Socceroos have a way to go still – on and off the field
By Adrian Musolino, 25 May 2010 Adrian Musolino is a Roar Expert
150 Have your say

Australia's Brett Holman celebrates after scoring a goal against New Zealand's during their soccer friendly in Melbourne, Australia, Monday, May 24, 2010. Australia won the match 2-1. (AP Photo/Andrew Brownbill)
Brett Holman’s last gasp goal against New Zealand may have saved Australia’s blushes, but their performance left an uninspiring feeling amongst supporters as the Socceroos head to South Africa.
It was a stodgy first-half performance from the Socceroos, and what was most worrying, aside from the tactical ineptitude on display, was the lack of spark from seasoned Socceroos.
My biggest concern, aside from the Pim Verbeek’s strategic predictability and the lack of depth, is the lack of spirit and emotion that the Socceroos are carrying into this World Cup campaign as opposed to four years ago.
While Holman’s late winner gave the Socceroos another come from behind win – and saved them from the indignation and national embarrassment of a home defeat to the Kiwis – I still don’t see the self-belief and hunger of 2006.
There were few standout performances, and more than a few disappointing ones, especially from experienced campaigners.
Vince Grella was a menace for the wrong reasons and wasted some rare chances, while Craig Moore looked slow and vulnerable at the back – not surprising given his lack of football of late.
Tim Cahill’s influence was negligible in the first half, while Scott McDonald was yet again exposed and isolated in a system that doesn’t suit him.
One has to wonder why Verbeek gave him the opportunity yet again when we all know McDonald is wasted when the Socceroos are lobbing long balls with no build up and control through the midfield.
Why did he not give Tommy Oar more time than the 15 minutes he had at the end of the match? Or Nicky Carle a final chance to impress?
On Oar, he did show flashes of pace and touch in his limited time, and surely he deserves a ticket to South Africa as the possible go-to man off the bench when the Socceroos need a lift.
But the overriding lesson we can take from the game is how vulnerable the current Socceroos team is when a few key ingredients are missing.
Take away Harry Kewell, Brett Emerton, Luke Wilkshire, Scott Chipperfield and the option of Josh Kennedy up front and they suddenly look very vulnerable, one-dimensional and predictable.
In attack, long balls to Kennedy (or worse, anyone else) and failure to create a cohesive attack from the midfield won’t worry Nemanja Vidic, just as Moore’s vulnerability will have Miroslav Klose and co. licking their lips.
The Socceroos need to have their strongest possible team on the park playing at their utmost ability and with a bit more passion if they are to do anything in Group D.
If any positives can be taken from the game it was the performances of the next generation of leaders, namely Dario Vidosic, Carl Valeri and Mile Jedinak, who provided the much needed stability and control in the midfield that had been lacking in the first half.
The much-maligned Holman smartly took his opportunity to win the game and is starting to prove the doubters wrong, while Beauchamp had a positive influence.
And credit to Jason Culina, who was one of the few experienced Socceroos to have a noticeable impact. It isn’t too damaging playing in the A-League, Pim.
But the negatives outweighed the positives. At the end of the day, it was dour and worrying.
There is much work to do for Verbeek as he contemplates the final make-up of his final squad, and, worryingly, I’m yet to see anywhere near the emotional wave of self-belief and passion of four years ago.
If it took so long for the Socceroos to lift in front of 55,000-plus fans at home against New Zealand, then perhaps we need to be worried.
Also, as opposed to four years ago, Verbeek doesn’t seem to have the tactical cards up his sleeve that Guus Hiddinck had (perhaps he just doesn’t know how to play them like Guus) come critical moments in matches.
Perhaps it’s the Verbeek mindset of only lifting when necessary that we saw in the Socceroos’ performance last night.
If so, it’s fitting Verbeek’s final Australian performance typified how he coached the Socceroos during his tenure.
Either way, there is still a lot of work to do for the Socceroos, and the final friendlies against Denmark and the USA in South Africa are critical.
Let’s hope Verbeek’s Socceroos show their true colours before it’s too late. Off the field there is a way to go yet, also.
I spent much of the night floating in and around the MCG gauging fans’ opinions and attitudes for a separate article.
While 55,000-plus crowd was beyond expectation, within the MCG it felt a lot less with gaping gaps in the stands. And amongst that crowd was a fair contingent of bandwagon support.
While a half empty MCG doesn’t lend itself to creating a dynamic atmosphere, it’s worrying how many of those bandwagon supporters know so little of the Socceroos and the game itself (some of the conversations I overheard were laughable).
The All Whites’ early goal, not to mention the Socceroos’ woeful performance, may have silenced the crowd to a certain extent, but the lack of atmosphere from the crowd was stifling.
The support, like the team, didn’t lift for the occasion, and there was a noticeable lack of antagonism from the Australian fans toward the Kiwis.
