St Kilda sex scandal a lesson for all footballers
By Michael DiFabrizio, 27 May 2010 Michael DiFabrizio is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- Adrian Anderson, AFL, sex in sport, St Kilda Saints
Related coverage

St Kilda coach Ross Lyon addresses his players at quarter time during the AFL Round 22 match between the Melbourne Demons and the St Kilda Saints at the MCG. Slattery Images
If there’s one thing we can take from the latest AFL – and St Kilda – sex scandal, it isn’t that players should no longer visit high schools, it isn’t that the Saints premiership chances are gone (again), and it isn’t that the game – or even the Saints – have widespread issues. No, the one thing we can take from it all is that players need to be more careful.
That’s it. Nothing more, nothing less.
The media had a field day on the report that a schoolgirl had fallen pregnant after having sex with two Saints players she met at a high school footy clinic. Headlines screamed “sex storm”. Questions were immediately being asked.
The Age even jumped on that worrying trend of sports journalism that is scanning comments on BigFooty and “reporting” the most interesting.
By the end of the day, however, the AFL’s investigation into the matter managed to take a bit of the heat out of the story.
Among its conclusions were that the relationship between the “two young players” and the girl was consensual and started after a game in Sydney in Round 1, not the clinic; phone records and an interview with the girl independently confirm the statements made by the players; and Victoria Police interviewed the girl and will not be taking action.
“All available evidence indicates that the players had no contact with the young woman at an AFL Player Appearance at the student’s school, but met for the first time some week’s later after an AFL match following round one of the 2010 season,” an AFL statement said.
This basically debunked the footy clinic angle, which was seen by some as the most surprising and potentially damaging aspect of the story.
The other part of the story that should be stressed – and was clearly missed by some covering yesterday’s events – was that the initial report claimed the girl told the players she was 18 and working at the Australian Institute of Sport, and that her Facebook page said she was 19.
So, given contact apparently didn’t take place at the school visit, it is not unreasonable to suggest that the players weren’t even aware she was a schoolgirl.
Which puts the initial story about a footballer impregnating a schoolgirl into some perspective, doesn’t it? The headlines were always going to sound bad – how could they not? – but it is good that some light was shed on the situation for those willing to look beyond the line at the top of the story.
At the same time, however, the girl should not be forgotten because of the way things were reported.
The sad part of all this is a young girl is now pregnant. And whilst we can question why she was in Sydney or why there was such confusion over her age, it remains that a footballer is believed to be responsible.
Had the footballers been more careful, this part of the story would not have occurred, if there would be a story at all. In this day and age, where players are practically regarded as heroes, caution needs to be used.
Maybe that means the players should have been more careful when it came to contraception. Maybe that means they should have been more careful when it came to accepting the girl’s age, even if they had no reason for doubt.
Either way, there’s a lesson for all young footballers in the story, and it would be great if that was how the football world walked away from all this.
It probably won’t – the media love a good sex scandal – but with the AFL, St Kilda and Police all deciding to not take further action, there is hope.
Adrian Anderson declared it yesterday “a private issue between the parties.” St Kilda labelled it “a private matter.”
The unfortunate thing is, so far it’s been anything but.
Recommend this story.
Follow Michael on twitter @mdifabrizio
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
- Explore:
- Adrian Anderson, AFL, sex in sport, St Kilda Saints


May 27th 2010 @ 6:16pm
Karlos said | May 27th 2010 @ 6:16pm | Report comment
Yes Anne, I bet she is devastated carrying a baby of a footballer she idolises. James, you are the one who needs to grow up and stop pretending all footballers are meatheads and all females are innocent.
May 27th 2010 @ 6:21pm
Redb said | May 27th 2010 @ 6:21pm | Report comment
The Answer,
Common is it?
Please furnish with past examples.
I know the names just don’t know business it is of yours or mine.
May 27th 2010 @ 6:44pm
mattamkII said | May 27th 2010 @ 6:44pm | Report comment
Jesus, few people making way too much of this.
