
NRL Rugby League, Melbourne Storm v Warriors at Etihad Stadium, Sunday April 25th 2010. Digital image by Brett Crockford, © nrlphotos
Some pride may have been restored in the hearts of Melbourne Storm fans following their rousing 40-6 victory over the New Zealand Warriors at Etihad Stadium in front of an impressive 23,906 crowd, but where do they go from here?
Now that the emotion of proving a point to themselves, their fans and the rest of the competition has been left at Etihad on Anzac Day, the reality that the rest of the 2010 season will be a point-less exercise with that emotion of last night’s match dwindling with each round sets in.
Aside from playing for their representative careers and contracts for next season, will the Storm players really lift to the extent they did last night to tear the poor Warriors apart for the remainder of the season, particularly when the true story of culpability hasn’t emerged as yet?
And now that the fans have shown their solidarity with the club following their week from hell, will they continue to turn out each week?
Watch the replay of the match closely and beyond all the celebrations of the Storm’s performance during the game, there were two moments that bookended Fox Sports’ coverage that suggested the hurt of the scandal has infested the club.
At the beginning of the coverage, as Fox panned across Etihad’s expansive stands, the faces in the crowd seemed particularly downcast, undoubtedly still reeling from the lost 2010 season and premierships.
Fast forward to the end of the coverage and despite the big win, the final shot was of the Storm players looking as downcast as their fans did before the game; reality having hit them hard following the initial exaltation of the prize-less win.
That pain and hurt will only grow as the resilience they showed last night washes away and recriminations and accusations emerge.
Unlike the Bulldogs previously, Melbourne faces a much longer haul to get to the end of the season with so little to play for.
On the crowd, 23,906 was a strong statement from the Storm faithful – a figure not far off the record home and away crowd of 25,404 achieved on Good Friday.
It was the expected show of support for the club in crisis.
One banner in the crowd read: “We believe in the Storm players. Sin bin the admin.” The overwhelming feeling from the core Storm supporters is that the club is the victim.
But how many fans will be there in Round 26 when the Storm host the Newcastle Knights?
Again, as the hard reality of the draconian 2010 punishment sets in, the Storm is buried in the Victorian press by the AFL, and the emotion of the controversy fades, crowds could well hit A-League Gold Coast lows.
Let’s judge the Storm’s future in Melbourne based on that Round 26 crowd, not on last night’s turnout as that will be the truer test away from the immediate emotional reaction.
On the park, the shattering display from the Storm highlights that there is a significant gulf between the illegally formulated squad and the rest of the competition – and this was with Greg Inglis and others watching from the sidelines.
Once the Storm are forced onto an even playing field with the rest of the competition next season, the overall spectacle of the NRL, with this great side in the competition, will regress – and as Phil Gould has said, the NRL must ask the question of whether they want Storm ilk teams or the inconsistent teams that make up the majority of the competition.
A tinkering of the salary cap may be required.
As the great Storm side parades around the competition, Penrith coach Matt Elliott has said they could well become the Harlem Globetrotters of the NRL – entertaining with their brand of exciting football and tinkering for future reference with their highly talented squad.
But remember, as you watch the Storm on their “globetrotting” tour of the NRL that this team is at its core a fallacy, or a mirage.
As a result, the Warriors, for example, have a right to feel aggrieved, particularly should the miss the finals by the points they could have won on their trip to Melbourne.
Should they miss the finals series as a result, do they not have a claim at being cheated?
Any team who succumbs to the Storm for the remainder of the season has a legitimate case for protesting the fact that they have lost to a team formulated by breaching the rules, and still doing so – particularly those who face them twice.
This is the greatest flaw in the punishment.
Gould – who has made some salient points amongst the throng of media deliberations on this issue – wrote that the NRL has two immediate choices to make: either force the Storm to sit out the remainder of the 2010 season (something he acknowledges would kill the club), or force them to make the necessary changes and abide by the salary cap.
The latter appears to be the only just solution if the Storm are allowed to steal their competition’s points this season.
The calls for a review of the punishment for this season will increase in the coming weeks, as will the unraveling of who was culpable, or knowing, of the salary cap breaches within the Storm organisation.
The Fairfax press is reporting that seven players – Billy Slater, Cameron Smith, Cooper Cronk, Dallas Johnson, Brett White, Michael Crocker and Steve Turner – will have their salaries scrutinised in the coming weeks.
