What legacy has Pim Verbeek left us?
By Mike Tuckerman, 25 Jun 2010 Mike Tuckerman is a Roar Expert
- Tagged:
- 2010 World Cup, Brett Holman, football, Harry Kewell, new zealand all whites, Pim Verbeek, Ricki Herbert, Socceroos, World Cup
Related coverage
- Football news
- Socceroos news
- Socceroos Fixtures news
- World Cup Favourites news
- World Cup Roar of the Crowd Competition news
- Football World Cup - South Africa 2010 news
- Socceroos 2014 FIFA World Cup Qualifying news
As the dust settles on Australia’s valiant performance in Nelspruit, speculation has turned to who might replace Pim Verbeek at the helm of the Socceroos.
A couple of names have already been bandied about, but we should also question just what sort of legacy Verbeek has left us from his time in charge.
One answer surely concluded yesterday was that whoever replaces Verbeek should be willing to embrace Australia’s natural attacking instincts.
What a difference it made to see Verbeek sacrifice a superfluous defensive midfielder for a more attacking one just after the hour mark, and it’s a shame that was left to the final half hour of the tournament for Australia to finally unlock the shackles.
Granted, things looked to be going smoothly against Ghana in Rustenburg until Harry Kewell’s unfortunate dismissal, but surely there’s a case for Australia’s next coach to adapt a more flexible approach in future, rather than try to enforce a rigidly defensive game plan on players who appear to flourish in a more attacking environment.
Yet, despite his flaws, Verbeek should at least be some credit for the positives to have come out of the campaign.
His decision to stand by the much-maligned Brett Holman in the face of concerted criticism turned out to be a masterstroke, and there was some small irony in the fact that it was Holman’s incessant running which took him into position to score against both Ghana and Serbia.
Holman may yet go on to prove a key figure for the Socceroos, and Carl Valeri is another who comes out of the tournament with his reputation enhanced – so much so that questions must surely be asked of the playing future of the once pivotal Vince Grella in a green-and-gold jersey.
And let’s not forget that despite his obvious disdain for the A-League, Verbeek still managed to steer a squad of mostly A-League players to the 2011 AFC Asian Cup finals in Qatar – where squad regeneration is a must.
However, his oft-repeated claim that “training in Europe is better than playing in the A-League” has been made to look foolish by Ricki Herbert and his resolute New Zealand outfit, with the All Whites stunning world football by recording three successive draws.
Indeed, New Zealand played in Group F as Australia should have played against Germany in their opening game – with respect, but not fear – and with a game plan that was designed to leave nothing on the pitch.
Following a qualifying campaign based almost entirely on defensive football, perhaps it was too much to ask for Verbeek to change his stripes going into the most important match of his career.
But the manner of Australia’s capitulation at the hands of a young German side was the final straw for his many detractors, and the Dutchman was on the end of a brutal excoriation from both media and fans alike following that disastrous opening display.
So what kind of legacy has Pim Verbeek ultimately left us?
He certainly hasn’t furnished the squad with multitudes of young talent, although the likes of Nikita Rukavytsya, James Holland and Tommy Oar obviously have cause to hope that they will feature prominently down the line.
One could argue that the win over Serbia helped to restore some confidence within the squad, however the players themselves were largely responsible for that.
Ultimately, Verbeek’s reign has left us with few tangible results to speak of.
He relied heavily on most of the same personnel who excelled in 2006 – all of whom are now four years older, and most of whom are on the verge of retirement.
And he denigrated the A-League and made it harder to convince sceptics that Australia’s domestic league is a competition worth taking seriously, where young players are afforded a pathway to the national team.
Sadly, Verbeek leaves us having established no discernible legacy at all.
And that unfortunate fact must come into the reckoning when Football Federation Australia determines the next Socceroos coach.
Recommend this story.
Follow Mike on twitter @Mike_Tuckerman
The Turkey 10
The Turkey 10 teams have now been selected, as Wild Turkey Bourbon's sport sponsorship kicks into the next exciting phase.
Choose which side you're going to support and get in the running to win $2,500!
Simply visit Wild Turkey Australia on Facebook for your chance to win.
Find out more.
