Stormgate could bring down other NRL clubs
By Spiro Zavos, 25 Apr 2010 Spiro Zavos is a Roar Expert

Matt Orford looking dejected during the NRL Round 22, Manly-Warringah Sea Eagles v Melbourne Storm at Brookvale Oval, Sydney, Friday Aug. 8, 2008. Storm won 16-10. AAP Image/Action Photographics, Grant Trouville
Phil Rothfield, The Daily Telegraph’s leader of its rugby league reporters pack, had a terrific story on Friday about the last days and hours of Brian Waldron as a sports administrator.
My guess is that all the administrators of other NRL clubs who read the story would have shuddered a bit with the thought that their club might be next on the rorting hit list.
In the Rothfield story, Waldron comes across as a arrogant, bossy type of person, a smart-arse full of bluster and brutal charm, who will turn very nasty, a bit like a trapped rat, if things turn against him.
So there is Waldron earlier on in the week, when he still thought he was in the clear, on the phone constantly to Rothfield telling him ‘don’t make a big deal out of this but there are four very minor things they are looking for.’
As an aside, these lies give people involved in running things a clue why reporters tend not to believe the spin dealt out to them all the time.
Back to the chase, though. As it became obvious to Waldron that more than four minor things were being looked at and that explosive evidence of rorting had been discovered, the tone of the calls to Rothfield changed.
Rothfield suggests that Waldron was ‘panicking’. Reading the story I got the impression that Waldron had adopted a posture of defiance, the sort of defiance of someone who knows he is going down and is prepared to bring down as many other people as he can with him.
Waldron made three specific accusations: ‘There were people on the board who knew about everything that was going on.’
Accusation two: ‘What about xxxxx leaving us and getting paid $200,000 by sponsors zzzzzzz outside the cap by team yyyyyy?’
Accusation three: ‘This is a joke. All clubs do it.’
During my time as a lead writer for the SMH, I wrote many editorials about corruption within the NSW police force. I spent a good deal of time arguing that the ‘rotten apple’ theory, that the rogue cops were a small minority of the total, clean force, can completely wrong, and mischievous.
My argument was that there was systematic corruption in the police force, what was called ‘the joke’. The whole barrel was tainted with corruption, an argument that the Wood Royal Commission endorsed.
Now apply this analogy to Stormgate. The harsh treatment by the NRL of the Melbourne Storm and, in due course most probably, officials like Waldron seems to be based on the notions of the rotten apple theory. John Hartigan, the iconic chairman of News Ltd, talked about a couple of ‘rats’ in the ranks to explain why Stormgate had happened.
But what if Waldron is right? What if every club is doing, to a lesser degree presumably, what the Storm had been doing to rort the system? What if lots of people knew what was going on?
The SMH gave Andrew Stevenson the privilege of writing their front page colour story on Friday on the Stormgate affair. Stevenson, a rugby league tragic, is one of the best of the Young Turks in the SMH’s sports department. His excellent story carried the headline: ‘It’s happened before – and will happen again’.
This seems to endorse Waldron’s line that rorting the salary cap system is endemic among the NRL clubs (with the exception perhaps of the Cronulla Sharks who are too broke to even reach their salary cap limits).
This brings us back to Phil Rothfield. Underneath the article on Waldron, he ran another piece, which was more like an editorial, titled: ‘It’s time to sort this out – the clubs’ dirty little secret puts the very future of the game at stake’.
And what is the dirty little secret? According to Rothfield, who has been covering rugby league for 34 years and knows most of its secrets: ”Salary cap rorting has got so far out of control it’s almost time for the NRL to call for an amnesty.”
But can the NRL allow an amnesty after its draconian attack on the Melbourne Storm? And will the NRL try to isolate Stormgate by turning a blind eye on the rorts that all those in the rugby league game know are going on all the time?
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.

Billo said | April 25th 2010 @ 3:29am | Report comment
Spiro, “Stormgate could bring down other NRL clubs”!
You may as well write, “NRL clubs could rob banks to make illicit payments to players”.
Many things “could” happen, but in my experience it’s normally better to stick to what “does” happen.
Redb said | April 25th 2010 @ 6:42am | Report comment
I’d suggest not every Nrl club was as desperate as Storm for success.
The extent of the rorting is yet to be exposed, $700,000 over this year, but prior to that only about $200k over?? Sounds a bit light to me.
Leave it to the forensics.
As for the knee jerk st kilda investigation they were like Cronulla at the time not even able to pay the whole cap. Broke and languishing at the bottom of the ladder I guess the AFL could strip them of their wooden spoons
Emperor Penguin said | April 25th 2010 @ 8:43am | Report comment
Load of crap Spiro.
Corruption in sport is likely in any code. Especially in this day and age where administrators, players and staff are interchangeable.
Little surprise that it is a Rugby Union jurno who is keen to condemn the entire NRL. Jelousy? Check your own clubs books and admin. He who is without sin and all that.
Gerry Faehrmann said | April 25th 2010 @ 11:37am | Report comment
Silly comment about jealousy! So what if Spiro is a Rugger Bugger, he will still report things as honestly as possible.
It’s time for a 30 day amnesty, bit like the gun amnesty!
Dogs Of War said | April 25th 2010 @ 11:54am | Report comment
I agree. Spiro comments are even more apt, as they come from a person removed from the game. So the NRL needs to take notice on what people outside the game think, as that will help them with the direction in the future.