The Sunday Herald Sun even reported that some players were given “boats, cars, tens of thousands of dollars in shopping vouchers and paid-for home renovations,” raising the prospect that some players could well have been aware of the breaches.
Already there are reports of fractured relationships developing in the Storm camp, which could well grow as this current state of unity evaporates into the reality of the fraud.
The Storm must act swiftly if it emerges that players were involved, cutting out the cancerous tumors immediately to try and stop the wave of irreparable damage.
This is a necessity to try and limit the hurt – particularly with the fans, if stars players were aware – and help the Storm carry on this growing perception that they are the victims rather than villains.
Meanwhile, across town earlier in the afternoon, the AFL hosted its now traditional Anzac day clash at the MCG between Collingwood and Essendon, with the Magpies romping home over the sorry Bombers in front of over 90,000.
It was quite a contrast.
Herald Sun reporter Jon Ralph probably summed up the feeling of many Victorians when he tweeted: “What a contrast – Essendon and Collingwood play for everything on Anzac Day. Hours later Storm play for nothing… literally.”
Only in its sixteenth season, you’d think the Anzac contest has been played for decades judging by the fanfare and reverence in which the fixture is received, with all its ceremony and the rivalry that has developed between the two clubs.
This is just one strong indication of how intrinsically linked the AFL is with a Melburnians DNA and the power it has over the state.
That is the behemoth rugby league and the NRL has faced in the Storm’s brief history in the Victorian capital, and must now face with its damaged brand and the baggage of its breach.
Beyond the diehard supporters who turned up to AAMI Park on Saturday and at Etihad Stadium yesterday to support the Storm, the casual Victorian supporters may be lost in the mire of the corruption, for whom Essendon, Collingwood and co remain the only football in their hearts – and an untainted code, in their minds.
These are the Victorians upon whom the future of the Storm rests, otherwise 25,000 crowds will become a distant memory and the club’s size and influence will shrink.
Melbourne is the most congested sporting city in the country, and remember that as the Storm stumble to the end of their point-less season and rebuild within the restriction of a salary cap they so blatantly ignored, the Rebels will be born with a clean slate.
Remember that the Storm that will be reborn next season will be complying with the same rules as everyone else in the competition and could well be buried in the mid-table or worse.
This won’t be an easy rebirth and last night’s events do not change the immense challenges the club faces.
As they continue on in 2010, let’s hope the fans remain committed and faithful.
It won’t be an easy ride, but for the sake of the 23,906 fans who parted with their money to watch the Storm last night let’s hope they can survive and one day return to the summit of the NRL legitimately.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.

waterboy said | April 26th 2010 @ 7:48am | Report comment
Another article bagging rugby league Adrian. Yawn.
You would think the editors at the Roar would do us all a favour and limit you to a maximum of one such article a fortnight.
Your current stats are way above that.
If rugby league is so insignificant and of so little threat to the behemoth that is AFL in Vict and for that matter nation wide, why does the AFL community spend so much time castigating our game?
Why put so much Clearasil on such a tiny little pimple?
JK said | April 26th 2010 @ 7:58am | Report comment
Didn’t look like Essendon were playing for points either!
Mister Football said | April 26th 2010 @ 7:17pm | Report comment
VEry true – I turned off after 20 minutes when it was obvious what was about to unfold – build up to game was great though.
Crosscoder said | April 26th 2010 @ 8:48am | Report comment
Your point Adrian? Surely not a dig at an NRL club on its knees ,in a city where it is a very minor sport.Fancy drawing comparison with the MCG crowd in the home of the code.Why the need to do so ?
.It has zilch to do with the specific matter at hand “the Storm situation”.
No one knew what the crowd would be for starter,in fact quite a few pundits predicted a low figure of 10,000.
In fact the passion and size of the crowd (and understandably fans and players would be downcast, a given), reinforces the statement by News Ltd more than once”they are in for the long haul”.The only believable historic comment I can attribute to the architect of this mess”there is a base for this club of 20,000″.
Every fan of RL is appalled at what happened no doubt,and no doubt people from other sports are of the same view.
For a team that was supposedly developing fractured relationships,they sure as hell didn’t play like it last night,with the fluency ,speed,excitement thus confirming what a great game rugby league is.