The Crowd Says (64) | Page 2 of Comments
Have Your Say
Do you have what it takes to become a sports writer? Write for the roar
Football articles
- Fans want a club, not a name, that fills them with Pride (129)
- The war that’s not a war (128)
- Would a video referee work in football? (103)
- Too many doubts over new A-League club (101)
- Magic EPL finish as Manchester City triumph in tightest of title races (93)
- Is this the end of the football salary cap? (63)
- Manchester City, ‘Uniting’ the sporting world (60)
- Bling when you’re winning
- Dual signings give Mariners A-League boost (12)
- Would a video referee work in football? (104)
- Oman the Socceroos’ focus, says Kennedy (18)
- There’s life In England’s lower leagues (20)
- Chelsea teach Barca and Real an ugly football lesson (20)
- Solving the issue of the long A-League off-season (17)
- Bling when you’re winning (0)
- There’s life In England’s lower leagues (20)
- Chelsea teach Barca and Real an ugly football lesson (20)
- Solving the issue of the long A-League off-season (17)
- Oh my god! They’ve killed Kenny (12)
- Is Chelsea’s Abramovic finally satisfied? (15)
- Is this the end of the football salary cap? (63)
- Explore:
- 2010 World Cup, Brett Holman, football, Harry Kewell, new zealand all whites, Pim Verbeek, Ricki Herbert, Socceroos, World Cup



June 25th 2010 @ 11:09am
Gob Bluth said | June 25th 2010 @ 11:09am | Report comment
“willing to embrace Australia’s natural attacking instincts” WTF does that mean?
Australians are unique in enjoying scoring goals?
If we are such natural attackers why the hell can’t we produce more strikers to play in the world’s best leagues. We seem tp produce plenty of goalkeepers and defenders, does that mean we are naturally defensive?
What the line gets at is there is a myth that Australian soccer is about goals, goals, goals which is any attempt to make the game more attractive to non-football fans so that when they tune into a 0-0 draw we can say “this isn’t our natural game, it’s these bloddy foreigners making the game so dull… look at the way they dive..we play it tough.”
If you want a tough sport with lots of points watch League, Union or AFL.
Now as a footballing nations we can continue with our bagging of Pim because he was boring and Dutch while falling ourselves for the enxt bloke who couldn’t get a decent gig elsewhere.
June 25th 2010 @ 11:27am
Al said | June 25th 2010 @ 11:27am | Report comment
Australia did beat American Samoa 31-0, perhaps Foster was referring to that game when he made the “natural attacking instincts” comment.
June 25th 2010 @ 11:36am
The Bear said | June 25th 2010 @ 11:36am | Report comment
Myth that Australian soccer is about goals, goals, goals? If you say so. (well actually, we have had our moments and I am not referring to American Samoa. Frank Farina’s Socceroos played Germany in 2005 and narrowly lost 4-3. Do your history before you talk about Football).
And “Natural attacking instincts” was likely meant to infer that attack is the best form of defense. Verbeek had us running scared against Germany, that got a lot of people’s goat. The fact that that first game didn’t upset you for this reason tells me that you know little about the Socceroo’s spirit and perhaps care even less.
June 25th 2010 @ 11:48am
Luke10 said | June 25th 2010 @ 11:48am | Report comment
Not unique at scoring goals, “Australia’s natural attacking instincts” means that we would prefer an attacking style of football rather than sitting deep all the time with a overtly defensive 4-2-3-1 formation set in stone. What is wrong with thinking about scoring goals, I though that was the whole point to our game, to score and win.
June 25th 2010 @ 11:54am
Gob Bluth said | June 25th 2010 @ 11:54am | Report comment
How many other countries prefer to see their side defending rather than attacking?
June 27th 2010 @ 3:06pm
The Bear said | June 27th 2010 @ 3:06pm | Report comment
Italy, they made it an artform… once again no clue about football. Gob smacking ignorant. Why bother??
June 25th 2010 @ 11:22am
Raghu said | June 25th 2010 @ 11:22am | Report comment
PIM’s legacy is:
Germany 4-0 Australia
Formation 4-6-0
June 25th 2010 @ 11:24am
Luke10 said | June 25th 2010 @ 11:24am | Report comment
It’s a very good question Mike. With Australia’s 2010 World Cup chapter closed we look forward to the Asia Cup. PIm directed our national team to these competitions, qualifying was his mandate and he delivered what was required.
In my opinion, results aside, Pim’s helped us debate and maybe he even showed us a style of football which does NOT suit the Australia psychic. Whether its Rugby, AFL cricket or football, we are a very competitive sporting nation as Mike puts it, with a natural attacking instinct. Modern football is a possession game, offence being just as important as defence. Scoring goals in any game is the best tactic to defending a teams path to victory.
Pim’s time at the helm, also has shown us what type of coach Australia needs. We need a new coach to create a team with attacking flair and defensive strength at both ends of the pitch. We require a coach who can develop and give HAL players international experience. Who knows what talent is out there in HAL who could excel in the green and gold given the opportunity. Japan`s 3-1 win this morning over Denmark and progression into the final 16 is probably that nations greatest international victory with only a handful of OS players. It shows us what is possible when using local league talent. We need a coach who is an ambassador for football, savy with the press and has club managerial and international credentials which players and supporters respect.