Encouragingly, heading into the stadium, the huge number of corporations represented in numerous stands handing out freebies (Solo undies took the prize for most innovative) highlighted how far the Socceroos brand has come. But in terms of hearts and minds, there is still more progress that needs to be achieved.
Thankfully the bandwagon support had a last gasp victory to go home with, but the Socceroos class of 2010 doesn’t seem to have the bandwagon support of 2006 just yet.
In more ways than one, our 2010 World Cup campaign is falling well short of the mark set in 2006.
We can only hope there is a marked improvement come South Africa, both on and off the field.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.

Mick said | May 25th 2010 @ 2:03am | Report comment
OK Adrian I take it you’re not a fan of Pim, WE GET IT, but the point is we won and put the Kiwis back in their place. No soccer boss from NZ calls us chicken sh*(t and gets away with it. They threaten injuries on our players, we do the same back. Don’t screw with the Socceroos.
AA said | May 25th 2010 @ 2:38am | Report comment
I totally agree with what Mick said above, for the NZ soccer boss to call us chicken sh*t late last year and for Fallon to threaten to injure us, New Zealand got what they deserved to be frank. The FFA also needs a big kick up the backside for their ineptitude also in the handling of this game.
Steve said | May 25th 2010 @ 6:23am | Report comment
So how does that work then? Grella calls out Fallon for “unprofessional” comments but then goes ahead and tries to put Bertos out of the cup.. Pot Kettle etc. By the way this is what Fallon said:
“I wouldn’t be surprised if there are a few injuries. I don’t think anyone is going to hold back. Australia will be the same – they won’t want to get beaten by a team they think of as a lesser country”
I don’t see any threats there, he just (correctly) made a prediction as to what could happen. And by the way there is no skill to diving in with 2 footed tackles. NZ could have done the same if they wanted to, and “to be frank” it would have been what you deserved.
Kuri said | May 25th 2010 @ 7:12am | Report comment
Says a lot about a team when your own coah publicly berates you for unsportsmanlike behaviour. Like he says had it been a world cup they would have been red carded. We were very lucky to win last night.
http://www.smh.com.au/world-cup-2010/world-cup-news/not-good-enough-verbeek-takes-aim-at-reckless-tackles-by-cahill-grella-20100524-w89q.html?autostart=1
Kuri said | May 25th 2010 @ 6:11am | Report comment
Do explain how we put them back in their place?
Beating them by one point is hardly an ass whipping and it wasn’t until the dying seconds that the goal was scored.
The Kiwis did embarrass us in parts especially the first 45 even though they lost.
We were expected to win this match easily and we only just scrapped through.
The Kiwis were more than worthwhile opponents and once again have shown the world Australian football is nowhere near as good as we like to think it is.
whiskeymac said | May 25th 2010 @ 9:26am | Report comment
the other view is that maybe kiwi football isnt anywhere as bad as we think it is. fallon, killen and nelsen are good players as good as their socceroo counterparts (nelsen maybe better).
Kuri said | May 25th 2010 @ 9:30am | Report comment
Yes exactly Whiskymac pretty much what I have been alluding to.
The Kiwis are very well coached and organized and give credit where it’s due they are a good team who definitely not as bad as many people would like us to believe they are.
nikio said | May 25th 2010 @ 3:29pm | Report comment
Thanks its nice to see a decent comment and not a rubbishing one!
Carlos said | May 25th 2010 @ 11:16am | Report comment
Hey Mick , what game were you watching. “Put the kiwis back in their place” , mate you’re kidding. For a team ranked 20 you were utter rubbishI. As for the comments, it’s the likes of you that give Australian sport (along with your cricketers) a bad name for everything from ignorant conceited arrogance to the worlds worst incidences of bad sportsmanship. Herbert called F.A. (not you) chickensh*t because they wouldn’t commit to what to everyone else was a perfect fit for a world cup build-up friendly, because they didn’t deem us to be worthy enough opposition. Well, be glad they relented because you guys needed a hell of a wake up call so be glad you got it and give the kiwis the credit they deserve. Fallon made no pre-game threats whatsoever if you take the time to read his comments and assimilate them intelligently (?). Ive played in many teams that would have gone all out to splinter the bones of, say Cahill, after those two challenges on Bertos and they would have had every right. Even then, I doubt you would see it as an evening up. Be glad then that the kiwis at least are professional enough to show sportsmanship and be glad you still have the Cahills to get on the plane to S.A. Having said that, we’re neighbours and after the All Whites I will be cheering on every Aussie kick and hoping you do improve and take the World Cup by storm. Go the Kiwis, Go the Aussies!
Jared Mathers said | May 25th 2010 @ 1:53pm | Report comment
Here Here!!
