Gambling on football a growing problem
By Rich_daddy, 7 Jun 2010 Rich_daddy is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- AFL, gambling in sport, sports gambling, The Footy Show
During recent times I have noticed a huge spike in the prevalence of advertising relating to placing a bet on games when watching the football. Gambling has been always been part of sport growing up as a lad, but it was mainly isolated to horse racing.
But in the last ten years betting agencies have decided it would be a good idea to actively encourage people to part with their cash whilst supporting their local footy team.
Betting on football has become such a big industry that these days the latest odds are displayed on television during previews for matches or even during the game if following it online. You can even support your team by going to “Bomberbet” or “Crowsbet” online.
It may just be me, but I have a huge problem with this.
Gambling is an addiction that destroys people’s lives. Worst still, the regulations (or lack thereof) prohibit any person taking action to prevent someone gambling away their life savings.
The responsibility is on the person with the gambling addiction.
Of course gambling can be enjoyed in moderation but there’s no doubt mass advertising is going to encourage addicts or potential addicts to place a bet. The AFL and NRL show their hypocrisy on this issue by demanding players and supporters act like saints at all times and have punished those in the inner circle that have made bets on games.
But on the other hand they accept massive revenue from these organisations that deal in people’s misery. Something needs to change.
From what I understand there was a law that was in place that prohibited television stations actively referring to odds on matches. The odds were to be “seen and not heard”.
ABC’s Mediawatch questioned channel Nine’s rugby league coverage and its references to gambling but this seemed to fall on deaf ears. It now appears to have gone out the window altogether.
These days, in the case of the AFL Footy Show, the betting odds (which simply appeared without any reference from speakers) are now great sources of discussion when players and hosts when giving their tip.
The pathetically clichéd “please gamble responsibility” appears in fine print down the bottom or may get mentioned by one of the hosts.
Cigarette companies are banned from advertising and the issue on restrictions on alcohol advertising have also been flagged. The time has come for the gambling cancer to be controlled by the relevant authority.
It is likely to happen considering the money involved? Don’t bet on it.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
AFL articles
- Record low AFL crowd for GWS home match (209)
- Giant challenges ahead for Greater Western Sydney (200)
- Three Sydney teams? Sheedy’s being greedy (184)
- Kevin Sheedy sticks by comments (143)
- Long, cold winter ahead for Western Bulldogs (83)
- Why we should ease up on the Giants (81)
- Third Sydney AFL team? Never say never (74)
- My open-letter to AFL supporters (63)
- A conference system won’t provide AFL equality (68)
- Adelaide Crows vs St Kilda: AFL live scores, blog (57)
- Richmond vs Melbourne: AFL live scores, blog (52)
- Carlton vs Port Adelaide: AFL live scores (0)
- Are we witnessing the best debut season ever? (16)
- History repeats for Nic Naitanui (0)
Recommend this story.
- Explore:
- AFL, gambling in sport, sports gambling, The Footy Show

June 7th 2010 @ 8:59am
Baz35 said | June 7th 2010 @ 8:59am | Report comment
I’ll give anyone 2 to1 on that the “football” will be changed to “AFL” before midday!
June 7th 2010 @ 9:28am
simonjzw said | June 7th 2010 @ 9:28am | Report comment
2 to 1 on – in the red it is Baz….. Not sure if you have the odds right but it was music to my ears, took me back to the time before digitised bookmaking when the betting ring had some character.
June 7th 2010 @ 9:34am
Baz35 said | June 7th 2010 @ 9:34am | Report comment
1.50 for you trendy types
June 7th 2010 @ 11:49am
Redb said | June 7th 2010 @ 11:49am | Report comment
can I get a line on that?
June 7th 2010 @ 9:16am
Brett McKay said | June 7th 2010 @ 9:16am | Report comment
Rich Daddy (ironic moniker, given the topic), this will only get worse if/when AFL games started being shown live. You’ll then start getting updates at quarter-time, half time etc, even as key moments happen in play…
June 7th 2010 @ 9:56am
simonjzw said | June 7th 2010 @ 9:56am | Report comment
I have to say I agree with the sentiments expressed by you Rich Daddy.
I’ve been a regular punter on the AFL and NFL for quite a few years and I used to think the marketing restrictions on sports betting agencies were ridiculous. But even I think the emphasis placed on odds during commentary and analysis is way over the top.
