Related coverage
- Wellington Phoenix news
- Football news
- A-League news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- New Zealand All Blacks news

New Zealand supporters celebrate at the end of the World Cup Group F soccer match between Italy and New Zealand at Mbombela Stadium in Nelspruit, South Africa, Sunday, June 20, 2010. (AP Photo/Bernat Armangue)
The All Blacks centre Conrad Smith stayed up all night a couple of days before the Test against Ireland to watch the All Whites draw with Slovakia. And the New Zealand Prime Minister was at Nelspruit in South Africa to see the All Whites win (in New Zealand eyes) a 1-1 result from the football powerhouse Italy.
The All Whites progress in the 2010 World Cup has captured the attention of all New Zealanders whether they play football or have played the game, or not.
The fact that Italy had to resort to a dive to gain a crucial penalty, which was converted, resonated with New Zealanders with a passion due to their country’s sporting history. A similar act of bastardry on the part of the home side – and incompetence or worse by the referee – stopped the iconic 1905 All Blacks from recording an unbeaten tour of the UK and France when Wales dragged an All Blacks try-scorer back into the field of play before the referee arrived on the scene.
Getting back to the All Whites, the controversial penalty for Italy reinforces the traditional chip-on-shoulder New Zealand attitude going back to 1905, in whatever sport, that the referees are always against them.
There is a great affection for football in New Zealand, outside of the ranks of the true believers, even from diehard rugby union supporters. By way of contrast, this does not apply to rugby league. While many of the players like rugby league (Dan Carter and Piri Weepu are two admirers), rugby union people in New Zealand tend to dislike the league code.
This mainly relates to the way its officials and league tragic journalists are forever bashing rugby union. Football supporters, for their part, have honoured the traditions and success of the All Blacks, as the nickname given to the national football side indicates.
Football was played in New Zealand before rugby union. But when Auckland, the entrepreneurial and population centre of New Zealand, became a rugby province in 1873 rugby union became the national game.
But football was survived around the country and especially when strong personalities with good administrative skills became involved. Places like Gisborne, for instance, have been football power houses in their day. The knock-out national football competition, the Chatham Cup, was a major sporting event in New Zealand up to the 1970s. As a kid, for instance, I remember going to many Chatham Cup finals at the Basin Reserve, Wellington, which were invariably played to full houses.
In the 1950s football got a great charge from the influx of migrants from the UK, especially. Many of these migrants found work on the wharves and the Watersiders and Settlers clubs in Wellington quickly became a successful and iconic teams.
In 1982 New Zealand sent its first team to a football World Cup tournament in Spain. There were popular visits from all-star teams which packed out the Basin Reserve. But there were too many officials with Scottish accents to impress the general New Zealand public. Interest in the game died away.
The advent of pay television with its coverage of the Premier League, visits to New Zealand of stars like David Beckham (whose second tour, though, was a financial flop), the rise of the ‘soccer mum’ culture and more recently the success of the Wellington Phoenix club in the A-League has seen the demographics of the football players in New Zealand change significantly.
Increasingly the officials and the players at all levels in the game talked in New Zealand accents. It is significant in this respect that Winston Reid, the scorer of the first goal scored by the All Whites in a World Cup tournament, is a Maori.
With the Kiwisation of New Zealand football has come the development of a playing style that reflects the New Zealand character and physique. The All Whites play football the way the All Blacks play, especially in their attritional days, might have played the game.
Against Italy, for instance, The Observer noted that the All Whites defended ‘like giants’. The reference intrigued me for some decades ago The Observer referred to the All Blacks as ‘unsmiling giants’.
The Italian media referred to the All Whites as ‘a team of excellent athletes, but mediocre footballers.’
This is also interesting because it gets to the heart of how New Zealanders play their sport and why they have been so successful in so many different sporting arenas.
The New Zealand character tends to under-stated and laconic. New Zealanders tend to be skeptical of individualists. They tend to be physical rather than cerebral in the way they play games. They like to quote the mantra that a champion team will defeat a team of individual champions. New Zealanders, too, tend to produce big athletes.
Finally the football authorities in New Zealand have accepted that if the country is to be successful at football (currently the All Whites are ranked 78th in the world), they have to adopt a style that suits the New Zealand character and physique. The All Whites side is noticeably bigger and more aggressive than the other teams in its pool round.
This makes its long ball game far more potent than when it is played, say, by less athletic teams. Against Slovakia and Italy the cross into the congested area in front of the goal posts induced all sorts of panic, bordering on fear, from the defenders as they contemplated the charge towards them and the ball of big New Zealand attackers.