Us aussies get a bit carried away with our chest beating, but lets give the all whites some credit. A team with even more challenges than us (population, team profile etc.) gave us more than a run for our money, and will be loud and proud at the world cup. As two of the lesser world cup nations, we should be supportive of each other. Until we have to face each other for real. As a die hard socceroo fan, I’ll be watching and cheering the All whites with gusto.
nikio said | May 25th 2010 @ 3:31pm | Report comment
I’m going to SA and after last nights show from the green and gold – I really don’t think I can support them even for the sake of the southern teams cause ya got to admit that was pretty dam dirty play….
Mick said | May 25th 2010 @ 9:08pm | Report comment
Carlos: Socceroos 2 vs. All Whites 1. Funny how the rest of the world whinges when Australia is winning in any code. Even with half our team missing we still beat the Kiwis
Carlos said | May 26th 2010 @ 9:49am | Report comment
Mick – the only whinging is because you don’t know how to win graciously. That was some of the dirtiest play I’ve ever seen, and in a friendly. Instead of apologising like a true professional that Blackburn reserve team player crossed with an animal ,Grella, simply said “that’s football”. So, who spat the dummy and tried to break legs? Australia did because they were getting outplayed. In a friendly with so many substitutions the result is almost immaterial it’s how you play and how you can tinker and I can tell you as they get on the plane to Europe to play our next friendly the All Whites are happy, happy, happy. You guys are scratching your heads trying to figure out what’s gone wrong with 3 weeks to the cup.
Mick said | May 26th 2010 @ 3:37pm | Report comment
Your reply just explains my point. All I got out of that was: “NZ lost because Australia weren’t gentlemen on the field”. I’m sorry, but we actually have something to play for at the World Cup.
Mick said | May 26th 2010 @ 3:38pm | Report comment
Carlos, again the scoreline: Socceroos 2, All-Whites 1. It’s NZ who should be scratcihing their heads. Aren’t they the ones who LOST. Wake Up mate.
James said | May 25th 2010 @ 4:07am | Report comment
Thank God Pim is on his way out.
Aldershot said | May 25th 2010 @ 4:45am | Report comment
So are most of the stars.
oikee said | May 25th 2010 @ 6:10am | Report comment
How was the 3-D, did anyone watch the game in 3-D.
Aldershot said | May 25th 2010 @ 7:22am | Report comment
I saw the six nations in 3D. Pretty good if you can put up with the glasses.
hammer said | May 25th 2010 @ 6:28am | Report comment
probably an ideal game to dampen some of the wild optimism about how far this socceroos side will progress ..
the teams far too clunky – Neill, Moore are too slow in defence and together with Grella should pick up a string of cards for their poor tackling techniques – refs in the world cup just won’t let players get away with the types of challenges Grella and Cahill put in ….
Cahill’s the star of the side but really nothing more than a decent premier league footballer – the celebration should be around them making their 3rd ever world cup – and not the too high an expectation of making the last 16
st. penguin said | May 26th 2010 @ 9:03am | Report comment
mate, I agree with you. Making the last 16 is going to be very very tough for this team.
But I think you’re being harsh on Cahill saying he is nothing more than a decent footballer. Evertonians love the man, and Moyes recently said he will go down in Everton folklore (although, granted, he was trying to re-sign timmy at the time!)
Derryn said | May 25th 2010 @ 6:46am | Report comment
Credit to the All Whites. They really took the game to us in the first half and had our boys rattled. We sat far too deep though, surely in a game like this we could afford to be a bit more attacking. I’ve only ever seen the one tactic from Pim, even in friendlies and dead rubbers. Not really good enough.
Beauchamp, Culina and dare I say it Holman impressed.
Really wouldn’t mind seeing Moore, Grella not play for Australia again. Grella is a hack that struggles to get a game for Blakcburn. I have a feeling he has been red carded for the Socceroos before?
McDonald didn’t play badly at all, he just was stuck in a defensive structure. Being alone up front as a short striker makes very difficult to even get a touch. He should still make the 23, but ffs Pim play more then 1 striker for a change. McDonald and Kennedy up front would make a good combo.
It wasn’t a bad hit out for a friendly. I’d almost have been happier with a draw, it might have stunned our boys into action a bit more for the upcoming games.
bruski said | May 25th 2010 @ 6:56am | Report comment
I also think that the performance by Australia was well below par. What was the go in the first half, was it tactical or was it that our boys were just dithering at the back with no other option.
I cannot really see how Moore deserves his place in this team, he was showed up for a lack speed in the A-League regularly and in a world cup this is going to only get worse. Drop him I say, am I the only one who feels this?
Grella is also undercooked and showed bugger all really.
The question of tactics popped up earlier, the 2nd half the Aussies came out and started moving the ball. I was thinking, is it tactical or is it because we have a lot of young guys on the park? Perhaps it will be a good thing when some of the older guys move on as I think they are lacking some zip and spark which is dissapointing.