Though I don’t know about an amnesty, what if another club is found to be rorting the cap even worse, yet due to the amnesty, they get off scott free, while the Storm pay for the sins (of there own doing). Imagine if that club won the comp! How would that look for the game?
The way I see it. the Storm situation is a good warning to other clubs that cheating has it’s pitfalls, and no matter how good you think you are at doing this, it only takes one slip up for the whole thing to come apart in a spectacular way. I am sure those who may be doing it, will be winding back the operations this very minute.
The Mexican said | April 25th 2010 @ 12:52pm | Report comment
There just has to be an amnesty. If club a supposedly has a player b who supposedly receives a benefit from sponsor c, then club a likely knows about a possible club b who may have a player c whose new house is maybe being paid for by the number one ticket holder and so on. One man will not sit back and carry the can for the whole competition. If you want to protect the brand, you must prevent the gradual exposure of a culture across the NRL. To protect the brand, you have to draw a line in the sand. Do it quickly, privately, and start afresh. Revoke the stripping of the flags as many were probably doing the same thing. Let Storm play for points in 2010 but ban them from playing finals. Get the game back on track as AFL, Union, and Soccer will be quick to pounce on players, sponsors, and broadcasters $$$ who are disenfranchised by continual negative publicity. The NRL simply cannot afford to give up that ground.
oikee said | April 25th 2010 @ 8:45am | Report comment
Tell you something spiro, what hurts rugby league only makes it stronger. I have already read a report from one of your rugby union Journalist mates from NZ this morning. Telling all and sundry how rugby union are angels compared to the dark un-enchanted world of the corrupt NRL and its eating of children.
He has said that the Rebels will be taking over Melbourne now and everyone will be welcoming them with open arms, even those thug AFL followerers. (he even partially sunk the boot into them). Mate, you know as well as anyone that rugby league if anything is very resilient. The more you or your rugby bumkins try to knock the game, the stronger the public backlash, the stronger the game gets.
Have alook at Penrith last nite, biggest crowd since 2004. And the more Sydney teams this year making the finals, the more Rugby league is going to boom. Good luck with your analizing.
People who think that the Storm is not a recognised Brand around the world are jealous of there own code. The storm made headlines BBC, New York Times ran a story. Some guy mentioned Kenya ? Mate, i have not got a clue what is happening in Kenya, Nor do you.
rugbyfuture said | April 25th 2010 @ 5:07pm | Report comment
not saying your point is wrong oikee, but see how suddenly all is being forgiven slowly in league?
oikee said | April 25th 2010 @ 10:07pm | Report comment
You have not been around that long , mate one thing you will learn over time, its human nature to forgive, how quick is up to you.
Ask yourself this, how many have forgiven Tiger.? Most guys probably think he is a stud. Banks will be forgiven for causing the ressession. I could even forgive you, if you went off the deep-end.
Dont blame me, blame religion, its built around forgiveness.
I am a rugby league follower, to me, the storm did nothing wrong except blew the cap. There problem, get over it.
If the fans dont stick tight, they should be following another sport.
mona said | April 25th 2010 @ 8:48am | Report comment
don’t call it stormgate.
gates are constantly associated with so many scandals, it’s not fair.
JVGO said | April 25th 2010 @ 9:09am | Report comment
No other club was so dependent on success in a hostile environment as The Storm and on bucketloads of corporate money. Look at the resilience of the Bulldogs or the Sharks. The Sharks are integral to the Shires identity, their emergence in 67 virually created the Shire as a seperate entity from the St George area. People will fight for them. A similar scandal would not destroy the Broncos or Manly or even Souths, the most likely fellow rorters. Face it most RL cubs are on a more solid footing than RU franchises and play a game that is actually entertaining. RU franchises are more likely to go out backwards through sheer fan stupefaction with their ‘product’.
Richard said | April 25th 2010 @ 9:11am | Report comment
If Waldron can prove his accusation that other’s are rorting the salary cap system, he should prove it. He owes that to himself, to the Melbourne Storm club, and to those of his fellow employees whose reputations and futures have been ruined by this scandal. If he is right, he should take the NRL to task and make it face the facts about its salary cap system. If he can’t prove it, then we are entitled to think this is just one more lie from a congenital liar.
Worlds Biggest said | April 25th 2010 @ 9:43am | Report comment
Waldron was always a smug SOB and not popular with anyone. I dare say the paper shredder got a workout at most NRL Clubs on Friday.
Billo Boy said | April 25th 2010 @ 10:02am | Report comment
Listen up Spiro. The NRL salary cap is a self imposed restriction. It’s not government law. It’s not a criminal offence to break a sporting club or organisation’s rules. (There may be implications under tax and corporate law, but they flow from how the deed was done).
The reason RU looks so squeaky clean in comparison is because your sport chooses to operate with no salary cap. But one only has to look at Bloodgate to see that corruption and deceit can exist in RU too.
JK said | April 25th 2010 @ 10:16am | Report comment
It’s fraud, that is criminal.
The Mexican said | April 25th 2010 @ 10:16am | Report comment
I have read in excess of 100 articles on this matter and this is the best, the most accurate assessment of the situation, and the first I have read that has the answer, an amnesty. When the time comes, it will be shown that one man alone did not create and perpetrate. The question is, who is the broker that will sit down with Gallop and co and get the amnesty across the line? If the amnesty doesn’t happen, the damage to the NRL brand could set the game back decades. Sometimes in life, you have to be careful not to smile too hard at others misfortunes. To those that live amongst the bananas, if the next chapter opens, the chaps in the white shirts and black pants will not be party to a cover up.