Maybe Pims’s legacy is, he opened the door for us to think and debate what we want to achieve next as a developing football nation. Qualifying for tournaments is one thing but there is so much more to achieve at local and international levels which requires a national coach or manager with vision and a positive passion for developing football in Australia.
June 25th 2010 @ 11:38am
The Bear said | June 25th 2010 @ 11:38am | Report comment
What he said ; )
June 25th 2010 @ 11:49am
apaway said | June 25th 2010 @ 11:49am | Report comment
Perhaps the players should be the ones to judge what sort of legacy Pim Verbeek has left. At least he kept his promise and sang the Australian national anthem once the Socceroos had qualified…
June 25th 2010 @ 12:01pm
The Special One said | June 25th 2010 @ 12:01pm | Report comment
Pims legacy?
The $8 million dollars the FFA gets for making the tournament !!
June 25th 2010 @ 12:19pm
aka said | June 25th 2010 @ 12:19pm | Report comment
His legacy will be.
1. Will will expect to qualify for the WC through Asia. Non qualification would be a disaster. We didn’t know how tough it would be, it was tough, but they way we accumulated the points to qualify has set a high standard for the next manager to meet.
2. We have no false sense of the standard of the A-league. Most knew this but with Pim’s comments there’s no hiding from it as some wanted to. The A-league will become better faster as a result.
3. Managers in the future will briefed in the culture and mentality of the nation, and that we should never enter a game without the courage to try and win.
June 25th 2010 @ 12:21pm
AndyRoo said | June 25th 2010 @ 12:21pm | Report comment
Pretty good sumnation
June 25th 2010 @ 12:32pm
whiskeymac said | June 25th 2010 @ 12:32pm | Report comment
yeah lets not forget Pim came in after Graham Arnold’s debacle in 2007 – he stopped the rot from the Asain Cup disaster and through his experience and (albeit at times lucky) plans got us to even talk about this WC and philosophise as to whether 4 points is acceptable or not. somebody might have done better, many wuld not. note guus wasnt there with russia. beenhakker wasnt there with poland. and dirty dick wasnt there to pay up the money he owes.
June 25th 2010 @ 1:00pm
jupiter53 said | June 25th 2010 @ 1:00pm | Report comment
Yep, well said.
We’re all pretty blase about having qualified now but I remember how frightening it looked after the Asian Cup disaster. We have to assume that Pim’s Asian knowledge was an important part of how it was managed and that therefore Lowy and the FFA were right to choose him.
I also agree that the tactical and technical sophistication of the A League was very low at the time he made his initial comments [and I have been a Sydney season ticket holder since the start]. If they were part of what has led to the employment of Lavicka, Vant’Schip and the new guy at the Fury then the angst has been worth it.
Totally agree that none of us wants to sit back and play for a draw. Our players seem to have the capacity to perform as a team well above the level that would be expected from their reputations. Never again should we go into a game planning not to attack at least some of the time.
Sorry – I seem to have just restated every point you made – shows the extent of my concurrence
June 25th 2010 @ 1:23pm
whiskeymac said | June 25th 2010 @ 1:23pm | Report comment
on the plus side – a few years on the FFA set up is different. we have a few aussie assistant coaches and administrators now WITH asian experience, and some who may join who have playing experience there too (no idea who but if any of the roos retire and go into the suit side of things…). there’s Vidmar, GVE on the one hand, plus Gorman and of course…GA.
maybe this means that where as one of Pim’s main selling points before – asian experience – was important it might not be so important today when deciding who is to take over. we can be a little more confident that they can chose a coach who can be advised properly by his aussie admin. one more step towards self sufficency for the FFA (ie becoming self reliant in one more area)?
June 25th 2010 @ 1:33pm
Fargovich said | June 25th 2010 @ 1:33pm | Report comment
I think we left more with Pim than he left us !! Don’t bring your dutch attitude as the Aussie Spirit always wins ! will this be the case with our next future Roo’s who are now being trained under the Dutch regime !! End of the “Ronnie Smith era” more like it as a large majority of the Socceroos over the past 10years were trained under Ronnie
June 25th 2010 @ 1:34pm
Melanie Dinjaski said | June 25th 2010 @ 1:34pm | Report comment
Where has Pim Verbeek left us?
In dire need of a coach that truly understands the type of football Australia play (eg, don’t side another team like he did against Germany), who has experience in how to win tournaments, and who never goes into a match expecting anything but a win.
June 25th 2010 @ 1:43pm
whiskeymac said | June 25th 2010 @ 1:43pm | Report comment
no ones mentioned hair yet.
do we want another follicled marvel which in pim’s case rather deceptively alluded to an adventerous streak, or are we happy to accept normal and restrained behaviour here?