How many 17 year old girls have fellas younger than 18? not many. Girls usually go for older guys…lord, I reckon most of girl that were 17 when I was 17 were with blokes closer to 20.
May 27th 2010 @ 8:06pm
Paul J said | May 27th 2010 @ 8:06pm | Report comment
The off field dramas for the NRL in 2009 were terribly damaging for the game. When the players are named, Greg Inglis, Brett Stewart, Matty Johns, the media camp outside their house and their faces are in print and on the TV constantly.
I realise AFL players who test positive for drugs are not named as the AFL refuses to name them but how does the AFL keep these St Kilda guys names away from the media circus that would surely follow?
Does anyone know how they have done it?
May 27th 2010 @ 8:55pm
Michael C said | May 27th 2010 @ 8:55pm | Report comment
Paul J -
in addition to Redb’s point below – - you seem to be trying to score code vs code points???
Remeber, the NRL does NOT name positive drug test players either, on the first strike.
how many of them are there?
That’s right…….we don’t know. The NRL don’t report it. The AFL does. Names aren’t everything……names satisfy the gossip mongers,
however, being upfront with real information, the important stuff.
does it matter that we don’t know the names of 2 or 4 or 6 guys out of 700 or so??
btw – Mark Robinson was the fellow who broke this story, he was speaking on SEN tonight (he’s a Thurs night regular) – - and at the time of the story breaking on Tuesday evening, they didn’t have the names and so going to print for Wednesday the paper didn’t have names (would they have printed them??).
As Wednesday progressed the social internetworking was full of rumours and speculation – - however, as the story evolved it became clear that there WAS NO STORY. The only angle was potential breach of trust on visit’s to a school. With that debunked – - there is NO story.
May 28th 2010 @ 12:19am
Karlos said | May 28th 2010 @ 12:19am | Report comment
They are named, shamed and sacked.
May 28th 2010 @ 12:21am
Karlos said | May 28th 2010 @ 12:21am | Report comment
No 4 Corners investigation here I bet. How many times has 4 corners investigated rugby league now and how many time Aussie Rules? Class warfare.
May 27th 2010 @ 8:37pm
Redb said | May 27th 2010 @ 8:37pm | Report comment
I’ll try and be kind Paul J as your comparsion with Inglis, Stewart and Johns is absurd.
Can you guess the difference here?
Hint….. Poilce charges, rape accusations.
Stokes and Johnson both named re their minor drug possession.
May 28th 2010 @ 12:55pm
MattS said | May 28th 2010 @ 12:55pm | Report comment
Listened to ABC radio a couple of nights back and some stupid reporter actually said to the effect “We cannot name the AFL St Kilda players but can tell you they came from rugby league states…” Amazing!
May 28th 2010 @ 2:44pm
Redb said | May 28th 2010 @ 2:44pm | Report comment
All 3 are.
May 28th 2010 @ 12:57pm
ac said | May 28th 2010 @ 12:57pm | Report comment
Of all the things i have read one point is very clear – How does the AFL stop the guys being named. If it was NRL they would be named and shamed. I take my hat off to the AFL for its sheer influence with the media in all these cases they are pretty powerful.
May 28th 2010 @ 2:38pm
Billo Boy said | May 28th 2010 @ 2:38pm | Report comment
I heard this same question this morning on ABC radio in Sydney. They had Josh Massoud and Criag Norenbergs(?) on with the host.
They said that the Melbourne media was too intimidated by the AFL and Aussie rules generally to ever risk speaking out.
Simply it is just a very bad career move to portray AFL in a bad way if you want to keep working in AFL. Even the AFL reporters in NSW and Queensland don’t seem to ever write in a negative way about AFL.
They said on ABC that in Sydney that the NRL can’t do that as the media would just threaten the NRL back by saying they would dump NRL and give their space to another code if the NRL threatened to cancel media passes and access to players etc.
Everyone remembers how the AFL officials and players responded to Channel 7 trying to name the AFL players who tested positive to drugs. And wasn’t there a SEN radio presenter who was sacked within one day because he made some assertion about the AFL?
