The custodians of sport are losing touch with reality
Columnist
By Adrian Musolino, 30 May 2010 Adrian Musolino is a Roar Expert
A Gelong fan flexes his muscles during the AFL Round 09 match between the Collingwood Magpies and the Geelong Cats at the MCG, Melbourne.
What do you do when fans aren’t turning up to sporting events and you’re left with the indignity of televising from empty stadiums? You create virtual spectators instead. Yes, in the race to satisfy the demands of television and fiscal goals, the custodians of our codes want to manufacture crowds rather than listening to them.
Over 40,000 may have turned up on a Monday night for Carlton versus St Kilda recently, but the AFL must still have concerns about the night’s ability to attract regular huge crowds if the crazy admission by Channel Nine’s executive director Jeff Browne is anything to go by.
Browne, whose network is keen to regain AFL television rights at the next round of negotiations, told The Age that as part of the network’s push to convince the AFL of Monday night footy they will use digital technology to superimpose a virtual crowd on to our screens to compensate for the possibility of empty stadiums.
So while there may only be 16,000 at AAMI Stadium (as there was yesterday for Richmond’s surprise victory over Port Power) or the like, television viewers at home could be treated to a packed stadium and, supposedly, the fake atmosphere to accompany it.
Upon reading the article I couldn’t help but check my calendar to make sure it wasn’t April Fools.
Could such a ludicrous proposition be genuine?
“People are being diabolically conservative about this,” Browne said.
Is expecting reality – real reality not virtual reality – diabolically conservative nowadays?
What a fallacy that such actions and ideas could be deemed acceptable – cheating and misconstruing audiences to hide the truth.
It reminds me of the common practice of doctoring photos of models and celebrities in magazines to make them ‘perfect’ – and then we wonder why so many young people suffer body issues as they try and attain the impossible look propagated to them on newsstands.
What’s worrying is people in positions of power such as Browne not only believe such ideas are acceptable, but they seem confident enough to push them in the public domain believing people will support it.
According to Caroline Wilson’s article: “The AFL, which hopes to sell its next five-year broadcast package complete with nine weekly home-and-away games for $1 billion, said the virtual audience would solve the TV problem but not the prospect of relatively empty Monday night stadiums.”
So the AFL is okay with a virtual audience?
Perhaps the FFA could look into the technology for A-League games!
But joking aside, the ridiculousness of the proposal highlights the gulf between such executives and the fans – not to mention reality.
With television executives increasingly influencing the direction of codes, is it healthy for them to be so submissive to the demands of television while ignoring the core reasons why fans are speaking with their feet on matters such as the popularity of footy on Monday nights in the first place?
Absolutely not.
Sports stand on the brink when they resort to such distortions to hide reality.
The reality is the future of punters actually going to sporting events is at risk, with the advent of high definition and 3D technology making it even easier for fans to stay in rather than face the traffic, costs, dodgy food and wintery conditions in half-empty stadiums – especially when atmosphere can be manufactured by digital technology in high definition on the couch.
And the increasing demand for live coverage of games is a reaction from fans who know live sport is the final ingredient in their viewing utopia.
But codes must not cave in to the lunacy of corporate suits and their bottom dollars and remember the soul of their sports can be found in the stands – the actual people sitting in the stands, not the digitised variation you may be seeing on Channel 9 on Monday nights in the near future.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
AFL articles
- More rugby league players to defect to the AFL? (160)
- Mobile madness: Optus decision bad news for codes (153)
- AFL divisions are the way of the future (106)
- Foxtel’s AFL coverage is nirvana for footy fans (89)
- AFL’s most hated club turns 120 years old (78)
- Israel Folau now ready for AFL (76)
- Optus ruling actually a good thing for AFL fans (52)
- Ling holds hope for club loyalty in AFL
- Andrew Krakouer given four weeks leave from Collingwood
- Giants inspired to prove doubters wrong (32)
- Malthouse not fazed by assistant issue
- Richo says look out for the Tigers in AFL
- AFL clubs’ leadership groups getting out of hand (15)
- Who’s to blame for the Majak Daw beat-up? (32)
- AFL clubs’ leadership groups getting out of hand (15)
- AFL divisions are the way of the future (107)
- Crows changing, but will this AFL preview change your life? (2)
- Is Heath Shaw the right leader for Collingwood? (11)
- Could a female coach succeed in the AFL? (36)
- Demons’ two captain Jacks the right leadership choice (5)
- Mobile madness: Optus decision bad news for codes (153)
- Explore:
- AFL, Caroline Wilson, channel night, Crowds, Jeff Browne, Monday night football, virtual reality
Forgetmenot said | May 30th 2010 @ 2:18am | Report comment
Completely agree Adrian. Virtual crowds will just look very fake on tv. Although i must admit it is a very creative idea.