There is one other aspect to the way the All Whites play football that should be noted. The writer John Mulgan in a famous essay “Report on Experience” noted that one of the defining characteristics of New Zealanders was that they had ‘the versatility of practical men.’
This penchant for the practical makes New Zealanders intense competitors. There is no use playing games if you don’t try your hardest to win them. And New Zealanders will often find ways to win that might not be conventional. The Guardian by describing ‘the resourceful display’ by the All Whites against Italy made an appropriate and insightful comment in this respect.
I was intrigued, for instance, to note that Winston Reid, the scorer of the historic goal against Slovakia, was a defender. I looked up the record of that peerless defender, the longtime England captain, Bobby Moore. He never scored a goal in any important international match, aside from a goal in two friendlies.
This gets us back to point about the ‘versatility of practical men.’ Just because Reid was a defender it did not mean that he saw himself as having no responsibility about scoring goals.
This brings me to make a comparison between the All Whites and the Socceroos. A large part of the All Whites success and popularity with all New Zealanders is that they are seen as a New Zealand team. Their management is New Zealand. The players are virtually all New Zealand born. But most of all, the team plays in a way that reflects the New Zealand character.
Robbie Slater had a very pertinent point to make about the Socceroos after their dismal performance against Germany: ‘It was un-Australian … You at least have to go out and try and win the game and we never did that.’
With two draws, the All Whites are looking to sneak into the next round with a win against Paraguay. Already the newspapers in New Zealand are running stories covering all the various possibilities of how the All Whites can progress in World Cup 2010. This embraces, even, the possibility of a FIFA bureaucrat picking a name out of a hat.
The All Whites have put themselves into this position, and got the nation behind them, because they have brought a touch of Kiwi to the way they have played in the World Cup tournament.
More power to their boots.
Enjoy sports? Enjoy a bargain? All Sports Online has your favourite sporting brands at up to 70% off. Online only, premium quality sporting goods and merchandise at discounted prices. Get a deal now.

VootballKid said | June 22nd 2010 @ 3:08am | Report comment
We’re bonded with New Zealand now both having suffered cheating Italian dives at the WC. When you mentioned Scottish accents it reminded me of how half the coaches in the A-league have Scottish accents. Do they not want their coaches in Scotland?
Also, you might want to correct it when you say it’s NZs first goal because Steve Sumner and Steve Wooddin each scored against Scotland in a group game at the 1982 World Cup.
AA said | June 22nd 2010 @ 3:11am | Report comment
Sprio, not your fault here, but I have not appreciated some comments in the Australian media about Italy “diving”.
I think that the Italians are being stereo-typed in the Australian (and maybe now the NZ media), which is not good.
In saying that, there was a clear hold on the Italian players’ shirt for the penalty, and NZ’s goal had a touch of off-side about it.
Both goals were arguable to be honest.
But again, I stress that the Australasian media have been stereo-typing that Italian team in the past 24 hours, which I feel is not good.
Good, informative article otherwise.
dasilva said | June 22nd 2010 @ 3:37am | Report comment
the stereotypes that Italian cheats.
Well sometimes stereotypes have a bit of truth to them
http://www.footballitaliano.co.uk/article.aspx?id=113
It seems to me bending the rules is an art form itself
___________________________
I also found this story in a blog
I have been called many things over the years. Wog, dago, goombah, eyetie, even greaseball. But the insult that always stung the most was being called a cheater.
Growing up as an Italo-Australian can be tough as it is. Apart from no one being able to correctly spell my name, I find myself constantly having to defend my mother country from criticism. It’s not Berlusconi’s philandering that dishonours me, but the likes of Roberto Baggio, Francesco Totti and Fabio Grosso.
Having followed the Azzuri since I was a little meatball, I have always denied that Italian football players are cheats, but today I am going to clean about something: We Italians are cheaters. Dirty, dirty cheaters. I have the proof.
At fourteen I went on a summer vacation to the Italian seaside. While over there my father thought it would be fun to enroll me in a genuine Italian football camp for juniors. It was mostly dribbling, passing, and shooting drills as well as some defensive strategy. However, on the last day I was shocked to discover a more ‘advanced’ part of the curriculum.
In front of us stood a tall plastic mannequin that we used to simulate a defender. I was told to dribble the ball past the man, catch my leg on his, and fall to the ground. Shin clasping, eye squinting, blasphemy and shouts of ‘Mama Mia!’ sold the tackle more authentically, and my peers cheered. They cheered me for diving (and also for inadvertently cursing my own mother, as I later found out.)
