbourne crowds for all sport like to be contrary. If someone tells they shouldn’t go to something they will – once or twice. See how the crowds are this time next year ( if the club is still around by then). That will be the real test.
JiMMM said | April 23rd 2010 @ 7:29am | Report comment
The problem is Kurt that we all felt that all clubs would be on notice after the bulldogs in 2002, turns out they weren’t.
Have to say I am feeling pretty jaded with the game at the moment, I don’t know about anyone else but the last couple of years in league have hurt more than the decade of mediocraty by the Reds, because at least with the Reds I felt every year that they were about to turn the corner and come good. I just can’t believe that about Rugby League anymore.
LeftArmSpinner said | April 23rd 2010 @ 7:30am | Report comment
Some observations that hopefully dont just repeat the noise in the ether currently.
1. Where there is smoke, there is fire. If the $1.7m is the smoke, I suspect that more breaches will come out…………both at the storm and in other clubs. I would be checking out the body language of the current NRL CEO’s this weekend!!!!
2. If $1.7M is the extent of it, and $700k is in 2010, that means about $250k in the previous 4 years, in the form of an extra $50k for 5 players. although 250K is 1/16th or 6% of the total cap, it represents a 30% advantage to a player on $150K moving to $200K.
2. When a fraud such as this happens in the corp world, Accounting firms, banks, etc, the trick is to change the name and rebrand it quickly. move all the assets to the new corp. and move on with new mgt, new board and (like a change of govt) blame everything on the previous administration………….
4. Finally, The Rebels will clearly no longer need Waldron. St Kilda might have a closer look at the period that Waldron was running their show………. Leopards dont change their spots!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The Rebels have really dodged a bullet and can capture the Melbourne Steeden and Gilbert oval ball market if they move quickly……………………Go Mr Mitchell, or can I call you Harold?
AndyRoo said | April 23rd 2010 @ 9:12am | Report comment
I think Rugby would be very wise not to be seen to be dancing on the Storms grave. They have already got rid of Waldron and should just try and keep quiet for a couple of weeks before emerging and then doing a really good job and getting their membership package out their as quick as possible. It is a boon but they don’t want to turn it into us against them.
Everyone thinks their dead and buried now but the fact the punishment is so severe might save them. If the players keep putting in then at the end of the year when they are handed the spoon their will probably be a lot of sympathy for them and sentiments might change.
kovana said | April 23rd 2010 @ 9:24am | Report comment
Totally agree with you..
I actually see the Storm getting thru this.. And maybe getting stronger in the process.
Gerry Faehrmann said | April 23rd 2010 @ 7:39am | Report comment
The deceit, lies, fraud, misplaced trust, trickery…it just hurts, even if you aren’t a Storm supporter!
todd said | April 23rd 2010 @ 7:50am | Report comment
I admire the switness and efficacy of the NRL’s actions but have concerns for the game and the likelihood that other clubs are doing something similar to keep their top level players. This incident provides an opportunity for News Ltd to completely distance itself from the sport and for the NRL to look at more viable ways to fund clubs to allow them to pay players to be retained by the code. Dont forget we are competing witj Rugby and AFL to keep our stars
I think the “playing on” for zero points to be harsh and it diminishes the value of this years premiership. If Melbourne can now prove they are paying under the cap (even if they have to release players mutually from contract) they should be allowed to compete for this years premiership by starting this round with zero points.
captain nemo said | April 23rd 2010 @ 8:52am | Report comment
Regarding the swiftness of Gallops actions, I am in two minds about what has been dealt. Firstly, how long had the investigation been going on?? For what has been unravelled so far, I am sure it was a detailed with on going ramification’s. This type of investigation must of taken months. Regarding the team not playing for points, I think something that should be considered is that the current decision is placed on ice and in the next few weeks, maybe all the CEO’s of the NRL clubs get together to decide what they think is fair regarding dishing out a points penalty for this year. Just a thought.
TembaVJ said | April 23rd 2010 @ 8:10am | Report comment
This is going on in almost every club in NRL, its politics plain and simple… dark rooms with files in them, come on?
Someone blew the whistle and don’t be surprised if more of this comes out over the next couple of months. I smell a rat that goes further then the storm.
