Socceroos have a way to go still – on and off the field
By Adrian Musolino, 25 May 2010 Adrian Musolino is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- All Whites, Brett Holman, Craig Moore, football, Guus Hiddink, Harry Kewell, Jason Culina, Lucas Neill, New Zealand, Pim Verbeek, Socceroos, tommy oar
150 Have your say
Related coverage

Australia's Brett Holman celebrates after scoring a goal against New Zealand's during their soccer friendly in Melbourne, Australia, Monday, May 24, 2010. Australia won the match 2-1. (AP Photo/Andrew Brownbill)
Brett Holman’s last gasp goal against New Zealand may have saved Australia’s blushes, but their performance left an uninspiring feeling amongst supporters as the Socceroos head to South Africa.
It was a stodgy first-half performance from the Socceroos, and what was most worrying, aside from the tactical ineptitude on display, was the lack of spark from seasoned Socceroos.
My biggest concern, aside from the Pim Verbeek’s strategic predictability and the lack of depth, is the lack of spirit and emotion that the Socceroos are carrying into this World Cup campaign as opposed to four years ago.
While Holman’s late winner gave the Socceroos another come from behind win – and saved them from the indignation and national embarrassment of a home defeat to the Kiwis – I still don’t see the self-belief and hunger of 2006.
There were few standout performances, and more than a few disappointing ones, especially from experienced campaigners.
Vince Grella was a menace for the wrong reasons and wasted some rare chances, while Craig Moore looked slow and vulnerable at the back – not surprising given his lack of football of late.
Tim Cahill’s influence was negligible in the first half, while Scott McDonald was yet again exposed and isolated in a system that doesn’t suit him.
One has to wonder why Verbeek gave him the opportunity yet again when we all know McDonald is wasted when the Socceroos are lobbing long balls with no build up and control through the midfield.
Why did he not give Tommy Oar more time than the 15 minutes he had at the end of the match? Or Nicky Carle a final chance to impress?
On Oar, he did show flashes of pace and touch in his limited time, and surely he deserves a ticket to South Africa as the possible go-to man off the bench when the Socceroos need a lift.
But the overriding lesson we can take from the game is how vulnerable the current Socceroos team is when a few key ingredients are missing.
Take away Harry Kewell, Brett Emerton, Luke Wilkshire, Scott Chipperfield and the option of Josh Kennedy up front and they suddenly look very vulnerable, one-dimensional and predictable.
In attack, long balls to Kennedy (or worse, anyone else) and failure to create a cohesive attack from the midfield won’t worry Nemanja Vidic, just as Moore’s vulnerability will have Miroslav Klose and co. licking their lips.
The Socceroos need to have their strongest possible team on the park playing at their utmost ability and with a bit more passion if they are to do anything in Group D.
If any positives can be taken from the game it was the performances of the next generation of leaders, namely Dario Vidosic, Carl Valeri and Mile Jedinak, who provided the much needed stability and control in the midfield that had been lacking in the first half.
The much-maligned Holman smartly took his opportunity to win the game and is starting to prove the doubters wrong, while Beauchamp had a positive influence.
And credit to Jason Culina, who was one of the few experienced Socceroos to have a noticeable impact. It isn’t too damaging playing in the A-League, Pim.
But the negatives outweighed the positives. At the end of the day, it was dour and worrying.
There is much work to do for Verbeek as he contemplates the final make-up of his final squad, and, worryingly, I’m yet to see anywhere near the emotional wave of self-belief and passion of four years ago.
If it took so long for the Socceroos to lift in front of 55,000-plus fans at home against New Zealand, then perhaps we need to be worried.
Also, as opposed to four years ago, Verbeek doesn’t seem to have the tactical cards up his sleeve that Guus Hiddinck had (perhaps he just doesn’t know how to play them like Guus) come critical moments in matches.
Perhaps it’s the Verbeek mindset of only lifting when necessary that we saw in the Socceroos’ performance last night.
If so, it’s fitting Verbeek’s final Australian performance typified how he coached the Socceroos during his tenure.
Either way, there is still a lot of work to do for the Socceroos, and the final friendlies against Denmark and the USA in South Africa are critical.
Let’s hope Verbeek’s Socceroos show their true colours before it’s too late. Off the field there is a way to go yet, also.