The tackling was shocking, Grella should have been Red Carded, he went for the legs. The Socceroos have worked hard trying to loose the tag of a physical team with no technical ability. well Vince, you have well and truly blown that out of the water!!
Cahill’s challenge was not as bad but still as spectacularly shcoking as Grella’s, it was as if he just went in without thinking. You would not expect someone with the skill of Cahill to do this.
My standouts were Culina and Vidosic, I also thought McDonald had a good game but cannot get the oppurtunity which has been said many of times with this formation.
On a final note, I have not really been that worried about Pim but the first half last night got me thinking a bit. Is it the old cattle he is playing with or just his way of getting some miles into the legs of his elderly players? Or is it that he has no other ideas.
I feel that NZ should have won, we are lucky!!
Either way, it is not a good look with the World Cup just about to start.
Kuri said | May 25th 2010 @ 7:04am | Report comment
I did make one oobservation before the game especially on the whole buddy thing Pim and Herbet were showing prior to the match. It was hardly two coaches who were desperate for a win at all, more like two mates out for a training run.
This in turn I feel went into the match and the cynic in me can not help but think that Herbet and Pim had a word to their teams and before kick off. If you go back and watch the first 45 then 2nd you will see one big noticeable difference.
1st 45 Socceroos played a very defensive orientated game whilst the Kiwis pushed hard up front and it worked a treat creating a few oppurtunities.
2nd 45Kiwis palyed a very defensive game whilst we played an attack game. Maybe it was the way the game went, but I can’t help but feel Pim and Herbert came to an agreement so each side could test out their defense and attack. Not saying the score was set but I think it showed the Kiwis need to improve defensively as do we.
punter said | May 25th 2010 @ 7:48am | Report comment
First thing first, Grella was without doubt one of the stars in WC06 in Germany, a true Socceroo legend.
That performance last night, especially that tackle was of a player sadly either not playing much, in decline or badly out of form. That tackle was horrible, Bertos was down the wing going nowhere & he lunged in, red card.
Full credit for the Kiwis, they fought hard, deserved the lead & unfortunate to lose.
stevo said | May 25th 2010 @ 9:40am | Report comment
grella was a star in 06 but has been consistently poor since (including being one of the many to be horrible at the asian cup)
his lack of game time and loss of pace makes what was already an aggressive tackling style dangerous (both to opposition players and to our chances when he gets sent off)
chris mackinnon said | May 25th 2010 @ 8:29am | Report comment
the game last night gave some indication of where we are at with the players picked and also, our preparation and hope we are lucky we have another 2 more games before germany.
our preparation we qualified through asia were we werent scoring many goals against minnow opposition, yeah we didnt loose but the quality of opposition is questioned.
did the socceroos take the all whites to easy in first half, i think with some of the body language either it was that or the other question could be why do we have fair well game the players have to travel all this way i would have preferred to have played two games in europe
scott mcdonald played poorly and surely cant go, had he chances in goal. mark milligan in right full back struggle, grella was either underdone or just put in a poor performance rather than playing the game instead of running his mouth and playing the man. our mid field struggled grella and well culina what impact he has well i dont know.
new zealand are ranked way below us in fifa team rankings but to get here they beat bahrain and we played against them and couldnt put them away either, hopefully with the inclusion of kennedy, kewell emerton , wilkshire, schwarzer
Towser said | May 25th 2010 @ 8:50am | Report comment
Never underestimate in 2006 the momentum of actually qualifying after 32 years. It provided a platform for both fans & players to lift for the whole event.
Qualifying through Asia is the real way football operates throughout the world in relation to qualifying for major tournaments.
Steady as you go from now on will never match the hype of 5 years ago against Uruguay.
Dont know why therefore there is any suprise that many fans at the match were not diehard ones.
Australia is still learning about football, as its only in the last 5 years that its started to penetrate mainstream consciousness to any degree.
The 88000 at Wembley last night to see England beat Mexico would have been far more informed on average about football than the 55000 at the MCG. Quite simply because the sport at International level has been part of English main stream consciousness for over 100 years.
As for the match. We only beat Lichenstein 3-1 prior to the 2006 WC. Cant read to much into this therefore, except we won.
If you took this match seriously as an indicator of how we’ll perform in our group you would come away very confused.
Truly a match of two halves.
That steady diet of World cup & Asian cup qualifiers & consequently qualifying for those competitions will eventually pay dividends in a more informed Football public in Australia.
From that will be a more informed & balanced football media to satisfy the more informed football public.
Joe FC said | May 25th 2010 @ 1:15pm | Report comment
Towser I think Adrian should employ you as his ghost writer.
mahony said | May 26th 2010 @ 11:49am | Report comment
Great contribution Towser – very reasonable. They World Cup sky is not ‘falling in’ and the context of the national football team has changed from 4 years ago. Football needs to mature in this country and I am glad it is.