Salary caps are so 70’s, this should open the debate on weather its right for the sport. There are other more modern effective ways to even the field.
This is going to open the gates for union especially the Rebels, some nice signings there… which player would like to sign with the storm next year?
Whiteline said | April 23rd 2010 @ 8:12am | Report comment
Gallop,D. take a bow. At last, some honesty and integrity in high level sport. Brilliant stuff.
Redb said | April 23rd 2010 @ 8:19am | Report comment
The News Ltd/NRL have acted foolishly. The penalities are too harsh.
Back in Storm’s early days they were given some concessions by the NRL much like the AFL did with the Swans and Lions, maybe not to the same extent. It was an acknowledgement that in a non trational area for any game, success is required to attract and retain interest.
That is as true now as it was back then. But then the storm won in their second year.
The NRL thinking: 1. Success achieved the fans will flock to the ‘greatest game’ and 2. We dont want Melbourne to be ‘too’ successful, they stripped them of any advanatage way too early.
Waldron mid 2000s sensing the Storm had not capitalised on that early success or that it wasnt simply enough in a market the club was losing $6M a year, made some bad and unethical decisions (it appears).
He knows the formula, success brings bandwagon, sustain it long enough and you get rusted on fans to keep you alive during the hard times.
So Adrian i see you think the AFL would not have been this harsh, probably not, They’re not that stupid.
Proactively the AFL has made sure that its new franchises do receive some concessions becuase if you just drop a new team into a competition against other clubs that have been around for 100 years and expect them to magicially be successful on and off the field overnight in a non tradtional market – you are kidding yourself.
Unless Waldron has been lining his own pocket, his intentions no matter how poorly conducted from an ethical perspective were aimed at building rugby league in a ‘foreign’ market and I note many RL fans outside Victoria loved him for it.
I feel sorry for the diehard fans who were with the Storm 5 years and before.
I’m not a Storm fan, but from a neutral perspective:
The wiping out of future points for 2010 is the most ridiculous and counter productive penalty given in Australian sport. Dock them the 8 points, hit them with a penalty of 10 points, force them to drop players to fit into the salary cap. But allow them to play to win.
The NRL has been too harsh, its no good saying the AFL would not have been, they are not that incompetent.
Conspiracy theories abound, but a perfect exit clause for News Ltd has been created for the Storm. Will they opt for it?
gingerbeer said | April 23rd 2010 @ 8:29am | Report comment
Playing for nothing, is totally demoralising for competitive people. It does make a clean cut / fresh start. How would you play for nothing.
captain nemo said | April 23rd 2010 @ 8:55am | Report comment
i would hate to have to play against the Storm this weekend, they will put 50 points on the warriors. However after this weekend, they could lose by 100 points. Not that much petrol in the tank.
AndyRoo said | April 23rd 2010 @ 9:16am | Report comment
Portsmouth this year and the Bulldogs in the year they were busted both kept putting in despite playing for nothing. Their playing for their futures and reputations.
I still expect the Sharks and Richmond to keep putting in despite the fact they cant win anything
Redb said | April 23rd 2010 @ 12:07pm | Report comment
Big difference is that when the Sharks or Tigers do win they get the points, they climb the ladder or at least have a honourable win against their name.
The Storm will get a crowd on Sunday due to sentiment and may even battle on past the new stadium opening ,etc. But eventually the futility of the season will hit the players and a large bank of fans.
When Canterbury had its points stripped they didn’t have to play the next 20 rounds for no points in the next season.
The NRL could have docked the 8 current points, put them at negative 40 points (same penalty) but allow them to fight to win with players under the salary cap immediately (transparent), its a fundamental. How excruciating for even diehard fans.
If Storm do manage to win a game , how robbed will the opposing team and its fans feel every time? They are on borrowed time until the end of the season with no hope to claw back.
The NRL have effectively provided a weekly shame penalty until the season finishes. It is a form of torture for the innocent parties involved.
AndyRoo said | April 23rd 2010 @ 1:24pm | Report comment
The Bulldogs were stripped of points mid season and so had no chance of avoiding the spoon. They still played on the only difference between the situations was the amount of games. Premiership points are pretty meaningless when the best you can finish is last.