I suggest you remember the Bulldogs early 2000 and their rebirth,fans were disenfranchised some left,now the club is one
of the benchmarks for the game.Being in the middle of a table happens ,some club has to be there.Being there will not eradicate the passinate ones.The passion for the club and the game has not been developed overnight.Therefore the Rebels should also be aware of that.
Competition ! Rugby league has grown and thrived despite SL war(competition),the intro of professional union,and the AFL in the northern states.Without competition a code becomes complacent.
The club will rebuild and looking at the new talent introduced into last night’s game,Widdop,Duffie and Isa,there is real talent on the production line.
Paul J said | April 26th 2010 @ 8:49am | Report comment
Adrian
As an AFL fan you can be excused for not having as much knowledge of rugby league as the genuine league fans.
oikee said | April 26th 2010 @ 8:53am | Report comment
Phifftt, like i said once before, the true Anzac day clash is between the Kiwis and Kangaroos, always has been, always will be.
I think the Storm and Warriors has more relivence than Dragons Roosters. Until rugby league gets this mess we are in sorted out, they are doing untold damage to the game.
I think its time Gallop moved on, he is becoming like a stale set of undies. Take his mate Finch with him.
Dont get me wrong, he has done a good job, but his time is up.
sheek said | April 26th 2010 @ 10:05am | Report comment
Oikee,
Since when is the true Anzac day clash between the Kiwis & Kangaroos? The All Blacks & Wallabies have as much right. Also the All Whites & Socceroos. And even if it were out of season for them, the Black Caps & Baggy Greens.
Why restrict it just to the men? What about the Silver Ferns & Diamonds? I think I got the netball national teams right???
Jay said | April 26th 2010 @ 12:51pm | Report comment
add the baggy greens and black caps to the list
Corey said | April 26th 2010 @ 2:06pm | Report comment
I think oikee’s point is the 2 nations battling it out, not necessarily the 2 nations of one code. Now there is an article- Wallabies and Kangaroos v All Blacks and Kiwis!
Emperor Penguin said | April 26th 2010 @ 3:03pm | Report comment
One nation? try half of one nation with Collingwood Essendon.
Ken said | April 28th 2010 @ 12:59pm | Report comment
Collingwood and Essendon are half the country? and here I was thinking that they were just 2 suburbs of 1 city….
JVGO said | April 26th 2010 @ 9:44am | Report comment
Are you seriously the most stupid ill informed sports journo of all time. I thought grand old untainted behemoth Carlton got busted for salary cap rorting and lost points and the number one draft pick. I’m not sure, I’m only a league fan with zero interest in AFL, and I’m not paid to write this sort of drivel either.
Ziggy the God said | April 26th 2010 @ 9:50am | Report comment
Yeah, they forget about that, everyone knows that the AFL sweeps everything under the carpet, because all that is important to them is the almighty dollar and the onward march of their code.
Don’t worry about fair competition, who cares if some are more even than others, they have lands to conquer.
Just shows you how brainwashed their masses are, much akin to a religious cult.
DB said | April 27th 2010 @ 11:00am | Report comment
I read this and thought, I’m not sure if this guy is serious. Then I read your next post and realised you were.
How embarrassing for you
Ziggy the God said | April 26th 2010 @ 9:46am | Report comment
Yes, yes, the AFL is massive in Melbourne ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ.
FFS, tell us something we do not know, are you guys serious journalists, or do you do this on the side of your real job.
Lets face it, the AFL Anzac day game is one of the major games of the AFL, but who gave a damn about it in Sydney?
No one did, and I bet when the viewing figures come out they too will be beaten by the re-run of Lassie in Sydney.
I bet you won’t report that.
James said | April 26th 2010 @ 10:12am | Report comment
His talking about Melbourne. Sydney has nothing to do with this point. Again, you’re putting it in your mind that this is an anti league thing when it’s just a reflection on the situation in Victoria.
Norm said | April 26th 2010 @ 1:44pm | Report comment
Everyone knows what the situation is in Victoria, we’ve heard it a million times.