May 28th 2010 @ 2:46pm
Redb said | May 28th 2010 @ 2:46pm | Report comment
Josh Massoud LOL
The Masters apprentice.
May 28th 2010 @ 4:13pm
Billo Boy said | May 28th 2010 @ 4:13pm | Report comment
Let’s end the week agreeing that AFL and its fans are the most insular sports fans on the planet. Anyone who disagrees with a member of the Cazaly brigade is immediately denigrated. Never mind that what Massoud said is self-evidently the truth.
May 28th 2010 @ 5:52pm
Jim said | May 28th 2010 @ 5:52pm | Report comment
Billo Boy, Thankfully people in this country can follow the indigenous code. We are not a european colony any more we can stand on our own two feet and play our own form of football. Maybe some people aren’t as confident with there place in the world and seek to follow european sports to compensate.
May 28th 2010 @ 7:13pm
Billo Boy said | May 28th 2010 @ 7:13pm | Report comment
You mean like Melbourne’s biggest sporting events? Cricket, tennis and horse racing?
May 28th 2010 @ 6:33pm
LH said | May 28th 2010 @ 6:33pm | Report comment
I am absolutely disgusted with these players and the culture in football that finds this acceptable. They are disgusting and should not be glorified and encouraged as role models. Scum.
May 28th 2010 @ 9:14pm
Greney said | May 28th 2010 @ 9:14pm | Report comment
“I hope they go to prison for underage sex”
She’s 17. Under Australian legislation she’s an adult.
May 28th 2010 @ 11:42pm
Anne said | May 28th 2010 @ 11:42pm | Report comment
Grow up LH, she was ADULT enough to seek these men out to have sex with them, then she is an adult. Are you so naive to think that women/girls like this don’t lie to men about how old they are?,
And as far as the football codes being bashed about on here, I am a Sydney sider who LOVES Rugby league & AFL equally….it is childish to argue about such things.
May 29th 2010 @ 12:00am
Chris Scotts said | May 29th 2010 @ 12:00am | Report comment
Child abuse?
A young woman consciously traveled hundreds of km to have legal and consensual sex with someone.
If that is child abuse then I am Margret Thatcher.
As for your comments – accusing someone of being a Child abuser and saying they should be imprisoned is about the most defamatory statement I have seen in a bloody long time. It’s ok to not agree with someones morals (and from a moral perspective I am not a huge fan of one night stands) but to accuse them of a very serious crime is totally unacceptable.
May 29th 2010 @ 9:41am
ac said | May 29th 2010 @ 9:41am | Report comment
Once again I repeat forgetting the circumstances how does the AFL get away with it. The NRL would have been front page headlines with this story in the media. The AFL controls the media so well.
May 29th 2010 @ 12:42pm
Paul J said | May 29th 2010 @ 12:42pm | Report comment
ac
I asked how the AFL manage to hide the players names from the media (not the drug users, we know they refuse to name them), and the AFL boys didn’t answer it.
I think it’s fair to say no one on the Roar knows how they manage to do it.
I’m sure the other codes would love to know how to keep the names out of the media, as i said earlier in this post, when you name names it is much more damaging for the image of the code.
Anyways here is some light reading from i’m assuming a non Melbourne jurno. Reminds me of the NRL last year.
http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/state-of-origin/bad-boys-in-afl-angels-in-nrl–and-saint-locky-20100528-wlfn.html
May 30th 2010 @ 1:35pm
Mark D said | May 30th 2010 @ 1:35pm | Report comment
Have any of you thought that maybe she was dating one of them?
Because i heard….. “Aparently” she slept with one of them in sydney and it was a fling but then when she got back to melbourne she started actually seeing the other player… ? theyd been in a relationship for a few months and then this came out ?
June 23rd 2010 @ 11:15pm
Susie said | June 23rd 2010 @ 11:15pm | Report comment
I heard the same thing Mark… And I’ve seen both of them together, a numerous amount of times.