And unless something is done now it will only get worse.
All the sports betting agencies are currently lobbying for a change in leglislation to enable internet betting while the game is in progress. And why shouldn’t you be able to bet on the outcome during the game via internet when you can do so via the phone?
If the legislative change takes place the problem will be the impact on tv commentary and analysis – we’ll get constant updates on the odds during the match (e.g. “They started at the game at $1.65 but right now they’re at $3.10!”, “What do you think James Hird? is that value for money?”) and we may even get regular onscreen advertising of singular event odds (eg. “TAB Sportsbet have Thurston at $1.50 to convert”), during the game.
Analysis of the odds will take up more and more of the time during telecasts and preview/review programs.
It’s borders on distraction from the contest now imagine what it will be like then.
When a punter like me thinks the tv advertising for sports betting agencies and odds for matches is over the top we should all take pause and consider what’s best for sport in this country.
After all when you go to the races you place your bet and then you go and watch the race, concentrating on it and the spectacle. The race commentator doesn’t analyse the odds during the race.
June 7th 2010 @ 10:00am
Tom said | June 7th 2010 @ 10:00am | Report comment
Yeah this is a real problem. If they’re talking about the odds on the Footy Show and in the coverage then they’ll be talking about them in the primary school playground.
I suppose gambling is already pretty much normalised in the Australian culture but there’s a risk that it starts to be seen as being as important as the sport itself.
I can’t imagine how hard it must be for recovering gambling addicts to watch an NRL game at the moment, when the commentators seem to be regularly referring to the odds.
June 7th 2010 @ 10:35am
Gob Bluth said | June 7th 2010 @ 10:35am | Report comment
Well the AFL have got to get the cash for Israel somehow…….
June 7th 2010 @ 11:54am
Redb said | June 7th 2010 @ 11:54am | Report comment
There is no doubt it is creeping into the commentators vernacular as well (paid advertorial). In the pre game on Fox (Coll v Bull) they discussed the odds with more than a few uncomfortable pauses. Doesn’t sit well with some I suspect.
It is of course a major social problem, but so is drinking. Both are taxed, so like cigarettes the government gets it take as well.
June 7th 2010 @ 4:17pm
Midfielder said | June 7th 2010 @ 4:17pm | Report comment
BD
No doubt and it’s growing… FFA knocked back (at least for now anyway) a offer to take over North Queensland Fury.. the offer came with heaps of coin but from one of Asia’s biggest gambling firms…
TBH I cannot understand why people bet on sport (must be a woser I suppose) I buy a ticket each year in the cheap sweep of the Melbourne Cup and never watch the race…
But many others receive fun out of doing so… but the tempetition must be huge… examples from every code everywhere in the world of match fixing … boxing who believes the judgements or even the match ups anymore…
It won’t hurt me at all except if a client can’t pay my bill… but like many others I fear the future…
As an aside and interested in your tho’s Redb…. free to Air TV, long ago lost any clear lines between News coverage, magazine shows, sport shows.. and the inter linking between sports product ownership and news reporting … But mix this with gambling related products could be a major concern… say a big gaming house is the principal FTA backer of a sport… does anyone else get concerned about how netural the coverage could be… read News limited if you are looking for examples…
June 7th 2010 @ 4:37pm
Redb said | June 7th 2010 @ 4:37pm | Report comment
Mid,
I wrote an article on this subject a while back where I raised the prospect that gaming companies who sponsor the game and some clubs could exert influence over the announcement timing of team changes as one example of their potential influence.
There is no doubt the duality of the relationship is potentially damaging.
Sport exists for sport, in my book the gamblers and gaming companies can please themselves we should not change a thing to suit them.
As for coverage I’m not sure of the impact of a gaming company ‘owning’ a sport is a problem from a biased coverage perspective, more what influence could be brought to bear on tribunal results, team selection, even game manipulation to suit a best outcome.
June 7th 2010 @ 10:48pm
Midfielder said | June 7th 2010 @ 10:48pm | Report comment
RD
This is quite a good article you have written but the Roar does not seem to take kindly to it … tis a shame I says
June 8th 2010 @ 10:11pm
Rich_daddy said | June 8th 2010 @ 10:11pm | Report comment
Just found an article on the AFL website that illustrates one of my points.
Tigers suspend part-time runner for betting
http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/95964/default.aspx