The AFL needs to be very careful not to lose sight of its aim to increase game attendance rather than TV dollars. As soon as that happens then football is purely business. Football is still the peoples game and Channel Nine needs to respect that and not try and influence the AFL.
Looking further into the future, it could be entirely possible that you can view a match from home by wearing a 3D goggles, and actually feel like you are sitting at the game. I would love to see crowds then …
Love the picture as well. Titles a bit misleading though.
James said | May 30th 2010 @ 3:23am | Report comment
Virtual crowds! Are these people for real? Clueless.
Jecker said | May 30th 2010 @ 5:29am | Report comment
Why should St. Kilda or the Sea Eagles or Waratah fans suffer heartache when their team is beaten? Let’s forget virtual crowds and go to virtual games where the subscriber controls the result.
Another point: 3-D coverage will affect attendance to a small degree but when they finally perfect holographic transmission it’s all over.
Redb said | May 30th 2010 @ 7:10am | Report comment
The AFL has said its not convinced about regular Monday nights it was ch 9 that suggested a virtual crowd. Stupid idea.
Agree holographic 3D will get closer to actually being there, but nothing will ever substitute for seeing the game live in real D. Perfect example last Friday night.
Agree, the A League needs to look into it.
Vinay Verma said | May 30th 2010 @ 7:44am | Report comment
Adrian, if Browne has been reported accurately then his suggestion is no different to falsifying accounts. This is the same sorry scenario engulfing Goldman Sachs and Lehman Bros. And ,dare I say it,the Storm.
Corporates in Australia and around the world need to take a hard look at themselves. Sporting standards will ultimately reflect the kind of society we live in. We must continue to improve as a caring,concerned and cohesive society. We have made major strides in equality and empowerment but a lot more needs to be done.
Sport is too precious to be left solely in the hands of broadcasters.
James said | May 30th 2010 @ 1:02pm | Report comment
Exactly. It’s a different type of fraud.
sheek said | May 30th 2010 @ 7:29pm | Report comment
Vinay,
I agree, with you of course but society as a whole is too complacent. Unfortunately, we will end up getting what we deserve, & it won’t be pretty….. !
Kento said | May 30th 2010 @ 8:33am | Report comment
Nice article. I agree it’s nuts.
The only thing I’ll say is that I’ve always thought they should pipe the sound of the crowd through the speakers at ANZ stadium to make up for the vacumous atmosphere given the size and accoustics of the stadium.
But that’s just amplifying what’s there already and quite different to manufacturing a crowd.
–
Comment left via The Roar’s iPhone app. Download it now [http://itunes.apple.com/au/app/the-roar/id327174726?mt=8].
mds1970 said | May 30th 2010 @ 8:37am | Report comment
Want bigger crowds Clive, but don’t want to pay the transport tax? Ask Jeff Browne how.
MV Dave said | May 30th 2010 @ 8:50am | Report comment
It all comes down to how much the various sporting organisations are willing to sell their (league’s) soul. The more influence the TV companies have the more money they will pay. I still shake my head at FIFA’s cave in to European TV schedules for the 2 WCs played in Mehico…with the result that games at altitude commenced at midday/early afternoon in 100plus degree F temps (England vs Brazil 1970 comes to mind) so that the Europeans could watch the game at a decent time.
Which of the sports will be first to put up their hand and say enoughs enough?
Axel V said | May 30th 2010 @ 11:37am | Report comment
Virtual crowds and atmospheres are the stupidest thing i’ve ever heard.
Although I have a suggestion for the A-League, when playing at docklands, rather than having the Northern Terrace mic 80 meters away from it’s supporters behind a board,
and the away mic only 30 meters away where you can hear their whispers, why don’t they put both mics 30 meters away from each other? Or have them both 80 meters away and pump up the volume, is not artificial and will bring it closer to the sound intesnity of what’s it’s like being at the game!
Rob said | May 30th 2010 @ 1:10pm | Report comment
Although this will horrify most real sports fans the idea is not new, nor is it a sudden change in philosophy or approach for our sports.
It is widely understood and accepted by those at the coalface that pretty much all professional sport would still be in a 60s shameteurish state without TV revenue. TV revenue is overwhelmingly the primary financial driver for professional sports.
So whilst it is not ever publicly expressed, the notion that stadia are effectively just the worlds largest TV studios has been an integral part of our sporting landscape for over a generation.
Those of us who actually go to the grounds feel very differently, but in the end we are not financially important to the survival of our codes. Sad but true.