Can SBS raise the A-League’s profile?
By Davidde Corran, 18 May 2010 Davidde Corran is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- A-League, ACL, Asian Champions League, football, SBS, World Football
Related coverage
- Football news
- A-League news
- World Football - EPL, Champions League & Europe news
- ACL - Asian Champions League news
There was an interesting offshoot to the discussion on Mike Tuckerman’s article on this very site about the rising prominence of the Asian Champions League last week.
With one member of The Roar community, Hoolifan, commenting that “sticking (The ACL) on Foxtel so only a fraction of the potential audience can view it” was a “funny way to promote a sport”, the point was made that SBS should seriously consider broadcasting Asian Champions League matches not already covered by Fox Sports.
That idea got me both commenting and thinking, but now I’d like to push the discussion even further to a topic that is always highly controversial on this website: could broadcasting the A-League on SBS help raise the competition’s profile?
Firstly let me mention my “conflicts of interest”. My work as a freelance football journalist often sees me working for both Fox Sports and SBS (not to mention a range of other publications and media outlets). However, as I said in the comments section of Mike’s article last week, I’m not sure whether having interests in both sides of the debate makes me bias or objective!
Still I’m going to put this idea out there and leave it open for discussion as I think it’s a fascinating topic.
Now, it might seem an odd time to bring up the A-League TV rights as attention across the country turns towards the upcoming World Cup in South Africa. Instead, I’d argue now is the perfect moment.
When I was back in Australia over Christmas, I came across some old newspaper cuttings of mine. One that caught my eye was a piece taken from the front page of The Age’s 1st of June 2002 edition. It was a captivating article on the opening game of the 2002 FIFA World Cup.
Of course, the beauty, in more ways then one, was in the detail: this article was written by the Senior Football Writer for England’s The Daily Telegrpah, the talented Henry Winter.
Eight years on and you can bet The Age, along with pretty much every other publication and media outlet in the country will be sending their own journalists to South Africa. Considering the continuing fluctuations within the media industry, it is another sign of the tournament’s increasing relevance to an Australian audience.
Only surpassed by the Socceroos themselves, I have no doubt that SBS’ continuing coverage of the World Cup has been a major factor in driving the profile of the tournament in this country.
Would 16 years of The World Cup receiving the kind of commercial network coverage in Australia that the Australian Open is still suffering from have brought us to this very same point? Let alone taken us even further?
(http://www.theroar.com.au/2010/01/31/channel-7-has-stifled-this-years-australian-open/)
The final caveat to all of this is that Fox Sports have done and continue to do a great job of broadcasting the A-League. For their part, I doubt the A-League would be where it is if it wasn’t for Fox Sports brave investment in the game back in 2005.
Yet, while I could be wrong, I suspect it would be in everyone’s best interest including Fox Sports, for at least some portion of the A-League to receive Free To Air coverage.
So to those who doubt whether SBS can help the A-League take the next step up, consider this: if SBS has managed to almost single-handily raise the profile of the World Cup in this country, why couldn’t they do it for our domestic competition?
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- Phoenix need more than flash in the pan crowds (133)
- ‘New football’ fans may help save the game in Australia (124)
- Does Tasmania have a case for A-League inclusion? (119)
- What happened in Port Said was not a football riot (118)
- Magilton struggling to make a mark (68)
- Does the A-League need an injection of humour? (44)
- Socceroos screwed over by FIFA, again (41)
- Melbourne Victory vs Central Coast Mariners: A-League live scores, blog (96)
- Liam Miller: Bargain buy of the A-League season? (8)
- Zambia plays Cup of Nations final in memory of their fallen (7)
- Capello’s resignation ends an awkward marriage (8)
- Does the A-League need an injection of humour? (46)
- Redknapp the best bet to clean up Capello’s England mess (2)
- Redknapp tight-lipped over England job
- Melbourne Victory vs Central Coast Mariners: A-League live scores, blog (96)
- Liam Miller: Bargain buy of the A-League season? (8)
- Zambia plays Cup of Nations final in memory of their fallen (7)
- Capello’s resignation ends an awkward marriage (8)
- Redknapp the best bet to clean up Capello’s England mess (2)
- Melbourne derby reveals tale of two journeys (3)
- O’ so close for John: How JON almost landed the biggest job in sport (16)
- Explore:
- A-League, ACL, Asian Champions League, football, SBS, World Football

The Special One said | May 18th 2010 @ 5:52am | Report comment
The problem here is do you take the money or the free to air coverage on SBS? The answer is, take the money.
