Solution to the refereeing problems
By drew777, 22 Jun 2010 drew777 is a Roar Pro
- Tagged:
- 2010 World Cup, FIFA, football, referees, World Cup
Related coverage
- Football news
- World Cup Favourites news
- World Cup Roar of the Crowd Competition news
- Football World Cup - South Africa 2010 news
Today, I will attempt to offer a possible reason as to why there has been some woeful refereeing decisions at this year’s (and indeed previous) World Cup.
Of the referees chosen to officiate at the World Cup, only a select few are then picked for round of 16, quarters, etc. FIFA select officials for finals by performance at the group stage.
On the surface this looks like a fair and reasonable way of doing things. But what are the underlying factors? We can safely assume that there must be some criteria performed well to show how good a referee is.
1. Positioning – we can assume a referee’s decisions are based on their positioning in the game. If a ref has bad positioning he will not be picked.
2. Ground covered – a ref must keep up with the game and not be caught in back play.
3. Acknowledgement of assistants – using and communicating well with his assistants to get the decisions right.
4. Consistency – being unbiased with calls.
5. Simple things – as a referee myself, one of the most fundamental things we were taught was how to use our whistle, how to indicate throw ins etc, and how to behave. These obviously must be done right.
6. Communication with players – a ref who awards free kicks but does not talk to players as to why will always cause problems.
7. Time-keeping – including extra time, a ref must know when and where to end a game. For instance, not on a corner kick.
8. Errors – obviously a ref must strive to ensure no errors are made.
If anyone else can think of others please let me know, but I think these eight are probably the most likely criteria to be met.
Now, as every referee is having every group game performance assessed, by an intimidating fat bloke with a clip board in the stands (not to mention endless video replays), one can assume referees are under considerable pressure. Think about it; every move you make, every step, every whistle blow is being analysed and just one mistake can spell the end of your World Cup run. Even spell the end of your officiating career.
With many of these top level referee’s depending on their ref wages for a large portion of their livelihood, there is considerable pressure on them.
Could the way FIFA be conducting things be a reason why there are so many howling decisions? As every ref attempts to out do another to get further in the competition, this pressure might just be the deciding factor.
Surely not all referees (especially ones at the World Cup, who are meant to be the best) can be messing up like this on a regular basis in league competitions.
So I put it to FIFA that they decide the refs who are to do what games from the start. Appoint refs who are to do group matches, refs for round of 16 etc.
From those refs there are going to be some who are at the end of their career, some in the middle, and some youngsters just starting to penetrate the highest levels.
FIFA should say “you old ones, we want you to come along to games with us and help us improve these younger ones, you middle ones, we want to prepare you for bigger games in the next World Cup, and you young ones we want to polish you to be world cup regulars in the coming years.”
This way everyone knows what they are doing, there is no pressure to outdo another and the ref only needs to concentrate on the job at hand, not look forward to furthering themselves.
Indeed, it now appears that this may be a large factor contributing to refereeing mistakes. Coupled with the fact that some referees are just useless and I think I may have uncovered the reason as to why there is so much controversy around some of these matches and decisions; after all, the world stage is just as big for referees as it is for players.
Recommend this story.
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- Fans want a club, not a name, that fills them with Pride (129)
- The war that’s not a war (128)
- Would a video referee work in football? (103)
- Too many doubts over new A-League club (101)
- Magic EPL finish as Manchester City triumph in tightest of title races (93)
- Is this the end of the football salary cap? (63)
- Manchester City, ‘Uniting’ the sporting world (60)
- Bling when you’re winning
- Dual signings give Mariners A-League boost (12)
- Would a video referee work in football? (104)
- Oman the Socceroos’ focus, says Kennedy (18)
- There’s life In England’s lower leagues (20)
- Chelsea teach Barca and Real an ugly football lesson (20)
- Solving the issue of the long A-League off-season (17)
- Bling when you’re winning (0)
- There’s life In England’s lower leagues (20)
- Chelsea teach Barca and Real an ugly football lesson (20)
- Solving the issue of the long A-League off-season (17)
- Oh my god! They’ve killed Kenny (12)
- Is Chelsea’s Abramovic finally satisfied? (15)
- Is this the end of the football salary cap? (63)
- Explore:
- 2010 World Cup, FIFA, football, referees, World Cup


June 22nd 2010 @ 3:43pm
joeb said | June 22nd 2010 @ 3:43pm | Report comment
You’ll never have a perfect system, simply look at union, league (where they’re now using two refs), and cricket, and even tennis if you like. It’ll always come down to the honesty and unbiasedness of the individual holding the whistle. But in the Kewell incident how would introducing the “hot spot” as we have in cricket for leg before and nicks to the keeper and slips etc. go, or would it slow the momentum of the game down too much as soccer / football all in all is a very free-flowing game? …
Sure, the older refs should always impart their knowledge and experience to the up and comers, naturally, just as the great St George Dragons’ halfback Billy Smith once imparted his wealth of knowledge and experience to Cattle Dog.
June 22nd 2010 @ 9:36pm
drew777 said | June 22nd 2010 @ 9:36pm | Report comment
well, what is we did away with assistant referees for offsides, just let the play go, and if a goal or corner or something that advantages the attacking team occurs then it is check by video replay?
also, you could check goals on replay fairly quickly, or fouls etc. wouldn’t slow it up that much I wouldn’t think
June 22nd 2010 @ 9:37pm
drew777 said | June 22nd 2010 @ 9:37pm | Report comment
maybe give each team a number of appeals of ref calls, similar to that of tennis?