I spent much of the night floating in and around the MCG gauging fans’ opinions and attitudes for a separate article.
While 55,000-plus crowd was beyond expectation, within the MCG it felt a lot less with gaping gaps in the stands. And amongst that crowd was a fair contingent of bandwagon support.
While a half empty MCG doesn’t lend itself to creating a dynamic atmosphere, it’s worrying how many of those bandwagon supporters know so little of the Socceroos and the game itself (some of the conversations I overheard were laughable).
The All Whites’ early goal, not to mention the Socceroos’ woeful performance, may have silenced the crowd to a certain extent, but the lack of atmosphere from the crowd was stifling.
The support, like the team, didn’t lift for the occasion, and there was a noticeable lack of antagonism from the Australian fans toward the Kiwis.
Encouragingly, heading into the stadium, the huge number of corporations represented in numerous stands handing out freebies (Solo undies took the prize for most innovative) highlighted how far the Socceroos brand has come. But in terms of hearts and minds, there is still more progress that needs to be achieved.
Thankfully the bandwagon support had a last gasp victory to go home with, but the Socceroos class of 2010 doesn’t seem to have the bandwagon support of 2006 just yet.
In more ways than one, our 2010 World Cup campaign is falling well short of the mark set in 2006.
We can only hope there is a marked improvement come South Africa, both on and off the field.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.


May 25th 2010 @ 8:51am
Kuri said | May 25th 2010 @ 8:51am | Report comment
What bugs me the most is how highly we rate ourselves in the soccer world. While we’re good we are far from great.
Give the Kiwis credit they played very well in the first 45 especially, a team made up of mostly A-League stars kept a team full of European club players honest and on their toes.
I find it astounding how hardly any credit is given to the kiwis, we played bad because they put pressure on us. We didn’t put them away because we simply do not have the fire power to do so.
Everyone expected this to be a walk in the park and a total thrashing, but oh how wrong many of us were. Here we are thinking we are the great almighty and can only put away a team ranked 50+ places below us from Oceania by one goal. Seems the Kiwis would and can put up more resistance than most asian teams and they did it against a team playing dirty with players who should have been red carded.
If anyone can hold their heads high it is the New Zealanders and their brave and gutsy performance in front of a hostile crowd an aggressive team.
Australia – we simply aren’t as good as we like to think we are.
New Zealand – teams will underestimate you at their own peril
May 25th 2010 @ 9:01am
Towser said | May 25th 2010 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Agree
Give the Kiwis some credit in the way they played this match.
Personally i hope that NZ football continues to rise as it can only be good for the region.
May 25th 2010 @ 9:49am
AndyRoo said | May 25th 2010 @ 9:49am | Report comment
NZ were really good value, as they were in their playoff at home to Bahrain which was a great amtch.
But their midfield is limited and we should have done much better.
May 25th 2010 @ 10:04am
Kuri said | May 25th 2010 @ 10:04am | Report comment
Yes it is limited but what does that say about ours AndyRoo?
The Kiwis are also saying that they should have played much better.
May 25th 2010 @ 10:23am
AndyRoo said | May 25th 2010 @ 10:23am | Report comment
It says we should be worried and hope Pim turns it arround.
All 5 of them were bad in the first half and Grella and Bresc as much as I love them should be put on notice.
I don’t agree that the Kiwis could have played much better. Their defence was solid and their forwards are their strong point (their 3 starters and young Wood). Elliot had a better game than I’ve seen him play in along time and Brown is turning into a good player.
Thier midfield is A league standard really, it’s fine and does a job but it’s not their strength. For Australia that’s not the case, Grella, Bresciano, Cullina, Kewell and Cahill need to play well or the Roos struggle.
May 25th 2010 @ 1:38pm
Kuri said | May 25th 2010 @ 1:38pm | Report comment
I’ll have to strongly disagree,
Do rememeber the lads across the ditch very rarely get to play together.
I look forward with anticipation on how much they can improve.
Everyone is capable of improvement
May 25th 2010 @ 8:52am
Gif Richard said | May 25th 2010 @ 8:52am | Report comment
I’d forgotten Holman was still on the park.
May 25th 2010 @ 12:16pm
DaMan3000 said | May 25th 2010 @ 12:16pm | Report comment
CLASSIC – me too!
