The numbers don’t add up for NRL bosses
By Steve Kaless, 7 May 2010 Steve Kaless is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- NRL, Rugby League, Steve Noyce
NRL administrators have found themselves in the stocks of late as players and fans vent their frustrations at the perceived failings of those charged with running the game.
I often find myself playing the role of defender for those charged with making the tough calls in rugby league, but an incident this week pushed me over the edge and has forced me to pick up and hurl a rotten tomato.
First of all, fresh from the NRL CEOs meeting, Roosters boss Steve Noyce announced an idea that players should wear individual numbers rather than their positional numbers as per tradition.
The idea was that apparently lots of kids would be keen to buy jerseys if they could get their favourite players number on the back. I believe the term income stream may or may not have been used.
Fair dinkum, what are they teaching in MBA’s these days?
While the idea was sold as part of these whole new wave of shrewd management thinking sweeping the NRL at present, it’s far from original. Not only is it a straight rip off from American sports, but also has been pinched from the old Super League days.
Yep, good old Super League, which is meant to have had the sort of affect on traditional rugby league supporters as garlic to vampires was exhumed (pardon the continuing undead pun) to bring out that brain wave.
I refuse to believe that suddenly Wests Tigers jerseys will be flying off the shelf because Chris Heightington is wearing the number 36 (chosen due to the fact that’s the amount of penalties he gives away over two matches).
Of course, it didn’t take long for someone to suggest a superstar, ala Benji Marshall, wearing the number 23.
Ah 23!
The number Michael Jordan wore is still the number marketers pluck for, even though he’s been retired for eight years, which strikes me as the last time many CEOs had an original idea.
Sorry, but if someone is wearing a Wests Tigers jersey with number 6 on the back, I’m pretty sure they’re a big Benji fan rather than being a one man movement to have Daniel Fitzhenry installed at pivot.
The other reason I know that the idea to turn the rugby league field into a massive roulette table will fail is history. In Super League, it didn’t work.
Sure there is some novelty value with the big guns having a weird number, although why wouldn’t Darren Lockyer just choose ‘6’.
But it then means you get Brad Morrin in 27 and Shaun Fensom in 44. What is the friggin’ point?
I’ll concede it would be gold to see Jarrad Hickey wearing 88 so someone can shout “Two fat ladies!,” but it’s hardly worth all the effort.
So while the announcement was rubbish, it was also a symptom of the problem with the NRL.
Here we have the NRL CEOs meeting, a time when every man and his dog is talking salary cap overhaul, player departures and Independent Commission, and what’s the first press release we get from the game’s most powerful?
What about a change in jersey numbers.
For F*%$’s sake!
I know it wasn’t the key issue discussed at the meeting, so why not come out swinging with a bold plan to tackle the game’s challenges rather than coming out and trying to get everyone to look away from the burning vehicle by shouting, “Look Michael Bani in jumper number 33!”
There was no talk of a step towards the Independent Commission (the target date of November 1 quickly becoming best case scenario as the meetings drag on), no talk of tackling the salary cap problem anymore than wheeling out the same old tired clichés.
The old arguments have merit, but you still need to show that some thought is being put into problems.
Perception is reality for the punters. People perceive many NRL CEOs as just a bunch of suits keen for another meeting and another lunch.
I know that’s not the case. I know some very smart and very hardworking people work in rugby league. But the message constantly sent to public is off a tired old group living off the goodwill of fans and players.
When the player’s behaviour off the field wasn’t up to scratch, they were given a kick in the pants from those who love rugby league.
Now it’s the administrators letting the game down with their rabbit in the headlights impersonation.
As an old coach of mine used to say: “It’s time to lift or f%$& off!”
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
- Explore:
- NRL, Rugby League, Steve Noyce


oikee said | May 7th 2010 @ 6:57am | Report comment
But seriously, rugby league leadership is non exsistent with this group of rabble rousers we have now. They hold a meeting and come out and tell us nothing will change. ?
We have marketeers not marketing the game, clubs losing millions, players and fans unhappy, yet we still dont see any light at the end of the tunnel.
The game needs new blood, a group who can take the game forward, without any interference from old stale ceo’s looking to keep there jobs.
What you are seeing “now” is a game that has been run poorly, very poorly,. Why “now” you might ask, because even the players are getting sick of the game being run like a muppet show.
You know me, i have been on there case for over a year now, nothing has changed, but i will keep banging my head until it does. We have a great product, we just need leadership now.
I wrote a blog yeasterday of how to fix this week-ends fixtures. Its simple, so simple, nobody has thought about this issue. But, i will tell you something, i was here last year, same program, same fixtures, telling everyone, that we need to change the format for these fixtures, playing both the test and city/country game same night.