Remember, the A-league was bust if the FFA hadnt signed that agreement with Foxtel for 7 years or so.
They find themselves in a similar position where they will need the money just to stay afloat. So it will be Foxtel for awhile yet for the a-league and ACL i think.
However, listening to Senator Conroy on SBS on Sunday, he seemed to suggest that socceroos fans will be happy with the changes to the anti-siphoning laws that will come out soon. I think Socceroos games will move back to free to air.
Phutbol said | May 18th 2010 @ 10:03am | Report comment
If the roos go back to FTA, the TV money from Foxtel will be a lot less. The current deal includes A-league and roos (and ACL?). I wonder if the anti-siphoning legislation, if applied to the roos will include compensation to FFA for lost revenue, if such happens?
AndyRoo said | May 18th 2010 @ 10:25am | Report comment
I don’t think we will lose revenue because the Socceroos are worth FTA money now. It just wouldn’t have gone up as much as it would have if it was still able to be sold to Pay.
Will have a lot of non $$$ benefits as well. A league players previosuly only seen on Pay TV will have a chance to build a reputation.
Davidde Corran said | May 19th 2010 @ 5:00am | Report comment
As I understand it, Socceroos World Cup qualifiers are being considered for the anti-siphoning list. To me that seems reasonable.
With everything else Fox Sports (and all other Pay TV channels) deserve the right to bid on an even keel with FTA.
Brendo51 said | May 18th 2010 @ 8:03am | Report comment
David
I have no doubt that that SBS’s coverage of the World Cup has HELPED the profile but I think the Socceroos making it to 2006 and their performance had far more to do with the increased interest than which channel it was broadcasted on.
The fact is people went looking for the matches in 2006 because the complete media machine jumped on board the Socceroos fairytale, this will not happen with the A-League. For the A-League to prosper we need a balance of money and exposure. I would argue that is what SBS cannot provide. Only a partnership between one of the big three FTA stations and Foxtel can truly provide the balance that will propel our game to the next level.
Would SBS provide the best coverage, yes without a doubt but is this enough when they lack the $$$$ and the exposure to draw non-football viewers. I don’t think so.
Davidde Corran said | May 19th 2010 @ 4:56am | Report comment
Brendo51, I agree the biggest catalyst was the Socceroos. That said SBS definitely laid the seed for this growth with the coverage of the tournaments leading up to it. For me 2002 was when we began to “turn the corner” so to speak in terms of coverage.
My overall point is that the World Cup hasn’t suffered from “only being on SBS” as some say, so why would the A-League?
agga78 said | May 18th 2010 @ 8:20am | Report comment
I would not mind SBS having some coverage of the A league or Asian champions league, but the bitterness shown towards the A league especially by Les Murray since it’s inception has led me to believe it would be a negative outcome if SBS had any rights to the A league or ACL. I have watch SBS football for 30 years and only in the last 5 years has Les and co become very negative about the local game, I don’t recall any big reviews of playing standards on their programs back in the old NSL days, they did not pick apart that competition, the way they have the A league.
I also think letting Foz loose during ACL or A league games is dangerous, because if you don’t play like Barcalona and you play more like a British team, then you play negative non technical football and he would fail to see a difference in the financial set ups of Asian teams compared to A league teams and he would be saying we need more coaches who play a certian way, when often it comes down to money as it does in the ECL. An example of this is when he expects Celtic to out play Barcalona at home and then a criticizes Celtic because they are set up not to concede and hit Barcalona on the break.
Phil E Buster said | May 18th 2010 @ 9:15am | Report comment
Whenever I watch football on SBS they do their best to ruin the experience for me.