At the end of the exercise we all voted on who we thought was the best actor, and not surprisingly the whiny kid with the mullet won. They gave him a medal.
So you see, Italians may be cheaters, but we are the best damn cheaters in the whole game. Seeing an Italian take a dive is like an evening at the ballet – a performance full of grace and expression and wild gesticulation. Besides, there comes a point where you have to give up your objections and really just admire how good we are at it.
So call us what you want. Call us cheaters if you must. But remember, it’s not a crime if you don’t get caught.
AA said | June 22nd 2010 @ 3:41am | Report comment
Still dasilva, it’s almost a back-handed form of racism to say that Italians are cheaters, it’s almost as stereo-typical that Chinese can’t drive. Same thing, you are branding another culture with a ‘tag’, which is not good.
Jerry said | June 22nd 2010 @ 10:01am | Report comment
The ‘Chinese cant’ drive’ and general “Asians can’t drive’ thing is largely true though. In those countries the road rules are all but non existent so many struggle to adapt to more stringent rules elsewhere. Obviously it’s a general trend only and there’s exceptions, and there’s nothing intrinsic in their ethnic background, but it’s a societal thing. They probably think we can’t cross the road properly and are total wusses when in the back of a cab.
AGO74 said | June 22nd 2010 @ 10:06am | Report comment
AA – Did you actually see the NZ v Italy game the other night? Their performances were outrageous. Every time Rory Fallon got near the ball they went down like they’d been hit by Mike Tyson. It was appalling gamesmanship and purely driven to get Fallon sent off after talking the ref into a yellow card. Fallon then had to be substituted early because it was only a matter of time before the Italians conned the ref into a 2nd yellow. At another time in the game, Cannavaro goes down in agony writhing on the ground only to steal a quick glance up to see if the ref is looking. The ref is not lookiing so Cannavaro gets up and goes on having made a miraculous recovery. It was disgusting.
As for the goals, both had strong elements of doubt but where the kiwi’s got crucified was over the whole 90 minutes by the ref who was clearly star struck.
I don’t like lazy generalisations but in this instance the ‘tag’ is spot on. Italy were awful the other night.
dasilva said | June 22nd 2010 @ 1:11pm | Report comment
Well I guess debate whether it is ok to generalise or not will probably get political
For my opinion, not all generalisation are necessary wrong if both sides agree that generalisation does not mean always or never.
It’s true that every single person is an individual and have something unique in the world.
However I also believe that culture and the surrounding environment shapes the individual. So although you can’t say the person must have certain values, you can make good guesses based on cultural background
Is saying Italians are cheaters? accurate. Well I’ll just leave it to say that they have an end justify the mean view of playing the game
Now I say this, every country breaks the rules of the game and cheat including Australia and other Anglo countries. However, the difference is we see it as cheating, does the Italian culture even recognise it is cheating? After all, alot of stuff that we call cheating, they call it furbizia – the art of guile.
Greg said | June 22nd 2010 @ 2:33pm | Report comment
dasilva
For the Italian players, “Cheating” and “cheaters” is too harsh. “Simulators” is more accurate, or “furbizia” as you say.
Lots of cultures have the same view, if you can get away with it, its ok.
However, I would say cheating is not part of Australian sporting culture, it happens from time to time, but if caught out the player will be condemned for it.
Dan said | June 23rd 2010 @ 12:48am | Report comment
rubbish. Nobody is going around saying that all Italians are cheaters. They simply chastise the Italian soccer team as being cheaters. And if a team consistently cheats, then stereotyping them as cheaters is fair enough. You reap what you sow and with Italy’s fame for diving, along with the extensive corruption uncovered around the Serie A competition, we have a right to tag Italian football as dishonest until they prove otherwise.
Roger Rational said | June 22nd 2010 @ 3:49am | Report comment
Interesting… But I do think the “Italian cheaters” thing is over-done. Italian sides aren’t always dishonest – I remember Fergie praising Milan for their honesty in 2007. The Spanish and Brazilians are just as bad but people don’t seem to complain about them – maybe because they play better football? I suspect it’s the combination of sterile catenaccio and cynical diving that really gets to people.
Al said | June 22nd 2010 @ 8:39am | Report comment
How many Italians would have been playing in that Milan side?
whiskeymac said | June 22nd 2010 @ 10:40am | Report comment
i remember rivaldo was pilliored in 2002 for clutching his face in agony when kicked in the leg. and there’s diego’s proud admissions over the hand of god in 86 as two other WC examples. plus many kilnsmann highlights, and there’s the french handballs to qualify recently whichgot a reasonable amount of scrutiny n’est pas.