May 25th 2010 @ 8:52am
Realfootball said | May 25th 2010 @ 8:52am | Report comment
All Verbeek’s many limitations as a coach were exposed in this game: lack of control over the players; tactical inflexibility; limited vision; and an even more limited tactical imagination.
Verbeek is unequivocally the wrong man to take this team to South Africa and the only pleasure I could take from an embarrassment of a performance was the fact that it was the last time the dour Dutch apprentice will show his face at a Socceroos game in this country.
I exclude from that embarrassment the energy that Valeri, Holman, Vidosic and Jedinak (and Culina once he has moved forward) brought to the second half. Significantly, it was when the younger players had taken the pitch that Australia lifted. I personally doubt that Grella is worth his place in the team.
Verbeek is bewildering. Why give Oar and Rukayvitsa, our two most explosive talents, just 15 minutes in the game? How does that make sense on any level? The man is an incompetent. Our loss is most certainly not Morrocco’s gain.
May 25th 2010 @ 8:59am
Michael said | May 25th 2010 @ 8:59am | Report comment
Although I believe Craig Moore is well past his best, a lot of his problems last night stemmed from the poor positional play of Lucas Neill. Neill was to far away from his man most of the time and slow on the ball. The first goal came from Neill dropping off his man which left him free and then Moore was forced into trying to cover both attackers. If you look at the the replay Neill should have been picking up the player that flicked on the ball to Killen to score. Essentially Moore was made to look bad by the Neill’s poor positioning. I think the reality both players still have something to contribute you just can’t play both together anymore.
May 25th 2010 @ 9:03am
Ben of Phnom Penh said | May 25th 2010 @ 9:03am | Report comment
55000 to see a friendly against a side 58 places below us? Not a bad turn out I’d say. Yes, there are bandwagon supporters there however that is the entire point of the Socceroos, to engage the imagination of the broader public.
As for the performance Vidosic, Beauchamp and Valeri have made real cases for being in the starting eleven.
May 25th 2010 @ 5:10pm
The Bear said | May 25th 2010 @ 5:10pm | Report comment
Valeri on for Bresciano, with Carle on the bench at half time. At that point I KNEW Carle would not be going to South Africa.
May 25th 2010 @ 5:27pm
Harvey the Scouser said | May 25th 2010 @ 5:27pm | Report comment
Carle not making the team has been on the cards….for about 4 years.
May 25th 2010 @ 9:06am
keeper11 said | May 25th 2010 @ 9:06am | Report comment
what are you on about Adrian….are you a news-limited hack in your spare time..
55,000 for a friendly against a nation ranked 100 or so and you critisize the turnout ..??
theres a another other somewhat well promoted local code that also played in melbourne recently..
a full international against the reigning # 1in that sport …but could only muster 29000…
but it was in a smaller ground so made ‘good pictures’ ..
yet the fact is that crowd figure was trumpeted by its media masters as a triumph and proof of its unrivalled success and popularity in the australian sporting landscape..
Get real..
May 25th 2010 @ 9:53am
yimbo said | May 25th 2010 @ 9:53am | Report comment
Are you talking about the rugby league test earlier this month? or the local code that got 88,000 at the g on friday night?
55000 was good number considering the weather. probably should have held the game at etihad stadium for better atmosphere.
May 25th 2010 @ 12:21pm
Chris said | May 25th 2010 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
It’s all relative. If I was a soccer fan I would be pretty happy with 55,000 (which would have looked phenomenal at Etihad).
If you look at it as “We played a nation ranked in the hundreds, on a weeknight, and still got 55,000″ it looks great.
If you look at it as “33,000 more turned up to an AFL game between two suburbs than turned up to a Soccer game between the best sides of two continents” it looks measly.
May 25th 2010 @ 1:40pm
Kuri said | May 25th 2010 @ 1:40pm | Report comment
New Zealand are not ranked in the hundreds are they?
I thought they were in the late 70′s to early 80′s
Just goes to show rankings don’t mean sweet stuff all
May 25th 2010 @ 6:56pm
Chris said | May 25th 2010 @ 6:56pm | Report comment
The FIFA rankings are best described in terms of “to the nearest 30″.
May 26th 2010 @ 6:49am
MV Dave said | May 26th 2010 @ 6:49am | Report comment
Is that because they are the only code with more than 30 countries who actually take the game seriously?