Bob said | April 26th 2010 @ 9:59am | Report comment
23K- how many league games in Sydney get that sort of crowd? Rightly or wrongly, Melburnites will feel that Sydneyites are out to get them. a bit like Collingwood really.
ricardo said | April 26th 2010 @ 10:00am | Report comment
i think the nrl just gave the rebels a running start next year..
adrien2166 said | April 26th 2010 @ 12:27pm | Report comment
LOL !!! if the majority of the victorians as a lot of people said, don’t like Rugby League, how do you want they like union? Because of the magic kicking game? the lovely scrums? the prop forwards flick passes and speed? the amazing spectacular rucks? the 2hundred penalties by game?
Hey please stop joking man ! A guy who don’t have cultural union background given by the family or the place he lives, won’t like union when he can watch league at the same time in the same place !
A logical man will prefer a game with a lot of tries and big hits than a game with less tries, less hits and with a knock on each 2tackles !
Seriously open your eyes, the Melbourne Rebels…even the name make me laugh!
rugbyfuture said | April 26th 2010 @ 12:31pm | Report comment
except rugby has a small base in victoria and melbourne already? i know i appreciate the lovely scrums, prop forwards skillset and the rucks, although i dont like the kicks and penalties. Typically though i think the two clubs are looking to work together more than anything else, meaning not te same time and not the same place, most people arent as rabid as you and i and follow both codes.
adrien2166 said | April 26th 2010 @ 12:34pm | Report comment
I like the way you think, and i really hope they will work together. Sorry of my impulsivity but i’m a bit tired of people saying rugby league will die, the rebels will be loved by everyone etc etc…
rugbyfuture said | April 26th 2010 @ 12:35pm | Report comment
yeh well, rugby needs to think positive in some sense, much of the negative play in the game is because the fans are so sceptical now of every wrong decision.
adrien2166 said | April 26th 2010 @ 12:41pm | Report comment
I think the Storm deserve a bit of respect because they made great things for the code and it was pretty hard to hold the line sometimes i guess. But what i just can’t stand it’s people saying thant now the rebels will just come and take advantage of the storm achievements, fanbase, and even pick their players.
Corey said | April 26th 2010 @ 2:12pm | Report comment
Is Wally Waldron still the CEO of the Rebels? Because if he is I don’t think the Storm will be going anywhere near the Rebels. But if he isn’t than they should link up.
rugbyfuture said | April 26th 2010 @ 4:45pm | Report comment
nah waldron “resigned” (was asked to leave) now its ARU executive and former manly guy Pat Wilson
Emperor Penguin said | April 26th 2010 @ 3:07pm | Report comment
Yes, the Rebels and Storm might work together to an extent. I wonder if your precious Force will be so accommodating when the Perth Reds are back.
I have heard plenty of times from Unionites that the Reds have no right/ market not big enough/ no fans in Perth. Smells like fear.
DB said | April 27th 2010 @ 11:06am | Report comment
I grew up in a working class family in country Victoria with no aligence to one or the other, as they were viewed as the same thing. and have since watched as much Rugby Union as Rugby League over the years (which admittedly is not much) and I enjoy Rugby Union more. I don’t know why that is as I’m not down with the intricacies of either game, It’s just how I feel.
James said | April 26th 2010 @ 10:09am | Report comment
Problem with some NRL fans out of all this is they are getting way too defensive and they need to acknowledge that this its potentially game over in Melbourne.
It’s not the games fault, and this is what you NRL diehards are forgetting. No one is suggesting that. You are going around using those tired old stereotypes that your the victims of anti rugby league conspiracies which is blinding you of the realities of this saga.
It’s just that unlike the Bulldogs, who are from NRL heartland, this has happened to a club in ambivalent Victoria.
Face the fact.
Dogs Of War said | April 26th 2010 @ 10:19am | Report comment
They aren’t dead yet, and your wishful thinking won’t make it so. Melbourne is here for the long term. News Ltd have said they will back the club for the next 5 years, and with a company like that backing them, there is hope for the club.
With a nice turn out by supporters to show there support for the club, I don’t think it’s game over by any means. If anything it shows that enough people in Melbourne do care about the club to make it viable. With the new stadium, I think the sky is the limit with the niche they should be able to carve out for themselves.
As for the Rebels, it took 13years for the Storm to establish themselves, and there are no easy routes to that. Don’t think Melbourne will just embrace the Rebels because they are not the Storm.
James said | April 26th 2010 @ 10:22am | Report comment
I hope they aren’t either, but to acknowledge that this is damage is made worse by the fact that it is the Melbourne club, where AFL rules and League struggles for attention, is a basic fact.