So when it comes to diving/ cheating its not just italians, but they are – as da silvas pointed out percieved to be the best and or most blatant at it. and for many this perception is a reality which has never really been dispelled by the azzurri.
Socboy said | June 22nd 2010 @ 6:26am | Report comment
I’m a Kiwi as you know and ok the dive wasn’t exactly sportsmanlike but neither was Smiths shirt tugging, the rules say you can’t do it but he did and the penalty was awarded. No one apart from the ref knows if it was actually for the tugging or perceived trip/dive why the free kick was awarded.
As also has been pointed out Smeltz technically was offside so maybe it was a fitting final result.
Now I wonder if other teams even our own were as good a actors as the Italians would we be bemoaning the dive?
One last thing Dasilva, have a look at some of these comments in here and you tell me I was being out of line yesterday. The double standards and hypocrisy in this forum are/is unbelievable
Roger Rational said | June 22nd 2010 @ 3:24am | Report comment
I think you’re over-analysing, Spiro. NZ play rudimentary, long ball football not for philosophical reasons – but because, basically, they have crap players. No disrespect – but they really are completely useless. Watching them lurch around the field clattering into people is just embarrassing.
And what’s all this guff about the All Blacks favouring physicality over skill? They are consistently the most skilful team in world rugby bar none.
Me thinks you are shoe-horning the facts into a rather questionable and romantic theory…
AA said | June 22nd 2010 @ 3:44am | Report comment
Roger, as I said elsewhere on here yesterday, NZ were played off the park football wise by Italy for all bar 5% of the game, Yes, NZ are playing with heart, but technically and tactially, they have a long way to go.
They are enjoying this moment.
Roger Rational said | June 22nd 2010 @ 3:53am | Report comment
No doubt – and fair play to them. But let’s not kid ourselves that the All Whites are honouring their frontiersmen forefathers by playing in a style that “suits their character and physique” – they are playing in a style which suits their glaring absence of talent.
Mr Saunders said | June 22nd 2010 @ 5:58am | Report comment
‘Romantic theory’ is as polite as one can get, RR. A more realistic assessment might be undergrad Sociology painting by numbers. Then again… perhaps Mr Zavos is right. Maybe the NZ team train by running up hills with a hogget under each arm?
Farqwar said | June 22nd 2010 @ 4:55pm | Report comment
Do you mean “hogget” or “hobbit”?
Mr Saunders said | June 22nd 2010 @ 5:53pm | Report comment
Lol. That is very good.
Mega said | June 22nd 2010 @ 3:43am | Report comment
There appears to be a ghost in that crowd.
Brett McKay said | June 22nd 2010 @ 8:57am | Report comment
It’s the Stig’s annorexic cousin…
Greg Russell said | June 22nd 2010 @ 6:45am | Report comment
“The fact that Italy had to resort to a dive to gain a crucial penalty, which was converted, resonated with New Zealanders with a passion due to their country’s sporting history. A similar act of bastardry on the part of the home side – and incompetence or worse by the referee – stopped the iconic 1905 All Blacks from recording an unbeaten tour of the UK and France when Wales dragged an All Blacks try-scorer back into the field of play before the referee arrived on the scene.”
Spiro, I should not need to remind you that NZers are not lilywhite in this regard. A famous example is Andy Haden (another who has been in the news of late!) in 1978. Here’s wikipedia on this legendary episode from rugby history (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Haden):
“Haden was a controversial player, who was accused of cheating and unsporting conduct by opposing players. The most infamous occurrence of this happened in a match against Wales at Cardiff Arms Park in 1978. The score was 12-10 in Wales’s favour, when Haden and another New Zealand player, Frank Oliver, suddenly fell to the ground as if pushed. The referee awarded a penalty in the dying moments of the match, which Brian McKechnie kicked, winning the game for New Zealand. Later, Welsh legend JPR Williams wrote that Haden should have been sent off. Despite the controversy however, the referee subsequently stated that the penalty had actually been awarded for an actual infringement against Oliver and not the Haden ‘dive’ as was thought. Haden doesn’t however deny that the attempts to cheat the referee were pre planned, something also confirmed by his captain Graham Mourie.”
Joe FC said | June 22nd 2010 @ 11:57am | Report comment
Indeed Greg I actually thought of a certian incident involving Ken Catchpole & one Colin Meads.
