SANZAR get it wrong with Giteau fine
By itsuckstobeyou, 30 Apr 2010 itsuckstobeyou is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- Brumbies, Matt Giteau, Rugby Union, steve walsh, Super Rugby, Waratahs
In the wake of the worst refereeing performance in local derby history, Matt Giteau has been fined $5,000 for offering an honest opinion to a journalist’s question.
The performance of Steve Walsh in the Waratahs-Brumbies clash was as bad as I’ve seen. The lack of respect shown to Brumbies’ captain Steve Hoiles and the Brumbies front row was abhorrent.
Worse than that was the disregard shown for the rules and the spirit of the game.
After missing a number of blatant knock-ons from both sides, the stage was set for a horror night of rugby when Walsh penalised Hoiles for not releasing the ball, when clearly the tackler had fallen off. After labelling the penalty “a rubbish call”, Hoiles was marched a further 10m and was then sledged by Walsh, saying “Good work. Good work”.
This led to a complete breakdown in communication between the two.
Shortly after, having awarded several penalties against the competition’s best performing prop Ben Alexander, Walsh convened a meeting of the Brumbies front row, asking them not to “hit on an angle”.
Acting hooker Salesi Ma’afu asked: “You know how you want us to pack square?” to which Walsh replied “I didn’t say that”. Ma’afu was left wondering what they were doing wrong.
This resulted in a flurry of scrum collapses which saw several penalties being handed out to both sides, despite each collapse being seemingly identical.
Then there was the Adam Ashley-Cooper try/penalty.
After awarding the penalty to the Tahs on the advice of a sideline official, Walsh could clearly be heard describing the penalty as being for a “double movement”. In rugby union, there is no such law.
This is a rugby league rule, and whether you thought it was a try or not, it is not acceptable for a referee to explain a penalty, citing a rule which does not exist.
On the flip-side, Walsh and Waugh seemed particularly pleased to catch up. Walsh could be seen laughing with Waugh, with the occasional wink and a smile.
I am not suggesting that Walsh cost the Brumbies the game.
In a game with so many disruptions, it is impossible to tell who the better side was. This was also not a simple case of a referee not allowing the game to flow.
This was poor refereeing in the sense that the rules of the game were not enforced and there was an in-balance as to how the teams were treated.
With this in mind, it is completely understandable that Matt Giteau said what he did.
To fine a man $5000 for stating the bleeding obvious is a crime in itself. Giteau’s remarks, however, have enabled SANZAR to cite him as the reason for the withdrawal of Walsh from this weekend’s Brumbies-Reds clash, as his participation would be untenable.
Walsh gets off scot-free with a week off and Giteau gets fined for being the only honest figure in the sport.
Yet again, an Australian sportsman is hammered back into line for straying from his pre-approved list of clichés.
In my opinion, the fine should be paid by Walsh and refunded to the fans that paid good money to watch that debacle.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Rugby Union articles
- Reds back in contention, but Waratahs need a cleanout (287)
- What Hansen’s first squad means for the Wallabies (191)
- Will Cooper and Mitchell be back in time for Wallaby selection? (156)
- Who will be in the Wallabies’ backrow? (155)
- ALAN JONES: We have the players, it’s the coaches that are to blame (153)
- CAMPO: Will Deans change the style of the Wallabies play? (128)
- Tahs out. Brumbies win ugly. And Quade’s back! (124)
- Brumbies vs Reds: a lesson for the other provinces (3)
- Chiefs vs Bulls: Super Rugby live scores, blog (12)
- Rocky Elsom axed from Wallabies (55)
- The burning question: Beale at 15 or 10? (118)
- Hola Argentina, and welcome to the Rugby Championship! (20)
- White welcomes Reds’ rugby battle tactics (81)
- Rebels want fast start against Hurricanes (4)
- Brumbies vs Reds: a lesson for the other provinces (3)
- Chiefs vs Bulls: Super Rugby live scores, blog (12)
- Hola Argentina, and welcome to the Rugby Championship! (20)
- Irish coaches looking to head Western Force (15)
- Dull Super Rugby coaches equal dull rugby (48)
- Coaching, not lack of depth, the issue for Australian rugby (30)
- Super Rugby round 14 preview (8)
- Explore:
- Brumbies, Matt Giteau, Rugby Union, steve walsh, Super Rugby, Waratahs


April 30th 2010 @ 7:57am
Fuchal said | April 30th 2010 @ 7:57am | Report comment
After reading that article, I have to agree – it does suck to be you.
D
April 30th 2010 @ 2:20pm
MarkR said | April 30th 2010 @ 2:20pm | Report comment
Funny, that was the first thought in my mind too
April 30th 2010 @ 8:08am
Dingobob said | April 30th 2010 @ 8:08am | Report comment
Ha Ha Ha Ben Alexander the best performing prop. Oh! you were serious.
April 30th 2010 @ 8:31am
JK said | April 30th 2010 @ 8:31am | Report comment
Could ya show show just a little objectivity? makes for more interesting reading.
April 30th 2010 @ 8:32am
Yikes said | April 30th 2010 @ 8:32am | Report comment
That is the biggest load of rubbish I think I have ever read on The Roar.
And that’s saying something.
April 30th 2010 @ 8:38am
Peter K said | April 30th 2010 @ 8:38am | Report comment
What utter one eyed garbage.
This has been done to death anyway.
Walsh reffed well technically , needs to work on man management.
Hoiles worst captain in local derby history, he deserved what he got.
Imagine saying rubbish call and then expecting the ref to be on your side.
April 30th 2010 @ 8:53am
Brett McKay said | April 30th 2010 @ 8:53am | Report comment
and the heading looked so promising too….
April 30th 2010 @ 10:35am
itsuckstobeyou said | April 30th 2010 @ 10:35am | Report comment
haha… my original header was Walsh Blind, Giteau Fined. I reckon it would have given you a better idea of what you were in for before you read it.
April 30th 2010 @ 10:44am
Brett McKay said | April 30th 2010 @ 10:44am | Report comment
ah yeah, I can see that in the URL actually. My point being that I imagined you were going to get into how lucky Giteau is to be playing this weekend at all, but that’s quite obviously not your opinion…
April 30th 2010 @ 10:51am
itsuckstobeyou said | April 30th 2010 @ 10:51am | Report comment
obviously
April 30th 2010 @ 8:56am
Grobby said | April 30th 2010 @ 8:56am | Report comment
utter bollocks
April 30th 2010 @ 9:30am
Nashi said | April 30th 2010 @ 9:30am | Report comment
I am so glad I said “most” Roarers had managed to put aside any personal bias in a post on this issue yesterday.
April 30th 2010 @ 9:31am
Jerry said | April 30th 2010 @ 9:31am | Report comment
“This is a rugby league rule, and whether you thought it was a try or not, it is not acceptable for a referee to explain a penalty, citing a rule which does not exist”
What about “truck and trailer”? What about “boring in”? What about “lazy running”? Is it unacceptable to use any of these terms? None of them are in the laws. Here’s another phrase that’s not in the laws “Forward pass”. Should they have to say “throw forward” instead?
April 30th 2010 @ 9:34am
Hombre said | April 30th 2010 @ 9:34am | Report comment
May I just concur with the first 8 posts on here – this piece is utter, utter rubbish