Lesson needs heeding in manager search
By Paddy Higgs, 24 Jun 2010 Paddy Higgs is a Roar Guru
- Tagged:
- 2010 World Cup, FFA, football, Football Federation Australia, Paul Le Guen, Pim Verbeek, Raymond Domenech, Socceroos, World Cup
Related coverage
- Football news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- World Cup Favourites news
- World Cup Roar of the Crowd Competition news
- Football World Cup - South Africa 2010 news
- Socceroos 2014 FIFA World Cup Qualifying news
Australia’s search for a new coach is set to intensify after the World Cup, with names like Paul Le Guen already linked to the Socceroos’ top job. Plenty has been learned by Australia’s performances on the pitch. But just as much can be gleaned from the drama off it.
Successful international coaches need a wealth of qualities to be properly equipped for the job. One quality in particular has been highlighted in the events surrounding several national teams.
France is already back in its homeland, having imploded under the reign of Raymond Domenech. The manager had hardly been a popular figure during his six-year tenure in charge, despite a brief respite of pressure when he guided Les Bleus to the final of the 2006 World Cup.
He was already set to depart after the World Cup, but Domenech would have surely been given the flick anyway after his side exited the tournament at the group stage.
Domenech and his coaching staff lost complete control of the squad following the 2-0 loss to Mexico, sparked by a decision to send striker Nicolas Anelka home for reportedly calling his coach a “dirty son of a whore”.
Of course, Domenech has plenty of company in his falling out with Anelka, also known as ‘Le Sulk’.
Just ask Vicente del Bosque or most Arsenal fans.
But what happened next was best described as “an appalling soap opera” by French foreign minister Bertrand Kouchner. First, the whole squad walked off the training track.
The players then composed a statement, which they forced Domenech to read.
It was hardly surprising that the side meekly bowed out of the tournament just a few days later.
And after refusing to shake the hand of South African counterpart Carlos Pareira when France’s fate was sealed, it is also difficult to muster any sympathy for Domenech.
Nor are the French alone in experiences problems from within. The English tabloids were sent into overdrive when
John Terry undermined just about everyone in his press-conference comments about life inside the England camp, while bad-tempered Sulley Muntari is only reportedly still part of Ghana’s squad thanks to the intervention of Black Stars skipper Stephan Appiah.
Even the Socceroos were forced to hose down rumors of their own internal unrest after the 4-0 defeat to Germany.
All of the above illustrates why managers need more than just tactical nous to succeed. Man management is just as crucial.
The World Cup is considered by many to be the globe’s greatest sporting event; an aligning of the stars every four years.
Of course, the more highly paid the sportsman, the bigger the ego is likely to be. You only need to look at the NBA for further proof.
There has long been talk of several senior Socceroos not getting along, but there would be few teams in South Africa without their small rifts and fissures.
A good manager will still be able to get all the egos working in the same direction.
It is no doubt a key factor in the thinking of Football Federation Australia’s decision makers as they ponder Pim Verbeek’s successor.
Should they need it, the drama of the World Cup in South Africa serves as a timely reminder.
![]()
Passionate about your football? Then sign up to The Roar's brand new daily football email, delivering Roaring articles directly to you day-in, day-out. You'll love it!
Click here to join now!
Looking to join The Roar team? We're searching for an experienced Group Sales Manager to lead our team in Sydney. Yes, this does mean you get to work with the site all day long! If you're a digital media sales star, we want to hear from you. Apply now.


June 24th 2010 @ 7:47am
The Bear said | June 24th 2010 @ 7:47am | Report comment
Simple. Send Aussies into a game/tournament thinking that we can beat any Country.
And if we don’t end up beating them, then we may at least take the game to them…and stifle their confidence.
GOAL DIFFERENCE IS IMPORTANT!! How things could haven been different had we approached the first game with Lucas Neill (and the squad) putting their hands up and showing some guts. Not Asian Cup style arrogance, but calm courage and composure.
June 24th 2010 @ 8:57am
whiskeymac said | June 24th 2010 @ 8:57am | Report comment
Pims record – one loss (large) one draw (with 10 men) andone good win in the WC. Not too bad in hindsight, but very regrettable with the German game. boys did well int he end and have certainly redeemed themselves IMO – from beauchamp, moore through to carney, chipperfield and holman the side in the last 2 games was excting and positive for the most part and got 4 points in a very tough group. the same points guus got in 06.
in obvious hindsight it was the german game that did us in – not losing but losing badly and toa team that thenonly socred one more goal.
am curious to se if peole will consider this a bad WC for us still?
as for managers – well we start all over again. interesting times.
June 24th 2010 @ 9:01am
Al said | June 24th 2010 @ 9:01am | Report comment
Ultimately the Germany game overrides the other two results. The monemuntal stuff up is what Verbeek will be remembered for, the players will be remembered for their grit and determination in the final two games.