Jerry said | June 22nd 2010 @ 12:03pm | Report comment
Indeed. Chuck in Richard Loe and you’ve got a whopping two violent rugby players and one occasion of trying to game the ref. Shocking.
Greg – Haden is generally not that widely respected inNZ despite his All Black pedigree, both for that incident and his general attitude after retirement. He’s hardly representative.
Harry Kimble said | June 22nd 2010 @ 2:08pm | Report comment
And don’t forget that it was Brian McKechnie who kicked that match winning goal.
The same Brian McKechnie who threw away his bat when Trevor Chapell bowled him THAT underarm ball.
Maybe McKechnie to show his disgust for Haden should have deliberately missed with the kick. Ah then what would have been said.
Jerry said | June 22nd 2010 @ 6:21pm | Report comment
Did you read the bit where the penalty wasn’t for the dive?
The Special One said | June 22nd 2010 @ 8:01am | Report comment
The Italians have a word for what they do.
Its called furbo, which translates into wily or cunning. Which is what De Rossi did.
Im not quite sure why people think it wasnt a penalty, not even the guy who pulled the shirt seemed upset with the call against him.
Derby County FC said | June 22nd 2010 @ 9:25am | Report comment
Tug the shirt of an Italian in the area and he’ll go to ground (like a lot of countries players to be honest), this is old news isn’t it?
Spiro
Just because the Wobblies lost to England you are still allowed to write moaning articles about rugby you know!
PB said | June 22nd 2010 @ 9:42am | Report comment
Ryan Nelsen said De Rossi was laughing and saying he couldn’t believe that was given only seconds after.
The “shirt-tugging” is a technique a lot of defenders use – they are just holding the shirt a bit so they know where and when their man moves. The arm was never extended with force to restrain De Rossi. Italy set the ref up for 25 minutes falling over whenever they were breathed upon, jumping into Fallon etc… They gamed the ref, and Smith showed a touch of naivety not to be aware of the risk.
But yeah, as a friend put it, we’re so lowly and awesome we don’t care they had to dive to beat our giants. :p
On Spiro’s article, I have no idea where he gets this idea of a chip-on-th-shoulder attitude to refs. We’re astonished by them – as the way this week’s ref was sucked in – because we love an even playing field, but don’t blame them for losing. I think the outrage over Wayne Barne’s influence on the pressure-cooker quater-final is far and away the exception, and objectively it’s justified.
And nobody knows about 1905, much less feels aggrieved by it.
Overall, I agree with the concept there is a good team culture in the All Whites, and the make up of the administration with Herbert and the heritage is part of that. A lot of the “empirical evidence” in this piece doesn’t ring true, like the “soccer mums”, etc. Bit too much grasping at facts for what is purely speculative piece.
Damien said | June 26th 2010 @ 10:28pm | Report comment
Mr Sprio’s comments are back handed complements with a hint of chips on his own shoulders. His bio on the rugbyheaven website used to say he was a “former new zealander”, yes,”former”, (even a knob like Russell crowe accepts his shared NZ/Australian heritage) he (spiros) like other “kiwi’s” as they are referred to by Australians, try hard to convince the Australians (and himself no doubt) that he is an Australian like them, when in fact most Australians don’t care… The all whites played the best soccer in the tournement and to be compared to the Mighty All Blacks is silly. The Italians are not cheats, every single football team play within the boundaries of the refs, the refs are not stupid, they know they are acting 99% of he time, it is part of the game of football, accept it, move on… learn from it is the best advice. Love all peoples races and accept your own, stop with back handed compliements mr spiros, we are not stupid…
Towser said | June 22nd 2010 @ 9:47am | Report comment
Good article Spiro. Gives insight & adds to my knowledge of NZ football.
Whilst my background rejects diving culturally(Ie its cheating to me & that wont change) there is another angle to this subject as indicated by this article & its replies regarding New Zealand & Italy.
One which for me indicates why football has become a worldwide sport.
That is for different countries to be able to express their culture under a uniform set of rules on the park.
Whilst other sports may have some flexibility in this ,many are still tied to the cultural roots of where they were created.
Football seems to have overidden this.
I dont profess to have an answer why,but I do know that the way other countries play football & their on field antics is far removed from the football culture of my upbringing.
Republican said | June 22nd 2010 @ 10:15am | Report comment
The dying swan antics in Soccer are NOT peculiar to Italy – I assure you. They are integral to the culture of the code.
Despite this, Italy were the better side on the night.