May 26th 2010 @ 9:51am
Chris said | May 26th 2010 @ 9:51am | Report comment
You are really looking for a fight where none exists.
It’s more a reflection that a) Soccer results are pretty unpredictable and that b) It is just a downright horrible rankings system.
The ELO system seems to be a hell of a lot better – and FIFA could do worse than to take a look at Rugby’s IRB rankings as well.
That said – it has improved since 2006 when it somehow had the USA in the top 3.
May 25th 2010 @ 9:06am
Brendo51 said | May 25th 2010 @ 9:06am | Report comment
What is the real worry is how many of our first team players werevery poor last night
In the first half Moore, Bresc, Gella and Culina all had shockers. They were basicially missing. Grella and Culina especially consistently missed passes or were caught holding the ball, there just wasn’t any snap to their game.
Bresc looked lost out there, every time he touch the ball he stopped. It was a joke, but just not funny. I don’t think he made one attacking run down the right
Moore is gone, mark my words, he will be a liability if he plays. Neill is not quick and with both of them there we defend way too deep and invite trouble.
At least in the second half we saw some alternatives. Best game I have seen Holman play and he was best on for the second half. presented well, had a excellent touch and really brought Culina and Vidosic into the game by pushing the ball out wide. I have not been a fan but i would like to see him start in the CAM role next warm up game and play Cahill on the right, Vidosic on the left, kewell up front.
Beauchamp needs to start ahead of Moore, doesn’t even need discussion just do it Pim. Finally unless Grella improves immensely Varleri or Jedinak need to start alongside Culina (personally I would go with Jedinak).
Overall we have too many pasengers at the moment and its time for Pim to make some hard choices.
May 25th 2010 @ 9:12am
AndyRoo said | May 25th 2010 @ 9:12am | Report comment
Thankfully that was the first friendly and not the last. If it was the last one I would be really worried but I expect a few players to improve with more game time under their belt. Just training isn’t enough and players like Carney, Oar, Moore and Cullina haven’t been playing recently.
Beauchamp really surprised me as prior this game I wouldn’t have had him in my 23. Now I think he is the 3rd choice CB and pressuring Moore.
Negatives were the centre of the park, Grella and Cullina didn’t offer much (none of our Midfielders did much in the 1st half). Not being able to dominate midfield and the play when we have 5 midfielders to 4 against NZ is a really bad sign. At least with Cullina he had a good second half playing wide (but we need him to play well in the middle) and with a couple more games he may get back to his 06 form. Vinnie is a BIG worry, ever since he moved to England he has struggled and I only hope that he’s pacing himself for the main games as he is veteran now…. probably clutching at straws here.
So many substitiutions and was just a friendly but the coach seems a bit of a week link. A fine Monday to Friday coach but game day lacks inspiration. Let’s face it we are going to be a defensive counter attacking team and we might get through to the second round or go out “bravely” with 2 draws and a 1 nil loss. We are rolling the dice rather than forging our own destiny.
May 25th 2010 @ 9:16am
AndyRoo said | May 25th 2010 @ 9:16am | Report comment
Encouragingly, heading into the stadium, the huge number of corporations represented in numerous stands handing out freebies (Solo undies took the prize for most innovative) highlighted how far the Socceroos brand has come. But in terms of hearts and minds, there is still more progress that needs to be achieved.
Well I still have my LG “go Socceroos” hammer they gave out in 2001 when we played NZ.
May 25th 2010 @ 9:20am
Realfootball said | May 25th 2010 @ 9:20am | Report comment
Moore was right to call time on his international career way back against Paraguay. He is a mere shadow of the player he once was. The problem is that Verbeek has a record of picking players on past deeds (Grella being one), not on present form. If Moore and Neil start against Germany and Serbia, we will lose and lose badly. Honestly, Neill was so slow there were times when he had the ball when I thought I was watching a slomo replay. How on earth is Colosimo not in the squad when Milligan, a nonentity playing second tier football in Japan, gets a start?
These have been wasted years for too many talented Australian players. Carle didn’t even take the pitch. That was Verbeek giving the finger to the media. Poor Nick Carle and Scott MacDonald, to find themselves under the tutelage of an imcompetent whose narrow mind has been set in cement.