The FA Cup final, for instance, while benefitting thankfully from Martin Tyler’s commentary, was blighted by Les and Craig sneaking in snide comments such as unfavourable comparisons with Barcelona (who had nothing to do with the FA Cup but of course always get a mention), both going to great pains to make sure everyone knew neither of them were Chelsea fans, going out of the way to call the magnificent Drogba a diver, and generally try and trample all over Chelsea’s history making achievement this season. Foster, in particular, with his odd sarcastic attempts at humour was doing his best to make a mockery of what is one of the most treasured and traditional of football competitions. Honestly, the guy was acting like he was on drugs at times.
If anything, playing the world cup on an ethnic niche broadcaster has marginalised it as a game in the minds of many Australians, who still see it as a ‘foreign’ sport as a result.
Thankfully, SBS and their pompous, biased, snide snobbery and negativity are becoming ever more irrelevant to football in this country.
ilikedahoodoogurusingha said | May 18th 2010 @ 4:32pm | Report comment
Phil….I didn’t watch the FA cup final, but after hearing Foster on ABC radio the other week promoting his new book, I have to agree with your assessment of him. I think he is away with the fairies!
Joe FC said | May 18th 2010 @ 10:00pm | Report comment
Makes me glad Phil I watched it on Setanta.
AndrewMc said | May 18th 2010 @ 10:06am | Report comment
Put the games on OneHD
Mark said | May 18th 2010 @ 12:14pm | Report comment
I think this would be a great option because channel 10 can promote events on One HD, increasing the public awareness but also allowing free to air access. If Asian/World cup qualifiers were only shown on SBS only dedicated followers would watch because theses games are generally not publicised very well.
AndyRoo said | May 18th 2010 @ 12:18pm | Report comment
Huh..are you talking about the A league.
One HD is fine for A league but I think you guys are underestimating the Socceroos if you think they will be on SBS or One HD. They may be simulcast on One HD but they will be on 7, 9 and 10 and money will change hands.
Mark said | May 18th 2010 @ 12:26pm | Report comment
I realise the Socceroos have a strong pulling power, but when so many of their games will be played by loacally based players, not the first string line up I fear 7, 9 or 10 may shaft them like 7 did with the NSL.
If our top players are playing top opposition it would be fine, but the A- League roos playing an Asian team the general public don’t respect (eg Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam, etc) may get overlooked but the networks in favour of Masterchef or Underbelly.
AndyRoo said | May 18th 2010 @ 12:42pm | Report comment
Masterchef and Underbelly are expensive to make and jewells in the crown. I think even the A league Roos vs Indonesia would pull solid enough ratings against your run of the day programing (Two and a half men)….solid enough that they would skip a week of Underbelly because it’s in the can and it would bother them to delay the series for a week.
Yes those Asian games containing no Euro Roos are the weakest attraction but they aren’t actually in line to be protected. For the Socceroos they seem to be talking about only protecting the World cup qualifiers unless I’m reading the tea leafs wrong.
Moot point anyway because after we win the 2011 Asian Cup we wont have Asian cup qualifiers, instead we will be playing friendlies against USA, Mexico, Croatia, Japan (beat them in the final so they also don’t have qualifiers) and England
Davidde Corran said | May 19th 2010 @ 4:57am | Report comment
So that only people with a set top boxes can watch? Might as well keep it on Fox Sports and take the money…
Brendo51 said | May 19th 2010 @ 8:35am | Report comment
Lets not compare owning a set top box with purchasing Foxtel. Within 2 years the majority of households will have a set top box or a Digital TV, within 4 year only a few precent will be left out.
In fact the scheduling of key sports on digital only channels could be a very effective way to help increase the uptake.
ONE is a valid alternative to SBS or Foxtel (and if we really need to) the government could place the Socceroos in the FTA list and force it to be similucast on 10 for a couple more years.
Phil E Buster said | May 19th 2010 @ 8:41am | Report comment
Analogue TV is being switched off starting in some areas this year, so set top boxes or digital TVs will be the norm. a dedicated FTA sports channel hosting football including the A-League is therefore a natural fit. However, higher TV rights money is still the reason it should stay on pay TV, with a compromise such as a highlights package for FTA a good compromise.
Gweeds said | May 18th 2010 @ 11:00am | Report comment
Basically it would be great to have the A-League on FTA.