Now, that was a year ago, i saw the problem then, so why has nothing been done a year later. ? You watch, it will change, i can guaratee it will change next year, because we wont have these muppets running the show. ?
P.S
About those numbers Steve, i have seen a even better idea which is used in Super League England, ? have your name on the back of the jersey. What a great idea, wonder why no-one has thought of it here. Benji will be known as Benji, or Marshal, no 6 Marshal. Simple. no 6 Lockyer.
Steve Kaless said | May 7th 2010 @ 10:21am | Report comment
Oikee, I have been paralysed by fear after reading that first line.
Paul J said | May 7th 2010 @ 7:45am | Report comment
Well written Steve. Frustration is the best description for RL fans these days.
M1tch said | May 7th 2010 @ 9:44am | Report comment
I dunno, the ESL does it and I got no problem with it, but agree playing numbers is the least thing administrators should be worrying about
Emperor Penguin said | May 9th 2010 @ 2:55pm | Report comment
Numbers don’t matter. Bring back names on Jerseys if the marketers want something more personalised. Agree, its a massive non-issue concidering the problems with TV rights, Independent Commission, Salary Cap, et cetera.
mushi said | May 7th 2010 @ 9:48am | Report comment
The numbers thing I really don’t get, not sure Noyce has an MBA though. Maybe he got it from USQ
Taiabada said | May 7th 2010 @ 10:53am | Report comment
There would be such a demand for number 69, Jersey manufacturers wouldn’t be able to keep up!
Gazza said | May 7th 2010 @ 12:03pm | Report comment
maybe they should give up and start another union side in Sydney?
Maybe where the North Sydeny Bears where based or when Cronulla fold base a team there
sheek said | May 7th 2010 @ 1:41pm | Report comment
Steve,
Passion in writing – that’s what I like to see.
However, I’m NOT impressed that there are too many people on this site beginning to sound like me – that is, not afraid to put forward an opinion, & damn the consequences!
I pride myself on my uniqueness, but bloody hell, other people are starting to have their say without fear or favour also.
BTW, did I tell you I liked what you wrote. I can’t add anything at the moment, since I agree with just about all of it!!!
Steve Kaless said | May 7th 2010 @ 1:47pm | Report comment
Ah shucks Sheek.
I’ll enjoy the comparison.
Cheers
Brett McKay said | May 7th 2010 @ 3:15pm | Report comment
Steve, I had to laugh at this suggestion this week – why couldn’t the clubs just sell numbered jerseys now anyway??!?
oikee said | May 7th 2010 @ 3:19pm | Report comment
Hey Steve, you do realise the game cant grow because the salary cap is there to prop up weak clubs who cant afford to be in the comp.
Sounds good in theory, but its holding the game back because Gallop sold the game for peanuts. Now we have 3 more years of this torture because he also signed a 5 year deal. Mate, could he run a business, should he run a business, if it was your company, you would be spewing, well guess what, league fans are spewing.
This game is run by fools man. Dont be angry, just think, in 100 years time, this will all be behind us.
berra boy said | May 8th 2010 @ 8:34pm | Report comment
Gallop is the ONLY thing standing between a flourishing NRL and a comp with five Sydney sides and no-one watching. Seriously – if the game was left to peanuts like the ARL then Lowes ads would be the highest recognition a person could hope for.
I’m over this. The only good move by an NRL club CEo recently has been the Raiders promoting the offer to Dugan to highlight Roosters salary cap breaches and our no D Head policy which has made the club a pleasure to watch and be around.
You can have your Sydney Rugby League Oikee – have fun with Nick Politis and three mates and I’ll just go to AFL like the rest of the country.
Your Sincerely
Brumby Justin, Cosmos Forever, Berra Boy
Phil said | May 7th 2010 @ 4:50pm | Report comment
The NRL needs a new administration. David Gallop and his group are out of touch.
Corey said | May 7th 2010 @ 10:52pm | Report comment
I think Gallop needs to be there, but may be in an ethics committee role. The marketing manager needs to be changed, the media manager, the salary cap auditor and the CEO needs to be someone from the NFL or General Electric.
oikee said | May 8th 2010 @ 9:21am | Report comment
Excellent Corey, your on the right track now. We need businessmen or women who know business, we dont need ex-league players or people who know the game, does not matter, run the damm comp as a business so the damm code can grow.
Look, we have had rugby league people running the game for 100 years, look at the mess they have got the game in, crap deals, players paid peanuts, ceo’s losing millions, these dumb-arses propping them up. We need new feash talented business people who can run a business, we have tried dinosaurs and lets just say, its been a total failaure, we are 30 years behind where we should be.