Related coverage
Last Friday’s much-hyped Collingwood and Geelong clash was the highest-rating home and away match since Ben Cousins’ Richmond debut against Carlton in Round 1 of last year. It’s ironic given both games were originally slotted to be shown on delay.
It took people power to have them shown live, but the broadcasters can’t have walked away disappointed.
Despite Seven’s resistance to showing Friday night’s clash live outside of Melbourne, the game averaged over a million viewers nationally. It peaked at 784,000 in Melbourne.
The figures won’t mean we’ll see more live footy from Seven any time soon, of course. They are quite comfortable having Better Homes & Gardens lead in the footy in order to maximise ratings across the evening, and it’s not as though they have a history of moving around their schedule.
Remember when they had the AFL move back the start time for the St Kilda-Geelong clash last year to keep it as a lead in to the 6pm news?
So the only place left for fans to look – other than Channel Ten, who generally look after fans when given the chance – is the next broadcast deal, which may still fetch as much as $1 billion for the AFL.
Since the last deal was signed, a number of changes to the landscape offer hope for aggrieved supporters.
The first we have known all along – Channel Seven will not have the right to bid last this time, which means the AFL will have a little extra power at the negotiating table. If one network is unable to offer live football on Friday nights, it will be easier to then turn to another network who is willing and able to do so.
The possibility of this scenario is increased by the AFL’s indications it may sell individual timeslots to broadcasters, rather than package all timeslots as a whole.
The stumbling block here is how hard the AFL are willing to push for live football on Friday nights. They certainly sympathise with the plight of fans, but will they back it up if it means it could cost them in broadcast dollars?
It remains to be seen.
Another important shift is the relaxing of restrictions on advertising for betting companies. It emerged last year in The Age that live Friday night football could become mandatory in the new deal and that it was included in the prospectus handed to potential rights-holders.
This was because a trade-off to broadcasters came about in the form of increased revenue from advertising “live odds” at the start of each quarter, as Fox Sports already do. It is likely a fierce bidding war would ensue between betting companies to be aligned with the Friday night coverage.
The downside here is that it places gambling fairly prominently during broadcasts, a path the AFL mightn’t be too comfortable going down.
The final shift isn’t as tangible, but it’s one that simply cannot be overlooked. The public push for live football is stronger now than perhaps it has ever been.
At the time the last broadcast deal was being negotiated, Channel Nine went live on Friday nights wherever possible. Interstate games and sell-outs were almost always live on Nine. It wasn’t the best possible scenario, but footy fans were kept happy.
This time around, football fans are suffering through the treatment handed to them by Channel Seven, and it’s having a noticeable effect. The advent of many Facebook groups and live online streams – two other things that weren’t around last time rights were up for grabs – are clear indicators of fans’ unhappiness at Seven’s coverage.
The momentum is shifting towards live football and there are few excuses left for both the league and broadcasters come the next broadcast deal.
The only worry is that coverage outside of Melbourne will be overlooked.
As mentioned above, viewers in other states weren’t as lucky as Victorians on Friday night. Adelaide viewers typically have a one and a half hour delay for games out of Melbourne, and the gap is three hours for those in Perth.
Time zones do make it difficult, but more of an effort needs to be made to look after fans to the west.
Oh, and as for that final concern – that live football affects clubs at the gate – 88,195 turned up on Friday night. It was the biggest home and away crowd Geelong have ever played in front of.
The excuses really are running out.
Recommend this story.
Follow Michael on twitter @mdifabrizio
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.


May 25th 2010 @ 11:31pm
Tim Philp said | May 25th 2010 @ 11:31pm | Report comment
As a bit of an aside to this debate, we’re not seeing this Wednesdays origin match on 9 until 9.30pm in Perth… Crazy
May 26th 2010 @ 1:12pm
JamesP said | May 26th 2010 @ 1:12pm | Report comment
It will be intersting to see how it goes in melbourne up against Master Chef
I will probably tune in for the opening minutes, and then back and forth…
May 27th 2010 @ 8:50am
Michael DiFabrizio said | May 27th 2010 @ 8:50am | Report comment
Some interesting developments on the TV rights front here – http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/battle-for-tv-rights-stalls-20100526-weet.html
The AFL are waiting on the government taking four games off the anti-siphoning list, ESPN may become involved (there has been talk of this in the past but could be a serious player this time around), Seven and Ten must bid together and Nine are keen on Monday night football.
May 27th 2010 @ 9:28am
Ian said | May 27th 2010 @ 9:28am | Report comment
Late last year, the AFL produced a fair bit of spin with respect to having suceeded in lobbying Sentator Conroy for a number of its games to be removed from the anti siphoning list. http://www.smh.com.au/afl/afl-news/pay-tv-set-to-bid-on-afl-games-20091201-k3rs.html
They then followed this up with more spin, stating that the number of games currently shown on Free to Air channels will not reduce etc. http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/90917/default.aspx
The Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy (dbcde) has assured me that the Minister has told the codes / broadcaster that the number of FTA games each week will not change and if it is shown on FTA today it will continue in the future.
The reports by Demetriou are pure spin, designed to show he is starting negotiations from a position of strength. As Caroline Wilson quotes from a network executive, in her excellent Age article today ”The AFL might have outsmarted itself,”
This is a big concern moving forward and maximising revenue for the TV rights. Continued broadcasting at prime time into Sydney is not sustainable and will have to be offset by ratings in Melbourne and Western States or other concessions.
Of bigger concern is the rise of NRL in the AFL Heartland. After a sucessful origin game last night, the rugby league will be beamed into Melbourne Live (Four non Melbourne teams here) on Friday night and this Sundays Storm game near live. This additional coverage is unpresidented and finally gives choice to consumers south of the border, stuck with the local code.
Why would ESPN be interested in bidding for the AFL? Is this a bit more spin to try and keep Fox Sport honest?
May 27th 2010 @ 9:48am
Ian said | May 27th 2010 @ 9:48am | Report comment
Actually cancel that comment about the league being shown into Melbourne.
Last night the Commentator mentioned the games will be shown live across the Eastern Seaboard (which includes Victoria) and an online guide today at Ninemsn also confirmed such (for postcode 3000) , however after waiting an age for confirmation by Channel Nine Melbourne programming team, they have just advised the game will not be shown until after midnight nor on sold to subscription TV (ie they’re hoarding) so we’re back to no choice again.
Time to go hassle the Minister again I think!
May 27th 2010 @ 1:46pm
Redb said | May 27th 2010 @ 1:46pm | Report comment
I wonder if Foxtel would cut the ESPN feeds they get?