Dogs Of War said | April 26th 2010 @ 10:25am | Report comment
I said in another post, that this may be the emotional tie that the Storm needed for Melbourne to embrace the team. It’s easy to jump on the bandwagon when the club is successful. Much harder to get behind the club when times are tough like they are now. With 24K turning up to show there support, it shows that there is life after this scandal. It’s now about the Storm ensuring they make all the right moves from here on in, getting good management in, and coming clean on everything that is wrong with the club, and righting those wrongs where possible.
NRL isn’t going to take over Melbourne, but like the Swans in Sydney, they can carve out there niche, one that is large enough to support the teams existence in Melbourne. Plenty of room for all codes to have teams in each city. As long as you deliver an consistently entertaining product, which both AFL and NRL have.
James said | April 26th 2010 @ 10:29am | Report comment
That’s what the article says.
I have a theory from following this site. Many don’t actually read the columns, will simply rush over them and deduce the authors opinion and then comment, either agreeing or strongly disagreeing, particularly if it’s “against” your code.
And then when all go justifying your point you inevitably make the same arguements as the authors.
Dogs Of War said | April 26th 2010 @ 10:35am | Report comment
I am replying to your comment. The article may say similar things, but I added my own opinion to the mix. The article is interesting as it comes from the perspective of an AFL fan, who is commenting on the NRL. These are the people that the code needs to win over, but we won’t win them all over, all the NRL can do is try to get as many people interested in the code as possible. If the anti-siphoning rules are relaxed to allow AFL/NRL on the alternate digital channels in non-core markets, both sports will enjoy far greater support due to the fact that people will be able to follow the teams more easily.
James said | April 26th 2010 @ 10:40am | Report comment
Your making assumptions – an AFL fan. I’ve read so many people accuse this very author of being anti AFL, too.
Just because the article reflects on a day of contrast between the two codes in which the NRL is in a bit of trouble and the AFL waltzed on doesn’t make the author bias one way or the other, it’s just the fact of the situation.
Dogs Of War said | April 26th 2010 @ 10:52am | Report comment
I didn’t say the author was biased. Your the one inferring that I am.
I said it was interesting from that perspective of an AFL/Soccer support. A very different thing to accusing the author of bias. Adrian is an interesting case, because he comes from Adelaide, a place that NRL is lucky to even get column space in the Newspaper.
Your “facts” of any situation are what are distorted.
I refuted your “facts” – ” they need to acknowledge that this its potentially game over in Melbourne”, yet you then put your blinkers on, and continue as if I said nothing backing up with the “fact” – “it is the Melbourne club, where AFL rules and League struggles for attention, is a basic fact.” – No one says any different, NRL is carving out a niche, and the column space devoted to the Storm, although the club is not presented in the greatest light is exposure that it would not have otherwise got. The support show by the people who turned up to support the club for the first game was tremendous.
As for your comment “either agreeing or strongly disagreeing, particularly if it’s “against” your code. ” – If you pull down a code by bring up arguments which can be refuted, then expect your opinion to be challenged. Isn’t that the point of this website?
Maybe go have a lie down, and relax. We all have our opinions on the subject, and because someone doesn’t agree with your “facts” of the situation, doesn’t mean you should take offense. Maybe try presenting some “facts” rather than opinion to refute my argument.
James said | April 26th 2010 @ 10:59am | Report comment
Ok, let’s agree to move on.
JamesP said | April 26th 2010 @ 9:41pm | Report comment
“It took 13 years for the Storm to establish themselves”. I would argue that they are still to establish themselves. They got 24k after this massive week (and they were always going to get a “big” crowd due to the week) And they may get a big crowd for their next home game as people will be interested to check out the new stadium. But I feel that 25k or so includes just about every rugby league supporter, plus a few thousand sympathisers thrown in. Fast forward a few months, as the author has suggested, and they may be back to 15k and struggling again.
Comparisons to the Sydney Swans are futile, as the Sydney swans “established themsleves” in 1996 and have barely let their crowd average dip below 30k (i.e more than double the Storm) since. If they have a big year (they are currently on top of the ladder), expect the average to push up to 40k.
Next year, the storm will be mid table (at best)…something their supporters will have not experienced before…who nows how much support they will get?