The Bulldogs won a lot of credibility back because they kept soldiering on. Any of their wins will still be honorable (once they get under the cap which I bet will happen asap) and I think some fans will take your view about being robbed but I think it will become more about how well the Storm are doing despite having nothing to play for.
It’s a dark time for Storm fans now but that is important for them in the long run. When they keep on playing and winning and fans are calling for them to be allowed to play in the finals then you know redemption will be close.
This all comes from someone that has never liked the Storm, they have always been very boring to watch considering the talent they have and deprive interesting teams (pretty much everyone else bar the Raiders) of spots in the finals.
No one can say they got of light and once they have cleaned themselves up, removed the bad eggs and got under the cap give then back their premierships and let them rip into 2011. In the long run they will recover. I think after the initial condemnation it will no longer be cool to bag the Storm.
It even seems you feel sorry for them Redb, could be thing that gets some people to take them to heart as Melbourne’s team duded by the Sydney clowns.
Redb said | April 23rd 2010 @ 1:44pm | Report comment
I feel sorry for the diehard Storm fans, who wouldn’t?
I’m just being honest, I think the NRL has over done it. Its the concept of punishment I have a problem with not so much an up in arms march down the street to the next Storm game.
I don’t think people quite get what will happen to the Storm in the coming months once emotions settle and the harsh reality sets in. Sponsors, crowds, reputation, financial position, TV audience, it is dire.
Prior to this they were getting the odd good crowd when not in competition to the AFL but even then they got only 14,000 to their last game. With all that success there are only so many people who really care and some have now been disenfranchised, probably quite a few casuals as well.
I think you over-state the Syd-Melb antipathy, sure diehard Melb Storm fans already feel this way (it was fostered). The rest of us have more hate for Carlton, Collingwood, Hawthorn,etc.
Harsh but true, Melb indifference was slowly moved to ‘check it out’ by unprecedented success that has now been severely shamed – most people dont want to associate with failure and cheating going forward.
p.s. re the Cant Bulldogs example, they could still gain points if they won once points eradicated coudlnt they? Tthere is also a big difference when they are 1 of 9 teams in a city, so crowds which might be lopsided to the other Sydney team dont look so bad. There are few ‘away’ fans in melb.
Richard said | April 23rd 2010 @ 3:34pm | Report comment
Redb I’m hoping you’re going to have even more reason to hate Collingwood after this Sunday’s match. Go ‘Pies!
ps I don’t hate Hawthorn but I’m inclined to intense dislike of Port Adelaide. Could be hate.
Ken said | April 23rd 2010 @ 8:57am | Report comment
I can’t agree, the Storm left the NRL with no choice – if they remain in the competition then they can win it. And if they win it, the farce goes exponential. In a black and white sense it’s easy to argue the NRL have been lenient, apart from the $500,000 fine (which is less than the offence for just this year) the rest is really just giving back what they obtained illegally. While they know that even this ‘lenient’ penalty puts the Storm in dire jeopardy, anything less would have been massive weakness from the NRL and would have left a darker stain on the comp in the long run. If you think this is what the AFL would have done then I hope for your sake nothing of a similar nature is uncovered there.
Hopefully the Melbourne Storm can make peace with their supporters – that they are ‘rusted on’ hard enough (like the Dogs were, although obviously with more history to fall back on) to follow them through this lowest of low times. They are the key though, if the supporters give up on them then so will the sponsors (although they are sure to get some blows in this area anyway).
JK said | April 23rd 2010 @ 9:02am | Report comment
Totally agree, earning no points this year, I feel is punishing the whole code, fans and all, get them back on a level playing field with the rest and get on with it, if the players want redemption, put them all on minimum contracts this year, I know it’s not entirely the players fault, but would be a classy move on thier behalf, and might help with fans sticking with them, thost that don’t like it leave. Could probably be challenged legally, but as I said would show what they are made of.
gingerbeer said | April 23rd 2010 @ 2:00pm | Report comment
Why would you support a team that cheats????
the fans and the game deserve better, if the Storm fold because of this it is their own doing. League would be better off without them