But Foxtel is prepared to pay $$$ and the A-League need as much funding it can get. It’s the money or the box, and at this stage we should go for the money.
cbowden9000 said | May 18th 2010 @ 12:20pm | Report comment
I think if any Australian football is going to be shown on FTA TV, it should be on One HD for a few reasons:
1) Shows on One are also advertised on Channel 10, which is 2 channels of advertising
2) Channel 10 and One HD, being mainstream, get more viewers than SBS
3) One has taken a keen interest in football since it’s inception by showing the Serie A and Bundesliga, both with their own highlights show. One also showed the FIFA club world cup, and 10 did the Sydney FC v LA Galaxy game a while back.
4) I have noticed that Channel 10 has given football more interest. When I watch Sports Tonight the highlights and news of football is always very thorough, compared to if you watch 7 or 9 sports news where they often only show 1 or 2 goals from a game that had 5. On top of this, One HD and Channel 10 refer to our sport as “football”, where as 7 and 9 call it “soccer”
5) With Analogue TV signals being turned off, everyone will have digital TV and access to One.
6) One HD have their own Australian football show in World Football News
keeper11 said | May 18th 2010 @ 12:29pm | Report comment
That ALL Socceroos games …should be on FTA is a given….
the fact that a mickey mouse games like league’s city v country and AFL’s Irish ‘tests’ is on prime time FTA..
but genuine matches involving one of our most prominent national teams isn’t ..is a disgrace….
SBS attitude to A-league has been dissapoinintg and overtly political…pity as well as has been said a million times..
football could need them as in this country the game has many enemies and very few friends in the media……
Also FFA would resist to have the A-league primarily back on SBS as that would smell of ‘old soccer & NSL’
apart from possible Socceroos coverage….Ch7 /9 are a lost cause for football….way too many vested interests to protect in the current oligopoly ..and what football fan could forget ch7′s last sojourn with the ‘foreign’ game..
Ideal solution is a one hour higfhlights package show on FTA to compliemnt Fox …)
better option as mentioned a future for A-league on ONE HD is possible..which is making small steps towrds embracing football..both local & international is evident….though still not convinced if it is for long-term ……
MyGeneration said | May 18th 2010 @ 12:34pm | Report comment
You lost me at “…a given…”
AndyRoo said | May 18th 2010 @ 12:52pm | Report comment
Nine seem much better than 7 for mine. 60 minutes have done stories on Cahill, Palmer and Kewell in the last 12 months and Wide world of Sports gives the Roos a bit of time. They have dabled in the past (2002 World Cup where they did a crap job) and the Home Grown vs Euro’s matches which burnt them badly.
I happened to see Sunrise for the first time in a million years and they had a presenter of Ghanian background who did a decent interview on Kewell which followed on from Sunday morning on Wide World of Sports where they Interviewed Tommy Oar and plugged their Current Affair interview with Kewell.
But they own the rights to Cricket so it would be a big risk.
The Link said | May 18th 2010 @ 4:21pm | Report comment
didn’t realise City Country was on the anti siphoning list….
Brett McKay said | May 18th 2010 @ 1:08pm | Report comment
Can I raise my summer Friday night A-League (or T20 Big Bash cricket) idea again??
JF said | May 18th 2010 @ 1:25pm | Report comment
T20 on Friday nights over summer would be great, can’t be too long before it gets picked up by FTA. Do you know where the Big Bash are with their current broadcast deal?
Brett McKay said | May 18th 2010 @ 1:30pm | Report comment
JF, without wanting to hijack Davidde’s topic here, the Big Bash (as with all domestic cricket) only just renewed its deal with Fox Sports at the start of this most recent home summer. Though it has also been mentioned in relation to the anti-syphoning list…
ilikedahoodoogurusingha said | May 18th 2010 @ 4:34pm | Report comment
Brett T20 is only rounders in disguise!!! LOL
phil said | May 18th 2010 @ 1:58pm | Report comment
We are so fortunate that foxtel is willing to put millions of dollars in to the game of soccer. If the soccer rights went back to SBS the A-league would be broke the next day. In anycase,if you don’t want to subscribe to Foxtel you can always go and watch it live. The FFA needs true supporters that pay, not once a year supporters that are freeloaders.
whiskeymac said | May 18th 2010 @ 4:21pm | Report comment
i would have thought that the FFA needs, and wants, both.