Credit is due to Verbeek however, he certainly is largely to blame for our early exit however he has handled alot of the stick he has copped from all corners with dignity. He could have left like a petulant brat the way Domenech did but he has conducted himself with dignity and he deserves a bit of respect for that.
June 24th 2010 @ 10:53am
The Bear said | June 24th 2010 @ 10:53am | Report comment
I think we slipped up against Ghana, as well. Regardless of the Kewell Debacle, we had so many shots at goal that a decent striker is what we craved. We lost that game tho in midfield especially with Culina at LM, should have been Chippers/Carney.
June 24th 2010 @ 9:05am
Kenny Thompson said | June 24th 2010 @ 9:05am | Report comment
I see williamhill.com are betting on it or were betting on it …. it’s down now, but they had le guen 2.50, sven g erriksson (would be a disaster) at 5.00 and my man gerard houllier at 7.00.
i think he’d be great for the national team, but even better at sorting out the structure at all levels in Australian soccer. I think thats what we need …. someone who’s going to look at the youth set up upwards.
June 24th 2010 @ 9:11am
Al said | June 24th 2010 @ 9:11am | Report comment
Houllier by far is the best option out of those three, Errikson would be better than Le Guen.
June 24th 2010 @ 10:07am
AGO74 said | June 24th 2010 @ 10:07am | Report comment
Eriksson has done nothing for over 10 years. How does he keep getting these jobs?
June 24th 2010 @ 10:29am
Al said | June 24th 2010 @ 10:29am | Report comment
I agree, Eriksson was an excellent manager at club level, specifically in Italy however hasn’t done much at the international level, the 2002 World Cup with England was probably the most success he has had at international level.
Le Guen hasn’t done much anywhere.
June 24th 2010 @ 10:12am
AGO74 said | June 24th 2010 @ 10:12am | Report comment
It’s been said many times but I just hope we take our time and make the football decision rather than the high-profile decision. I don’t care who it is.
Please don’t take Le Guen. Look at what he’s done with Cameroon with (probably) a more talented bunch of players than ours in a soft group. His achievment – first team eliminated. Is this what we really want from our next coach?
These high-profile guys are just mercenaries. Hence I think we should stay away. Look at Dirty Dick Advocaat. Even Hiddink who did a wonderful job for us made some plays for other nations after failing to get there with Russia.
June 24th 2010 @ 10:54am
Aka said | June 24th 2010 @ 10:54am | Report comment
Han Berger has said that they are looking for a coach that has proven to be able to build (or rebuild) a side over time,
They will not be after, say, a Hiddink type that is more suited to getting quick results.
June 24th 2010 @ 11:10am
Towser said | June 24th 2010 @ 11:10am | Report comment
A difficult decision IMO.
PIm chose the safe & steady road to qualification to the World & Asian Cups. He was succesful. He had mixed results at the World cup. He didnt risk developing players,so we are at a crossroads as the Asian cup is looming. What is more important for the game to win the Asian Cup(in which case any new coach wont take risks also) or to use it as a platform to rebuild with an aim to qualifying & competing at the 2014 WC?
Can you do both?
June 24th 2010 @ 11:21am
Luke10 said | June 24th 2010 @ 11:21am | Report comment
I think Whiskeymac any WC experience is a good thing for Australia. Getting thumped by the Germans, while painful is better than a hiding from say a Nth Korea. That game in Durban will now be used as an example for generations of Socceroos to come. The game against Germany will forever be a powerful lesson to us that despite our successes in qualifying, when it comes to the WC every game needs to be played like it will be our last. Watching the game last night, you could feel that desperation and passion coming from the players. They chased, pressured and closed better. The guys were playing to win rather than being stifled in a formation which did not suit their abilities.
If anything, I hope the next coach of the Socceroos is flexible and focuses on developing a side and tactics around the players, rather than saying, this is my style, if you guys cant fit with it bad luck.
Who is better at playing the the role of a striker with 2 up-front? Kennedy, Cahill or McDonald? Leaving out McDonald was a monumental blunder.
In today’s modern game you need to be able to adapt and change formation to suit a given situation. Its a lesson for FFA as well. What style of football, as a nation do we want to play? Can the new coach deliver that style?
June 24th 2010 @ 11:28am
Towser said | June 24th 2010 @ 11:28am | Report comment
Will be interesting to see how soon Mcdonald is accepted back into the fold by a new coach.
Although I’ve seen many examples of club players performing at that level failing at International level, I cant see how( given that Mcdonald is easily the most prolific scorer, albeit in the SPL previously) he cannot score at International level.
He always looks lost to me & rarely involved.
We dont have the depth therefore luxury of quality proven strikers to ignore Mcdonald.
Surely coaches regardless of their systems & coaching ideology see if a player can do a job at club level,therefore why not at International level
June 24th 2010 @ 11:50am
Al said | June 24th 2010 @ 11:50am | Report comment
McDonald can’t play as a lone striker the way he has been set out to do at international level, at Celtic he has been paired up with the likes of Samaras/V.Of Hessilink, and needs to play alongside a targetman. I would have liked to have seen him play alongside Kennedy during the qualifiers.
I would also love to see the end of playing two defensive midfielders, as soon as Holman came on this morning we looked far more dynamic and threatening going forward.
June 24th 2010 @ 3:41pm
whiskeymac said | June 24th 2010 @ 3:41pm | Report comment
although tbh there have been many prolific club strikers who havent got going at an international level fr whatever reason – C Ronaldo; I an Wright and even dare i say it Viduka…. i keep hoping that Macca will come good and gets another chance.
June 24th 2010 @ 3:58pm
Al said | June 24th 2010 @ 3:58pm | Report comment
David Healy from Northern Ireland is the curious oddity here, could not stop scoring for his national team during the 06 World Cup Qualifying campaign and especially in the Euro 08 qualifiers, scoring a late winner against England, a hat-trick against Spain and a brace against Sweden in the process. He broke Davor Suker’s goal scoring record in Euro Qualifications yet he could hardly get a start for Leeds at the time who were a League 2 club and then for Fullham when his former national team manager, Lawrie Sanchez signed him up.
June 24th 2010 @ 9:13pm
Realfootball said | June 24th 2010 @ 9:13pm | Report comment
MacDonald did play along side Kennedy in the qualifiers – once, against Qatar at Suncorp. The Roos won 4-0. Needless to say, Verbeek didn’t do it again. The shock of scoring 4 goals was too much for him. He felt quite unwell and had to have a liedown.
June 24th 2010 @ 1:05pm
Davstar said | June 24th 2010 @ 1:05pm | Report comment
Marcelo Bielsa (chiles coach) players attacking footbal and knows how to raise a young squad which Australia will have next world cup. I think he would be the best man for the job who we could afford and acquire
June 24th 2010 @ 3:35pm
zizou said | June 24th 2010 @ 3:35pm | Report comment
If he takes Chile well into the tournament it may be hard to tempt him from the job. I do however believe he is on the short list.
June 24th 2010 @ 3:40pm
RobD said | June 24th 2010 @ 3:40pm | Report comment
Parreira! A world cup winner. Vast amounts of experience in international football all over the world. An attacking philosophy. Ticks all the the boxes.
June 24th 2010 @ 3:45pm
whiskeymac said | June 24th 2010 @ 3:45pm | Report comment
was thinking the same if its to be a WC coach. has Biesla done anything pre WC – does anyone know? TBH i havent heard of him before. altho i note people like Fozzie have started fondling his vuvuzelas over 2 impressive group games against Switzerland and someoneelse.
June 24th 2010 @ 3:56pm
zizou said | June 24th 2010 @ 3:56pm | Report comment
He coached Argentina in the 2002 World Cup where they crashed out at the group stage. Will be hard to tempt away from Chile if he takes them further into the tournament.
June 24th 2010 @ 4:10pm
cruyff turn said | June 24th 2010 @ 4:10pm | Report comment
Bielsa coached Argentina from 1998-2004, getting knocked out in the first round at 2002, but winning gold at the 2004 Olympics.
Like you mention, Fozz has fallen hard for this guy, and has written a blog on why he could be the next coach. Bielsa would encourage an attacking style, which goes hand-in-hand with our willingness to have a crack, but he would get us playing “smarter” when we have the ball. And with a group of young players destined to come through, they need to be educated by someone like this. Imagine what he could do if he got hold of boys like Kantarovski, Leckie, Oar and so on?
We don’t need a coach who can kick heads or keep egos in check. The Socceroos team ethic will always override anyone getting too big for his boots. Instead, we need a coach who can nurture the next generation. Bielsa has a great track record working with young players, he seems like the man.
June 24th 2010 @ 4:10pm
dasilva said | June 24th 2010 @ 4:10pm | Report comment
Well he was coached of Argentina between 1998-2004
He breezed through qualifiers topping the group playing some scintillating football. However the team flopped at the world cup.
However he did lead Argentina to win the Olympics in 2004
At club level
Won the Primera division with Newell’s Old Boys back in early 90s
Never coached in Europe though.
It would be an interesting choice and if we want someone to develop youths, he seems to be an good choice. Although they may be some cultural difference that may be an issue.
June 24th 2010 @ 4:17pm
whiskeymac said | June 24th 2010 @ 4:17pm | Report comment
cheers. am feelin’ educated =)